0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Here is Tutankhamen's name in hieroglyphics. © Copyright 1999, Jim LoyThe above says, "Ruler of Upper and Lower Egypt, Nebkheperura, Son of Ra, Tutankhamun."BUT..In the first bit you can clearly see a cd being washed in a bowl of water after a beetle made a mess on it 3 times. In the second part you can see that the cd was then wiped on the back of a duck to polish it! [:0]
Hi there.When I searched for info on Hammurabi for my earlier reply, the details provided to me were:Hammurabi Born c. 1728 BC (short)Died c. 1686 BC (short)Title King of BabylonSince I extracted and posted that information, and rechecking it due to your query, the info on the Wikipedia page has changed to Hammurabi Born c. 1795 BC (short)Died c. 1750 BC (short)Title King of BabylonDoes this fall in line with your understanding ?
I'm sure I red this when I first signed upto this forum about a week or two ago, and it was some kind of scam to buy a book... Looks like he reposted it.
I seeking to establish a set of rules for studying and verifying Evidence of Time Travel.
The documented accounts in certain ancient texts known as prophetic "dreams" or "visions" are about the contents of the 1995 produced Ancient Civilizations of the Mediterranean multi-media cd-rom.
Some results so farWhether pictures match ancient descriptions as a percentage, where 0-30 is NO, >30-50 is probably not, >50-75 is MAYBE,>75-85 is probably, and>85 to 100 is YES.Results from 12 Evaluation Sessionsnil: 0 - 302 : >30 - 504 : >50 - 754 : >75 - 852 : >85 - 100--12 in totalAverage is 67.71 percent, which means it is more than a coincidence.For these figures to actually be relevant, we need another series of evaluations by at least a 100 people to provide a better overall summary of opinions.Can you help ? Can you spare the time to complete the Evaluation Session [nofollow] ?.
The Theory is either1. God sent his Angels through time to bring modern cd-roms back to ancient prophets (to create new religions),or2. Human technological time travel took a selection of modern cd-roms and a computer back to ancient people (to warn them of ‘future religious wars’.)Once you have viewed the comparisons between ancient descriptions and modern cd-roms, you decide - Which theory best takes into account the presented evidence ?
Telling people what you want them to see and then asking them if they can see it is not a valid way to assess anything.
Going way back to the start of this thread...QuoteThe Theory is either1. God sent his Angels through time to bring modern cd-roms back to ancient prophets (to create new religions),or2. Human technological time travel took a selection of modern cd-roms and a computer back to ancient people (to warn them of ‘future religious wars’.)Once you have viewed the comparisons between ancient descriptions and modern cd-roms, you decide - Which theory best takes into account the presented evidence ?Nope. These are two outlandish hypotheses based on a large number of baseless assumptions (there is a god, angels exist, time travel is possible and happening, time travellers would attempt to change the course of history...). Hypotheses that make fewer assumptions are more likely to be true. These may include:1. The references in the texts bear no more resemblance than chance and coincidence.2. The author is hoping to see relevant references, and as a result sees links where there are none.3. The authors of the CD-ROM were influenced, consciously or otherwise, by the text.So by presenting yourself with only 2 hypotheses, each of which are based on poor assumptions, you have limited yourself to certain conclusions, and convinced yourself that one of these must be correct.
{1.} Has Ronald Pegg confirmed with the makers of the cd-rom that they had never seen or read any of the texts to which he's referring? {2.} If they have, then even subconsciously it could have affected the way that they chose to display the information.
What was the start date for the time travellers? (i.e. from what date did they go back?)
If this was recent, why take a 13 year old CD-rom with them? Why not take something more useful?
? Why bother coving it up? Why would the time travellers have hidden their tracks? Why would the only reference to them be hidden in these references?
Why would they show them a CD-ROM of the ancient world? That just doesn't make any sense. Surely you would show them more modern things, or inventions that could help them avoid pitfalls?
Personally, I feel that this is no evidence for time travel, but at best a coincidence and at worst a delusion.My final question is to you, Eddy_P. Are you willing to entertain the possibility that you are wrong? If not, I see no reason why this thread needs to continue.