Naked Science Forum

Life Sciences => Physiology & Medicine => Topic started by: Titanscape on 13/06/2004 19:29:19

Title: Metaphysics, penis size and vaginal sensitivity.
Post by: Titanscape on 13/06/2004 19:29:19

Thinking here from ontology and metaphysics about sex, I think that the part of sex in which the man is inside the woman is a very special part of knowing someone. In sex there is a veritable union and fusion of the two beings.

To have her will is in part to know her. That is if she accepts the husbands stimulus than he has her will and she comes to climax. To be deeply in her, by means of the blood rich and erect penis is really quite a significant phenomena on the individual scale. An erection a sure sign of the man's will as well. Mutual intimacy of bodies and wills and stimulus. Spirit, soul and bodily intmacy. The will emotions and intellect thoroughly involved!

This surely is a source of happiness. But also sorrow.

For it can be taken from a woman by force apart from her will. It would hurt the pleasure or my happiness I would have in a wife if another man had sex with her before, or after me during the relationship. In particular if his being or penis went further in than mine did. And if he took the honour of the first conception...

Perhaps there is an element of egotism in my sense of being and knowing. Certainly there is honour.

The penis stimulates the nerves in the vagina, however these are only found close to the surface in the more frontal part and not up at the top according to the sex Doctor on David Letterman some months back. I think she said the nerves are not close at the uterus part.

Still seven out of ten women in two surveys I have seen and heard say they prefer the longer penis. Three say they prefer the shorter or that it does not matter. They must play around to know. Perhaps it is a matter of metaphysics, the pleasure of knowing someone they like is fully deep inside, that perhaps appeals to them.

If I had a wife that wanted that, or anything other than my being and what I am, than that would be sadening. I don't like lust or want sensuality to get out of hand. In terms of penetration and possesiveness I like the idea of being the only one and that in terms of reach too.

I think the average length of the vagina from labia to the top of the uterus is more than the average penis length. Any stats? I feel a little angry for rape victims.

What do you fellows think about sex from a metaphysical viewpoint? Many of you would know much more than me.

Titanscape

Title: Re: Metaphysics, penis size and vaginal sensitivity.
Post by: Ylide on 17/06/2004 03:52:06

Sex is physics.  Love is metaphysics.  





This message brought to you by The Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People

Title: Re: Metaphysics, penis size and vaginal sensitivity.
Post by: bezoar on 17/06/2004 04:19:28

That is one of the best nutshell summaries I've ever read.

Title: Re: Metaphysics, penis size and vaginal sensitivity.
Post by: Titanscape on 18/06/2004 17:22:13

Do you mean sexual love cannabinoid? I see them as interwoven.

Titanscape

Title: Re: Metaphysics, penis size and vaginal sensitivity.
Post by: Ylide on 20/06/2004 08:51:23

Seriously, sex can be a powerful expression of an emotional connection with a person.  It could also just be that you're interpreting the endorphin rush and stimulation as something more than it is.  I don't see them as necessarily interwoven.  Sex is not crucial to strong emotional bond with a partner.  A strong emotional bond is not crucial to really good sex.  I stand by my previous post.



This message brought to you by The Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People

Title: Re: Metaphysics, penis size and vaginal sensitivity.
Post by: qazibasit on 03/07/2004 17:08:43

well i think cannaboid is right.

Title: Re: Metaphysics, penis size and vaginal sensitivity.
Post by: bezoar on 04/07/2004 22:27:59

I do too, and there's a place and time for both physics and metaphysics.