The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - katesisco

Pages: [1] 2
1
New Theories / Re: tumeric as an anti depressant
« on: 20/08/2013 01:28:33 »
<link to site offering sales of 'medical' turmeric removed - Mod>

2
New Theories / tumeric as an anti depressant
« on: 20/08/2013 01:27:16 »
USed very successfully but since it is poorly absorbed, the use of piperine is recommended.  This is commonly found in the multi mix of whole peppers sold for the grinder.

3
haarp has been closed per posting on What's Up With That but I suspect as soon as the solar magnetic reversal has finished (still waiting)  it will gain a new lease on life.  Probably the potential for disruption via a solar cme larger than usual due to the energy delay on the sun. 

4
I have this mnemonic to remember the oldest:  they are all cs:  colecanths, crocs, creepy crawlies (velvet worms) and crabs (horseshoe).  I have read the crocs are amazingly resistant to infection being as they live in bottom muck and shallow polluted water and yet stay healthy. 
It seems to me when I read Ward's/Brownlee's Rare Earth that there is a strong connection between the 65 my extinction and the follow-up punch of the carbon surge 56 my--9 my later. 
Do you think that these extinction events are actually a one-two punch?  Seems to me that the big punch is getting lesser and the space between getting shorter so what it could be is a Sol/Jupiter effect?

5
Then in 2011, scientists at the New York Center for Astrobiology at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute used the oldest minerals on Earth to reconstruct the atmospheric conditions present on Earth very soon after its birth. The findings were the first direct evidence of what the ancient atmosphere of the planet was like soon after its formation and directly challenge years of research on the type of atmosphere out of which life arose on the planet.

The scientists showed that the atmosphere of Earth just 500 million years after its creation was not a methane-filled wasteland as previously proposed, but instead was much closer to the conditions of our current atmosphere. The findings, in a paper titled "The oxidation state of Hadean magmas and implications for early Earth's atmosphere," have implications for our understanding of how and when life began on this planet and could begin elsewhere in the universe. The research was funded by NASA. 

'typical atmosphere' implies clouds, clouds imply water so 500 m y after Earth's creation water existed and probably was extant. 

6
When did farming occur?  About the same time Gobekli Tepe was built.  The head of the fertile crescent and the home of the olive tree. 

7
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2013/07/oxygen-were-the-building-blocks-of-earths-atmosphere-from-elsewhere-in-the-galaxy.html#comments
Then in 2011, scientists at the New York Center for Astrobiology at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute used the oldest minerals on Earth to reconstruct the atmospheric conditions present on Earth very soon after its birth. The findings were the first direct evidence of what the ancient atmosphere of the planet was like soon after its formation and directly challenge years of research on the type of atmosphere out of which life arose on the planet.

The scientists showed that the atmosphere of Earth just 500 million years after its creation was not a methane-filled wasteland as previously proposed, but instead was much closer to the conditions of our current atmosphere. The findings, in a paper titled "The oxidation state of Hadean magmas and implications for early Earth's atmosphere," have implications for our understanding of how and when life began on this planet and could begin elsewhere in the universe. The research was funded by NASA.
Since 'typical atmosphere' implies clouds and clouds imply water, you might infer that water was extent from 500 my after Earth's creation. 

8
New Theories / are human cells water masers?
« on: 06/04/2013 13:58:57 »
The principal seems the same--emission of light on an exact frequency. 
Just the scale is different.  And another question that has relevance to the oddity of monoatomic gold---this double water molecule might make up the difference in atmospheric radiation?  How did these strange escapees from the physics zoo happen? 

9
Butterfly wings contains 'pits' than enhance color and the addition of 'quantum dots' makes up the concept of bending light.  Since they can't go any smaller is the answer to reflect the light back and forth in a maze which has the effect of 'hiding' the light? 

10
I was wondering if war could be a natural cycle of our primary motivation of which I see three: food, sex and fairness.  If fairness is a major driver then as the assets are collected by the elite, the only response would be eventual war driven by our need for fairness.  We have done a lot of manipulation in history to created other causes, but the manipulation I is see most, including the media blitz now, is to buzz the mind as a way to occlude our drive for fairness. 

11
Chemistry / Re: Is it possible to unboil an egg
« on: 28/03/2013 14:54:10 »
Well, I was amazed when I read that you cannot cook the white in a turtle egg. Just won't set.  So how does that work?

12
That CAN'T be true ! / baking soda for radiation????
« on: 14/09/2012 23:44:51 »
i just couldn't believe it even when my trusted site tuberose.com said so.  So I looked it up on the net and Yes, is true.  http://www.healinggrapevine.com/recover-now/detox-protocols/how-to-detox-radiation-poisoning.html
So say you?

13
p://katesisco.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/why-does-na-use-so-much-ritalin-two-theories/

Did we bring as immigrants our ADHD with us?  As a primary symptom of NF!?

Radon gas dangers increasing:  http://state-radon.info/news/article_1718.html

14
New Theories / Re: Gravity Field EMG
« on: 08/07/2012 20:04:21 »
Well, I wondered about O Manuel's claim that our star, Sol, has an iron core.  Now, I think that is possible even though science says no.  That if it did there could be no nuclear fissioning taking place as irons stop nuclear reactions.  And it would be a neutron star.  I think such tremendous fields of magnetism are possible and can 'wrap' entire solar systems not just stars.  So if Sol was 'wrapped' by a magnetic field, and a controlled collapse occurred, the elements would be ordered, the nuclear reactions would take place on the surface like he proposed, and the magnetic field would alter the surrounding solar system, which is why our is so 'orderly' as opposed to what Kepler has found.  It is evident that such energy would not be available to human manipulation. 

15
New Theories / Re: Post Orgasmic Illness Syndrome (POIS)
« on: 08/07/2012 19:56:59 »
Female reply:  You might want to read EO Wilson's new book:  Social Contract
He replaces kin altruism with eusocial groups.  I infered from what he said he believes in genetic memory, and if we are moving toward group behavior, then individual sexual expression is not desired and Mother Nature could be in the process of removing it.  Science has known for decades slightly more than half of women experience orgasm.  And seems to have no information as to the other half don't except to claim it is a state of mind. 

16
I read Miles Mathis papers and he proposes that there are two forces, attractive (electrons) and repulsive and that our current solar system is unbalanced due to an excess of matter which translates into more gravity.  Worth reading.  And, of course, the implications are worth considering.  How did we get unblanced as one supposed the normal state is balance.  his main point is that charge is not virtual, its real and that is a whole new ball game. 

17
General Science / Is my bathroom drain radioactive?
« on: 30/05/2012 20:28:52 »
I just moved into a senior subsidized high rise and discovered my shower drain glows blue in the dark.  There is no natural light.  I immedately took off my Indyglow watch I have worn 24 hours a day for the last year; but also considered that the former resident was receiving radiation treatment and lost a part altho hospitals are supposed to be very vigilant about this radioactivity.  I consider radioactivity entirely possible due to the large increase in cancer treatmens involving radioactivity and that the patients are much more mobile and not confined to a hospital. 

18
Just Chat ! / 2012 radioactivity in the home
« on: 30/05/2012 20:27:06 »
I just moved into a senior subsidized high rise and discovered my shower drain glows blue in the dark.  There is no natural light.  I immedately took off my Indyglow watch I have work 24 hours a day for the last year; but also considered that the former resident was receiving radiation treatment and lost a part altho hospitals are supposed to be very vigilant about this radioactivity.  i consider it entirely possible that this glow is from radioactivity due to a body loss from a chemo patient, bacause of the large increase in cancer treatments and their common useage of radioactivity isotopes. 

Any ideas? 

19
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Earth Gravity anomaly
« on: 04/03/2012 18:06:22 »
My comments won't help much but I wonder also.  Miles Mathis has insights here that were helpful to me.
Anti-matter is the opposite of Z spin.  Let's assume that we had a lighter gravity --that means a lot more anti gravity --- in the past as S W Carey work has clearly demonstrated as evident in the geologic record.   
All I have is questions:  is the magnetic record of the rocks pertinent ONLY to the time frame of the brief occurance of the event?  How can we assume one identifiable magnetic record extends all the way forward to the next evident magnetic record.  Maybe inbetween is a period of non magnetism?  How are the pockets of unusual gravity (low) on Earth explained?  How exactly are they identified or can they be?  If a map of the magnetic field fails to identify these small pockets (because they are too small?) then how do we know for sure we have correctly identified our magnetic field? 
If the primary condition of E in the past was light gravity, with strong intermissions of gravity, how would we know?  It seems to me we are operating from the idea that since it is now, ever has been.  That is not science. 
For the sake of enlightenment (not argument) let's assume that E has been a planet with nearly 50% matter/anti-matter which would make a light gravity and explain the dinos. 

The question would then be why has the E became a dense gravity well. 

That is the question science would like to answer by applying anti-matter at will.  I do not think that will happen.  Miles Mathis hints that people may be the answer as to why we are at the bottom of a gravity well.  In a true irony, people themselves may be the cause of the initialization of a 'nub' up to matter spin and not anti-matter.  NASA called out attention to the water molecules in the air setting up synchronizing spin when SunDo passed through the cloud upon launch.  NASA implied the answer was sound. 

If E was composed of half matter/half anti-matter, something would have to stop the spin of anti-matter so the 'nub' as Miles Mathis identifies it would sit waiting for enough bumps to initialize spin.  But the problem is that once a 'nub' has been initialized, it spins up as matter.  This is science's problem.  Why? 

20
New Theories / ?Is Sol at the energetic edge??
« on: 14/09/2011 19:49:58 »
Plasma info site:  http://geobeck.tripod.com/frontier/bbang3.html

I agree with the concept of the plasma focus devise; thinking about this I wonder since we here on Earth have experienced periodic electromagnetic incursions on the order of 5,000 and only 10,000 y ago since the last DL back side exposure, 5,000 y ago we were spared this catastrophic event because the DL dropped before passing us onto the back side. 
Reading this article, I see us a being inside the area the plasma focus is storing charge in.  The sudden dropping of the magnetic incursion of sol's heliosphere is when the plasma focus emits jets. 
Would anyone like to speculate where the plasma focus that is utilizing the space normally used by sol for its expanded heliosphere is emitting? 
Is our little bitty tiny part of the galaxy actually part of the storage for the plasma focus that emits jets at the center of the Milky Way? 
And what consequences would that have for the possibilities of life anywhere? 
Except maybe in globular clusters?

21
New Theories / ?George we miss you...............
« on: 12/09/2011 18:18:56 »
George Gamov, replaced as the popularizer of solar science when the quantum world appeared on the horizon by R Feynmann.  In his book 1965, Our sun a star, page 191, he describes the crushing of atoms into the nucleus and free electrons which then present as a perfect gas, again compressable, almost infinitely compressable to the density of a nuclear fluid, he states that the free nucleus and electrons still obey the quantum world only they roam from 'the edge of the jar to the edge of the jar.' 

Walt Thornhill describes these plasmas as cofined to 'ropes' and 'sheathed';  I think that outside the solar heliosphere, whether its ours of another sun's there is nothing but plasma, plasma all the way out.  Plasma everywhere you look. 

Instead of clouds of gas, maybe ionized, luffing about in the cosmos, I think there is only the endless sea of plasma.  Where there is not plasma, there is a sun's heliosphere or a nova or a contracting neutron star.  There is not nothing.  Space is full, chock full. 

So, how is the charge received and dispersed?  I think maybe Birkeland currents are only a small way charge is apparent.  I think maybe George's eddies in the cosmos are correct and correct also that it is impossible to describe so why the default to BCs. 

Also, in ths 1965 book he notes transmutation of elements via heat/pressure.  Nothing is new but when science fails in a generation to advance key understanding the default occurs which is to erase the generation knowledge and rediscover it as to create a continuing impetus of forward motion. 

The problem now seems to be that we have not found a way to 'capture' a high energy source ( Well, let me look around----the character says in Red Planet when confronted with a dead battery in a Russian satellite on the surface of Mars---and see if I see any alternate high energy sources; Nope, just rocks.  I'm going to die on this planet.)so we erase what we have gone to great expense and toil to discover so we can rediscover it in the future where we repeat the process.  Atlas rolling the rock uphill. 

Doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome is an indication of insanity. 

22
Here is the link:  http://www.holoscience.com/synopsis.php?page=12
Here is a link to alchemy:  quantum agriculture/capatance battery d klocek
NASA: we are experiencing an increase in gravity --measureing E gravity well.
We are inside a compressed, continually reducing sphere of the Sun influence.  It is the result of the amgnetic cloud Fluff. 
Please NOTE:  this compression is directly responsible for the increase in gas density, and amazingly the so called alchemy of nature. 
Why did the ancients search so long for what they believed possible?  Because there was a time when it was.  A time when the magnetic cloud incurred and compression ruled.  When the magnetic field drops at 2013, there will again be a desperate search for the transmutation of materials. 
Why has the plasma concept of energy and the electric universe been almost universally ignored?  Because it can then be 'discovered' when the energy is understood and captured for use.  That will never happen.  So we carry on pretending. 
The magnetic cloud causing the compression comes and goes.  We are unable to duplicate such conditions on Earth. There is insufficient energy.  We will not be able to tap the Birkeland current to do so.  We will not be able to harness the heated core of the Earth. 
What we will do is hint at success, let the cities amass unsupportable populations, and when the discontinuity of 2013 causes global catastrophe, the then equatorial regions will suffer less and be the most desirable places to isolate the treasured advances of our limited technology.  There will of course not be any nuclear facilities.  They are too dangerous.  There will be a limited number of elites who self select among themselves for genetic abilities. 
Does all this sound familiar?  10,000 the residue of the elite appeared and were forced to begin anew; mining salt for food preservation to enable voyages by sea and horses and foot.  Atlantis redux.
Our history overlooks the thousands of successful other options:  towns that make themselves a center of a single type of trade and carried out that trade over long distances.  They declined to expand; they used long distance trade routes to protect their location but in the end, history records the violent, expansive, and all too many failures.  The success are there, look at the Stupe valley outside of Lima Peru, Harappa, and many others.  They succeeded not by expansion but by careful husbandry of resources and select trade.  We can do so again, violence is not the answer. 

23
Cooking With Fire by Harvard professor was a good read.  He makes excellent point that human gut is too short to process uncooked grain.  Raw meat needs cooking for the proteins to be extracted.  As to how it all began, he proposes maybe eating meat overran by fire or volcanic action.  As good as any.  If you go there, you will have to see us as totally dumb; because lack of protein is what people die from, the brain stultifies.  You can't think.  Back then you can't think, you're prey. 
I like the idea that controlled fire was first used to keep animals at bay at night.  But I have to admit that eating something already cooked by lava is appealing, saves the hunt.  But that is accidental, so it seems to me that the keeping animals away at night with fire led to eating things cooked --  the fire was always kept so food being exposed to heat was inevitable. 

24
I just reread Earth in Upheaval and of course, no reference to sterilized seas exist but this would explain why most of the 'start ups' of civilizations stayed small. 
Thinking about our latest magnetic field incursion: 
or it could be if W Thornhill's plasma sheath is incurring in the 5,000 year period as shows in the Earth's geologic record. 

Our history of cultures mostly begins 10,000 y ago; this may be when the magnetic field NASA has named Fluff dropped from running over Earth and exposing Earth to a fully cosmic environment on the back side of the DL of the plasma sheath.  Not only would the Earth be subject to massive and dangerous cosmic rays, but the Earth would also be subject to expansion in the same form as the floating mountains of Pandora.  Not much life would survive and things would have to start over. 
That our 10,000 y restart is still in our history books indicates that the magnetic cloud did not incur past Earth at the 5,000 y incursion.  We did not 'expand' which means Earth stayed in Sol's much reduced heliosphere; think of Earth as the last planet inside the heliosphere.  Everything past Earth was again exposed to cosmic rays and expansion.  Venus included. 

This event, now incurring, as evidenced by the clouds disappearing and reappearing on Jupiter's southern half, the sun's northern hemispheric explosion in January 2011, and the identification of a 'gravity well' around Earth are all due to the magnetic field Fluff reaching into Sol's system and forcing the gases to compress; think of a snow plow clearing the road.  Such is Fluff compressing. 

This time it appears that Fluff may stop before Earth, and may even stop outside of Venus.  If it does, expect the heavy atmosphere NASA once envisioned as a home for a floating space habitat, to sink to the lithosphere and begin creating a temperate planet.  More importantly, we can leave behind the false concept of how our solar system functions. 

We can recognize that Velikovsky may indeed be correct, that S W Carey indeed say 'expansion' events in the geologic record, and we may have a future in the only solar system we will ever call home. 

25
New Theories / is the big bang correct?
« on: 20/08/2011 16:50:34 »
Well........David Bohm sure thought so.  And he further stated that we are not privileged to know anything other than our current transformation. i do think O Manuel is on the right path; the Russians have just launched a radio telescope to look for our bitsy neutron star that has lashed Sol's system many times with magnetic waves, in other words, DL, as described by the Electric Universe.   

Pages: [1] 2
SMF 2.0 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
 
Login
Login with username, password and session length