as identified by the US Army Corps of Engineers
« Last post by MoreCarbonOK on Today at 16:44:00 »
as identified by the US Army Corps of Engineers
« Last post by wolfekeeper on Today at 16:08:22 »
Sorry, but I don't believe you've done a proper sceptical analysis of the sources. People that have done a proper analysis don't come to the conclusions you have.
« Last post by nathan123 on Today at 16:05:53 »
Hi, from the god sake POIS not bounce back even after one and half month and having an avg of three o's in a week.
Today visited the doctor for further appointment had a discussion for 2 hours and I would like to explain the discussion as per with my doctor.
In the earlier post, I posted only there was only numerological imbalance in me due to over masturbation resulted in POIS. Today I asked in depth. As per doctor for me, there was a over stimulation of acetylcholine parasympathetic nervous system. Due to there was a imbalance in CNS and over production of acetycholine leading to imbalance in brain chemistry. Further, there was also imbalance in digestive system and function of liver. That's why he has prescribed me four different varieties (one for CNS, one for digestion, one for parasite and another for stress and another for increasing vitamin C i.e. amla juice) and also suggested to follow one diet system for one month so that brain chemeistry should be normal.
After following the medicine and diet, brain chemistry i.e. ratio of various hormones and CNS came normal. He warned if any time continues Over masturbation for one month, again POIS will come.
To confirm this, pl check google for symtoms of over stimulation of acetylcholine parasympathetic nervous system and also for symtoms of high acetycholine. Also for masturbation and acetycholine parasympathetic nervous system.
Also I found one of the symtoms of high acetycholine is flu like symtoms that we have in POIS.
Further he also mentioned that there is no medicine to restore this in allopathy medicine. for this the only solution through herbal.
« Last post by MoreCarbonOK on Today at 15:58:35 »
rather than simply having 'an opinion'; everyone has an opinion, but I personally respect people that have experimental data directly backing up their opinion.
I did my own investigations, and very thorough at that, if I may say so myself...
but Imatfaal says
This is a clear warning - one more link to your blog will lead to your suspension.
imatfaal - moderator
Clearly, this is a catch 21 situation?
You must speak to him, not to me?
climate change henryp
and see if you can find my results...
« Last post by Mazurka on Today at 15:51:42 »
Perhaps you'd like to tell the arctic towns, whose buildings and roads are sinking as the permafrost melts, that it's all just media hype...Do you mean towns and communities like Akiak, Alakanuk, Barrow, Chefornak, Chevak, Clark's Point, Cordova, Deering , Dillingham, Emmonak, Golovin, Huslia, Kivalina, Kotilk, kwigillingok, Lime Village, McGrath, Napakiak, Newtok, Nunapitchuk, Port Heiden, Saint Micheal, Selawik, Shaktoolik, Shishmaref & Unalakleet? (as identified by the US Army Corps of Engineers)
« Last post by Bill S on Today at 15:28:37 »
Quote from: CD13
So our partial knowledge will always be zero.
Mathematically our partial knowledge would be zero, but there must be another way to look at it, because if you apply the same reasoning to matter in an infinite cosmos, then our "share" of that matter must be zero - yet we are here.
My protracted ramblings should - I hope - reach that alternative, I just hope others have the patience to stay with the animadversions of an old codger long enough. :)
« Last post by thedoc on Today at 14:30:01 »
Anton Lukas asked the Naked Scientists:
13.8 billion years ago the big bang created the universe. There was no space, matter. Time started then.
I do have a lot of questions. Can you answer some of them?
When was matter created?
Is the amount of matter still increasing?
Is the amount of dark energy increasing?
How can something be created from nothing?
What do you think?
« Last post by wolfekeeper on Today at 14:27:14 »
Tell you what, why don't you read the peer-reviewed papers on these subjects, and find out what the truth is rather than hanging out on echo-chamber websites?
I know it's dangerous, for example you might learn something, rather than simply having 'an opinion'; everyone has an opinion, but I personally respect people that have experimental data directly backing up their opinion.
« Last post by steviereal on Today at 13:32:01 »
I've been thinking about this some more and think that fields are what causing this mystery. In this case, it is the gravitational field vs. electric field (holding the particles of the surface together). All fields have energy and the bodies that the field acts on, have work done on them. In the case of gravity there is a formula that establishes the relationship between two bodies based on their distance and mass. The shorter the distance, the greater the potential energy is. Maybe this is the energy that is acted on the body when it is on the surface. On the other hand, the energy of the surface (that holds it together, the sum of binding energies) acts against this energy, so the two cancel each other out. They have opposite directions.
So I really think that the field is constantly working on the body it acts upon, only another energy is keeping it from doing anything useful. Quantum mechanically this has gotta be the case, let's just think about all those mediating particles (photons, gravitons) being exchanged constantly. Don't they carry energy just like any other photon/graviton?
« Last post by demografx on Today at 12:46:20 »
Today, May 20, 2013, is:
Weights & Measures Day!
Weight loss mantra? Fat chants!
A king measures his line with a ruler.