The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Paradox of motion in space  (Read 2393 times)

Offline NovaJoe

  • First timers
  • *
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Paradox of motion in space
« on: 02/11/2007 22:29:48 »
      If you have two bodies in space, one in motion and one stationary, other than observing measurements of time dilation, there is no way to definitively define which body is in motion and which body is stationary.  The only thing that can be stated on the motion of the bodies with any certainty; the bodies are moving relative to each other.  Which body is moving with what velocity is impossible to define outside of measuring time dilation.  The reason you cannot attach any meaning to velocity in space (other than time dilation) is because motion cannot exist without reference; there must be a third reference body in which all motion in space is defined relative to the inertia phenomenon or time dilation would not occur.  So when this paradox presents itself it is because this third reference body (the inertia phenomenon) has not yet been definitively defined and understood.  To definitively define the reference body of the inertia phenomenon would be to solve this paradox.  This paradox has been theoretically solved by the deductions of RHU Theory (Relativistic-Hyper-Unification Theory).  This solution becomes apparent when you think about this difficulty in this manner: Picture yourself outside the universe observing the rotation of the universes orbit around the black holes at the center of our universe.  Without a third reference body (the inertia phenomenon) it is impossible to know (without measuring time dilation) if the universe is rotating or not.  It could be that you are orbiting around the universe.  Outside of measuring time dilation, there is no meaning in velocity in space without a third reference body in which all relative motion is referenced proprietary to the inertia phenomenon.  As already mentioned, time dilation could not exist without the reference body of the inertia phenomena, which means there must be a reference body for the inertia phenomena.  The only motion that can be definitively defined without defining the reference body of the inertia phenomena or measuring time dilation is the expansion of the universe.  There is no need for a third reference body to define the expansion of the universe because you only need two bodies to define expansion in space.  As meaningless as this fact first appears, it is fundamental in defining the reference body of the inertia phenomena. 

       If we were to use a supercomputer to create a virtual reproduction of our universe, we would need to define the reference body of the inertia phenomena for our virtual universe.  The previous deduction defining the only definitive motion in space as expansion or contraction because only two bodies are required to define these motions are fundamental clues on how we should go about setting up our virtual universe so that it has the same properties as the actual universe as we experience it.  Using this fundamental clue you will come to the conclusion that a universal spatial expansion of space time and matter would work as the third reference (inertia) of all other motion in space.  The problem with this assumption is the fact that the universal spatial expansion of all space-time and matter would be meaningless (could not exist) without a reference body for this expansion.  So we create a SINGULAR point (Singularity) that is without expansion as the reference body of the universal spatial expansion of all space-time and matter.  This universal spatial expansion would be the third reference unto which all other motion in space is referenced relative to the inertia phenomena.  We use the universal spatial expansion as our reference body for the inertia phenomena because no other reference body can be defined under the conditions of existence in the reference-less void of space.  We need a singular point without expansion to reference a universal spatial expansion of space-time and matter or the universal spatial expansion could not exist as motion does not exist without reference.  For this (motion does not exist without reference) same reason, the universal spatial expansion of all matter in the universe is required to reference the inertia phenomenon, which in itself is meaningless without reference.  So we create a singular point without expansion for the reference of the universal spatial expansion so that our virtual universe could function as our actual universe does.  With space-time and matter expanding uniformly, there would be no reference for the observation of this motion within the virtual universe.  The Singular point or Singularity would exist invisibly within our virtual universe leaving no reference body for the observation of the universal spatial expansion.  Now if we created intelligent beings that exist only in our virtual universe, and gave them no knowledge of the reality of their existence, the intelligent beings would be presented with the exact same difficulties in defining their universe and their experience of phenomena.  We would be gleefully amused at their confusion in defining motion in space as we would know the answer to their difficulty.  The point being, that this theoretical solution perfectly describes the reference of motion in space relative to the inertia phenomenon in a manner that logically connects reference with motion, defining the inertia phenomenon and the reference of the inertia phenomenon.  For more information on RHU Theory go to
newbielink:http://www.relativetheorys.com [nonactive] 
 [8D]


 

another_someone

  • Guest
Paradox of motion in space
« Reply #1 on: 02/11/2007 22:53:16 »
This is an exact copy of http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=11208.msg137001#msg137001 (excepting the change in colour).

I accept that one poster did ask for a change in colour, so I understand why it was reposted in the new colour, but there is no need for two threads covering the same ground, so I will be locking this thread.
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Paradox of motion in space
« Reply #1 on: 02/11/2007 22:53:16 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums