The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Uranus, Neptune, Kuiper Belt !..They Should not be there ?..so why ?  (Read 8732 times)

Offline neilep

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 20602
  • Thanked: 8 times
    • View Profile
Dear Planetologists,

See these planets ?



Uranus & Neptune (oh yes and iddy biddy earthy werthy)


and  this Solar System Trouser Tightner !!





Apparently....these objects should not be there ?...they are too big ?.....did i hear right ?.....if I did !!...why are they there then if they should not be ?......do we need to tell them off for being norty planets and norty small bodies ! ?


hugs & Shmishes

xxxxxxxx







« Last Edit: 22/03/2008 18:11:10 by chris »


 

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3345
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • View Profile
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Why do you (or others) say they shouldn't be there?

Let me answer my question.  Planetary systems are likely to be disrupted by stars passing nearby in their orbits around the centre of the galaxy so the solar system must not have had too many close encounters with stars during its life.  The solar system also includes the Oort cloud which is outside of the Kuiper belt from which most of the comets originate.

Most people do not realise how widely separated most stars are and the probability of a close encounter is extremely low.  In the past it was considered that spiral arms in galaxies were areas of increased density and the sun experienced higher risks of close encounters every few hundred million years as it passed through them but that may not be entirely true nowadays they are understood to be more like shock waves where the supernovae resulting from short lived high mass stars spawn the condensation more stars from cold gas in front of them as they orbit. So the stellar density is not too great here it is just that they contain bright young stars and are more visible.
« Last Edit: 18/03/2008 09:26:46 by Soul Surfer »
 

Offline neilep

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 20602
  • Thanked: 8 times
    • View Profile
Why do you (or others) say they shouldn't be there? I Don't say this Ian....well..I'm reporting what I heard but I'm not stating a fact!!..hence the question

Let me answer my question.  Planetary systems are likely to be disrupted by stars passing nearby in their orbits around the centre of the galaxy so the solar system must not have had too many close encounters with stars during its life.  The solar system also includes the Oort cloud which is outside of the Kuiper belt from which most of the comets. originate.

Most people do not realise how widely separated most stars are and the probability of a close encounter is extremely slow.  In the past it was considered that spiral arms in galaxies were areas of increased density and the sun experienced higher risks of close encounters every few hundred million years as it passed through them but that may not be entirely true nowadays they are understood to be more like shock waves where the supernovae resulting from short lived high mass stars spawn the condensation more stars from cold gas in front of them as they orbit. So the stellar density is not too great here it is just that they contain bright young stars and are more visible.




THANK YOU IAN.
 

The Naked Scientists Forum


 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums