# The Naked Scientists Forum

### Author Topic: The Superultramodern Scientific Explanation of...  (Read 2868 times)

#### Kedar Joshi

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 16
##### The Superultramodern Scientific Explanation of...
« on: 18/11/2004 22:47:38 »
The Superultramodern Scientific Explanation of the Fundamental Forces-

Part I

The particle theorists’ explanation of the fundamental forces -

1) Explanation of the force of repulsion -

‘In quantum mechanics, the forces or interactions between matter particles are all supposed to be carried by particles of integer spin - 0, 1, or 2. What happens is that a matter particle, such as an electron or a quark, emits a force – carrying particle. The recoil from this emission changes the velocity of the matter particle. The force – carrying particle then collides with another matter particle and is absorbed. This collision changes the velocity of the second particle, just as if there had been a force between the two matter particles.’ ( See Hawking 1996, p. 90 )

2) Explanation of the force of attraction –

It is the same as the description of the force of attraction. For example,
‘The gravitational force of the sun on the earth is pictured in particle theories as being caused by the emission of a graviton by a particle in the sun and its absorption by a particle in the earth.’ ( See Hawking 1996, p. 217 )

a) Deficiency –

With reference to the particle theorists’ description of the force of repulsion it is quite simple to see that its explanation of the force of attraction is totally inadequate. By the emission and absorption of graviton the two matter particles would rather go away ( or be repulsed ) from each other.

b) Principal deficiency -

The particle theorists’ model does not at all explain how the matter particle, that emits a force - carrying particle, realises the presence of the other matter particle. In other words, the model does not explain how the emitter of the force – carrying particle knows when to emit a particle.

Part II

The Superultramodern Explanation -

According to the NSTP (Non - Spatial Thinking Process) theory any basic force of attraction or repulsion is just a form of spatial illusion to non - spatial observer/s, where the illusion is modulated or orderly governed by some superhuman thoughts also existing in the form of non-spatial feelings. Any experimental evidence in support of the particle theorists' explanation is also a form of orderly spatial illusion.

The NSTP theory is at the centre of superultramodern science. (Invention of Kedar Joshi (b.1979), Cambridge, UK)

« Last Edit: 27/11/2004 16:54:14 by Kedar Joshi »

#### Sandwalker

• Full Member
• Posts: 83
##### Re: The Superultramodern Scientific Explanation of...
« Reply #1 on: 26/11/2004 01:01:01 »
So its all done by mirrors then!

illusion -> magic -> mirrors.

No this does not explain the process either, it just replaces it with dogma.

This would be the basic princple for your theory then:

Nothing exists except as NSTP's, which themselves do not exist except in some some superhuman mind (GOD), which itself does not exist in time (but experiences change) and has no spacial dimension.

And you have no proof of this except your reasoning. (Sorry 'proof' that would be another form of orderly spatial illusion.)

Go build a religion!

Super Historic Ultra Fideism.
« Last Edit: 26/11/2004 01:05:08 by Sandwalker »

#### Kedar Joshi

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 16
##### Re: The Superultramodern Scientific Explanation of...
« Reply #2 on: 26/11/2004 21:43:15 »
quote:
Originally posted by Sandwalker

So its all done by mirrors then!

illusion -> magic -> mirrors.

No this does not explain the process either, it just replaces it with dogma.

This would be the basic princple for your theory then:

Nothing exists except as NSTP's, which themselves do not exist except in some some superhuman mind (GOD), which itself does not exist in time (but experiences change) and has no spacial dimension.

And you have no proof of this except your reasoning. (Sorry 'proof' that would be another form of orderly spatial illusion.)

Go build a religion!

Super Historic Ultra Fideism.

Proof ? I've given it. It's your inability to see it. If p implies q and q implies r then p implies r is supposed to be true to person A there could be a person B, with extremely low intellectual capacity, who says I just don't see any truth or proof whatsoever in that very proposition. In such case the person A has to say that person B is problematic not himself.

[By proof I mean well formed argumentation. The principle ‘anything may be possible ( for that which is believed to be 100 % certain at present may be because of the limited intellectual capacities of the believer )’ implies that the concept of proof is invalid.]

« Last Edit: 26/11/2004 22:04:19 by Kedar Joshi »

#### Sandwalker

• Full Member
• Posts: 83
##### Re: The Superultramodern Scientific Explanation of...
« Reply #3 on: 30/11/2004 09:50:27 »
Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem!

#### Sandwalker

• Full Member
• Posts: 83
##### Re: The Superultramodern Scientific Explanation of...
« Reply #4 on: 30/11/2004 09:52:33 »
And just cos I say 2+2=5, it does ALRIGHT.

#### The Naked Scientists Forum

##### Re: The Superultramodern Scientific Explanation of...
« Reply #4 on: 30/11/2004 09:52:33 »