The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Galaxy Stacks Created before the Big Bang  (Read 3444 times)

Offline common_sense_seeker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 213
    • View Profile
    • Believers In Gravity Shielding (BiGS)
Galaxy Stacks Created before the Big Bang
« on: 08/09/2008 15:31:31 »
Hi, I have a simple and elegant picture in my mind of how proto-galaxies could have been formed from 'nothing', which then begin to stack up atop one another and are compressed due to their mutual radiation of gravitons. It would have been perfectly symmetrical, except for the one thing, which will remain my secret for now. The Big Bang followed, giving us the view of the heavens we see today.


 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8676
  • Thanked: 42 times
    • View Profile
Galaxy Stacks Created before the Big Bang
« Reply #1 on: 08/09/2008 19:41:56 »
OK, maybe I'm just cruel but I couldn't help thinking when I read "I have a simple and elegant picture in my mind of how proto-galaxies could have been formed " that you should leave it there.
Equally, I don't see "which will remain my secret for now" as likely to be any great loss to science.
 

Offline common_sense_seeker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 213
    • View Profile
    • Believers In Gravity Shielding (BiGS)
Galaxy Stacks Created before the Big Bang
« Reply #2 on: 09/09/2008 10:09:18 »
Not you again!
 

Offline common_sense_seeker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 213
    • View Profile
    • Believers In Gravity Shielding (BiGS)
Galaxy Stacks Created before the Big Bang
« Reply #3 on: 09/09/2008 10:12:08 »
I'm assuming that the Standard Model is incorrect. Presumably you think it isn't.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8676
  • Thanked: 42 times
    • View Profile
Galaxy Stacks Created before the Big Bang
« Reply #4 on: 09/09/2008 19:40:47 »
Not you again!

Funny that, I thought the same thing.
I take it that your theory will be rich in long names and buzzwords, but totally devoid of
1 any testable predictions
2 any observed evidence
3 any mathematical basis.

The standard model may be incorrect but I think it will stand the onslaught of someone who doesn't check where the high tides are before basing his "theory" on them being in the wrong places or points out that the standard model predicts that the moon spins, whereas his new "theory" predicts that it says still.

Strangely, in both cases real life is not influenced by your theory; why should we be?
 

Offline common_sense_seeker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 213
    • View Profile
    • Believers In Gravity Shielding (BiGS)
Galaxy Stacks Created before the Big Bang
« Reply #5 on: 09/09/2008 20:39:25 »
There's plenty of observed evidence. There's plenty of predictions. The maths you have a point on. But then I was taught by a professor in Simulation Modelling (the only one in the country) that mathematics isn't the only way to understand a problem.

Oh yeah, and I'm also proposing that Newton's basic mathematical description is wrong.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8676
  • Thanked: 42 times
    • View Profile
Galaxy Stacks Created before the Big Bang
« Reply #6 on: 10/09/2008 19:25:20 »
"the only one in the country"
That figures.
 

Offline common_sense_seeker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 213
    • View Profile
    • Believers In Gravity Shielding (BiGS)
Galaxy Stacks Created before the Big Bang
« Reply #7 on: 11/09/2008 10:27:39 »
You seem to have strayed from the initial subject of the thread.

AL
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8676
  • Thanked: 42 times
    • View Profile
Galaxy Stacks Created before the Big Bang
« Reply #8 on: 11/09/2008 21:36:00 »

BC siad
"I take it that your theory will be rich in long names and buzzwords, but totally devoid of
1 any testable predictions
2 any observed evidence
3 any mathematical basis.
"
You said (in another thread)
"My 'big bang' is the outburst of the collapse of two opposing proto-galaxy stacks. I'm supposing that a 3-dimensional bubble appears in a 4th-dimensional space and is then 'injected' with spinning energy (i.e matter)."

Looks to me like I got 3 out of 3.
 

Offline common_sense_seeker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 213
    • View Profile
    • Believers In Gravity Shielding (BiGS)
Galaxy Stacks Created before the Big Bang
« Reply #9 on: 12/09/2008 11:24:50 »
Yeah, I'm a bit bored to. Bye..  8)
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Galaxy Stacks Created before the Big Bang
« Reply #9 on: 12/09/2008 11:24:50 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums