The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: x=Vt <=> (dx=Vdt & V=const)  (Read 3841 times)

Offline dedaNoe

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
    • Dedanoe -- Unileversal TAODotology
x=Vt <=> (dx=Vdt & V=const)
« on: 30/01/2005 10:51:47 »
Yes that is how it is: x=Vt <=> (dx=Vdt & V=const)
You are working all along with ocnstant velocity.
No wonder why you see c=const.

My page; section on kinetics!!

www.geocities.com/dedaNoe [nofollow]


 

Offline Ultima

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 488
    • View Profile
    • My Homepage
Re: x=Vt <=> (dx=Vdt & V=const)
« Reply #1 on: 30/01/2005 12:13:23 »
Sorry I got as far as "Unified Psycho Physics" and the fancy ying yang, and then stopped reading. I realize you are a trawl, but seriously if you want to have a proper discussion about this start one, donít just come here and spout something; having a personal website doesn't make something true, I notice from all of your other posts you keep linking to it.

wOw the world spins?
« Last Edit: 30/01/2005 12:21:39 by Ultima »
 

Offline neilep

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 20602
  • Thanked: 8 times
    • View Profile
Re: x=Vt <=> (dx=Vdt & V=const)
« Reply #2 on: 30/01/2005 17:19:51 »
Dobri, please clarify your topic title !!..it'll help with others identifying your thread and especially when others are using the search facility....oh and ditto everything Ultima has said too !!

'Men are the same as women...just inside out !'
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: x=Vt <=> (dx=Vdt & V=const)
« Reply #2 on: 30/01/2005 17:19:51 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums