[Hei-Tai (OP)]

 []


I have thinking question " What is electric current?" Wire,,,,lead electric current flow. When electric current dont flow wire construction is stable. When current flow,,,,i make question to my self.

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

When current flow, is the construction of this wire?;

C. With in,,means that do electric current push the construction of wire?
B. Go-between,,means that do electric current to jump atom to atom?
A. or canal,,,means that is the electric current flow that kind of small material flow which flow through wire,,,without using any kind of wire atoms.

Sorry my english,,i hope that you understand my question?

And magnetic-field?

My thought is that when electric flow through wire this motion "hits" wire-construction and then some matter particles fly out from wire,,,and that is the so called magnetic field.

 []

[lyner]

The conduction electrons in a metal are de-localised. That means that no individual electron 'belongs' to any atom, in particular. When a current flows, the conduction electrons all drift (very slowly - mms per second).  A very small amonunt of energy is used up as they move through the lattice but that is the loss which we identify as Resistance.

[allien]

Electric current is defined as opposite of electron movement.
It could be say the mixture of A and B .

Jump From atom to atom nearly light speed and outher surface of the wire.

The electron entering the wire is not the electron leaving from another side.

This is all from my remembrance, could be wrong.

[lyner]

Electric current is defined as opposite of electron movement.
It could be say the mixture of A and B .

Jump From atom to atom nearly light speed and outher surface of the wire.

The electron entering the wire is not the electron leaving from another side.

This is all from my remembrance, could be wrong.

Where did you get the idea of 'light speed' jumps?
Look in wikkers to find out about electron drift speed - it's all there and there's not much doubt about what I wrote.
I think your  idea of conduction being mainly on the surface refers to Alternating Current flow; because of the induced magnetic and electric fields changing with the alternations, the current occupies a 'skin' near the surface. The electrons, themselves, hardly do more than 'wobble' a bit, backwards and forwards.

Hei-Tai
Why not look at a book or in wikkers for some in-depth ideas of conventional Physics. You could then come up with some better informed questions which might speed up your learning.

[Hei-Tai (OP)]

The conduction electrons in a metal are de-localised. That means that no individual electron 'belongs' to any atom, in particular. When a current flows, the conduction electrons all drift (very slowly - mms per second).  A very small amonunt of energy is used up as they move through the lattice but that is the loss which we identify as Resistance.

 []

So if i think right you mean that A+C,,,C means that drift and loss means that A.

What is you opinion about that magnetic-field idea?

[Hei-Tai (OP)]

Electric current is defined as opposite of electron movement.
It could be say the mixture of A and B .

Jump From atom to atom nearly light speed and outher surface of the wire.

The electron entering the wire is not the electron leaving from another side.

This is all from my remembrance, could be wrong.

 []
So you means that jump atom-atom B and some-amount fly out of wire A and make magnetic-field?

Then magnetic field is some kind of matter-flow-process?

What happens if wire is empty? Electricity current dont flow?

 []

[allien]

Even electron moves slowly, the electricity (energy) moves nearly light speed.
Because the electron entering the wire is not the electron leaving from another side.

So electricity travels at c, while electrons do not.

[lyner]

I me

The conduction electrons in a metal are de-localised. That means that no individual electron 'belongs' to any atom, in particular. When a current flows, the conduction electrons all drift (very slowly - mms per second).  A very small amonunt of energy is used up as they move through the lattice but that is the loss which we identify as Resistance.

 []

So if i think right you mean that A+C,,,C means that drift and loss means that A.

What is you opinion about that magnetic-field idea?

I mean what happens is as it's described in all the text books. None of your  three alternative  views are in agreement with that. Is there any point in saying where they are at variance? As I said before, I suggest that you read a book to find out what goes on. You will save time in the long run.

[Hei-Tai (OP)]

 []

Magnet test.

Magnet and needlework wire. I keep wire on my finger and let magnet suck the needle. When needle goes near magnet i notice next.

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

Needle start to turn clock-wice,,like screw or spiral. I notice that same magnet-screw was other side of magnet.

So my opinion is that magnet-thing make matter-flow process where matter flow through magnet. And center of both end where needle is there is matter-spriral like tornado,,matter flow in the magnet center and rotate like tornado.
How i say,,some kind of matter-flow-tornado or matter screw thread.

My question is;

How magnet-material can put matter-particles to flow through itself that kind of way?

[Hei-Tai (OP)]

 []

Continue the same test.

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

My opinion is that smaal particle matter flow goes through magnet that way.

Both end center come matter-flow and fly out middle of magnet rod.

What i mean;
Magnet-thing is always some kind of matter-flow-process and magnet-rod example cause some how motion-process of those small-matter-particles and when those small particles start to flow then all iron-material start to go with this flow.

[lyner]

You are entitled to your opinion but are you saying that the text books have just got it wrong? That could be a bit presumptious. Would you, for instance, have any numerical data to support your idea?
Where does your 'matter' come from  and how does it get replenished? Magnets don't get lighter with age.

[Hei-Tai (OP)]

Would you, for instance, have any numerical data to support your idea?

Where does your 'matter' come from  and how does it get replenished?

Magnets don't get lighter with age.

 []

I dont need numerical data of that idea because i,,hmm. how i say,,,see it. If you want numerical data you can start to calculate.

Matter is round of magnet and magnet has some how that kind of hmm.material construction that it cause that matter-flow through it.

And i think that matter particle size is much smaller than we says how big electron is,,much smaller than we think that photon is. Why i think so? Because photon is smaller than electron but photon born at sun and fire,,,photon is secondary matter-state and there is smaller matter particles type which i call that it is that true basic matter.


- atom-thory give us idea of some size level matter particle
- photon is smaller level matter particle size
- and basic matter is smaller

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

Left matter-size cone.
bottom             = basic matter exist all of the universe every place
next size level    = so called photon size = born heat and light (also that electric charge perhaps)
third size level   = atom-theory level size
fourth size level  = iron, copper, etc.
fift size          = human cell, genes, etc.

Magnet put this basic matter some how to flow through it.

But like i mention my test with needle,,i think question,,,why this needle rotate,,,why there is both end of magnet that matter-rotating-current, magnet-screw.

Techical possibilityes; Magnet motor?

 []



 


 

[lyner]

I'm afraid that's nonsense.

[Vern]

Maybe there's something lost in the translation. There seems to be a vision there. I'm not sure it is a correct vision, but I would like to understand the vision. So I will continue to follow this thread and not relegate it to the trash heap just yet []

[Hei-Tai (OP)]

I'm afraid that's nonsense.

 []

I'm not afraid. I write and paint only that what is my opinion to my research doings.

My thoughts are clear.

This link the basic idea.

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=20289.0

My point is that space is full of matter and therefore can happend example next things.
- radiowaves can travell and so called magnet-fields can exist
- vehicles can travell
- planets can travell and be join together
- sun can make photons and heat like camp-fire

There is lot of todays science-ideas whose basic is empty space.
- magnetfield exist without matter
- radiowaves travell pure emptyness
- photon is massless-
- space-vehicles dont need anti-force(jump-force)
- planets join together something unknown gravity-wire
- etc.

Hmm,,thruth this world and things is much more what we cannot see yet,,,hmm. perhaps someone can. [:I]

But,,this thread,,,why and what cause that rotating-effect of that needle?


 []

[Hei-Tai (OP)]

Maybe there's something lost in the translation. There seems to be a vision there. I'm not sure it is a correct vision, but I would like to understand the vision. So I will continue to follow this thread and not relegate it to the trash heap just yet []

 []

Thanks vern your opinion,,,many scientist are like hmm.others,,,,,absolute right that existing data,,,so that reading data make brain and maind and dividing-thought control us,,us also,,so it is hard to walk middle-path,,thanks,,if you make same test like i make this magnet-needle test,,you get my question,,matter-flow somehow.

Must remember that electricity-magnet ideas was born 1500-1800 centuryes and 1900 centuryes dont come nothing new basic-idea,,so what is electricity and what is magnet-field,,that is unknown area at deepest matter-level.

Amazing is that atom-theory tell partly us that electricity must be some kind of matter-particle motion,,,but still many believe that electricity-magnetfield is not matter thing.

 []

[lyner]

Maybe there's something lost in the translation. There seems to be a vision there. I'm not sure it is a correct vision, but I would like to understand the vision. So I will continue to follow this thread and not relegate it to the trash heap just yet []

Verne:
Perhaps there is some loss. But it is asking a lot for us all to learn a new common language for discussing these things. There is a certain acceptable minimum of ability to communicate before presenting any brand new (?) idea. If someone wants to introduce new theories then they cannot expect to have them taken seriously if they don't use common terms in the accepted way. If the theory is worth its salt, it is worth while translating it properly.

I think you are being, politely, over generous about a very flimsy structure. Where is the Science?

[Hei-Tai (OP)]

Where is the Science?

 []

I'm not scientist, i have born year -57,,read many things,,,my longest work-area was have electricity-thing, maintenance, design, etc,,over 20 years,,i dont speak and write english not so good and  therefore i use drawings with my text. I dont have any back-round of my thoughts,,i say and wrote just i think things is. If this is not science then it is not. But i continue my work.

Next image show my test.

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

When i move needle closer magnet or coil same effect happend,,,needle start to rotate,,so magnet-screw exist.
I dont know why and how.

Next image show balance.

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

I put in the coil to different iron-thing (A,B),,,both case this iron-thing goes middle of center-coil.

So,,this magnet-flow pull this iron to it's mass-centerpoint.

Therefore my test proved that there is some kind of matter-flow which comes in both end of magnet/coil and come out center.

I dont see any kind of error on my test?

 []

[allien]

So,,this magnet-flow pull this iron to it's mass-centerpoint.

length center or mass center? Do you have this kind of experiment.

My theory is based on particle too. So I am similar idea like yours. I always think natural magnets as pumps.
What they pump?
Some tiny particles (maybe electrino and positrino).
How?
like electron emitters, some atoms pull tiny particles from one side and push it from different side.
Why?
Because of Osilation of (positive and negative) quarks in nucleons depending lattice structure of atoms.
Do I have solid prof?
Of course NO. [B)]    
Do we need to stop thinking?
Of course NO. Fisrt we must have an idea before prove (disprove) it with science. [)] So math and experiments could come later, this must not be problem. [^]

[Hei-Tai (OP)]

So,,this magnet-flow pull this iron to it's mass-centerpoint.

length center or mass center? Do you have this kind of experiment.

 []

Mass-center,,,i test it.

 []