The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: unified "theory"= universal principle law  (Read 3584 times)

universalprinciplelaw

  • Guest
unified "theory"= universal principle law
« on: 23/04/2009 22:30:59 »
That which is theoretical can never truly "unite." ( A term logically paradoxical and oxy-moronic)I have discovered the Universal Principle Law 'driving' the universe. This is as a result of discovering the value of... PI! Thus E=M mc"2". Where M is necessarily the Universal Principle Law. M=PI(revealed)! M is NOT membranous nor string. However 'in essence'( though purely illusory) these two(membrane and string) are accounted for by means of  M implication(s).Yet, when fully realized; M is much more phenomenal. I have discovered the relationship('pattern') of the Fib sequence as relating to M= PI. The golden ratio( "Geo-welding a rate ion(n)"...there are many more idiomatic expressions found within those two words; not easily discerned) is briliantly defined and elaborated upon relative to M principles and laws. Ensuing from this is the relationship between all animate and inanimate” being." This discovery does indeed explain physics; astronomy; history; linguistics,entropy, symmetry, the 4 forces(among others principally existential and innate); Thermodynamics, C"2", speed of light(constant); relativity principles eloquently defined;dimintion(plethoric..inflated illusory) etc.. All of these sciences share a peculiar yet realized affinity.  This representative of PI(M in E=Mmc"2") manipulation of all that is. M=Universal Principle Law. How this discovery came about will shock the senses for it is related to the driving force that even asserted itself into the full spectrum of mans language and syntax. Truly 'when unified theory is discovered it may be so simple' as to have been "star-ing" us in the face all a-long. I am seeking competent individuals to collaborate with so as to present these unequivocal discoveries to the masses. Please feel free to contact me at universalprinciplelaw@yahoo.com. Phone # 1-304-222-4067. Or Martin, P.O Box 1715 Beaver , WV. 25813.
 The answer to all that is or will ever "be" is("to be") found within each perspective human language...Pi has resided dormant within our very language. Idiomatically and phonetically.
 Idiom: an expression( Pi expression) whose meaning is not predictable( thus the omni-theories) from the usual meanings of its constituent elements,... or from the general grammatical rules of a language, ...and that is not a constituent of a larger expression of like characteristics.
   As well the word LINGUISTICS is defined in the following way: (Wicipedia): Linguistics is the scientific study of natural language. Thus through a SCIENTIFIC approach to language it lead to  profound Pi discoveries (and a myriad of other scientific  applications).


 

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
unified "theory"= universal principle law
« Reply #1 on: 24/04/2009 01:06:06 »
Well, I don't know. I read your post twice and I still don't know what it is that you propose.
 

universalprinciplelaw

  • Guest
unified "theory"= universal principle law
« Reply #2 on: 24/04/2009 10:10:49 »
Vern. I perused your ideas. Interesting. I would like to make some observations in regard to your first picture. Imagine that the large circle is a platform ...( an M..platform). A plane if you will. You exist on this plane and are peering through your plane of existence. The object of your interest is the smaller circle "facing" you. You are motionless at first( at rest) because the object that you are looking at simultaneously stopped when you did. You feel important because you associate the simultaneous resting of the object( just as you stopped) that you are looking at to be its "taking an interest in you.' You become bored with your over analyzing ( as if a light would somehow be thinking of you and observing you equally) the situation and begin to walk away. However a chill comes over you because as soon as you began to move you notice PI-ripherally( are I picture ally)that; at that exact moment the smaller circle moves. You stop it stops. Strange (= E-gene(M=mc)(energy- backward) are radius! Hmm. Phenomenal( picture nominal....look up the word nominal in a dictionary). Now imagine that the big circle represents you looking at a lightning bug ('cube beginning; teach Jah I el'). However again you begin to analyze. If you consider the distance between you and the lightning bug( the big circle(you) and the little circle) you realize scientifically that the reverse could be true  that you are really the lightening bug( the small circle)and the "bigger" circular/ magnifying glass represents an intelligent person looking "out "at you. What do I mean? Well if the lightening bug represents one side of a straw(a tube( e-beauty)-G+U+B= BUG) and you the other, then it( the bug) would look small to you as a result of distance and you would look small to it, from its perspective factoring in distance. You are relative to one another as a result of both being a component PART of the analogous tube/straw. So what do we have to decide? who is controlling the direction of the tube connector. If the small circle were asserting itself and desiring to move one way, and you the other eventually your connection to it would be ripped away. But you have concluded that their is a strange affinity. Indeed a sort of cooperation . You intellectually think it is you guiding the path and acceleration and it is favorable to you that the bug wishes to be your companion thus perpetually it acquiesces to your intent. However argumentatively the little circle( which may be bigger or smaller than you based upon distance) may be "simply elementally", inherently, and intellectually "mere-ore-ly" allowing you to control the light tube. At any time. If it were a thinking entity it could assert itself and rip away the relativity that is occurring. What would happen if the lightening bug did this? I will let you reason on that. I will state the proposal that you inquired about. What you just experienced is a Universal Principle Law...at Yah who? dot(deity) com(come). Indeed ( in deity)! you  just experienced M=Universal principle law. You just interacted ..OF NECESSITY with your allotted energy photon. You are a colorful being...a spectrum of the white light photon that is peering down(out, Up, right, left) at you from the other end of the TUBE("to be"). Photon you say. Indeed! a picture towing you are..an animated being originating at the other end of the relativity. You are the singularity the lightening bug is the singularity. A dual singularity if you will. Why? Because of the Universal principle law singularity phenomenon of M= Universal Principle Law. Who is towing who. Well the word Photon tells us. If the other end of the tube represents a photon and you are the spectrum then of course because you are you and it is the photon   it is towing you. You are the ______ that is being towed.  you are Not an impersonal picture because you are animated relative to the equally as animated and ever existential Photon. However what if the Photon moved away from its parallelism to you....you who resides on the perpendicular plane "larger" circle, relative to the smaller circle which is a counterpart of you(with you)? You decide.

 This introduces your second picture. What did you mean when saying: "both(dual) of its electromagnetic planes."? I would assume that you are realizing that E+ represents the photon. Thus B as to E+ would fittingly represent  the Plane of light from the Photon toward( to) you. If this were true then this would represent the "Other" side of straw relative to your side. You missed something though. You should have rotated the photon(E+) toward the spectrum (E-) so that both B of E+ and B of E- would touch heads. What I mean is : Imagine that you turn E+ counter clockwise ( don’t worry about E- it will, "naturally" follow "suit") a quarter of a turn(90 degrees. Now you will see the M-relativity. the singularity is a little off in your illustration. If you rotate it  in the way I described then the point right above E+ "head( the point on the circumference just above the letter E(+) will exactly appropriate the universal principle law (=M) everything else will automatically conform to your prerogatives......for it is a Universal Principle Law! Thus the perspective plane B's( "to be" 2C=C2), the yellows  will now "face" one another appropriate to M. Thus while being demonstratively parallel as to plain( E+ plane as to E- plane)...the Photon E+ will be perpendicular to the plane of E-(B as to E-), and Visa versa. It is always true that the Visa(E+) is the real photon( and light spreads out appropriately and infinitely so as to expand or contract E- at any time( relative to E+ relative to M-perpendicular plane) Thus it really is the 'Via say' for even though it collides at the M-singularity with "you" the E- it continues to pass through M after depositing and maintaining E-, so long as the parallelism to M(B to B) of E= remains. When we make these tiny adjustments, tweak it a little( respectfully)this is why  E+ remains e+ after going through the plane of E-(=M relativity of E= to E-). What do I mean. Well......when you turn this scenario the way I asked......E- and E+ will touch  at their M-relativity, singularity, circumferential points( remember right above the perspective e.) Notice now that the "E+" that you have colored red (on the E- side) will  line up with the original "red" (should be white, but we wont be picky) of the E+ of the E+ side. In other words what we will have is the yellows of each (dual) side facing each other in parallelism;  the red + ( E+ verses E-negative)on the "real" photon side will be shown as reaching singularity with E- then going through it ( and continuing to travel beyond E- plane of existence). As for the 'blue' of the E- side and the blue of the E+ side; now they will represent appropriately the reciprocal plane of "reflection" of the E- back toward(to) the original E+ photon.
   We can discuss your other ideas if you would like in a future reciprocal( locker-pieces....locking the two pieces forming  the whole. Of the singularity...."LOCKER PI SEAR" (  The definition of sear in the PARTICLE-AIR  I am  confining to, namely : to burn or char the surface of ( Photon E+ colliding with the "surface" of M , producing your for SURE-Face. At the SURFACE of M!
   I have a riddle for you ( el-‘didder‘; ‘el doer‘;  ‘ el deed I are '...you are, we are!). If you have 3 cups on a table and you take one "mass"  cup away, how many "objects do you have remaining? Think about it and get back with me. You can be as philosophical or scientific as you wish. Now I wish to ask you what the following words and their definitions have in common. Following this I will give you an equation( equate-ion...."know it aqua"..Noah Aqua) to consider. I am looking forward to you (E+) ( as I hope you are looking Forward "equally" to me) responding ( ‘rays pending‘…‘Gene I DNA Bizarre‘).
   I tried to send the words for consideration..to much space. I will be glad to send it to you through other means if you would like. It will ‘ prove to be’ IN-LIGHT-IN-NIG(energy). For light = ELEGANT!
I sent the equation, let me know if you received it.
 
 

universalprinciplelaw

  • Guest
unified "theory"= universal principle law
« Reply #3 on: 24/04/2009 10:16:52 »
Think about this Vern........('inner rev(- - - -) A string ( as in string theory) to us is a string......to a microscopic creature it may represent a tube). Now think of that analogy in a macro sense...we are the micro-organism!
 

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
unified "theory"= universal principle law
« Reply #4 on: 24/04/2009 13:26:27 »
I read both of your postings again. After spending fifteen minutes or so, I still don't have a clear understanding of what it is that you are proposing. Your screen name, universal principal law says more than your posting :)

Is it possible that you could condense your post down to its essence and see if I can glean some meaning out of it.
 

universalprinciplelaw

  • Guest
unified "theory"= universal principle law
« Reply #5 on: 24/04/2009 22:37:25 »
Vern....I have changed your illustration (picture 2) to reflect what i am "postulating. Refer to attatchment. Consider this along with the equation i sent you.
 

universalprinciplelaw

  • Guest
unified "theory"= universal principle law
« Reply #6 on: 24/04/2009 23:44:42 »
Vern i have to go to work at the present time............i will send you a condensed form of ( or essence) of my postulate latter on tonight. Looking forward to it with eager anticipation.
 

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
unified "theory"= universal principle law
« Reply #7 on: 25/04/2009 00:50:27 »
It will be better if you post your responses in the public forum. We can conduct the correspondence here. We don't want to leave out any lurking readers if we happen to discover some new and useful principal. :)

What would be good is that you could condense the essence of your assertion down to a paragraph or so, and we could then discuss it on its merits.

 

universalprinciplelaw

  • Guest
unified "theory"= universal principle law
« Reply #8 on: 25/04/2009 07:21:53 »
By November 5th 1991 I had concluded that the advocates of a completely electromagnetic universe were probably correct. Quantum Mechanics, admittedly the most successful theory yet conceived, was non-the-less wrong at its philosophical foundation. All of the elementary particles were simple constructs of electromagnetic energy. (electrode to the "magnetic" field M=e- of E+)
At first I thought I had stumbled upon some great truth, but then after several years researching the old texts and documents squirreled away by scientists of the early 20th century, I saw that this was an old idea. I saw mention in some of Einstein's published memos that James Clerk Maxwell, Lorentz, and Poincare worked on that assumption, leading to The Lorentz_ether_theory ....(ether spelled backword........reactor:  Thus; ether(grey matter= E- plethoric by means of E+ communicated to M)) =M( though not an ether as we would think). The Ether represents the E- existentials throughou the universe...insinuated as a result of the M-phenomonon throughout the Universe)
These great men worked out the details of just how matter so constructed must behave when subjected to motion( MUST BEHAVE( be halph)...for the Motion of E- is intimately related to the motion of its E+ counterpart....its duality, sharing the 'same place in space time' as the E+ due to the M(UPL)). Being constructed entirely of light( BRAVO! everything is 'invisible SPACE energy enclosed at perticular places in space due to thin lined circumferential perimeters. The LIGHT TUBE), any particle ( 'Part I seal'....E+origin seals E+ at a parralellism to M thus resulting in the other part's existence(E-)) of matter( 'Mat Tier'....= M-plain, platform (perpendicular to light cone from E+ to E-)(E- existence...."mass") would need to distort when in motion because of the invariance of the speed of light.( hmmm.  the distortion occurs when the light colides with the 'surface' of M and continues to distort away from the original path of light as it travels 'through' M; and produces the light angle ..deviation of the spectrum of "Mass" color. The path of light does NOT distort until it confronts the perpendicular horizon point of M...the singularity of E+ to E-. If M is NOT relative to the path of light; light does not distort and its path remains ... unaltered. As well its rings remain perfectly circular. E-Q(ube)-WALL-E- they  expand exponentially proportionate to how far it travels( infinitely... Thus: The diameter of  the  larget 'Photon', that is still traveling, is incomprehensible. If it were to reach an M-platform(presuming their was an 'enough-sized' M(=ether) plane to communicate it completely, ORE to contain it) the organism that would be produced would be infinitely gigantic. But of course: A little speck of light from the 2 inch diameter of a flashlight/ Bug( "Be HUGE'), would grow to 'this' size, if it NEVER colided with an M plane) ). It is the M(UPL) that causes the perfect circle photon to warp or stretch into the E- organism as well as the alloted space of the organism (space-mass 'RELATIVITY'). As well it is M that causes the "BOW"  of the original perfect circle(s). The stretching if you will.(stretch= "austere etching"). Look these two words( austere and etching) up in depth.( deep teach) The equations for this distortion are called the Lorentz Transformations.( trans-form= E+....the E- represents Ions on a mat...an Mplatform/plane mat. Thus the E- is the sub-form of the E+ trans-form) The distortion itself is called Relativity Phenomena.( But of course it is...relativity of E+to E-.by means of M...thus why,  purely observationally, the distortion(distort-ION) occurs) This phenomena is now well known and proven beyond any reasonable doubt.( I couldnt have said it more PUNCTURE- RATED myself.)
But the phenomena of Relativity and the Theory of Relativity are very different things. ( theory= 'teach eirie'...strange, odd, scientifically clumsy to the point of reprehensibility... Phenomena on the "other hand" reads: 'picture in amena' ( where AMENA is the Koine Greek word for "so be it". It is the reality that the phenomena is superior to the theory ) The Theory of Relativity is Albert Einstein's attempt to explain Relativity Phenomena. I decided that Einstein's concept of variable space-time was wrong( Hmmmmmmm. I believe M(UPL) will prove to the contrary.) There could not be two causes for Relativity Phenomena.( remember the problem isnt the constant "very-ability" of space- time, rather; the problem lies with the two theories being opposed to one another.. Thus it is the two theories that contradict 'each other'. Equally "One of them"contradict the UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLE LAW of the variance of space-time!.... This due to the  the' varient of light' as a result of coliding with the' M-Wall')
Variable space-time could not exist in a universe in which Relativity Phenomena is accounted for by the distortion of matter due to the fixed speed of light.(really..hmmmmmmmmmm.) For this to happen, the speed of light must be fixed( as it is! When its light colides with M producing the 'light cone'(tube: macro-string)(E+ photon on one side; E- on the other) in a special frame( see your seeing it just dont realize it...a "special frame"relative to light photon is E-=M-frame of E+...'.look up' the word frame ) of reference that is at rest in space.( The M=ether...Wall... is always at rest.. It never moves! What are the implications? We are 'living in a fish bowl' The M is the thin circumference of the bowl itself (surface) as well the water inside(the thickness). We are the E- swimmers...contained in the M (UPL) relative to the E+ space around the bowl. Thuis it(M) never moves because the universe is full of its ...'water'. Their is no place for it to go unless it spills out of the universe and empties its contents. Our Universe IS("to be") closed yet sufficiently endowed to produce and maintain all light space energy existential(s).) The invariance of the speed of light as measured by anyone moving is the result of the distortion of matter as it moves. ( the invarience of the speed of light as it relates to whatr 'we see and experience' is as a result of the distortion of LIGHT as it moves at constant C speed. Thus it is M that distorts and of necessity we distort. Light only distorts at 'that place in space-time'. Thus matter has not much to do 'with the matter'...of distortion. If E-= E+( E="mc".."2") then E- only distorts because something distorts E+(=E-). As well the speed of light is only 'seemingly' altered( slowed down for it never goes faster nor c2's) Llight photon(s), even inside of us, travels continually at the speed of light. It is the 'Loopin effect' (rotation of light trapped inside an M organism) that seems "TO US" to be a slowing down of light speed. It is the M(UPL) that creates this "simple, elemental...MERE-ORE effect. Illusion: "EL -LUCERE-ION"). M is transparent like glass! Only when peering through its middle (through its annealed 'green' thickness...hardness) does it deviate  from its  clear(combined with greyish backdrop= circumferencial demarcation of universe) transparent-ness to a Briliant and colorful core(thickness). Of course the only way to view this would be to get "outside the fishbowl'(UNIVERSE) so as to peer through the thickness of the universe. EXTRA DIMINTION sharing the same place in space time, within or own universe... we are approaching an understanding of it)... Vern(veering... of light photonE+ at the singularity with E-...=...M) you let me know if you wish for me to continue. It is your Thesis, i merely offer my respectful "opin-ion(s). 'OPINE IONS are like EyeBALLS....we are all IONS.' Thus we interact and share our  Ionic EYE deas with each other. Through such mutual interchange we may are-eye-ve at delightful scientific realities...together.
 

universalprinciplelaw

  • Guest
unified "theory"= universal principle law
« Reply #9 on: 25/04/2009 07:23:35 »
Thanks for your insight. I just downloaded this chat forum thus am consumed by frustration trying to utilize it to the full. I am  pitifully computer illiterate. Your suggestion is acknowledged. However...sigh! How do i post in the "public forum"? As well I hope I understood you correctly as to your desire to continue  carrying on this correspondence privately. For personal reasons( innate to the discoveries) I do not wish to "give away" these realities ( from a 8 yer long  arduous pursuit, primarily with regard to  Pi as it relates to Geometry) frivolously. Admittedly there are a lot of "strong minds" that frequent this site( not dissimilar to yourself)I do not want to prematurely introduce these things to too many. Rather, as I have stated: I wish to discern those who would be agreeable and properly disposed   toward assisting me in introducing these profound relevancy's. I could, in a  paragraph (along with a few vivid illustrations and pictures)....reconcile all of physics inquiry. Given the applications of it to the sciences that IS a modest statement.However I will NOT do that. I will occasionally find others who I can engage in regard to these matters....eventually i will find the right ones( competent and not trapped in a warping of science.)( as a few of your responces to people (recently) indicate that you are aware of the sad plight of science.)  I have no doubts that if the knowledge , resources, and competency of all those involved( through a separation of the 'wheat from the chaff") were synchronized with the M-Universal Principle Law...as will be elaborated upon, these things will  naturally be rushed to the public...the world. In time!......Time= EMIT! However i wish to simplify the PHONETICS of it all ( as your Thesis is similar in referring to PHOTONICS....their is a relationship.) By doing this maybe you can get around the "clutter" of my perpetual scrutinizing of words (and demonstrating there relevance) and "glean" from my statements the scientific principles and laws...M=Universal. Thus the following remarks should put you on right plane relative to my Plane( with regard to a consideration of the Phonetic " revelations"). Thus proceeds the condensing and the postulate.
   Illustration: look at the word Condensation. first I will "draw" your attention to a particular definition of the word: a condensed mass. OK...condensed from what? E+....to E-! Photon non-geometry ( though a superior form in itself) to Photon copy (e-). Now consider another definition: the act or process of reducing a gas or vapor to a liquid or solid form. You tell me ..what am i about to say? Indeed! The process of reducing the Photon( that possesses energy) to a liquid( as in water or a solid as in you and i). Now consider the Pi expressions: CON= Sowing( Ce+OWE+IN), son/Sun (C+O+N)  CO-In( where "CO" means: cobalt; var. of com- before a vowel, h, and gn: coadjutor; cohabit; cognate. The prefix co- now productively forms new words from bases beginning with any sound (conspirator; manage; coseismic), sometimes with the derived sense “auxiliary, subsidiary (coenzyme; copilot.........INDEED! E- is a Co-pilot to E+; a component and subsidiary part of the whole of E+=mc(E-), and, in mathematics and astronomy, with the sense complement (codeclination). Chemistry. a reaction between two or more organic molecules leading to the formation of a larger molecule and the elimination of a simple molecule such as water or alcohol.
9. Meteorology. the process by which atmospheric water vapor liquefies to form fog, clouds, or the like, or solidifies to form snow or hail. Can you see where the E+ is being discussed CON-TRARY to the E-? Physics. the relative amount by which the density of an elastic medium(M) varies from its average value(before the Photon collides with it) as a sound wave(C-sound wave) passes through it. condensate, compression, contraction, abridgement(M= E- as to E+), abridgment

    CON..continued= inner see(N+O+see...or 'I Know; see') ; In awake(N+OWE+C.. The C pronounced as a K or guttural as in the word "cup").
   The next letters in the word condensation is Dense: Mathematics. of or pertaining to a subset of a topological space in which every neighborhood of every point in the space contains at least one point of the subset.Opaque, with good contrast between light( the little circle bright) and dark areas( the bigger circle...E- at variance due to distance.). Used of a photographic negative. an E- as to an E positive(photon). Permitting little light to pass through(M), because of compactness of matter(M= e- "matter"; "mass". Difficult to understand(E+) because of complexity or obscurity( related to M).Having the constituent parts massed or crowded together; close; compact; thick; containing much matter in a small space; heavy; opaque; as, a dense crowd; a dense forest; a dense fog. permitting little if any light( in every square micro-inch of space) to pass through. ( E- is only receiving a little bit of this light through the light cone(tube).
    You can continue to break down the PI expression by closely listening to the word Condensation and thus finding the many words that exist their in.
    Postulate.............oscillate, ustulate, osculate; estolate,....power(P+owe+e(s)) (opposite: Owe+ Pe+ ES+ U+T); Post (after) you late". We came second! Stylate..dialate ( cause to Expand..ing Universe= 'R' Universe..where the R is necessarily omitted for the present time.
    Now 'do you C What( watch= 'teach double you')eye am ("to be"...tube) talking( talk-energy...TALC.."IN"...To apply this substance to a photographic plate, ) about( A Bow U Te...Beauty!).'
    Dense: relatively(relative to E+) opaque; transmitting little light, as a photographic( Photon-graphic= E- as to E+) negative, optical glass( the eye), or color( the spectrum images produced by the optic eye).
   E+ = Light Energy!         E-   = " light energy"   "copy". (R= M).  E- is a reflex -ion....it reacts instantaneously  to E+ my means of M.              Reflex: Physiology. noting or pertaining to an involuntary response to a stimulus, the nerve impulse from a receptor being transmitted inward to a nerve center that in turn transmits it outward to an effector. ( A. C current..eddy light cone between E+ and E-)2. occurring in reaction; responsive.3. cast back; reflected, as light, color, etc.4. bent or turned back ( warped space light energy = M            ACTS from an outside force/source(E+....from E+ origin).    Assiduous ACTS (of E+). The relationship between E+ and E- is represented by an "alternating current" (eddy....M= Magnetic plane; receives this eddy current and traps it 'at that place in space time'....by means of a light cone(tube-" macro-string). I have to stop there. Again these phonetic observations....lead to ......the value of PI! Even though they are sound (transparent, clear.realized) it still took me 8 years to fully come to understand it. Either (Ether) you can take these things and run with them....ORE you can choose to collaborate with me so as to present the 8 years( 23 years of linguistic studies) of discoveries i have made. I will await your RE-SPONSE.    ...Rays (Radius...ray-dios).........power  in ...SEE! Genesis 11: 1-9(19)(pay close attention to (uni)verse... (6); Job 42:2;  Habakkuk 3:4. 

 

The Naked Scientists Forum

unified "theory"= universal principle law
« Reply #9 on: 25/04/2009 07:23:35 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums
 
Login
Login with username, password and session length