The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: CREATION scientifically.  (Read 7384 times)

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
CREATION scientifically.
« on: 05/05/2009 17:34:05 »
Strange that science can not yet tell how the creation took place/happend!

In this way it went/goes.

CREATION scientifically.

There are only three different types of things.

1. Thought

2. Energy

3. Space


All, therefore, consists of one and the same thing which can be called energy. Energy is a state does not change. Space does not expand or bend/curv.

The idea of God or the creator of the intelligent designer, namely me, he created the even-fold universe force our ideas on energy. Me, he moved to a steady state of scattered energy density energyconcentrations ideas about force. We wanted to experience for ourselves and forget about everything for everything. Now we are once again finding themselves ourselves.

All phenomena can be explained by the pressure fluctuation based on the fact that the energy of atoms changes the nucleus at all times less energy, high-density mode, which is not expanding or bending/curving!

What else nucleus of atoms could be as one and the same energy which can be called?

Surely there is a so-called. protons and neutrons which is so called quarks, but all of these in a separate energy concentrations comprise one and the same thing that we like to call energy. At one and the same issue has ability snuggle up smaller area mode, in which energy is more densely and the ability to deploy larger area mode when energy is less frequent.

The whole visible universe is the history of the energy density of atoms in the nucleus has changed in less high-density, and this has resulted in pressure fluctuations, etc.




Otherwise it will not create the need!

Now you know how it happened in creation. You were involved in creating this universe and you were involved forget about ourselves. Now you're a part of discovering ourselves.

Nice time for us!
« Last Edit: 05/05/2009 21:19:17 by BenV »


 

Offline BenV

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1503
    • View Profile
Re: CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #1 on: 05/05/2009 21:18:40 »
This looks like complete nonsense to me.

Maybe it's a language thing, but first you say there are three types of things, then you say that they are all energy, then you go on to say that you are god, then I get lost in the nonsense...

Furthermore, stop spamming your website.  It's in your profile - if anyone wants to read more about what you have to say they can find it there. 

There is no need for you to start any new threads discussing your theory, add your new thoughts to the existing thread
« Last Edit: 05/05/2009 23:10:01 by BenV »
 

lyner

  • Guest
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #2 on: 05/05/2009 23:13:48 »
Quote
Strange that science can not yet tell how the creation took place/happened!
And have you provided anything better? You have just made assertions with no evidence at all.
 

Offline Don_1

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6890
  • Thanked: 7 times
  • A stupid comment for every occasion.
    • View Profile
    • Knight Light Haulage
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #3 on: 06/05/2009 08:46:17 »
Strange that science can not yet tell how the creation took place/happend!

Not so strange, though, is that science can tell how evolution took place.

.......The idea of God or the creator of the intelligent designer, namely me, .....

As an atheist, even I find this highly offensive. You are either mocking or insulting the religious and their beliefs, or in the eyes of them, you have committed just about the greatest blasphemy.
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #4 on: 06/05/2009 09:25:59 »
Quote
Strange that science can not yet tell how the creation took place/happened!
And have you provided anything better? You have just made assertions with no evidence at all.

Everything what you can see, heard, taste, smell or feel, proof that i am right.



Like sun.

5 billion years ago all that energy, what sun already emit/radiate, was inside sun. So, then that energy was more density, what it is now.

Same thing happen inside nucleus of atoms.



And yes, there is only energy, but that energy is in space. Energy + space is two things.

And ofcourse we cant forget thought, because we can think about everything.

Three things what we need, when we maked new Universe, after all energy is exploding in same level density energy, you know.

.
 

Offline BenV

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1503
    • View Profile
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #5 on: 06/05/2009 09:30:55 »
Nope, I still don't understand you, sorry.
 

lyner

  • Guest
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #6 on: 06/05/2009 12:22:49 »
I thought that this was supposed to be a Science forum.
Let's have some, then.
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7709
    • View Profile
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #7 on: 06/05/2009 12:27:15 »
E=mc2
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7709
    • View Profile
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #8 on: 06/05/2009 12:27:36 »
Let's see you beat that!! :P
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #9 on: 06/05/2009 18:56:30 »
E = space who exploding in backround space who dont expanding at all.

nucleus of atoms is exploding energy/space who exploding in backround who dont expanding.

Should physicists eat testosterone that they understand the same as me?

I produce testosterone is too much and it creates a sense of pressure in the left side of the brain. Therefore, the more I use the right side of my brain.

The problem is that other part to think creatively in the same left-side brain.

Ask some of Savant what they are think about onesimpleprinciple of idea.
 

Offline BenV

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1503
    • View Profile
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #10 on: 06/05/2009 19:36:59 »
Nope, sorry, you're still not getting your message across.  I do not understand what you are trying to communicate.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8667
  • Thanked: 42 times
    • View Profile
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #11 on: 06/05/2009 20:08:41 »
"I produce testosterone is too much and it creates a sense of pressure in the left side of the brain. Therefore, the more I use the right side of my brain."

There's an obvious retort to that.
Is it a problem of too much bollocks?
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #12 on: 07/05/2009 09:50:32 »
Perhaps physicists should take 15 minutes, the dose per pulse magnetic brain's left of that first? Then they too can handle the new physics at the right side of the brain?

http://areena.yle.fi/toista?id=2173410


There is some finnish, but everything important with english.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8667
  • Thanked: 42 times
    • View Profile
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #13 on: 07/05/2009 20:08:29 »
"Perhaps physicists should take 15 minutes, the dose per pulse magnetic brain's left of that first? Then they too can handle the new physics at the right side of the brain?"
Or perhaps not. Maybe they would prefer physics that makes sense without temporary electrically or pharmacologically induced brain damage.
 

Ethos

  • Guest
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #14 on: 07/05/2009 20:19:29 »
Should physicists eat testosterone that they understand the same as me?
Sooooo, how much testosterone does it take to understand like you do? Sounds like you've been sucking down quite a bit of it lately! Hey,....hey?
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #15 on: 09/05/2009 12:58:29 »
Should physicists eat testosterone that they understand the same as me?
Sooooo, how much testosterone does it take to understand like you do? Sounds like you've been sucking down quite a bit of it lately! Hey,....hey?

I dont need extra testosterone, because i have my own testosterone enaf. I have a strong libido and i can make love all day long.

I think physics needs some extra testosterone or magnetic pulse for left side brain, and then they maybe understund how simple that Universe really are.

I am sorry about Stephen Hawking, but Stephen just think about and think about and think about and thats why he cant see how simple that Universe really is!

 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7709
    • View Profile
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #16 on: 09/05/2009 13:10:07 »
I have a strong libido and i can make love all day long.
Now you're just showing off. :)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #17 on: 09/05/2009 13:22:44 »
I have a strong libido and i can make love all day long.
Now you're just showing off. :)

You post to read why savant people have this kind of talent. Too much testosterone too early... . Yes, maybe testosterone dont working later, but magnetic pulse working and after that you can using yours right side brain.

I can already using my right side brain and i can see how simple that Universe really is.

And quess what. Space dont expanding. YES. Space really dont expanding or bending or doing anything, you know!
« Last Edit: 09/05/2009 13:24:19 by JukriS »
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7709
    • View Profile
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #18 on: 09/05/2009 13:31:55 »
Alright, you win! Space isn't expanding. Are you happy now?
 

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #19 on: 28/05/2009 19:46:39 »
At least we can agree on one thing. Space is not expanding. We have struggled under that assumption since Einstein suggested that space and time were variables. With that concept, we will never understand the true nature of the universe. But when we consider space and time as the constants they truly are we are forced into a narrow range of possibilities to explain the workings of nature. 
 

lyner

  • Guest
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #20 on: 01/06/2009 13:10:19 »
I have a strong libido and i can make love all day long.
Now you're just showing off. :)
That made me think of the Woody Allen quote:
"I'm a fantastic lover. I practice a lot. Alone"
Hmmm, I wonder.
Isn't there a well known word for that sort of person?
 

Offline Don_1

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6890
  • Thanked: 7 times
  • A stupid comment for every occasion.
    • View Profile
    • Knight Light Haulage
CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #21 on: 01/06/2009 13:29:41 »
I have a strong libido and i can make love all day long.
Now you're just showing off. :)
That made me think of the Woody Allen quote:
"I'm a fantastic lover. I practice a lot. Alone"
Hmmm, I wonder.
Isn't there a well known word for that sort of person?

Yes, I believe they work for the likes of Barclays, Nat West, HBOS, Lloyds etc.
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

CREATION scientifically.
« Reply #21 on: 01/06/2009 13:29:41 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums