The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe  (Read 4236 times)

Offline kongkokhaw

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Hi, I am a new comer. It is glad to meet you guys who enthusiastic in physics.

I would like to share something different about physics where I try to understand physics in a whole in stead of piece by piece. The same science findings may have different kinds of explanations depending on the scientists who conduct the experiments. Although some theories and interpretations base on their findings were established, but they are still questionable and subject to further discussion.

I have reconstructed many of the old findings and new discoveries about physics. I have also put everything together into a common theory of everything, where the theory is powerful, universal and applicable to almost everything.

If you believe that the Universe is began from a big bang, or the universe is 'made' of something, then, everything appears in this Universe shall have the same ingredients. Begin from here, new theories are developed base on and by understanding their ingredients. Once you understand the ingredients, everything is easy to explain.

Below posts, I will highlight few contradictions about some physics theories which was established by the previous scientists. Those theories may still be widely used, but, most of them are only applicable to certain phenomena and contradict with other findings. Those theories face bottle neck when try to develop further. One of such theories is the wave function for electrons in atom. This wave function may apply to simple atom model, but it cannot explain the multiple shapes of molecules such as the 'V' shape of water molecule. Furthermore, the wave function itself uses lots of arbitrary assumptions.


 

Offline kongkokhaw

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe
« Reply #1 on: 17/05/2009 13:46:21 »
Few of my key understandings are posted as follow and followings posts:

Q1) From pair production and annihilation process, matter can be converted into wave and wave can be transformed into matter. Also in radioactive, matter can transform into radiation by reducing the mass. From these, can we conclude that matter and wave are having the same ingredients? In another word, whatever ingredients possessed by wave shall be the same to matter.

A1) My understanding is, both matter and wave are having the same ingredients, but in different form and interchangeable depending on the conditions. From here, a new theory on particle and atom is developed. This new theory on atom is proven that tally with many old science findings, but in different explanations. I have posted a comprehensive explanations and derivations including graphical presentation in this link newbielink:http://www.greatians.com/physics/mass.htm [nonactive], or more specifically for the new atom model at newbielink:http://www.greatians.com/physics/mass/atom%20model.htm [nonactive]

This website also explains why electrons never collapse into nucleus of an atom.

For variuos shapes of molecules, the quantum mechanics are developed to explain the shape. Few pictures are shown below. The link is at newbielink:http://www.greatians.com/physics/mass/chemical%20reaction.htm [nonactive]

The V-shape of H2O molecule is due to the quantum mechanics of atom. The shape is illustrated below.


The tetrahedron of methane moelcule is also due to the quantum mechanics of atom. The shape is decribed below.


The quantum mechanics of methane molecule is described below.
 

Offline kongkokhaw

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe
« Reply #2 on: 17/05/2009 15:44:31 »
Q2) From the theory on law of refraction, when light travels from one lighter medium to another heavier medium in terms of refraction index, the speed of light is slowed down. From the current theory about photon, photon possesses energy and momentum. The energy of photon is E=hf, where h = plank's constant and f = frequency of photon. Momentum of photon, p = hf/v, where v = velocity of photon.

The discrepancy is when photon/light travels from one medium to another medium of different refraction index, where the velocity changes, the energy of photon is conserved because frequency remains unchanged, but momentum changes because of changing in velocity. The energy is conserved but momentum is not conserved. This is a big discrepancy in the understanding of photon.

A2) Suppose, the energy and momentum of photons shall conserved in any medium under the condition of without energy transfer. A new look on light/photon is introduced here base on the conservation of energy and momentum. The energy, intensity and power of light are redefined. More comprehensive explanations, derivations and graphical presentations are posted in this link newbielink:http://www.greatians.com/physics/wave.htm [nonactive]

The energy and momentum of photon are described in detail in this link.
newbielink:http://www.greatians.com/physics/wave/energy%20of%20photon.htm [nonactive]

Photon is equivalent to one wavelength of electromagnetic wave. Light is a series of continuous photons. When an electron vibrates one time, it gives out one photon. Photon is quantized and countable. The relation of photon and light is illustrated below.

 

Offline kongkokhaw

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe
« Reply #3 on: 17/05/2009 15:51:55 »
Q3) What are the differences between light and photon? So far, the understanding of light is still very limited and students are taught with something confusive. In many secondary physics books, the light is interpreted like the magnetic and electric fields are alternating in sinusoidal form. The intensity of the light is depending on the amplitude of the magnetic or electric field. This is confused with the concept of photon where the energy of photon is only depending on its frequency. Base on conventional explanation about light, if a light source travels from the sun, its amplitude at the sun surface shall be very huge and reduces when reaches the Earth and very tiny when reaching Pluto. If this is the case, we may not able to detect a light from the other side of the Universe which is millions of light years from us. However, this is not the case.

A3) Due to the above confusion, a new theory about the light and photon is introduced. The light or electromagnetic wave shall be explained in terms of photons. The new explanations are posted in this link newbielink:http://www.greatians.com/physics/wave.htm [nonactive]

Figure below suggests the structure/components of a photon. The speed of photon is depending on its electric and magnetic component in vector.

 

Offline kongkokhaw

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe
« Reply #4 on: 17/05/2009 16:08:35 »
Q4) Does photon possesses size? If the size of photon is depending on the amplitude of its magnetic and electric field of the photon, when photon of different intensity enters into our eyes, can we able to distinguish and differentiate different kinds of colors and the boundary between few colors? If the amplitude of the photon is bigger than our eye ball due to high intensity, we may only see one kind of color. But these are not the case.

What happen to the amplitude of light when light is focused by a lens where the intensity increases at the focus point? Does smaller amplitude light combine to form a bigger amplitude light? Is this confuse you? Is there something wrong with the theory?

A4) Photon does possess a size. The size of photon is depending on its frequency/wavelenght. higher energy photon possesses smaller size. The size of photon does not change if its energy unchanged even after focused or diverted. The intensity of light is determined by the quantity of photons collected, but does not depend on the amplitude of light.

The size is so tiny that beyond the receptor size of our retina. Due to this reason, we are able to distinguish different kind of colors appear in this world. We can also distinguish the boundary of two different color. Due to this reason, we are able to notice a star which is located millions light year away from us by capturing the photons in quantity that give out by the star.

Also due to different size of photon, high energy photons such as X-ray is able to penetrate our body but not the compact bone. higher energy photon has high permeability due to smaller size of the photon.

More comprehensive explanations and derivations on the size of photon is posted in this link newbielink:http://www.greatians.com/physics/wave/photon.htm [nonactive]
 

Offline kongkokhaw

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe
« Reply #5 on: 17/05/2009 16:23:20 »
Q5) It is observed that our galaxy is 'flatten' in shape. The objects tend to circulate at the equator of the center of galaxy. Similar to our solar system, where the planets and objects tend to circulate at the equator, in planar around the center of the Sun. These phenomena are also observed to other galaxies and black holes, the circulating objects tend to fall on the equator of the center of attraction.

If the attraction force is governed by the mass dependent Newtonian gravitational force which has no preference in direction, the circulating objects shall form a spherical shape, as spherical as possible, where spherical shape has lower energy level compare to planar shape. But why this is not the case?

Also from Question 1, we understand that the ingredients of matter are similar to wave. Mass is no longer a base ingredients, the mass dependent Newtonian gravitational force is unable to become independent to create a force.

A5) Due to the observation of 'flatten' galaxy and black hole, where mass dependent Newtonian gravitation force is unable and not sufficient to describe the phenomena. Base on a new understanding about matter, a new gravitational force is introduced. This is cordially presented in detail in this link newbielink:http://www.greatians.com/physics/universe/gravity.htm [nonactive], where the actual forces that govern the activities of the Universe is introduced.

Figure below describes the actual forces that causes the 'flatten' galaxy where the galaxy system has lower energy level in 'flatten' shape.


 

Offline kongkokhaw

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe
« Reply #6 on: 17/05/2009 16:37:24 »
Q6) It is described that black hole is so massive and able to pull everything including light. However, light is mass-less, how can the light be attracted due to its mass according to mass dependent Newtonian gravitational force? Again, this is another big discrepancy on the current physics theories.

Again, objects that are pulled by black hole tend to orbit at the equator of the black hole.

A6) When light travels near to a black hole, it is observed that light is bent inward angle to the black hole. This is not due to the attraction force, but a phenomenon of diffraction of light. This is similar to when light is shone on a ball, the shadow of the ball becomes relatively smaller size on the target behind the ball. Also when you shine a light to a tiny ball, if the distance between the light source, tiny ball and target is far enough, you will not see the shadow of the tiny ball. The description of black hole is presented in this link newbielink:http://www.greatians.com/physics/universe/black%20hole.htm [nonactive]

Figure below is a photo taken of a black hole, treated to visible, where orbiting objects tend to fall to the equator of the black hole in order to achieve lower energy level.


Figure below suggests the acting forces that cause the shape of the black hole.

 

Offline kongkokhaw

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe
« Reply #7 on: 17/05/2009 16:48:46 »
Q7) Is there a boundary of the Universe? If yes, where is the boundary of the Universe?

A7) Yes, there is a boundary of the Universe. Unless the expansion rate of the Universe is at the speed of light or faster. However, it is observed that the expansion rate of the Universe is slower than the speed of light, otherwise, we will not able to see light/electromagnetic wave from a distant star at the boundary of the universe. The light will be stagnant at that particular position if the Universe is expanding at the speed of light. Since the expansion rate of the Universe is slower than the speed of light, and light travels faster than the expansion rate of the Universe, the light will be reflected at the boundary and keep within the Universe, otherwise, energy is not conserved in the Universe and we will not be able to detect the microwave background radiation. More detail explanations are posted on newbielink:http://www.greatians.com/physics/universe/properties%20of%20universe.htm [nonactive]

The boundary of Universe is defined by the lowest energy level where the kinetic energy of electrons at this level is at rest. The boundary of the Universe may not be in regular shape. Electromagnetic wave that reaches this boundary will be reflected.

Figure below shows the microwave background radiation of the Universe.
 

Offline kongkokhaw

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe
« Reply #8 on: 17/05/2009 17:05:07 »
Q8) It is predicted the existence of dark matter and dark energy in this Universe, but why still unable to detect it?

A8) The dark matter and dark energy do exist in this universe. The dark matter fills up the space of the whole universe. Dark matter is a kind of mass, similar to objects, having the same ingredients as matter. Objects such as planets and stars, are concentrated matter, therefore, objects are easily observed. While dark matter is loosen matter. We have been detected it, but do not aware its existence because the scientists oversight on the ingredients.

Dark matter forms the background matter throughout the whole universe while object matters are concentrated matter located at particular position in the space. The dark energy is related to the activities caused by the dark matter. More detail explanations are presented at newbielink:http://www.greatians.com/physics/universe/kong%20matter.htm [nonactive]

Figure below illustrates the difference between objects and dark matter. Dark matter forms the background matter of the Universe, while the concentrated matters are objects.

 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8655
  • Thanked: 42 times
    • View Profile
An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe
« Reply #9 on: 17/05/2009 18:07:51 »
I haven't read all the stuff you have posted; I doubt many will.
I'd just like to point out a couple of things. First Re "It is predicted the existence of dark matter and dark energy in this Universe, but why still unable to detect it?"
We did detect it.

Secondly I wonder what your idea has to offer that the conventional theory doesn't.
 

lyner

  • Guest
An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe
« Reply #10 on: 17/05/2009 18:23:45 »
You seem to have explained everything, from the few paragraphs I have read. Fantastic.
 

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe
« Reply #11 on: 18/05/2009 13:39:54 »
You show a quantum of energy consisting of one wave length of electromagnetic energy. I suspect that this is true. Many here do not agree. You seem to have stopped short of explaining what is mass. I suspect that mass is nothing more than electromagnetic change.

You mentioned that the electric and magnetic amplitude of a photon is missing in our current established theory. This is true. It is not needed because it is a constant. I speculate that the constant electric and magnetic amplitude of photons is the fundamental cause of all quantum phenomena. Plancks constant derives from this constant amplitude of photons.

Your theory seems a little off from the mainstream; however I did not find anything to refute. Maybe I missed something.

You may find some similar ideas to your own here

 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8655
  • Thanked: 42 times
    • View Profile
An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe
« Reply #12 on: 18/05/2009 21:18:39 »
If you crop a waveform down to just one cycle it's no longer possible to define the wavelength (and therefore the energy) accurately.
This seems to me to be rather a problem for anything that, for example, seeks to explain the spectra of atoms.
 

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe
« Reply #13 on: 18/05/2009 23:07:02 »
Quote from: Bored Chemist
If you crop a waveform down to just one cycle it's no longer possible to define the wavelength (and therefore the energy) accurately.
I can define it. I could just say the wave length is one meter. I think the problem comes when I try to measure it.
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

An alternative unified theory for matter, wave and Universe
« Reply #13 on: 18/05/2009 23:07:02 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums