The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Question about 100-metre sprint (too complex to fit here as question)  (Read 10465 times)

Herman Melville

  • Guest
The world record for the 100-metre sprint has been broken several times. However, this can't be broken indefinitely. For example, it will never be possible to run it in one second, or two seconds. Therefore, there must be an absolute limit that cannot be beaten, but what defines that limit?

Any thoughts on this?

Does this rule apply to any other human endeavours?



 

Offline neilep

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 20602
  • Thanked: 8 times
    • View Profile
I'm no expert (lol..I don't think i needed to actually announce that )...the limitations I would guess are bio-mechanical.  Oxygenation to the blood, physical movement of the muscles.......but...you know ?......I actually wonder if maybe one day humans may be able to run the hundred metres in a couple of seconds.

The future for humanity lays within the realms of genetics and/or cyber implants. It's vital for our survival. However, I am sure that without these additions ....that new methodologies to train and with advancements in dietry mechanics that by these developments in these fields I would expect humans to be able to run the 100 meters inside 5 seconds one day.
 

Offline Karsten

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
    • View Profile
    • Fortunately still only a game
And there are other limits:

1) Running surface
2) Shoe design
3) Rule changes
4) New medications (illegal or legal - depending on 3)
5) Genetic engineering
6) Improved aerodynamics (smaller heads? special clothing)

I would love to see someone running the 100m with the help of STRONG back winds! Illegal I know. Must feel great though and look spectacular.
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7709
    • View Profile
Maybe if they took lots of steriods they can do it in 9 seconds.
 

Offline Madidus_Scientia

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1451
    • View Profile
I dunno neilep, athletes are already squeezing every last bit they can from training methods and nutrition etc. and to double your speed is a hell of a lot to expect, i reckon you'd need definitely need a cyber implant or two to reach those speeds
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7709
    • View Profile
Carl Lewis ran 9.86 s in 1991, and considering that the time has only gone down 0.17 seconds in 18 years. It'll be another 500 years before humans will be able to run sub 5 second 100m dashes (if they will be able to at all that is)
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8669
  • Thanked: 42 times
    • View Profile
Imagine that there is some absolute limit, say 8 seconds.
The measurement of the 8 seconds will always be subject to some error. From time to time the error will be big enough to make it look like 7.9 seconds. Rather more rarely it will look like 7.8 sec. Very rarely indeed it wil look like 7.7 sec and so on.
 

Offline neilep

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 20602
  • Thanked: 8 times
    • View Profile
Well, I just did the 100 metres in 5 seconds so there !









erhmm...I was driving !...does that count ?
 

Offline LeeE

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3382
    • View Profile
    • Spatial
Specific people will have specific absolute limits at specific times; this is just down to the maximum power and stresses their muscles can generate and their skeleton cope with befoire they break themselves.  Improve the skeleton and muscles though, and the limit is raised, so there's no absolute limit for humans in general.

I'm with Neilp's initial answer.
 

lyner

  • Guest
There is the small matter of timing precision. Another decimal place will allow 'visible' improvements - quite illusionary - but good for keeping an interest in the sport.

A time may come when the personal costs for athletes to 'improve' their performances will be recognised as work related injuries and they will stop 'doing' records. The silly eating-related records have mostly disappeared from the Guinness  Book of records for the same reason.

Motor racing is a good example of a sport in which SAFETY looms large and the design criteria and rules have made 'records' irrelevant.  It's still good to watch, though.
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7709
    • View Profile
Imagine that there is some absolute limit, say 8 seconds.
The measurement of the 8 seconds will always be subject to some error. From time to time the error will be big enough to make it look like 7.9 seconds. Rather more rarely it will look like 7.8 sec. Very rarely indeed it wil look like 7.7 sec and so on.
I don't think it'll be off by that much, maybe more like 7.98 s, more rarely 7.94 and very rarely 7.90 s.
 

Offline Madidus_Scientia

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1451
    • View Profile
Specific people will have specific absolute limits at specific times; this is just down to the maximum power and stresses their muscles can generate and their skeleton cope with befoire they break themselves.  Improve the skeleton and muscles though, and the limit is raised, so there's no absolute limit for humans in general.

I'm with Neilp's initial answer.

You don't think there's some physiological limit to the speed at which a muscle can possibly contract, even with all the right conditions?
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7709
    • View Profile
Aren't we all forgetting air resistance here? ;D
 

Offline Madidus_Scientia

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1451
    • View Profile
Indeed, as you double speed you quadruple resistance
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8669
  • Thanked: 42 times
    • View Profile
Imagine that there is some absolute limit, say 8 seconds.
The measurement of the 8 seconds will always be subject to some error. From time to time the error will be big enough to make it look like 7.9 seconds. Rather more rarely it will look like 7.8 sec. Very rarely indeed it wil look like 7.7 sec and so on.
I don't think it'll be off by that much, maybe more like 7.98 s, more rarely 7.94 and very rarely 7.90 s.

I didn't say how rarely ;-)
the numbers were made up, but the idea is still valid.
 

lyner

  • Guest
They don't have 'records' in horse racing. That, I believe, is because they have been working on artificial selection for so long and the winning depends more on varying conditions than on differences the horses' physiques.
Could we really envisage breeding human sprinters? I would want not to be here.
 

Offline LeeE

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3382
    • View Profile
    • Spatial
Specific people will have specific absolute limits at specific times; this is just down to the maximum power and stresses their muscles can generate and their skeleton cope with befoire they break themselves.  Improve the skeleton and muscles though, and the limit is raised, so there's no absolute limit for humans in general.

I'm with Neilp's initial answer.

You don't think there's some physiological limit to the speed at which a muscle can possibly contract, even with all the right conditions?

Hmm... not until you get to really silly limits.  Humans struggle to get 4 steps/second when running but some humming-birds can flap their wings up to 90 times per second, so I think muscles could go quite some way further yet, before hitting general muscle related limits.
 

Offline turnipsock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 586
  • Beekeeper to the unsuspecting
    • View Profile
I was quite impressed that Usain Bolt's record was on Wikipedia before he even completed his victory lap.
 

Offline Karsten

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
    • View Profile
    • Fortunately still only a game
Aren't we all forgetting air resistance here? ;D

Like I suggested: Smaller heads. Big enough to attach a medal but much smaller than the current versions to reduce air resistance.
 

Offline Madidus_Scientia

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1451
    • View Profile
Specific people will have specific absolute limits at specific times; this is just down to the maximum power and stresses their muscles can generate and their skeleton cope with befoire they break themselves.  Improve the skeleton and muscles though, and the limit is raised, so there's no absolute limit for humans in general.

I'm with Neilp's initial answer.

You don't think there's some physiological limit to the speed at which a muscle can possibly contract, even with all the right conditions?

Hmm... not until you get to really silly limits.  Humans struggle to get 4 steps/second when running but some humming-birds can flap their wings up to 90 times per second, so I think muscles could go quite some way further yet, before hitting general muscle related limits.

But that's a very different animal, they probably have a much higher percentage of their weight in muscles dedicated just to flying, their respiratory system is probably optimised for delivering blood to wing muscles, they don't need as much oxygen for their brain, and they're only flapping through air, they're not hurling 70 odd kg of mass forwards. Basically they are built for it, but humans are not as specialised.
 

Offline LeeE

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3382
    • View Profile
    • Spatial
Specific people will have specific absolute limits at specific times; this is just down to the maximum power and stresses their muscles can generate and their skeleton cope with befoire they break themselves.  Improve the skeleton and muscles though, and the limit is raised, so there's no absolute limit for humans in general.

I'm with Neilp's initial answer.

You don't think there's some physiological limit to the speed at which a muscle can possibly contract, even with all the right conditions?

Hmm... not until you get to really silly limits.  Humans struggle to get 4 steps/second when running but some humming-birds can flap their wings up to 90 times per second, so I think muscles could go quite some way further yet, before hitting general muscle related limits.

But that's a very different animal, they probably have a much higher percentage of their weight in muscles dedicated just to flying, their respiratory system is probably optimised for delivering blood to wing muscles, they don't need as much oxygen for their brain, and they're only flapping through air, they're not hurling 70 odd kg of mass forwards. Basically they are built for it, but humans are not as specialised.

Sure, it's a different animal, but you asked if there was a limit to the speed that muscles could contract, even with the right conditions.  I cited the hummingbird to show that any limit to the speed that muscles can contract would seem to be a lot higher than humans currently achieve and that the current limitations on human muscle speed do not seem to be due to any such intrinsic limit on muscle speed.

Regarding specialisation; it's something that really needs to be qualified and carefully defined before it can be used with validity.  It's arguable that human athletes already show a very high degree of specialisation; a good high-jumper does not make a very good shot-putter, for example.
 

Offline Madidus_Scientia

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1451
    • View Profile
A human can specialise with training yes, but we haven't evolved to be specialised at running the way a hummingbird is at hovering, there's only so far training can get you and I don't think it'll get you to a 5 second 100m sprint without something a bit more than just training and diet
 

Offline LeeE

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3382
    • View Profile
    • Spatial
The difference between a good high-jumper and a good shot-putter isn't just down to training; they require significantly different body types.
 

Offline turnipsock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 586
  • Beekeeper to the unsuspecting
    • View Profile
you are born with fast twitch muscels...and that's it. You can tweak this with training...but if you are not born a sprinter you will never be one.

Usain Bolt, 9.77 tonight and he was slow out of the blocks so he will probably beat the world record again this year.

I'm starting to think the false start rule has something to do with this, Usain was expecting the usual one false start and didn't push hard...but when it didn't happen, he had lost time.
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7709
    • View Profile
The man seems to have appeared out of no where. But is he legal?
 

The Naked Scientists Forum


 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums