Naked Science Forum

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
09/09/2010 08:34:19
Forum HelpRecent Login Register
Topic
Board
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
992 Views

Can we "run out" of radioative materials?

Jessica H
Newbie
*
Posts: 49
United States

View Profile Take a look at my biography. WWW
Link to this post 273656
04/09/2009 16:46:32 »
You can find charts listing the relative abundance of elements in the universe(i.e. the most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and Helium).  Since some of these are radioactive, is the composition of our universe slowly changing? 

I'm a biologist, so I know that C-14 (radioactive carbon) is constantly being regenerated by the breakdown of nitrogen gas in the atmosphere, making carbon dating possible.

On the other hand, I assume that radioative Uranium on Earth is relatively finite, since it has to be made in the lab to get enough for bombs and energy???

Do we eventually "run out" of some radioative elements as they decay, or are all of them being constantly regenerated by some process?

Huh?
Jessica
Logged
RD
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4147


View Profile
Link to this post 274005
07/09/2009 12:42:09 »
Uranium is not going to decay away any time soon ...

Quote
The half-life of uranium-238 is about 4.47 billion years and that of uranium-235 is 704 million years
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium
Logged
Bored chemist
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5271
UK

View Profile
Link to this post 274072
07/09/2009 21:05:15 »
On our timescale we don't need to worry about uranium decaying before we use it. On the other hand, from a geological point of view the change can be significant.
When this happened
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_nuclear_fission_reactor
the proportion of the more easilly fissioned U235 was higher- otherwise the "reactor" would probably never have worked.
With "modern" uranium it wouldn't work- too much of the U235 has decayed so now we usually need to enrich the uranium to get fission reactors to work (there are other ways to get round it too).

On an even longer timescale things like supernovae produce "fresh" uranium- but you don't want to be there at the time.

Also there's the posibility of making radioactive materials in nuclear reactors.
Logged
Turveyd
Newbie
*
Posts: 25


View Profile
Link to this post 275338
15/09/2009 01:13:38 »

From my understanding there rare and getting rarer,  new reactors use them a lot more efficently though as there is no need to enrich the material for weapons these days.


There is a abundancy of Helium 3 they think on the moon though,  thats why the new interest in it,  bringing that back to earth would power everyone for 100,000years I heard,  this could be mainly speculation though.

Logged
JimBob
Neilep Level Member
******
Posts: 6754
Republic of Texas
Beaver-mania !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

View Profile Take a look at my biography.
Link to this post 275349
15/09/2009 02:50:36 »
Thorium is also being developed as a new nuclear fuel because of its relative abundance, low cost and short half-life.

Any question, ask Bass. 
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
  « previous next »
Jump to:  
Other Things on a Similar Subject.
Kitchen Science Podcasts Questions
Questions Articles Questions
Podcasts Articles Podcasts



Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 | SMF © 2005, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.051 seconds with 23 queries.