The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: An essay in futility, too long to read :)  (Read 279088 times)

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2050 on: 06/06/2016 08:02:05 »
So no, we're not in a simulation.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2051 on: 06/06/2016 08:05:47 »
The next question would be if a simulation would allow free choices. If you accept my idea of that creating limits, then those limits must exist for ones choices too. And a limited free choice is not a free choice. You can argue that physics set rules for all choices though.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2052 on: 06/06/2016 08:07:40 »
But a choice doesn't need to follow those rules, and looking at us, we don't follow them, unless forced by necessity, do we :) We have all kind of ideas, from ghosts existing to a flat earth.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2053 on: 06/06/2016 08:11:28 »
Free choice exist.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2054 on: 06/06/2016 08:16:37 »
The real point of it is that it won't matter. A infinity will still be infinite, the number of planets coming to no end, even though lesser than the volume of space. And that is an ever weirder thought, isn't it :)
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2055 on: 06/06/2016 08:17:51 »
And yes, a free choice must include free will.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2056 on: 06/06/2016 08:23:02 »
It depends on what one consider 'simulating' something too. If the simulation you make is indecipherable from what you call reality? Is it still just a 'simulation'?
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2057 on: 06/06/2016 08:24:45 »
We're not there, and probably never will be either. Not if we continue as now.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2058 on: 06/06/2016 08:45:40 »
Let's play the scenario one step further. In a 'perfect simulation', what would define you as its 'creator'? the ability to go down on a individual level, or your ability to close it down, change its origin of rules?
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2059 on: 06/06/2016 08:48:59 »
What do you think would be the level of expertise needed to 'go down' in such a simulation to redefine just one 'individual', without changing or disturbing the simulations general rules? And remember, we're defining this simulation as indecipherable from your own reality.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2060 on: 06/06/2016 08:50:33 »
I don't think it's possible myself, not if it include free will and infinity's.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2061 on: 06/06/2016 08:51:20 »
I'm not even sure if it's possible to close it down :)
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2062 on: 06/06/2016 08:53:50 »
It all depends on what one means by this 'simulation', doesn't it?
Imperfect? Or a perfect replica?
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2063 on: 06/06/2016 09:05:39 »
The universe use rules as far as I know, not magic. Now, if this universe would be magic instead, then you probably could do whatever you liked. Using rules though, the most I would expect is for you to set a origin, to then watch it unfold.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2064 on: 06/06/2016 09:08:57 »
And what join that origin, for you as well as for those 'inside it', should then be 'time'. All of this presuming it is possible, which I highly doubt.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2065 on: 06/06/2016 09:16:51 »
If we now could describe this infinite universe as a 'sphere' as seen from some 'higher dimension', then the number of planets are limited, and so must the volume of 'space' they exist in. What then would make us unable to prove it practically should be time. It all comes down to time, doesn't it.
==

A 'spheres surface' if so, not the 'volume' defining it, just that surface.
« Last Edit: 06/06/2016 09:18:52 by yor_on »
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2066 on: 07/06/2016 07:39:09 »
The idea of calling it a 'spheres surface' comes from two ideas. One is the 'holistic vision' in where we only might have one 'dimension' with the others being 'simulated' for our pleasure, possibly you can exclude the arrow from it too though? The other is this nagging feeling I still have of it being 'connections' that makes this universe. It 'communicates' itself into a reality as described from inside. So the 'sphere' is just a way of combining those two into a main stream description. If it's communication alone that makes it, not the idea of dimensions although they may be one way to describe it, then the universe becomes even more interesting to me :)
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2067 on: 07/06/2016 07:44:41 »
If the later is more correct then indeterminism is where it comes from, how then the rules for communication and acting is created is another thing, that I don't have a answer for so far, probably forever :) And indeterminism is no 'dimension'.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2068 on: 07/06/2016 07:47:02 »
But it still seems to me that there are evolutions going on, in several ways, ethics being one of the most important to me. We evolve.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2069 on: 07/06/2016 07:49:17 »
More precisely stated, either you evolve or you disappear. And that includes 'ethics' for those of us called humans, I think that's the next step we must take to survive.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2070 on: 07/06/2016 07:50:44 »
Mother Earth doesn't care, she have all the time in the world to try again if we now fail.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2071 on: 07/06/2016 07:53:29 »
To her your importance is no greater than the importance of a gnat, a flower or a tree. We overstepped our allowance here, so if there is a self regulating system we probably will get evicted from the premises. Unless we shape up.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2072 on: 07/06/2016 07:54:46 »
So, be a warrior. And start taking responsibility.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2073 on: 07/06/2016 08:17:05 »
Why she doesn't care? If now ethics is a step in the right direction? It's called 'free will', It's up to you.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11987
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2074 on: 07/06/2016 08:34:49 »
The most probable view I see is one in where we evict ourselves, by wars, overpopulation, and global warming, and as they grow we decline. And the reason we keep running away is your inability to assume responsibility for yourself. You lay it on hierarchies instead which have the effect of leaving no one responsible for anything. So the only thing left is that short time you exist, your immediate needs, and 'profits' as our common nominator and value meter. How we measure ourselves.
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Reply #2074 on: 07/06/2016 08:34:49 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums
 
Login
Login with username, password and session length