Two views of the Vacuum

In modern science there are two mutually exclusive points of view

on the behaviour of particles in a Vacuum. One point of view is

the position of classical physics which says that:

In the vacuum at T=0K any movement of a particle stops.

And if in the Empire of Cold there is no movement, it is a dead empire.

But another point of view completely rejects this formulation.

This point of view is expressed in the quantum theory. In 1911, M. Planck

stated that energy does not become zero at the approach T=0K.

He declared this on the 1st Solvay congress. So " Energy at T=0K" became

the main problem in physics because " Physics is first of all the vacuum".

Gradually it began to appear that Vacuum at T=0K is not empty dead space.

There live the "virtual" particles. These particles originally have negative and

imaginary mass, and then make a virtual transition ï¿½ to positive mass,

becoming real particles. But the apparently mystical "virtual particles"

as they make "virtual transitions". explains little.

Let's rethink these "virtual" particles. Let's ask a question:

What is the geometrical form of "virtual" particles in the Vacuum at T=0K?

The answer is:

According to the laws of physics :

J. Charles ( 1787), Gay-Lussac ( 1802), V. Nernst ( 1910), A. Einstein ( 1925)

particles in a Vacuum cannot have volume and consequently should be flat figures.

This means, particles have the geometrical form of a circle, as from all flat figures

the circle has the most optimum form: C/D=pi.

What are these "virtual" circles in the vacuum?

The answer is given in the theory of radiation of absolute black bodies.

The theory considers an area of the space which are in absolute thermal balance.

It is possible only at T=0K. But it is known, that such a condition is a

"thermal death " and is not observed in nature. Therefore Planck, studying this area,

came to the conclusion that condition T=0K has changed. In this space there should be

a radiation of a quantum of light, possessing an internal impulse h=Et=1.

So, ï¿½ the virtual circle ï¿½ is transformed to quantum of light.

This quantum of light has an impulse h=Et=1 and travels with constant speed, c=1.

From this assumption Quantum theory was born.

Therefore the Quantum theory is a theory only about a quantum of light and its various transformations.

And classical theory considers all other particles.

These particles have mass much greater than a quantum of light and

move with much smaller speeds. If we understand the difference between

a quantum of light and all other particles,

then all contradictions in the physics disappear, and all of physics becomes a

harmoniously integral science.

The Vacuum and the Electron

All know, that an electron is not a firm sphere. All know, that its form can be changed.

But nobody understands the borders of the change of the geometrical form of the electron.

So, what are the borders of this change? Quantum theory gives an answer to this question.

It says that at the interaction of the electron with the vacuum, the energy and mass of the

electron become infinite. Physics does not understand what to do with infinite sizes

and therefore have thought up "a method of renormalization", a method

"to sweep the dust under the carpet" / Feynman./

But the situation can be understood another way. Electrons, having the geometrical form

of a sphere, lose their volume and turn into an indefinitely flat circle. In this is the reason

for the occurrence of infinite sizes for the electron. But in physics we know

only one particle which has the form of a flat circle. It is a quantum of light

which flies rectilinearly with speed c= 1.

Hence, the electron turns into a quantum of light. Hence, the electron and a quantum of light

is the same particle in different states.

In the books it is written, that electrons interact among themselves with the help of

a quantum of light. In the books it is written that an electron in an atom passing from

one orbit to another radiates a quantum of light. It should be understood as follows.

The electron has a quantum of light in a pocket or under a "shirt" which from time to time

is freed. Interesting. But why is it necessary for it to hide?

The Vacuum and SRT.

SRT examines the behaviour of a quantum of light in the vacuum.

1) The First law of SRT - the speed of a quantum of light in vacuum has

a maximal magnitude (constant, absolute) of c=1.

2) SRT is not considered a gravitational field.

For this reason, Einstein created General Relativity Theory in 1915.

The field in which there is no gravitation is a vacuum.

3) This asserts that action in SRT occurs with particles in

negative four-dimensional (Minkowski) space. This space is absolute.

Mathematicians have constructed its model and speak

of this negative space as completely abstract.

Nobody sees that it has no connection to real existence.

This is similar to a sad joke.

For 100 years everyone has admired SRT.

Millions of articles, reviews and books have been written

and the United Nations has decided to establish 2005 as the centennial year of SRT.

Consider that all that is clear in this theory

is that negative four-dimensional space is abstract and has no real existence.

My God! There does not appear to be anyone to laugh at this joke!

Everyone searches for complex models of four-dimensional space, but truth lies in simplicity. All is very simple.

We meet the negative characteristic of space only in the vacuum, and in the vacuum,

space is merged with time (negative four-dimensional space).

According to the first law, the speed of light is absolute and movement occurs

in the absolute vacuum. So why does everyone speak and write that there is no

absolute movement; that only relative movement v =s/t is real?

Why does everyone say that there is no absolute reference system,

if the absolute speed can be only in absolute space?

Here we have one of the paradoxes in human intelligence.

* * *

If you have time and desire, I ask you to visit my site

http://www.socratus.comSocratus.