The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Do you agree that one should agree with the modern professional scientific intel  (Read 1809 times)

Offline maryakkutty

  • First timers
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Do you agree that one should agree with the modern professional scientific intellects even if it is a lie?
According to modern Professional Scientific Intellects:
1. Science never searches for divisibility.
2. Science never searches for comparability.
3. Science never searches for connectivity.
4. Science never searches for sensitivity.
5. Science never searches for transformability.
6. Science never searches for substitutability.
7. Science never searches for satisfiability.
One should agree with these statements. Else, you would be branded as maniac! Am I right?
Doesn't science search, find and teach you about divisibility of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Doesn?t mathematics teach you that everything is perfectly divisible by unity?

Doesn't science search, find and teach you about comparability of atoms, molecules, ions,  numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Doesn?t science teach   you the methods of comparing and contrasting things?

Doesn't science search, find and teach you about connectivity of atoms, molecules, ions,  numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Anything which cannot be connected to your mind cannot be thought.

Doesn't science search, find and teach you about sensitivity of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? How can one assay the cause-effect if no thing has sensitivity?
 
Doesn't science search, find and teach you about transformability of atoms, molecules, ions,numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Hasn?t science taught transformations of energy, matter, equations, sentences?

Doesn't science search, find and teach you about substitutability of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? No computer can be at work if does not have searched for substitutability. What is going to be in the place of what is present now? What is evolution?

Doesn't science search, find and teach you about the conditions which could be satisfied  (satisfiability) by atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs,  and other entities?

What would your knowledge be if no thing has divisibility, comparability, connectivity, sensitivity, transformability, substitutability and satisfiability?




 

Offline JimBob

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6564
  • Thanked: 7 times
  • Moderator
    • View Profile


1.)  .... even if it is a lie?
(snip)

2.)  One should agree with these statements. Else, you would be branded as maniac! Am I right?


1.) Where are you getting your information? These 7 statements have nothing to do with science as I know it OR with any of the training I received in science.

2.) One should never agree with established science. One should investigate and attempt to find new ideas on DATA that is at hand and obtained. It is only inquiring minds that advance our scientific thought.

Only if there is no supporting data to back one up, or if the data is misused, is one considered a maniac or a loony. And one needs to know what the data means before interpretations are made.

I am also moving this to a more suitable forum - "General Science."
 

The Naked Scientists Forum


 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums