Einstein thought that Bohr's interpretation of light interference was "crazy" and that there was most likely an alternative unknown principle involved. But, with the Bohr interpretation the only ball in the game everyone picked it up and ran with it. Sense I have put my experiments challenging that interpretation on the internet many recent alternatives have been brought to my attention.

One of these is a paper by Riadh H. Al Rabeh of the University of Basra, Iraq, titled " A Numerical Experiment with the Double Slit Geometry ". It can be found with a google search.

Partial abstract: " In this work we performed a numerical experiment in which a single charged particle is fired at wall of (fixed) charged particles containing gaps to mimic slits, and collect the results over many events in time. Assuming only a classical inverse square relation to hold between the particles - including those of the wall, the results show clear diffraction and interference patterns indicating that the wave behavior of the bullet particles arises simply from such interactions - "

I couldn't help but notice that this interpretation is commensurate with the results of my experiments as well as those of historic experiments previously considered as anomalous. With a new mathematical model that follows classical laws having been presented; has the more complicated portions of quantum theory, which, in my opinion, do not meet all experimental results, become cumbersome, obsolete, and unnecessary?