The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: What is the difference between poor conductor of heat and insulator of heat?  (Read 6673 times)

Offline The Scientist

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
  • Its great to be me!
    • View Profile
Do they mean the same thing? Or are there any difference? Please share you answers! Thanks!


 

Offline CZARCAR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 686
    • View Profile
same diff?
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6321
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile


The concepts are similar, but slightly different.  In general you could use either one to rank materials, although insulation might be a combination of conduction + convection.

Steel might be considered a poor heat conductor (as well as a poor electrical conductor).  However, it would not make a good heat or electrical insulator. 

That is only because steel is a poor heat/electrical conductor relative to other materials such as aluminium and copper.

Most thermal insulators use either air (or other gas), or a vacuum trapped in some kind of a system to limit convection.

In fact, Fiberglass is only a moderate insulator.  Fiberglass + air is a good insulator.  Rock would be a relatively poor insulator.  Rock Wool is a good insulator. 

And the photo above is silica (or Sodium Silicate) which might not be considered as a good insulator, except when in a very fine matrix (aerogel).
« Last Edit: 28/01/2011 18:15:45 by CliffordK »
 

The Naked Scientists Forum


 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums