The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Would this be the electromagnetic make-up of space?  (Read 2132 times)

Offline Dominus

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
    • The physical creation of Time and Space
With my topic “Is a natural electromagnetic process feasible?” I have suggested the existence in nature of an electromagnetic process creating time lengths and space lengths, implying all the while that free space is filled with an electromagnetic field. The presence of this field has been professed by Quantum Mechanics for years, although no reasons or hint has been given the why and the wherefore the electromagnetic field is there. In my work I am giving time and space “body”, I am giving time and space a physical inner structure.
Now then, notwithstanding the time and the talent thrown in to try to incorporate gravitation as portrayed by General Relativity with the Standard Model describing the quantum mechanical nature of the other three fundamental interactions, the road showed itself to be a dead end road.
The persisting interest of Einstein and the pledge of others since the beginning of last century did not give any results; there hasn’t been a way to unify these two physical aspects of the universe. The four forces of nature, we may say, have remained the way they were and the «theory of everything» has itself remained more than ever elusive. In other words, physicists in the name of Science have given up the unified Newtonian conception of the universe and afterwards did not known how to find a new conception equally unified that would respond to those laws that must be rigidly scientific.
Against the above background, I am now advancing a proposition. What we are seeing in figure 1 may be applicable to a single atom, to free (optical) space or, if you want to, we may extend the physical concept to the entire universe. This we can do keeping in mind that free (optical) space is an expanding substance composed of infinitely many small pointlike electromagnetic point-sources of self-generating energy each having its own unsaturated sink with continuous absorption because of the constant and continuous expansion and/or extension (the wavelength proper of the process for the creation of time and/or space) . These point-sources must be considered inertial frames moving at the speed of light and consequently their slope is 1/c, or 3.335x10−11 centimetres per second. In addition to it, by extrapolation to cosmological size, we may think of an entire cluster of galaxies containing infinitely many electromagnetic point-sources and retaining the same dynamics of a single point-source.
Following this line of thought and thinking for a moment of the universe as a sphere, we have before our very eyes the two faces of the one and only identical reality; we have first a non-linear electromagnetic field known as the gravitational field when we move from the centre of the sphere towards the outer edge; and then we have a linear electromagnetic field known as radiative field when we move transverse to the gravitational field and along any given wavelength, that is: forming a circle starting from any point along an imaginary radius vector to indicate the type of electromagnetic radiation we have chosen.
I shall here point out that my proposition finds strong support in the empirical evidence of:
(1) radiating energy in the gravitational field (non-linear field) where the energy itself is variable even though the speed remains constant throughout the energy steps, and
(2) radiating energy in the electromagnetic field (linear field) where the energy is constant and the speed is constant.
This is then the universe in which we live, and by the look of things it cannot be unified since it appears to have two different physical structures one running transverse to the other. We may then say that in order to explain the large scale behaviour we experience, the field, that is: free space, must be «seen» in two distinct ways. In the non-linear, gravitational or else extending field, the wave propagates with direction in space becoming longer up to, and not exceeding, the finite length of 300 million metres. This explains why at each energy level the wavelength is not the same and the waveform is not the same; and this also explains why along the extension there is no signal transfer, or telecommunication. On the other hand, when viewed transverse to the extension (linear field), the wave may be considered to be «resident energy» and as such maintains the same length and the same form, and it is part, together with similar waves, of a telecommunication channel for any electromagnetic signal to travel with direction in space.
To show the difference between gravitation and the radiative field of Maxwell, I have used a sphere. I would now like to show this difference with a cone-like figure and perhaps render the concept a bit more perceptible. If, for example, we put the cone upright as seen in figure 2 and identify the cone with the electromagnetic spectrum, we can easily imagine all radiations running orthogonal to it. From gamma radiation at the bottom, to visible light confined half way through, to long waves. All radiations have the same speed of the spectrum, they all have a frequency range which belongs to the spectrum, they all have an inner structure coming from a transverse section of the spectrum.

Here, I shall recall to mind that the 1st axiom of my work reads: time and space are physically created by an electromagnetic process of expansion and/or extension to be identified with the existing electromagnetic spectrum.
I now conclude by saying that the gravitational field is a non-linear field in the same way that the gradation scale of the electromagnetic spectrum is. With the spectrum (extension in space) the wave becomes asymptotically long up to the full length of the gradation scale which is 3x108 metres per second. With gravitation the wave becomes asymptotically short as we approach the gravitating body. My view is that with a clear picture of the inner structure of space as shown above, Science will move a bit closer to nature and scientists can step forward with rapid strides towards their glorious achievements.


 

Offline JP

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3366
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Would this be the electromagnetic make-up of space?
« Reply #1 on: 22/03/2011 14:41:49 »
Dominus, I'm not belittling your theory, but you might find it gets taken more seriously if you can show how it works to make actual numerical predictions about nature.  Theories that claim to have answers are extremely common, but only a few can make numerical predictions that agree with reality.
 

Offline Dominus

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
    • The physical creation of Time and Space
Would this be the electromagnetic make-up of space?
« Reply #2 on: 22/03/2011 17:47:54 »
Dominus, I'm not belittling your theory, but you might find it gets taken more seriously if you can show how it works to make actual numerical predictions about nature.  Theories that claim to have answers are extremely common, but only a few can make numerical predictions that agree with reality.
Hello JP,
I am delighted by your witty remark. I have no much room to move, JP. Even as it is, by the forum’s standards it’s a long topic. For example, I need a couple of A4 pages to prove on mathematical ground that the parameter “time” will have to come down from the wall where it is now hanging as a “mental abstraction” and be put into nature where it belongs. Time as a product of nature will wipe out in one go all Relativity paradoxes and all Quantum Mechanics paradoxes. You will realize yourself that the twin “going around the world” and getting younger is the most natural thing to happen if time is embedded into space. For me, JP, even the unit measure of time of a walking man is shorter than that of a man standing still.
Likewise, a person standing a metre away from me and to whom I am speaking to is, from my point of view, 3x10−6 seconds in the past, and, from his/her point of view I am the one 3x10−6 seconds in the past. I have already run short of space, sorry. I’ll be posting some more. If you have the time, read me please, and if you see any flaw in it: fire. I’ll accept it.
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Would this be the electromagnetic make-up of space?
« Reply #2 on: 22/03/2011 17:47:54 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums
 
Login
Login with username, password and session length