The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: QotW - 11.04.03 - What is the most efficient way to heat water?  (Read 22477 times)

Offline thedoc

  • Forum Admin
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 511
  • Thanked: 12 times
    • View Profile
I'm in Croatia and I'm having a debate with my friend about water heaters.

I have a water heater in my bathroom. I take on shower per day. I set it at just the right level so that it gives me just enough hot water for a 5-minute shower, no more. I turn on the boiler about 1-hour before I want to take a shower and then turn it off right when I get into the shower. I don't turn it on until the next day, where I follow the same ritual.

My friend says I'm being inefficient and not saving any energy. He says I should leave the boiler on 24-hours a day, because it takes a minimal amount of energy to keep the water hot once it's hot.

If I turn it off, the water cools and then must be re-heated from scratch, requiring far more energy than if it had been on all along. Who's right?

Asked by Francis Tapon


                                       

                                          Find out more on our podcast page

                                       

 

« Last Edit: 05/04/2011 17:16:38 by _system »


 

Offline thedoc

  • Forum Admin
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 511
  • Thanked: 12 times
    • View Profile


We put this to Hugh Hunt, from Cambridge University's Engineering Department...

Hugh -   This is a very interesting and topical question.  If the hot water is stored in a perfectly insulated tank, then it makes no difference whether the water is heated one hour before it’s needed or one day before, or even one year before.   There's nothing at all to be gained from heating the water up 22 hours in advance, but that requires that the insulation is perfect.

In reality, insulation is not perfect and the water heater will lose some heat in advance and this heat cannot be recovered.  It’s the same as when we’re boiling water for a cup of tea.  If we boil the water when we need it, that makes sense because the kettle is not that well-insulated.  If you boil the water an hour in advance, the water would be cold when we needed it.

How much energy wastage are we talking about?  Suppose a 5-minute shower uses 60 litres of water, which is about right; and suppose the water is delivered at about 40 degrees, which is about right; and in the winter the water is cold, somewhere around 0, which is about right.  So we’re talking about 4 kilojoules/degree/litre of water.

Now suppose the tank loses 10% of its heat in 24 hours.  Well then that's a loss of getting up to 1 Mega Joule of heat.  That's equivalent to running an electric kettle for 6 minutes, enough to boil the water for several cups of tea.  So if you're the kind of person who’s bothered not to over-fill the kettle when making a cup of tea then you should certainly follow our Croatian friend’s example and only heat the shower water when it’s needed.
« Last Edit: 05/04/2011 17:17:18 by BenV »
 

Offline Geezer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8328
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
It depends on how well insulated the tank that holds the hot water is. If it's really well insulated, you won't waste energy whether you leave it on all the time, or turn it off and on, so you might as well leave it on all the time if you find that more convenient.

If the tank is not well insulated, you are going to waste energy whether you leave it on all the time, or turn it off and on, but you'll probably waste a bit less if you only turn it on just before you use it.

We have a well insulated electrically heated tank that is always on. I know it is not wasting energy because it is in a cupboard under the stairs. If the tank was losing heat, the air temperature in the cupboard would be appreciably warmer than the air outside the cupboard, but it isn't. Also, on the few occasions when I have disabled the heating elements, it has taken a very long time for the water in the tank to cool down.

That said, probably the most efficient water heating systems are the type that don't store hot water at all. They only heat the water as it is being used, but I doubt they are all that much more efficient than stored hot water systems that have well insulated tanks.
 

Offline chris

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5339
  • Thanked: 65 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Ironically, in some countries, they call the immersion heater the "geyser", Geezer.

Chris
 

Offline CZARCAR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 686
    • View Profile
standby heatloss is dependent on the temp difference between the hot tank & the environment around it. I do the same= drain/use the hot water storage & leave the tank cold so it cant lose heat while standing by= cold tank has no heat to lose.
 

Offline Geezer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8328
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
Ironically, in some countries, they call the immersion heater the "geyser", Geezer.

Chris

Yes - my granny had a gas geyser, or maybe that was my grandfather?
« Last Edit: 28/03/2011 02:52:28 by Geezer »
 

Offline Geezer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8328
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
BTW, and drifting off topic a bit, there are some really cool (well, hot really) heat pump water heaters. They extract heat from the ambient air in the home and use it to heat the water. This works really well in warm climates because the water heater is actually helping to cool the home.

Even in a cold climate, these systems heat the water very economically. The only problem is that they are extremely expensive, although I suspect the prices will come down a lot if there is sufficient competition. I don't think there is anything fundamentally expensive about the technology. It's a lot like a refrigerator in reverse.
 

Offline percepts

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 53
    • View Profile
The energy to heat the water to a temp is the same whether you do it immediately prior to shower or several hours prior. But it's the thermal isulation which is critical to the overall efficiency of the system. If the system has 100% effective insulation so the water stays at temp then there is no advantage to one system over the other. But if the water in the tank is able to cool before being used then more energy will be used by using central heating to keep it constantly upto temp.
If you use your bathroom heater to only heat enough water for your shower, then that should be more efficient than having it on all the time except the problem is that as you use the water from the water heater tank it refills itself with cold water which cools the already hot water which is inefficient.
So the most efficient way to heat water would be a system which only heats water on demand without storing it and in fact these systems are becoming increasingly popular for that very reason. Called Combi heaters which heat the house but also heat hot water on demand.
But the absolute most energy efficient way to shower is to use cold water. Hot water is for wimps.
« Last Edit: 28/03/2011 02:55:01 by percepts »
 

Offline Geezer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8328
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile

Hot water is for wimps.


Yes, well good luck with that! I don't know where you are, but the water here comes out the tap at a blistering 46°F.
 

@geo2ward

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #9 on: 28/03/2011 17:31:32 »
@NakedScientists It depends entirely on the size of your boiler. Problem sorted :)

was tweeted by @geo2ward
 

Offline SeanB

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1118
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.04.03 - What is the most efficient way to heat water?
« Reply #10 on: 28/03/2011 20:34:28 »

Hot water is for wimps.


Yes, well good luck with that! I don't know where you are, but the water here comes out the tap at a blistering 46°F.

I lived in a town where the cold water was rather warmer than that. I was having a shower one day when my neighbour walked in and asked if they had fixed the boiler. I had to tell him I was only using cold water, as it was near to boiling just from solar heating in 20m of pipe on the roof.
 

Offline PeterBroad

  • First timers
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.04.03 - What is the most efficient way to heat water?
« Reply #11 on: 31/03/2011 11:53:03 »
The answer is turn the water off when not being used.

The rate of cooling i.e. the energy lost is proportional to the excess temperature.  That is the temperature of the water heater above the room.  This rate of loss is always highest if you maintain the temperature of the water at its highest i.e. that which you use it for your shower.  The fact you need to reheat the water from the lower temperature is not the dominant factor here because by keeping the heater on you are constantly doing this anyway as the thermostat cycles on and off.

The only way to lower your energy input is to insulate the boiler as best you can and try and retain as much heat as possible when you next switch it on.
 

@bangscience

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #12 on: 31/03/2011 15:52:24 »
@NakedScientists Is the answer the most common one in science, 'It depends...'?

was tweeted by @bangscience
 

Offline Gwernogyss

  • First timers
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.04.03 - What is the most efficient way to heat water?
« Reply #13 on: 20/04/2011 12:20:26 »
When you've had a shower, the water taken out of the tank is replaced by an equal quantity of cold water - which needs to be heated up - just as in the case of only heating it when you need it.  Factor this in, and only heating it when you need it is far and away the most efficient thing to do.
 

Offline wolfekeeper

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1092
  • Thanked: 11 times
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.04.03 - What is the most efficient way to heat water?
« Reply #14 on: 20/04/2011 14:37:53 »
Actually, he's being slightly inefficient in one way. I *think* he should turn the water heater off right before he has the shower.

That way it will avoid the heater coming on during the shower- which will probably largely waste heat, you would be mostly heating up water that you're not going to use in the shower. Also he should not turn it on too long before hand- the optimum temperature for the water is hot enough to just last for one shower.

But there is one catch worth mentioning- if the water doesn't get hot enough, then you're at risk from Legionaires disease; hot water systems run at the uncomfortably hot temperature they do to kill off the bugs...
 

Offline Geezer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8328
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.04.03 - What is the most efficient way to heat water?
« Reply #15 on: 20/04/2011 21:13:12 »
Of course, there is another factor that should be taken into consideration here. The water in the tank is not all at the same temperature. It actually stratifies so that the hottest water is at the top of the tank, and the feed to the shower is taken from the top of the tank.

So, if you have a crappy tank with lousy insulation, what you want to do is heat precisely the amount of water that you need for the shower then turn off the heater and give it just enough time for all the hot water to collect at the top of the tank. If you do this correctly, the shower will suddenly cool down just as you are about to get out.

Of course, if you invest in a tank with decent insulation, you can forget about all this nonsense, because you will waste a lot less energy by just leaving the heating on and allowing the thermostats to do what they are good at.
 

Offline CZARCAR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 686
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.04.03 - What is the most efficient way to heat water?
« Reply #16 on: 22/04/2011 20:57:21 »
Actually, he's being slightly inefficient in one way. I *think* he should turn the water heater off right before he has the shower.

That way it will avoid the heater coming on during the shower- which will probably largely waste heat, you would be mostly heating up water that you're not going to use in the shower. Also he should not turn it on too long before hand- the optimum temperature for the water is hot enough to just last for one shower.

But there is one catch worth mentioning- if the water doesn't get hot enough, then you're at risk from Legionaires disease; hot water systems run at the uncomfortably hot temperature they do to kill off the bugs...

bingo
 

Offline Geezer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8328
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.04.03 - What is the most efficient way to heat water?
« Reply #17 on: 23/04/2011 00:46:26 »
Contrary to popular belief, electricity does not leak from power outlets when there isn't a plug in the socket. Remarkably, neither does much heat escape from a well insulated water tank. If the tank is well insulated, the financial penalty for heating the water before it's actually needed is negligible.

On the other hand, the financial penalty for using a tank that is not well insulated, regardless of any scheme to manually control the applied power, is significant.
 

Francis Tapon

  • Guest
None
« Reply #18 on: 06/05/2011 13:29:15 »
wolfekeeper, I do turn off the water heater right before I get in the shower. You're right to make the point.

Naked Scientists, Hugh Hunt's answer is logical, but there's one assumption that is faulty. It assume that the heat loss is 10% per day. It's more like 50% per day with my water heater. I know this because if I heat up the standard level that I need for a 5-minute shower, then in two days, the water is cold if I don't use it.

A 10% loss implies that roughly after 10 days, the water is cold/room-temperature. It reaches this state in just 2 days. Thus, the energy is not running the electric kettle for 6 minutes, but rather for 30 minutes. That's a bit more expensive and significant than originally assumed.

Thank you for proving me right!

Francis Tapon
 

Offline Atomic-S

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 935
  • Thanked: 19 times
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.04.03 - What is the most efficient way to heat water?
« Reply #19 on: 09/05/2011 04:01:57 »
You should also consider what effect intermittent aperation of the water heater has on the longevity of the appliance. Thermal cycling through large temperature differences might possibly deteriorate the tank more quickly. Then you have to replace the appliance sooner. May not be a good bargain.
 

Offline Geezer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8328
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.04.03 - What is the most efficient way to heat water?
« Reply #20 on: 09/05/2011 20:59:46 »

It's more like 50% per day with my water heater.


Good grief! Are you heating a cauldron on a wood stove?
 

jo nurd

  • Guest
None
« Reply #21 on: 29/05/2011 02:30:40 »
This is all good discussion and the theory is correct but one thing is missing.  In many countries where hot water is heated with electricity the electrical power to the heater is controlled remotely by the power company.  There are two tariffs for the cost of power – one or power consumed during the ‘peak’ hours and one for ‘off peak’.  The reasons for this are another topic. Peak is usually a few hours in the morning, lunch time and the evening.  So . . . if the hot water heater is switched on at 2 am it will heat up but if it is switched on at 6am it will not heat up until the morning peak is over (albeit some installations have an override switch BUT the override uses electricity at the peak tariff).  So . . . to save energy 1) take a shorter shower and 2) use a solar assisted or heat pump hot water supply or a well insulated hot water heater with the smallest capacity your household can manage with off peak demand heating.  Clearly option 1 is the only option for the person with the original question.
 

Offline syhprum

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3822
  • Thanked: 19 times
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.04.03 - What is the most efficient way to heat water?
« Reply #22 on: 13/06/2011 19:36:57 »
If my water came out of the hot tap at 46°F I would regard that as perishing cold not blistering hot.
« Last Edit: 13/06/2011 19:38:49 by syhprum »
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6321
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.04.03 - What is the most efficient way to heat water?
« Reply #23 on: 13/06/2011 22:45:27 »
If my water came out of the hot tap at 46°F I would regard that as perishing cold not blistering hot.
I wonder if that was intended as Celsius.

That is about the temperature of the Metolius River. 
I will tell you that it is CCCCOOOOLLLLDDDD

I've been boating in it.  Get splashed with it and it bites.
I did tip over once, but I didn't stay in the water for very long.  [xx(]

I believe well water around here comes out in the mid-50's.
 

Offline Geezer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8328
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.04.03 - What is the most efficient way to heat water?
« Reply #24 on: 14/06/2011 00:34:28 »
If my water came out of the hot tap at 46°F I would regard that as perishing cold not blistering hot.

Sheesh! You scientists are soooooo literal. My comment was an example of irony.

Wiki - Irony "Ironic statements (verbal irony) typically imply a meaning in opposition to their literal meaning."
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

QotW - 11.04.03 - What is the most efficient way to heat water?
« Reply #24 on: 14/06/2011 00:34:28 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums