# The Naked Scientists Forum

### Author Topic: Pencho Valev - why Einstein is wrong  (Read 19545 times)

#### Pentcho Valev

• Full Member
• Posts: 78
##### Re: Pencho Valev - why Einstein is wrong
« Reply #25 on: 12/10/2006 08:44:13 »
WHY EINSTEIN'S CULT IS CRIMINAL

Consider the introduction of gravitational time dilation by Einstein's hypnotists:

http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu/~phys16/Textbook/ch13.pdf pp.2-4

If the speed of the light pulses in the gravitational field is VARIABLE, then the frequency shift measured by Pound and Rebka is a direct consequence of this variability and there is no gravitational time dilation. Also, the speed of the light pulses is VARIABLE in the absence of a gravitational field as well and obeys the formula c'=c+v, where c is the initial speed of the pulses relative to the light source and v is the relative speed of the light source and the receiver (observer).

However Einstein's hypnotists do not discuss the variability of the speed of light when the discussion is dangerous. They discuss the variability when the discussion is not dangerous:

"So, it is absolutely true that the speed of light is _not_ constant in a gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle, applies as well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference]. If this were not so, there would be no bending of light by the gravitational field of stars. One can do a simple Huyghens reconstruction of a wave front, taking into account the different speed of advance of the wavefront at different distances from the star (variation of speed of light), to derive the deflection of the light by the star.
Indeed, this is exactly how Einstein did the calculation in:
"On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light," Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911.
which predated the full formal development of general relativity by about four years. This paper is widely available in English. You can find a copy beginning on page 99 of the Dover book "The Principle of Relativity." You will find in section 3 of that paper, Einstein's derivation of the (variable) speed of light in a gravitational potential, eqn (3). The result is,
c' = c0 ( 1 + V / c2 )
where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the speed of light c0 is measured."

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/speed_of_light.html
"Einstein went on to discover a more general theory of relativity which explained gravity in terms of curved spacetime, and he talked about the speed of light changing in this new theory. In the 1920 book "Relativity: the special and general theory" he wrote: . . . according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity [. . .] cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position. Since Einstein talks of velocity (a vector quantity: speed with direction) rather than speed alone, it is not clear that he meant the speed will change, but the reference to special relativity suggests that he did mean so."

Finally, Einstein's hypnotists have destroyed the rationality of generations of scientists so that, in Einstein's zombie world, the idea of combining dangerous and non-dangerous discussions can never emerge. Zombies just learn by rote contradictory texts and then go fighting heretics.

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com

#### lightarrow

• Neilep Level Member
• Posts: 4586
• Thanked: 7 times
##### Re: Pencho Valev - why Einstein is wrong
« Reply #26 on: 12/10/2006 15:33:13 »
I think Pentcho Valev is actually nothing else than a computer program who sends posts (almost) randomly, maybe depending on key words in the others posts.
What do you think?
« Last Edit: 12/10/2006 15:35:32 by lightarrow »

#### ukmicky

• Moderator
• Neilep Level Member
• Posts: 3011
##### Re: Pencho Valev - why Einstein is wrong
« Reply #27 on: 12/10/2006 18:34:25 »
I once thought the same as the same things are posted on many many sites. However i recently saw and read some answers he had given to people who were challanging him on a web site which could only have been written if he had read the questions.

« Last Edit: 12/10/2006 18:41:49 by ukmicky »

#### lightarrow

• Neilep Level Member
• Posts: 4586
• Thanked: 7 times
##### Re: Pencho Valev - why Einstein is wrong
« Reply #28 on: 12/10/2006 19:59:10 »
Maybe he let his program run continuously and, once in a while, he answers by person, just to make people believe every post was made from him personally? In any case, it seems to me that his only purpose is to spread his "truths" around the world.

#### Pentcho Valev

• Full Member
• Posts: 78
##### Re: Pencho Valev - why Einstein is wrong
« Reply #29 on: 13/10/2006 07:28:03 »
quote:
Originally posted by lightarrow

Maybe he let his program run continuously and, once in a while, he answers by person, just to make people believe every post was made from him personally? In any case, it seems to me that his only purpose is to spread his "truths" around the world.

Not just my "truths" - rather, other people's falsities.

EINSTEIN'S ZOMBIES WRITE TEXTBOOKS

Sometimes relativity textbooks are written by Einstein's zombies, not by Einstein's hypnotists, and in such cases one can find unforgettable texts. For instance, Einstein's hypnotists often confuse the reader by introducing a light source that emits flashes at time intervals T and then calling the quantity 1/T "frequency", in the hope that the reader will confuse this frequency with the wave frequency (in Einstein's zombie world the reader always confuses the two frequencies). However hypnotists never go so far as to call the distance between the flashes "wavelength" - see, for instance:

http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu/~phys16/Textbook/ch13.pdf pp.2-4

Zombies' reasoning is bolder - they somehow know that there can be no frequency without wavelength:

Murat Boratav, Ryszard Kerner
Professeurs a l'Universite Pierre-et-Marie Curie, Paris VI
"RELATIVITE", 1991, p. 74:
"La source O emet deux signaux successifs separes dans l'espace par une distance lambda_0 et dans le temps par un temps T_0, qu'on peut appeler "longueur d'onde propre" ou "periode propre" en ce sens que ces grandeurs sont caracteristiques du referentiel ou la source emettrice est au repos."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com

#### lightarrow

• Neilep Level Member
• Posts: 4586
• Thanked: 7 times
##### Re: Pencho Valev - why Einstein is wrong
« Reply #30 on: 13/10/2006 12:07:04 »
If we explain gravitation in terms of a curved space-time, as in GR, then, in the absence of other forces, all bodies and light too follow a geodesic line, which is the analogue to the straight line in an euclidean (flat) geometry.

One of the problems there are in GR is that it's not possible to define the velocity vector univocally: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/einstein/node2.html

quote:

"In general relativity, we cannot even talk about relative velocities, except for two particles at the same point of spacetime -- that is, at the same place at the same instant. The reason is that in general relativity, we take very seriously the notion that a vector is a little arrow sitting at a particular point in spacetime. To compare vectors at different points of spacetime, we must carry one over to the other. The process of carrying a vector along a path without turning or stretching it is called `parallel transport'. When spacetime is curved, the result of parallel transport from one point to another depends on the path taken! In fact, this is the very definition of what it means for spacetime to be curved. Thus it is ambiguous to ask whether two particles have the same velocity vector unless they are at the same point of spacetime."
« Last Edit: 13/10/2006 12:16:55 by lightarrow »

#### Pentcho Valev

• Full Member
• Posts: 78
##### Re: Pencho Valev - why Einstein is wrong
« Reply #31 on: 16/10/2006 06:49:38 »
EINSTEIN MAKES FUN OF THE ZOMBIE WORLD

Einstein knew all along that the speed of light in a gravitational field is variable and obeys the formula c'=c(1+V/c^2), and that the gravitational redshift f'=f(1+V/c^2) is a direct consequence of this variability. However Einstein was looking for fun and performed an experiment. He offered two questions and two answers to the zombie world:

Question 1: Is there any relation between the variable speed of light c'=c(1+V/c^2) and the gravitational redshift f'=f(1+V/c^2)?

Question 2: The gravitational redshift f'=f(1+V/c^2) is a direct consequence of what?

The zombie world had to find an answer for either question. It did it successfully and Einstein had a lot of fun.

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com

#### Pentcho Valev

• Full Member
• Posts: 78
##### Re: Pencho Valev - why Einstein is wrong
« Reply #32 on: 20/10/2006 12:42:18 »
FATAL MISTAKE OF EINSTEINIANS

Einstein's criminal cult, like any similar organization, obeys strict rules imposed by the founder. Violation of these rules would be fatal. Here is one of them:

The zombie world should constantly be forced to deal with reciprocal time dilation and its immediate negation (I measure your clock to be SLOWER than mine and you measure mine to be SLOWER than yours but if you go and return you will find mine to be FASTER than yours) until any remnants of human rationality disappear. However the expression "The clock at rest runs slow by a factor 1/gamma" is forbidden: any calculations based on this phrase would expose the idiocy of relativity and destroy the cult in the end.

For almost 100 years the rule has been obeyed but recently a careless hypnotist did produce the fatal phrase: see the solution to Problem 3 "Circular motion", (b), p. 19, in

http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu/~phys16/Textbook/ch13.pdf

Nothing can save Einstein's criminal cult now. Yet panic should be avoided: the zombie world is inert and relativity activists will have enough time to start another criminal business.

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com

#### lightarrow

• Neilep Level Member
• Posts: 4586
• Thanked: 7 times
##### Re: Pencho Valev - why Einstein is wrong
« Reply #33 on: 20/10/2006 13:21:01 »
quote:
Originally posted by Pentcho Valev

FATAL MISTAKE OF EINSTEINIANS

Einstein's criminal cult, like any similar organization, obeys strict rules imposed by the founder. Violation of these rules would be fatal. Here is one of them:

The zombie world should constantly be forced to deal with reciprocal time dilation and its immediate negation (I measure your clock to be SLOWER than mine and you measure mine to be SLOWER than yours but if you go and return you will find mine to be FASTER than yours) until any remnants of human rationality disappear. However the expression "The clock at rest runs slow by a factor 1/gamma" is forbidden: any calculations based on this phrase would expose the idiocy of relativity and destroy the cult in the end.

For almost 100 years the rule has been obeyed but recently a careless hypnotist did produce the fatal phrase: see the solution to Problem 3 "Circular motion", (b), p. 19, in

http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu/~phys16/Textbook/ch13.pdf

Nothing can save Einstein's criminal cult now. Yet panic should be avoided: the zombie world is inert and relativity activists will have enough time to start another criminal business.

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com

In that problem, the approximation v<<c is necessary, otherwise it's not possible to write a = v^2/r and
1 + ar/c^2 = 1 + v^2/c^2. This because that equation is valid only on an Euclidean space-time (that is, FLAT) and this is not the case of a curved space-time.
This because a = v^2/r comes from v = omega*r which comes from arc = angle*r which is true only on an Euclidean geometry. Think about a circumference drawn on a spherical surface, for example.

quote:
1910: Theodor Kaluza points out that there is nothing inherently paradoxical about the static and disk-riding observers obtaining different results for the circumference. This does however imply, he argues, that "the geometry of the rotating disk" is non-euclidean. He asserts without proof that this geometry is in fact essentially just the geometry of the hyperbolic plane.

The modern resolution of the "paradox" can be briefly summarized as follows:

1.Small distances measured by disk-riding observers are described by the Langevin-Landau-Lifschitz metric, which is indeed well approximated (for small angular velocity) by the geometry of the hyperbolic plane, just as Kaluza had claimed

#### The Naked Scientists Forum

##### Re: Pencho Valev - why Einstein is wrong
« Reply #33 on: 20/10/2006 13:21:01 »