The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: A new theory of nothing  (Read 12219 times)

Offline Hadrian

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2175
  • Scallywag
    • View Profile
A new theory of nothing
« on: 19/04/2006 15:28:29 »
A new theory of nothing
There was once nothing and then there was something. Then after along time something became nothing again and so it all came to nothing in the end. Which turned out to be something after all, even though it had little to do with anything anyway. Which is just as well as you can get anything out of nothing with out something be there in there first place and that would mean the nothing was something and the would then result in there was once nothing and then there was something and so on.

If I donít get a Nobel Prize for this I will know itís fixed size=1]

What you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say.
« Last Edit: 25/05/2006 13:39:32 by Hadrian »


 

Offline Andrew K Fletcher

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2331
  • KIS Keep It Simple
    • View Profile
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #1 on: 19/04/2006 19:06:47 »
Maybe you will get nothing :)

"The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct."
K.I.S. "Keep it simple!"
 

Offline Hadrian

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2175
  • Scallywag
    • View Profile
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #2 on: 21/04/2006 08:22:02 »
Ah the zero effect   :D:D:D

What you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say.
 

Offline Dante

  • First timers
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
    • http://www.carbondog.net
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #3 on: 16/05/2006 07:49:15 »
Be honest now, that's just meant to confuse people.
it's philisophical anyway.
everything=something and nothing=something, so everything=nothing.
so don't worry about it, you don't actualy exist.
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 12656
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
    • View Profile
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #4 on: 22/05/2006 11:37:41 »
Or, as Terry Pratchett put it...

Once upon a time there was nothing, which exploded. It then got very big.

Brand new forum at
http://beaverlandforum.y4a.net
More than just science
 

Offline neilep

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 20602
  • Thanked: 8 times
    • View Profile
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #5 on: 22/05/2006 13:58:21 »
If nothing is something then nothing does not exist !

Men are the same as women, just inside out !
 

Offline science_guy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
  • I'm right there... inside neilep's head!
    • View Profile
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #6 on: 25/05/2006 19:31:32 »
no, something used to be nothing, and may become nothing again, but nothing is never somthing.  After all, the only oxymoron ive ever seen that works is Jumbo Shrimp.

Maybe we should go for the little bang theory. :)

E=MC2... m=deg/360 X C... C= PiD

therefore E=deg/360 X 2(PiD)
 

Offline FHLew

  • First timers
  • *
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
    • http://lewfh.tripod.com/
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #7 on: 17/06/2006 07:30:26 »
Hadrian wrote:
( Posted - 19 Apr 2006 : 15:28:29)

   < There was once nothing and then there was something. Then after along time something became nothing again and so it all came to nothing in the end.....>

The Living Void [ Physical Vacuum ]

Form is emptiness, and emptiness is indeed form. Emptiness is not different from Form,Form is not different from Emptiness. What is Form that is Emptiness, what is Emptiness that is Form ? The Physical Vacuum, as it is called in Field Theory, is not a state of mere nothingness but contains the potentiality for all forms of the particle world. These forms,in turn, are not independent physical entities but merely transcient manifestations of the underlying Void. The Great Void cannot but consist of Chi, Prana or Vital Force; this Zero Point Energy, Chi or etheric nothingness cannot but condense to form all things; and these things cannot but become dispersed so as to form , once more ,the Great Void. At the time of its condensation, can one say otherwise than that this is but temporary? But at the time of its dispersing, can one hastily say that it is then non-existent ? Thus Chi condenses and disperses rhythmically, bringing forth all forms which eventually dissolve into the Void. Solid objects with Form dissipate quanta as Colour. Thus, No Form, No Colour.

Most of the time, every thing is not black, white, grey, red or yellow but is mostly invisible - The 2004 Nobel Prize Winning " Colour Force " of Quarks and Gluons,

Only the Sound of Light in the vibrant DNA, the Living Wave in the Universal Mind.

With regards
   Lew
 


Doctors merely assist. Only Mother Nature does the healing.
 

Offline Andrew K Fletcher

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2331
  • KIS Keep It Simple
    • View Profile
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #8 on: 18/06/2006 10:56:43 »
.
 

Offline Hadrian

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2175
  • Scallywag
    • View Profile
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #9 on: 18/06/2006 13:27:07 »
Dear Lew.

May you bask in the hands of endless bliss that lies within and yet beyond all form.

Hadrian

What you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say.
 

Offline heikki

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 56
    • View Profile
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #10 on: 15/07/2006 14:51:47 »
quote:
Originally posted by Hadrian

A new theory of nothing
There was once nothing and then there was something. Then after along time something became nothing again and so it all came to nothing in the end. Which turned out to be something after all, even though it had little to do with anything anyway. Which is just as well as you can get anything out of nothing with out something be there in there first place and that would mean the nothing was something and the would then result in there was once nothing and then there was something and so on.





:)

Hi.

I have think that also and i found answer.

Nothing dont exist.

Then this all dont has start point.

And evolution is timeless continuous space-nature process without start or end.

And we are part of that.

We cannot know everything and it is not necessary.

So, life is life.

:)
 

Offline Hadrian

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2175
  • Scallywag
    • View Profile
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #11 on: 16/07/2006 14:35:40 »
I stand on the edge of nothingness with my arms apart
What is before me as is behind me is neither I nor not I
Do not fall a much as give like the air gives to you hand
With a childís eye you see a universe in a grain of sand
In one moment of essence all time it is neither I nor not I
I sink in love now in to eternal emptiness with a joyful hart


What you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say.
 

Offline Karen W.

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *****
  • Posts: 31653
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • "come fly with me"
    • View Profile
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #12 on: 24/07/2006 04:14:18 »
Hadrian you amaze me!......Karen
 

Offline moonfire

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4597
  • Can't stand the heat, step away from the fire!
    • View Profile
    • http://www.m2global.com/stormdiamonds
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #13 on: 25/07/2006 13:29:36 »
Truly amazing Hadrian!!  LOL  I think Andrew put it best as you can see by his experiment or no experiment..there is nothing there at all!  LOL

"Lo" Loretta
 

Offline Boo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #14 on: 16/08/2006 06:29:29 »
HAHAH wonderful! this whole post is amazing and i think i like it..

becca :)
 

Offline Hadrian

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2175
  • Scallywag
    • View Profile
Re: A new theory of nothing
« Reply #15 on: 12/12/2006 10:38:44 »
Glad to say nothing is still happening and that something
 

jolly

  • Guest
A new theory of nothing
« Reply #16 on: 23/02/2007 23:57:26 »
deleted as inapproprate
« Last Edit: 06/03/2007 00:40:53 by jolly »
 

Offline Hadrian

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2175
  • Scallywag
    • View Profile
A new theory of nothing
« Reply #17 on: 06/03/2007 17:56:46 »
Nothings changes,


So it wasnít nothing to begin with or how could it change

 
 

Offline Infamous

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 74
    • View Profile
A new theory of nothing
« Reply #18 on: 06/03/2007 18:06:20 »
Nothing, nada, zip, zero, goose egg, and naught. A question for those interested; If nothing grows very large, is a big nothing more useful than a small nothing?

My answer: Yes, because it allows more room for something!!

........................Infy
 

Offline Hadrian

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2175
  • Scallywag
    • View Profile
A new theory of nothing
« Reply #19 on: 06/03/2007 19:28:50 »
vary true the bigger the nothing the bigger the something that fills it.  [:0]
 

Offline Hadrian

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2175
  • Scallywag
    • View Profile
A new theory of nothing
« Reply #20 on: 02/10/2007 14:30:28 »
nonthing much to report about something is still nothing.
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

A new theory of nothing
« Reply #20 on: 02/10/2007 14:30:28 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums