The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: How do you analyse data without presupposition?  (Read 4741 times)

Offline thedoc

  • Forum Admin
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 511
  • Thanked: 11 times
    • View Profile
How do you analyse data without presupposition?
« on: 13/12/2011 17:44:33 »
How do you analyse data without having a presupposition of what you're actually looking for? Because that's important too.  You're actually biasing the search system.
Asked by Evil Eye Monster via Twitter


                                        Visit the webpage for the podcast in which this question is answered.

 

« Last Edit: 13/12/2011 17:44:33 by _system »


 

Offline thedoc

  • Forum Admin
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 511
  • Thanked: 11 times
    • View Profile
How do you analyse data without presupposition?
« Reply #1 on: 13/12/2011 17:44:33 »
We answered this question on the show...



Steven -  Actually, different people can look at the same data set and try and find different information from it.  So, itís not necessarily one approach.  Different people will try and tease out different bits from the same data source.

« Last Edit: 13/12/2011 17:44:33 by _system »
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6321
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
How do you analyse data without presupposition?
« Reply #2 on: 14/12/2011 05:37:34 »
One can certainly crunch data to look for something that is significant.  But, there is often a fallacy in doing it that way.  They say that a good statistician can prove anything!!

If one is analyzing the data without an a-priori hypothesis, then one should at least find a way to split the data.  Perhaps doing a small pilot study, then repeating with a second larger and more rigorous study to see if the new hypothesis holds up.

Generally a researcher should have some expectations of what to expect, then do some kind of a blinded study so that their expectations don't interfere with the data collection.  The biggest risk, of course, is to have a study that is designed to prove the hypothesis without thoroughly considering alternative explanations.

Some of the cohort studies like the Framingham Heart Study were designed precisely to look for obscure causes of heart disease.  But, as I mentioned, one must be careful to ascertain that the data is generally applicable, and not just an artifact of the one particular study.
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

How do you analyse data without presupposition?
« Reply #2 on: 14/12/2011 05:37:34 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums