The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Atomic Reconstruction  (Read 2719 times)

Offline Balisk

  • First timers
  • *
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Atomic Reconstruction
« on: 19/02/2012 06:36:47 »
Hi I'm new here and I have this theory that I find sorta controversial if it ever were to be proven true and I have been wanting some opinions on it from people who know what they are talking about.

My theory Atomic Reconstruction is based off the fact that we can use highly intense electromagnetic fields to keep atoms or really matter away from a single atom of anti-matter for studying for less then a second well if we were to improve on the EMF's so that they could be stabilized at a much higher level that they could be then used on the individual atom and its components being mainly the protons that atom could then be reconstructed by having the EMF's take away a proton or feasibly add one to thus change the properties of the atom allowing for it to be changed.  Taking from this if say at its highest form a portable version were to be made one could become a god as this would also in-tale immortality in the form of not aging do to having the atomic structure of our cells be renewed to keep us the same age, in addition to being able to change anything into anything else and protection from anything lethal do to an atomic shield.  These are some of the applications aside from any given do to common sense.

So if anyone would be willing to comment I would appreciate it.


 

Offline imatfaal

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2787
  • rouge moderator
    • View Profile
Re: Atomic Reconstruction
« Reply #1 on: 22/02/2012 11:35:01 »
Hi Balisk - you are gonna have to explain in more detail and with a bit more attention to simple sentences/language; I cannot follow what you are trying to express.
 

Offline Balisk

  • First timers
  • *
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: Atomic Reconstruction
« Reply #2 on: 22/02/2012 18:27:23 »
Hi Balisk - you are gonna have to explain in more detail and with a bit more attention to simple sentences/language; I cannot follow what you are trying to express.

ok simply put my theory involves changing the properties of an atom by using super powerful electromagnetic fields to take away or add protons to an atom.  Sorry im not all that good at communicating whats in my head effectively.

I came up with this after reading about how scientists use electromagnetic fields to separate a single particle of anti-matter from regular matter for studying so I thought well if we can make EM fields that strong could we build on that and make them even stronger and more accurate so we could pinpoint them to move protons.
« Last Edit: 22/02/2012 18:31:50 by Balisk »
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 12001
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Atomic Reconstruction
« Reply #3 on: 26/02/2012 23:39:59 »
As some sort of radiative 'pincers' rearranging molecules and atoms inside the body? I've been wondering about something similar, if we could use radiation originating from two, or more, sources and where they 'crisscross' then operate, or stimulate, for example inside the brain. It would make for good non intrusive surgery. But the implications for it being used 'evilly' roams just as large in my mind.

Seems there are no things without a 'backside' to it.
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: Atomic Reconstruction
« Reply #3 on: 26/02/2012 23:39:59 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums
 
Login
Login with username, password and session length