Naked Science Forum

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
18/06/2013 21:03:43

Author Topic: What exactly is the string theory?  (Read 509 times)

thedoc

  • Forum Admin
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 325
    • View Profile
  • on: 19/06/2012 17:19:04
What exactly is the string theory? Do these 'strings' really exist? And how can we know they exist if they have not been proven? I would really like to know! I love your programme and am telling all my friends about it. Take care and keep up the good work.

Catherine Hiscox
Asked by Catherine Hiscox


                                        Visit the webpage for the podcast in which this question is answered.

 

« Last Edit: 19/06/2012 17:19:04 by _system »

thedoc

  • Forum Admin
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 325
    • View Profile
  • Reply #1 on: 19/06/2012 17:19:04
We answered this question on the show...



Dave - String theory is essentially trying to explain why we have all the fundamental particles we have.  So, protons and neutrons are made up of even smaller particles called quarks, and you get electrons and higher energy, more exotic particles – things like muons, and all sorts of different particles.  They can combine in different ways and they all have different masses.
People who are much better at maths than I am have spent a long time trying to find mathematical constructs, so ways of putting maths together to produce objects which look like the particles that we see and have similar properties which we can call mass. 
One of the ways they've done this is with some maths which look a bit like strings.  You can have oscillations on a string.  If you wobble the string slowly, you get one wobble in it as it wobbles left and right.  If you wobble it faster, you can get it to start making a snaking wobble.  As you make it faster and faster, these different vibrations could be associated with different particles.
The actual strings themselves are probably just maths.  We have no evidence to say there are actual little bits of cotton wobbling very, very rapidly.  So all we know is that there is some maths which gives rise to things which look a bit like the particles we have.  I'm not even sure that there's any actual evidence to say that string theory is better than any other particular theory.  They haven’t actually got that far, but that's what the guys in CERN are trying to do.
« Last Edit: 19/06/2012 17:19:04 by _system »

Soul Surfer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • View Profile
    • ian kimber's web workspace
  • Reply #2 on: 20/06/2012 22:01:56
Conventional particle theory had the concept of a point particle but this creates mathematical problems because at a precise geometrical point standard inverse square law forces all go of to infinity.  These can be avoided with a few mathematical tricks like defining the calculations on a way that runs a line around the mathematical point and gets arbitrarily close to it and showing that the results are good right up to the limit.

String theory is another way of avoiding the problem by defining the particle as finite lines  this makes many aspects of the maths more difficult and has vastly more possible solutions. However it avoids the infinity problems.

Geezer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8427
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
  • Reply #3 on: 21/06/2012 01:41:19
Can we be sure they are not just stringing us along?

imatfaal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2970
  • rouge moderator
    • View Profile
  • Reply #4 on: 21/06/2012 16:55:48
Can we be sure they are not just stringing us along?

possibly not - it's definitely a brane-teaser.

 

Naked Scientists Science Radio Show Home Who are The Naked Scientists Information about Naked Scientists
Naked Scientists Podcast Ask the Naked Scientists Podcast Question of the Week Podcast
Naked Science Articles Experiments to do at Home Science Discussion Forum
Science News Stories Answers to Science Questions Interviews with Famous Scientists

Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.

Click here for the Naked Scientists PODCAST

The contents of this site are © The Naked Scientists® 2000-2013. The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science™ are registered trademarks.


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!