# Naked Science Forum

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
19/05/2013 16:46:30

### Author Topic: What is the relative speed of colliding protons in the LHC?  (Read 440 times)

#### thedoc

• Forum Admin
• Administrator
• Sr. Member
• Posts: 327
• on: 18/07/2012 12:30:07
Chris Green  asked the Naked Scientists:

I listen to you by podcast while out walking, training for a planned hike in the Cotswolds later this year. I always enjoy hearing this, and learn a lot from it.

My question: we are always told that nothing can exceed the speed of light. However, when talking about the LHC, we hear that two beams of protons are accelerated to almost the speed of light in opposite directions around the loop, then are made to collide. Does that not mean that the relative velocity of the two streams is almost twice the speed of light? How is that explained?

I have a similar problem when we hear about a capsule mating with the Space Station, We are told that they are moving at a great speed, and so the manoeuvre is very difficult. But in fact the relative speed is clearly approaching zero. In any case, what does the 'speed' of the Space Station mean? Relative to the earth? The moon? The universe

Hope you can explain this sometime...

Warm regards
Chris
-- Chris W. Green

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 18/07/2012 12:30:07 by _system »

#### distimpson

• Newbie
• Posts: 47
• Reply #1 on: 18/07/2012 18:27:00
Hi Chris, I'm new to this forum and assuming it is OK for anyone to take a stab at an answer-if this is not the case, please speak up.

It is true that special relativity states nothing can travel faster than the speed of light and the measured speed of light must be the same in all inertial reference frames, for example, a space ship moving at substantially constant velocity. In your example, the beams of protons in the LHC are traveling toward each other at slightly less than c relative to the laboratory.  However, when you say relative velocity I think you are really referring to the change in distance between the protons as they approach each other. If at some point we call that distance D and measure the time for 2 protons moving toward each other to collide then the result will about D/2c. So while you might say the distance (as measured in the laboratory) between approaching protons is changing at 2c, there is nothing actually moving faster than light. The protons are the traveling objects which in the laboratory reference frame are going slightly less than c and really only travel D/2 before collision.

The surprising observation is that from the point of view of the protons, while moving close to c in the laboratory frame, they will view the approaching protons as moving asymptotically close to but less than c according to the Lorentz transformation and described by special relativity, the equation is difficult to write here.

With the space station example, you have to travel about 17,000mph to stay in orbit above the Earth, that is the great speed and it is relative to the surface of Earth. As you point out, relative to a docking spacecraft the speed should be about zero or else we have a cosmic fender bender.

This is to the best of my understanding, hope it helps. You never know if you really understand something until you try to explain it! best wishes, don

#### Soul Surfer

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3303
• keep banging the rocks together
• Reply #2 on: 19/07/2012 07:26:01
Very good distimpson.  Do not worry about adding your bit at any time these pages are open to all to contribute as they wish.

 Naked Scientists Science Radio Show Home Who are The Naked Scientists Information about Naked Scientists Naked Scientists Podcast Ask the Naked Scientists Podcast Question of the Week Podcast Naked Science Articles Experiments to do at Home Science Discussion Forum Science News Stories Answers to Science Questions Interviews with Famous Scientists

Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.

The contents of this site are © The Naked Scientists® 2000-2013. The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science™ are registered trademarks.