The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Better nutrition for offspring than umbilical cord?  (Read 1457 times)

Offline ConfusedHermit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 101
    • View Profile
Is there a more or most effective means of non-human mothers giving nutrients to their young before they are bornóthat donít have umbilical cords?

For mammals, is the umbilical cord the only thing helping the baby? Will it die without it? Will the mother?

Is it only helping it grow until itís ready, or do the nutrients from the cord help them get Ďa healthier startí when itís born?

Sorry for all the questions; it's packed but I hope to learn the answers for each of them in time :{o~


 

Offline Don_1

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6890
  • Thanked: 7 times
  • A stupid comment for every occasion.
    • View Profile
    • Knight Light Haulage
Re: Better nutrition for offspring than umbilical cord?
« Reply #1 on: 22/07/2012 01:04:32 »
Its a question of investment. Perhaps the most successful investors in the future generations are the marsupials.
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6321
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: Better nutrition for offspring than umbilical cord?
« Reply #2 on: 22/07/2012 02:26:33 »
Of course, there is also the duck billed platypus that also breaks all the rules.

The placenta and umbilical cords seems to be efficient enough.  Many animals eat their placenta after birth, so the nutrition in the organ is not entirely lost.  Well, at least pigs will eat it.

So, what the placenta and umbilical cords buy a species is extending the protected in-utero developmental period. 

Sharks (not mammals, of course), have most interesting reproductive systems, with some sharks laying eggs (oviparous), some sharks having egg-like structures developing internally (ovoviviparous), and some with true placentas (viviparous).  Apparently some of the sharks with live birth start eating stuff prior to hatching.
 

Offline ConfusedHermit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 101
    • View Profile
Re: Better nutrition for offspring than umbilical cord?
« Reply #3 on: 22/07/2012 03:56:48 »
The platypus is such a rebel, man.

Those are some interesting links and facts. Thanks once again :{D~
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: Better nutrition for offspring than umbilical cord?
« Reply #3 on: 22/07/2012 03:56:48 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums