# The Naked Scientists Forum

### Author Topic: Zero Particle Theory  (Read 28092 times)

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #100 on: 04/04/2013 15:54:15 »
The Two Slit Experiment Solved...

The two slit experiment contains positrons without an observer. So there are bump forces, and wave forces. With an observer the electrons neutralize the Positrons. So the wave forces vanish into neutral forces.

We do not find positrons most of the time because electron forces neutralize them from our observations quite often.

Positrons are abundantly around us all of the time.

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #101 on: 04/04/2013 15:57:10 »
I have definitely 100% solved the Theory Of Everything. I know everything.

I just need a computer to program it into.

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #102 on: 04/04/2013 16:22:56 »
Entangled Action At A Distance...

Your scale determines your true area of least resistance. A small body can pass through smaller spaces than a larger body.

Time is a scalar Point Origin of electrons, containing positrons.

Entangled particles share the same origin as scalar information. Which you could call a scalar spin force, like iron filings share the same scalar spin force as a magnet.

Two photons entangled share the same scalar spin force towards an origin. They are behaving like iron filings towards a magnet.

When they are not observed their positrons are active, and that makes the photons neutral with an electron.

When observed the interaction of electrons changes the polarity from positive to neutral. So now the photons are active again with zero mass.

The photons now turn towards their scalar origin.

« Last Edit: 05/04/2013 10:33:37 by Pincho »

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #103 on: 04/04/2013 18:07:56 »
What is an origin?

Where science uses location as X/Y/Z you change to Scalar X / Y /Z. The area of least resistance from scale.

But there are two more locations.. In, and Out. Which is the scalar time location.

You can think of this like an hour glass with sand. X/Y/Z/In/Out with In as the hole in the middle, and out because the hole works from both positive, and negative scalar factors.

XYZ and into a hole, and out of a hole. The holes are points in the middle of electrons the nucleus of an atom. The sand is positrons moving towards points. The photon is a bunch of touching positrons passing a signal.

So the entangled photons are also entangled positrons, inside electrons, and thus a lot of cancelling out is happening...

1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + -1 + -1 + -1 + -1 to get zero mass for a photon.

But the observer uses some sort of charge to observe. You cannot observe the cloud without changing the polarity a bit.

Whatever a spin becomes is part of the observation.

Entangled particles share the same origin, because they share the same scale as a force added together. Like Rice Crispie atoms share the same origin when they are part of a rice crispy. They have no choice, their scale is added together, and their total scale determines their location, and where they will move to next.

Because Spacetime is a grain structure, this sharing of a location like Rice Crispies travels through the entire Universe. It plays the part of propagating Action At A Distance, but is in fact

Local Area Of Least Resistance From Scale
« Last Edit: 04/04/2013 18:16:05 by Pincho »

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #104 on: 04/04/2013 18:28:13 »
Today's science match....

Watch this scalar origin come to life in a new printing device...

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/2013/04/3d-printed-tissue.html

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #105 on: 04/04/2013 19:44:47 »
Say it with flowers....

http://www.newser.com/story/163260/flowers-use-electricity-to-talk-with-bees.html

The shared origin of entangled particles can be taken advantage of. The Positrons that pass messages, pass the origin, and also share the origin of whatever they touch. Positrons are scalar particles, they can touch at a certain speed to pass a message. You can make a whole line of them touch if you send the message fast enough, and that line will all share the same origin. The bees can also create a positive charge like a Positron. So the bees can create a message through the positrons to a flower, and that message will pick up the flower origin and pass it to the bee as poise time. The bee now just allows the poise time to reverse back to the flower. The bee dance can be used in this way. Cause Positrons to share an origin by touch, and the bees will pick up on it.

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #106 on: 05/04/2013 10:52:18 »
We eliminate positrons by observation...

Observation eliminates positrons on Earth. If you put the positrons back into the picture you get...

Unobserved photon = Positron
Unobserved photon  = +1
Unobserved photon  = Convex sphere

Observed Photon = Positron + Electron Pairing
Observed Photon = Neutral
Observed Photon = Flat

So whenever we see a photon we add an electron to a positron. Therefore the photon is a positron until observed. Observing a photon means giving the photon an origin to you, entangling it to an electron. The electron acts as a locator, the locator is like iron filings around a magnet. The photon gets an origin to locate to.

A rainbow is the arrangement of photons to an origin based on scale. The rice Crispy effect of scale through a grain structure. Distance through scale from Red to Blue (example) to origin.

« Last Edit: 05/04/2013 10:54:41 by Pincho »

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #107 on: 05/04/2013 11:07:36 »
You also get a push Gravity from the missing positrons. You also get mass from the push gravity. You also get Dark Matter from the neutral Photons.

Simple. Just one word 'Pull', that messed science up since 1640's.

Tell Isaac Newton.... Maths is not proof.

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #108 on: 05/04/2013 11:26:07 »
People ask Why Is The Universe Expanding?

The structure of the Universe is granular. Colour has location to origin of observer. When an observer observes they set a new origin to the photons. Scale towards the new origin creates a new rainbow with Red furthest away. Spacetime grain flows to the area of least resistance which is always in the location of a Black Hole (which may not be a black hole). By looking at the Milky Way you can see that the grain builds up to a dome at the black hole location (which may not be a black hole).

The particles are probably negatively scaled towards the black hole location, or blocked in the Black Hole location. Anyway, you can see a change in scale towards the black hole location.

Red shift is to do with the arrangement of scale through a grain structure towards an origin. One origin leads to the next origin in a fractal pattern of Newton's Kissing problem.

The change between origins has to do with entanglement.
« Last Edit: 05/04/2013 11:28:58 by Pincho »

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #109 on: 05/04/2013 11:30:09 »
What is a black hole?

I'm beginning to think that it isn't a black hole. More like an hour glass with two bubbles spurting out material. The point at which the two bubbles touch is flat, and neutral. A neutral hole would be a bit like a Black Hole.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23248-giant-milky-way-bubbles-blown-by-black-hole-merger.html
« Last Edit: 05/04/2013 11:33:08 by Pincho »

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #110 on: 05/04/2013 11:34:31 »
What are the bubbles?

Huge Positron and electron flow collisions changing to neutral photons. Or the reverse, that the material is moving into the bubbles.

The scale of the Milky way is from thin to thick in the middle. I need to run it on my computer to get a more accurate description of it.
« Last Edit: 05/04/2013 11:48:46 by Pincho »

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #111 on: 05/04/2013 11:52:14 »
The thing is that the Universe could be scaling down from very large to very small. It means that particles split into smaller bits all of the time. 1 becomes 13 bits. This becomes a new origin with the central bit as a neutral location to move into. The middle is invisible, so that leaves 12 bits that can be seen. 6 positive, and 6 negative.
« Last Edit: 05/04/2013 11:54:25 by Pincho »

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #112 on: 05/04/2013 13:28:51 »
All particles are the same...

There are just two particles in the whole Universe...

Positron and Electron

The photon is a positron that changes to both combined in a flash to become a Neutrino.

The other particles are different scaled versions of the same particles, and the scaling is a fractal, so easy to reproduce.

So therefore just 2 particles, a bit of scaling, and that''s a Universe. What's that? 100 lines of computer code at the most. Probably more like 20 lines.

A Universe in 20 lines of code... just need a fast PC.

My speed problem is here... 4 frames per second, and hardly any particles...
« Last Edit: 05/04/2013 13:36:03 by Pincho »

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #113 on: 06/04/2013 08:50:38 »
My Role In The Theory Of Everything

My current role is to say as much as possible to help as many people as possible in their particular problems. But it is not to be 100% involved in any particular subject just yet. So I am not 100% precise, because I don't stop on one subject for longer than a few minutes. In plate tectonics for example I said that an object has scale in the X / Y / Z, now a more precise version is to use vectors for force of Gravity so that an elephant's feet sink into mud. Even that is not 100% precise. If I sometimes stop to fix mistakes, I can do it, but then I have to stop on a subject for a long time. Which subject do I stop on? It's a Self Teaching Theory Of Everything, I probably can keep solving things for the rest of my life. Do I stop on Cancer, do I stop on Invention, Do I stop on the creation of life? No, I go with the flow in my head at the moment, and the computer program that I write  will have details in it to measure.

You should say...

"I know what he means, but it isn't very accurate, I will fix it myself."

Or

"He got that part wrong."

So let's just stop a little longer on Plate Tectonics as an example.

The Force Of Gravity a bit deeper, and tectonics...

Because of Positrons being scalar particles they melt into a surface of electrons. This melting has its own physics that work as flow through a structure. The flow acts as jets, and the surface acts as a pipe. An elephant's feet act as an outflow of Gravity from above, so act as exhaust pipes of a flow towards Earth. An asteroid acts as a pipe towards Earth from an outside flow. The asteroid also has a bow shock as it moves forwards. A bow shock is the melting away of Positrons.

Positrons melt away, move into electron spin, the spin acts as a caterpillar track, the caterpillar track creates a jet, and the jet is the magnetic push force. So the resistance towards Gravity is countered by a jet. In other words a push force Gravity should not work on a sphere towards Gravity as the side of the sphere moving forwards would exhibit higher pressure. But the jet force counters the higher pressure, and so you get a zero net change. So you can move the Earth into a push flow, because the push flow is then a jet flow. The shapes of the flow act as pipes, and an elephant's feet are acting as exhaust pipes for scaled down Positrons which will be new particles of push magnetism.

Plate tectonics includes all of these forces. It can be worked out very precisely. It is not for me however to get fixated on a subject. I have to work on everything. I don't have time to stop on a subject. I don't have time to do maths. But I have an image of plate tectonics in my head including moving the origin of a plate's X/Y/Z, and including the Gravity, and the jet forces. But the fun part is leaving this to the mathematicians.

Mathematicians should use me as a first step towards solving a problem. That is my role in the Theory Of Everything.

My second role is to create the computer program of the fractal.

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #114 on: 06/04/2013 11:10:33 »
THE MOST IMPORTANT POST OF ALL TIME

Feet, Legs, and Bodies As Jet Streams...

The Missing AMS Data....

Dark Matter....

This is quite important actually. AMS picked up Electrons, and it Picked up Positrons, what it didn't pick up is both combined which makes Neutral particles.

IMPORTANT MESSAGE!!! NEUTRAL BUMPS NEUTRAL

It's the missing piece of the jigsaw puzzle, it's the Dark Matter.

The Neutral flow is of course zero, but an electron is -1.

Energy moves towards lower energy...

Neutral bumps towards Electrons.

The jet stream of particles from an elephant's feet is Neutral. It crushes you, but it's neutral. Gravity is a constant C, but the two forces combined are not a constant. There can be more positrons involved, or more electrons involved in the mixture. The Neutral is the Gravity as a combination of both forces.

If you take feet as jetstreams they match the body of an animal to take their weight. I'll give you some very nice examples...

A deer walks through mud, it's neutral jetstream creates hooves into the mud. You can see the stream jetting in that direction, and as a slight diagonal flow force.

A tree has roots, it's neutral jetstream is into dirt. You can see the jetstream wiggling its way through the dirt as its roots. The tree itself is Newtons 3rd law, that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

We have flat feet, and our opposite action is our hair.

But IMPORTANT news....

Dinosaurs feet do not appear to match their body size. Something is wrong. That needs looking into. Is G a constant? No it isn't, it's based on Positrons and electrons mixed. We would not feel much of a change if gravity changed, but our Neutral jetstream becomes stronger. How strong can a neutral jetstream get? Unknown. But I would say that the jetstream can become unhealthily strong as a pressure inside our bodies.

I also would like you to take a look at hieroglyphics. There is a message in them that I don't wish to discuss on here. The clue is in the Pyramid Lightbulb, and another clue is in the Ankh.

Neutral Gravity is not a constant, it is just Neutral, and always zero, but that doesn't make it a constant.

The change is in the jetstream like a magnet can have a change in jetstream. The spin increases to counter the flow. If you have a spin, and put pressure on that spin it increases. When an ice skater pulls their arms in they go faster.

Our internal body spin counters our Neutral Gravity flow. And that spin speed I think can become unhealthy.

The T-Rex has feet the area of an elephant, but only two of them. That's not right. The Brontosaurus is huge, it's feet don't seem to match.

Egyptians built a pyramid, what for? Maybe there is a clue?

Sometimes you have to just go with what you are thinking. If it's a bit strange to scientists, I'm a scientist too. I don't treat science as 100% accuracy, because I am the most accurate that science has ever been, and I know that science has only ever been about 5% accurate. I am about 90% accurate. Who cares if I go with what I am thinking, and I don't use maths? My accuracy is greater than maths. My computer program is greater than me, but I am then not playing my important role of talking to everyone.

When I watch Richard Feynman, people complain that he wasn't talking enough to the public. It's true, I like it when he talks to the public. If you sit doing maths as proof, you might get 5% accuracy if you don't know what you are doing.

Is G a constant... no.
Is the maths a constant... yes. G = A Neutral Force.

Ok so now you can fix the maths by using some sort of jetstream formula to take into account Positrons, and electrons, and their Neutral combination as a bump force, and combined with a total pressure from Positron scaling with a delay.

I shouldn't use maths myself, I shouldn't reduce my talking time. I have the physics in my head, and that's all I need.

I can tell people a lot. I can get a noble prize every 5 minutes. That's how fast I solve a problem. In fact whilst I am typing I am solving things in real time. By the time I get to the end of a post it is solved in the post.

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #115 on: 06/04/2013 11:22:59 »
I now have enough information for the Computer Program.

I think I was waiting for Neutral as a bump force. That's the final part that I only figured out from the AMS data. My next post therefore will be the computer program.

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #116 on: 06/04/2013 13:39:56 »
I started more of the Computer Program, but I still have a lot going through my head.

I have the red shift figured out as physics...

Colour is spin in a scaled container. So like an Ice Skaters arms the colour is fixed to spin speed by pressure. The Universe has pressure, it's made from scalar particles in a grain structure. Red is the least pressure, and blue is the higher pressure.. etc. Pressure through scalar spin is visible in a rainbow, the red is at the top, low pressure, and blue at the bottom, high pressure. Spin speed, and scalar changes.

So red shift is due to pressure in the universe rising. The red moves into an area of least resistance. Away from the centre, and away from all points.

It's great because I can make my computer program use mathematical colours even for invisible particles. Just follow those rules but change the scale for a Quantum Human.

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #117 on: 06/04/2013 13:57:54 »
The Universe is splitting into finer pieces.

A pressure change in the Universe will scale us down. We must be constantly scaling down. The physics are to split particles into 13 parts so that the new parts are scaled down from the old part. It doesn't actually end the Universe or anything. It makes the Universe have a higher resolution, and more chaos. Which is actually a good thing. If you watch a HD TV, and the old SD TV it is better to watch the HD TV. The Universe is getting more HD as time goes by. People get more intelligent, and evolution has more to work with. The Universe has a fractal, and by looking at trees you can see that the fractal is getting smoother from the old Hexagon shape.

Yes the universe started off with just 13 points, separated by a great distance. It splits down, and each split is a new set of physics that can be used in evolution.

It works for germs too, they can become more complex. In fact the germs have first pick of the  new physics. You can imagine that the physics match a germs scale better than our scale. So it can grab a weapon that we can't.

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #118 on: 06/04/2013 20:26:22 »

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #119 on: 07/04/2013 01:16:40 »
Earlier on today I was setting up the program that will hopefully create the Universe. I expect it to do some strange things, and program itself. But after a few lines of code I saw a scaling sphere on the screen. I was a bit shocked because I didn't program that, and I thought that somehow I had tapped into the Quantum Physics of the computer. But it's a really good optical illusion in fact. I am just moving 12 points towards the middle of the screen. It's a bit like those human dancers that you can find that are made from dots. YouTube blurred the quality, but the illusion is here...

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #120 on: 07/04/2013 18:32:00 »

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #121 on: 08/04/2013 09:04:40 »
Life, and Intelligence emanating from the Earth...

Is it possible that life comes from the centre of the Earth as an outflow? I have been studying gravity, and its outflow, and there is an Inverse square law in both directions. Everyone knows the inverse square law of Gravity, but this inverse square law is more interesting.

Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, so the inverse square law has an equal, and opposite reaction on the Earth. Now Gravity is cancelled out by spin, and flow, and so it is hard to actually measure mass 100% accurately. If the Earth contained a flow force similar to a singularity, it would be cancelled out by an inverse outflow. This outflow would be able to create life by creating particles through the Earth from pressure.

Well, I found a relationship to this information. It is in the skin of animals, and life...

The Outflow of life

The Inverse square law is visible in the skin combined with the mass, and combined with the contact with the Earth of points, and distance from the Earth. So for example...

1/ You have the low end of the scale. The bird which is lightweight, with feathers flowing out in every direction. It's outflow is high compared with its body weight. Two spindly legs, and spends a lot of time a long distance away from the Earth. Call this the light scale.

2/ Low to medium weight you have the cat, and the dog. The cat with 4 legs in contact with the Earth, covered in fur, and outflow relating to the 4 points in contact with the Earth. So fur on the back where fur is on our head is a relationship to outflow in the same direction. Spends most of the time up to about 2ft away from the Earth.

3/ You have a human, about 10 stone, two legs touching the Earth, 1ft square contact. This human has smooth skin, some hair at the top, and some genital hair. The smooth skin, and the hair are the outflow forces. 6ft away from the Earth. This is the exact middle scale, which you can call the Neutral scale. I think that this neutral scale is important to intelligence.

4/ Getting bigger, the cow. 4 legs in contact with the Earth. The nails are starting to become hooves, the fur is getting shorter from the cat, and the dog. Th skin is still smooth. 5ft away from the Earth.

5/ The elephant. 4 legs in contact with the Earth. The nails are thick. The feet are flat. The fur is dwindling away. The skin is starting to become wrinkled. The wrinkles are related to the outflow changing back to an inflow, like a snowflake, and a Bose/ Einstein Condensate. 8ft away from the Earth.

6/ The tree. Multiple contacts with the Earth as roots. The feet embed into the ground. The fur has become leaves, and the skin is extremely wrinkled. A powerful inflow, and outflow combined. The tree has taken on its own life giving properties like the Earth. It's height is divided into roots flows, hard to measure per root.

I believe that this is the inverted Inverse Square Law as Newton's 3rd law that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

The flows are also related to temperature. So lizards have a different flow force, and are also very close to the ground. Like snakes.. you never see a fury snake.

Insects, extremely close to the ground. Exoskeleton.

I also think that bones are a neutral change location.
« Last Edit: 08/04/2013 09:31:57 by Pincho »

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #122 on: 08/04/2013 10:45:24 »
Hexagonal Fractals in Nature...

I say that trees are smoothing out an hexagonal fractal. What does that mean? Well it is better if I show you. These next two examples have a clear hexagonal structure, because they are the perfect mathematical size. It's a bit like the perfect woman, you want the best symmetry, well these trees have the best symmetry...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/51035740406@N01/5669558892/

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #123 on: 08/04/2013 11:08:04 »
Holes

Think of a Black Hole as power. A hole is power, and energy in a flow of particles. The whirlpool spinning around a hole is locating energy to a circular space. Locking it there means that it can be used. An electron is a hole, it's energy is a neutral spin around the hole, the same as the flow of water around a whirlpool. Holes are power, and the Earth has a lot of power, so I say that it has a hole.

I want to also add that the important part of atoms is their holes, and their flows. The nucleus is Neutral, but can flow towards negative holes, so the Nucleus can flow towards electrons, and that is time. When a Neutral force moves around a hole, it takes on the hole spin. So then the Neutral force becomes an electric field. Static electricity is the Nucleus flowing through the electrons to become a static electric field. So a balloon can be rubbed, and Neutral forces will change to static electricity. The rubber is not good as a conductor because it is Neutral, but the Neutral easily changes into electrons. You could say that rubber is not a good container of water because it is a full bucket of water already.
« Last Edit: 08/04/2013 11:12:51 by Pincho »

#### Pincho

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 268
• Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #124 on: 08/04/2013 11:34:45 »
The Bose / Einstein Condensate

The condensate is the opposite flow of static electricity. In static electricity the nucleus flows out towards electrons, takes on the electron spin to become energy. The snowflake reverses the flow towards the nucleus.. electrons take on positrons, and move towards Neutral areas. The condensate exaggerates a snowflake to its final solution. Time is flowing backwards.

#### The Naked Scientists Forum

##### Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #124 on: 08/04/2013 11:34:45 »