The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Zero Particle Theory  (Read 28787 times)

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #125 on: 08/04/2013 11:36:21 »
Where are the positrons?

You see them as photons. Whatever science is calling a positron, isn't a positron. It's probably a double positron. Call it a dirty positron for simplicity. There is some sort of scalar change happening very fast, and it is so fast that a photon is taking on the part of 3 other particles. I think that time is faster than C, so that might be why.
« Last Edit: 08/04/2013 11:42:02 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #126 on: 08/04/2013 12:01:04 »
Solving Everything

It may seem hard to believe but over the years I have been solving everything as an independent witness of science. I never studied science so I had to re-invent it all from scratch. That was for fun. So I re-invented things right back from before Newton, and didn't read anything. I came up with Gravity, and Time, and Dimensions, and my own set of particles, and my own set of rules. I have solved almost everything now. It is interesting however to read my old posts. For example when I invented Dark Matter...

http://theabsolute.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=4962&start=100

My posts started in 2003, and get progressively better over time. But in the above example I am calling Dark Matter.. ghost. That's because I just invented it. I also invented Dark Flow. The words were not in use at the time, so I just came up with the physics, and gave them my own names. You may think it is strange to call Dark Matter 'Ghost' but I don't think that anybody had heard of Dark Matter in 2009. It had been out of circulation for years. I also invented the Aether, but of course it was already in use. I just didn't know about it. I also invented the Aether sink holes, and spurt holes as time holes.

When I say invented, I mean re-invented without knowing it. To me.. I have solved everything in the Universe, but to everyone else.. I came after somebody else.

But my point is that I have played the parts of Newton, Einstein, and everyone else, all on my own.

This gives me a great deal of vision of the Universe in my mind. I have a real connection with it. I can fly around the Universe, and see everything at any scale. It's amazing.

 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #127 on: 08/04/2013 12:25:46 »
In the above as well, you have to remember that Dark matter came up in my theory because I was using a push Gravity system. Not because some Galaxy was spinning wrong. Dark Matter is a natural occurrence of a Push Gravity system, and so are bubbles.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #128 on: 08/04/2013 12:42:19 »
Then this link, has yet another link where I think of Dark Matter in 2004, but unfortunately the link has gone...
http://theabsolute.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?p=115168#p115168

That post caused NASA to notice the Pioneer Anomaly. I asked NASA in Feb 2004 if their spaceships were slowing down, and they said no. Then in August 2004 they had a meeting and found the Pioneer anomaly from some old data going back to 1970.

In the end though it turned out not to be Dark Matter afterall.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #129 on: 09/04/2013 00:19:10 »
Cause And Effect

Cause and effect are added to Newton's 3rd law that every action has an equal, and opposite reaction.

The very first cause...

Inflation from a hole. So you get the sphere, and the hole all at once. Equal, and opposite. Newton's 3rd law.

The effect
Zero is created. The sphere, and it's hole added together equals zero, equal, and opposite. 1 + -1 = 0. You get neutral space.

That happened once, it happens infinitely from infinite points. It equals zero, the opposite of zero is infinity.

What you do here is create an infinite rule that cancels itself out. The positions of the sphere are cancelled out by Newton's Kissing Problem, which is a shape that has a pattern of symmetry from natural cause, and effect.

The next stage is filling in the gaps. There is always a gap to fill in.

Then the particles start to touch each other. Now Newton's 3rd law is to to the opposite to touch.. move away.

Then infinity squashes all of the particles together from inflation. The opposite is to shrink down.

Anyway, eventually form Cause, and effect you get now. And what has happened is that all of the rules of Cause, and effect, and equal, and opposite forced only one possible outcome for the Universe. Zero Particle Theory.

But I say that pull doesn't exist. What is the equal, and opposite to push?

The half tennis ball shows you that the equal, and opposite to a bump surface, is a dip surface. Convex, and concave. So pull, is actually flow into a hole.

And then people wonder how do we start a thought off in our head. What is the first cause of a thought...

The energy of thought is the inflation from a hole the same as the first Cause of the Universe. Not much has actually changed in billions of years. Just a constant set of Cause, and effect, and Newton's 3rd Law.

So why is science so complicated?

In 1746 Isaac Newton became very famous with his ideas on Gravity. A celebrity status, with a bold man as the role model with more men to follow him. I think of the seagulls in Finding Nemo all saying "Pull, pull, pull pull pull, pull..." with trill voices. By turning physics on its head with a pull force instead of a push force science became the most impossible puzzle to solve. Everyone trying to fix this problem, and anyone saying that Gravity is a push force is a joke. It's the Emperors New Suit that you are stupid if you don't call Gravity a pull force.

Then everything started to work nicely backwards, because of Newton's 3rd law that things can be worked out by their opposite reaction. But pull is only similar to flow into a hole, not exact enough to work forever. You end up with Dark matter as a push force.

Now you have a pull force, and Dark Matter as a push force, and yet they are both the exact same force. The problems aren't over yet...

You get this mass where there should be a hole. Nobody used the tennis ball idea, so nobody has the holes in the Earth in the right places, they have mass in the holes. And Electrons get a mass.

Now electrons have a mass so Quantum physics is messed up. because the electron is now backwards, and so the Michelson and Morley experiment is not towards holes it is towards mass. The photon should be in a wind from mass, but not from holes. So that is all backwards.

You have another problem. You don't have electron holes, you have electron mass, so in that hole you have a particle missing. The missing particle is playing the part of gravity. So you have gravity missing. So you need a particle for mass, and come up with the Higgs Boson. So now you have invented a new particle to replace the one in the electron hole. You have really found a scalar particle of some sort, and it doesn't really matter which one it is, because the electron, and positron are scalar particles that make all of the other scalar particles.

So you have missing positrons, and you start the two slit experiment. Guess what, you find the missing positrons, but you don't know about them. So now you think that weird things are happening to photons.

Anyway, it goes on like Bizarro World in Superman comics...

http://noahpinionblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/i-found-bizarro-economics-world.html

I turn to these people who can see the emperor in his new suit, and I say "Pull, pull, pull, pull..." in a trill voice. Scientists shout "Banned, Banned, Banned, Banned..."

Brilliant! 1746 is strong in the Bizarros.

Einstein doesn't help. He takes advantage of the mess that science is in. basically, at this point you could say almost anything, and get away with it. With science backwards lets just take physics away completely and give it to the observer. So now the observer is reverse rolled into the physics.

You have a pull force where there should be a push force, and you have an observer watching a train to account for the physics on the train.

Then there should be a flow towards the Earth, but you have a pull, so Einstein decides to bend Spacetime. Oh brilliant!!! The bend was the flow, now it's a bend. You may as well add a twist to the bend because its a plughole, so Einstein adds a twist to the bend, but backwards.

So now you have a pull force that bends spacetime with a twist, instead of simple physics, a flow into holes with a twist.. it's a plughole. No difference.

Then you have a Black Hole with a pull force, and a twist that is a Galaxy. It's a whirlpool. There's no difference.

And out of 7 billion people on Earth, I'm the only one to see it. I don't even feel that clever to work it out really. It's just too obvious to be called clever.

I live on a Bizarro World, all backwards. They tell me to do the maths... it's a joke.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #130 on: 10/04/2013 10:38:27 »
Nucleus propagation and C

First you imagine Frog Spawn. A separation of the egg by a distance of jelly. You turn this into a Newton's Cradle. This is the passing of information by egg. To get the eggs to pass information they must bump each other. So they need to rock around in the jelly. Frog Spawn has a separation distance, and angle similar to Newton's Kissing Problem. If you look at Frog Spawn...

http://doubtfulnews.com/2013/02/goo-up-in-the-trees/

... you will quickly find the Hexagon. That's the Kissing Problem of stacking sphere. The jelly swells up in water, and we will call that scalar for this example. We will call the eggs Positrons. We will think of the jelly as Electrons. We will call one Kissing shape of 13 particles the Zero Particle. And to complete the Zero Particle we will scale all of this down to a gas. So now the jelly is a cloud, and the positrons are floating in the cloud. The cloud bumps in the directions of Newton's Kissing Problem. The positrons swing in the Directions of the bumps. The positrons are swinging like a Newton's Cradle. When the positrons bump they act as Photons. When they don't bump they are hidden in the electron cancellation. 1 + -1 = 0.

The act of creating the Newton's Cradle is both random from the CMB, and also Observer propagated. All you have to do to get the flow in a certain direction is degenerate the cloud. We degenerate the cloud of electrons at an angle through the Newton's Kissing shape to change the Two Slit Experiment from a CMB wave into an Observer Propagated wave. The CMB wave looks different to the Observer wave because it has no direction apart from a newton's Kissing Problem structure, which is mostly hexagonal. Particles passing through a hexagonal structure move in a wave pattern. Hexagons link to other hexagons in a wave formation.

The propagation of light is a Frog Spawn Fractal.
« Last Edit: 10/04/2013 10:42:30 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #131 on: 10/04/2013 10:49:25 »
Propagate light, propagate physics

The light, and the physics are related. They work the same way as each other. If you propagate light using the above method, you can propagate mass the same way. If you haven't downloaded my snowflake generator, here it is... press the spacebar to make it work...

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pinchopaxton/Snowflake.rar

It is the Frog Spawn propagation of matter that creates the snowflake.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #132 on: 10/04/2013 10:58:35 »
The propagation of Gravity

The Propagation of a galaxy

You can keep going.. they are all the same. Everything uses this propagation method. All that is missing is the scalar information for the other particles, and the periodic table of missing eggs in the frog spawn. The protons create an initial pattern of propagation with missing Positrons, so the propagation is a different shape. Instead of a Hexagon you might get a five pointed star. So you get the periodic table. You also get weak shearing through the propagating material as positrons can move to a free area.

 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #133 on: 10/04/2013 11:27:22 »
My science match for the previous posts moves to another Frog Spawn Fractal...

http://www.space.com/14258-space-bubbles-star-evolution.html

Notice that the fractal is both physically a fractal that energy is in the centre of a bubble of gas, and visually a fractal that the light is a sphere within a sphere. The egg of the frog being the movement, and the jelly being the food.

So...

Tadpole = Movement

matches

Sun = movement


Jelly = Food

Matches

Gas = Food

Sphere in a sphere is both a physical, and aesthetic fractal. The Universe is made from fractals that obey fractal laws.
« Last Edit: 10/04/2013 11:35:22 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #134 on: 10/04/2013 12:14:33 »
I sort of wondered if you could actually make a magnetic version of this Newton's cradle. You could try liquid iron, and oil with an iron core suspended from a wire. The wire being attached to an electric current. Put the oil in a trough touching the cores, then switch on the current in a linear direction passing along the wires. The oil should propagate along the iron cores to the end of the trough. If you made the trough a see saw, it could rock back to the beginning again. So now you have an electric rocker switch using Frog Spawn propagation.

If you could make a jelly version with magnetic cores, you could get some nice natural shapes in the jelly. Watch the jelly change into a starfish for example. Or some bouncy balls that start to bounce on their own.
« Last Edit: 10/04/2013 12:20:15 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #135 on: 10/04/2013 13:08:06 »
The fractals smooth out.

As the fractal splits, and splits, it smooths out. But when you understand the fractal, you can still see it. I can just about see it in a tree for example. I can just about see it everywhere in this video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJyUtbn0O5Y&feature=youtube_gdata_player

But it is very smoothed out by now.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #136 on: 10/04/2013 21:08:32 »
Time and Dilation to local points...

The time that I call Poise Time is located inside points. It is at each point of the Frog Spawn, and curls up in there as energy. Per point means local, and local time means that matter must be local to a point to use that time. The outflow of time separates distance of matter to time. So the inflow being local uses the nearest time nucleus, and not its original time nucleus. So when time flows backwards to make a snowflake, it is not backwards to its original location, it is backwards towards a point, where In flow is backwards, and Out flow is forwards. So movement reorganises time backwards from forwards, but different to the the Standard Model time does not have an arrow. It has locality to points, In, and Out.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #137 on: 11/04/2013 00:09:56 »
Growing Old...

In a fractal Universe I have a fractal description of time using holes separated by Newton's Kissing problem. Time flows out for energy propagation, and heat, and time flows back into the nearest local hole for negative propagation, and cold. The negative flow towards holes folds inwards to create snowflake fractals. But it also flows inwards when energy is running low from that hole. Points require energy to hold them open, and that energy is like a plug in the hole. If a point starts to empty, then the plug is out of the hole, and time travels into that hole.

Humans are a DNA energy pack of time. It flows from the holes, and propagates our shape. It uses scalar energy to keep flowing forwards.. but it runs out. At about 40 your time flow has run out, and so time starts flowing backwards for you... yes backwards.

You are not flowing into your past (well just a bit with memory slowly working backwards), but you are taking in energy from the opposite direction... like a hand saw. Energy out, energy in for 40 years to complete the energy cycle.

This change in direction at 40 hits you at first. The slow down is a low peak in your mental abilities. But it gains speed back to something close to before. But now with energy flowing inwards you start to wrinkle. You are taking on the energy of the snowflake fractal, and it isn't smooth, it is wrinkly. Like a balloon going down. You can only last so long on backwards energy, it is like an extra fuel tank.

But the nice thing about it is that you are being stored in holes. So it gives your imagination the chance to say that there is an afterlife, because your energy went into holes. Which is another way to examine DNA... is DNA a person stored in holes?

That is fantasising a bit. Anyway you get older by reversing the energy of time back into holes. You brain starts to pick thing out in the wrong sequence. And then you forget names, because those names are in the wrong order to work in reverse.

Say Tommy is 48, and you remember Tommy at 12. You look at Tommy, he looks to old to be Tommy. Your flow is backwards.

But time itself is only energy. Any reference to Past, and Future is a misunderstanding. It's just a flow force from holes. No need to add anything paranormal to it. It may be fun for scientists to think of these paranormal events, but science should be accuracy, not fun.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #138 on: 11/04/2013 10:35:32 »
The time / origin displacement

Connected particles share an origin. Particles connect locally in X/Y/Z/In/Out/Flat-line. Time connects locally just the same. In / Out / Flat-line are the origin of the force of particles. At the point of In / Out / Flat-line there is scalar regression. Scale works like curvature, and time starts at flat line In / Out. Time is a bit like a trampoline combined with inflation. So if the trampoline is concave you get inflation filling the concave dent. If the trampoline is convex then time is feeding outwards, and you have inflation. We share a fractal with a Universal Membrane. X/Y/Z, and Out are local to us, but In, and Flat-line are local to the Universal membrane. Action at a distance is really local to In/ and Flat-line. The sorting order of the Universal Membrane is scalar. Colours most likely sort to pressure in a Universal membrane, but still appear to us at X / Y /Z coordinates.

Mathematically the origin can be tied to particles as vectors. Physically the origin is tied to particles in the Nucleus of the particle in a hole. The hole in the standard model would lead to the 4th dimension, but the holes are too fragmented to work in the standard model.

The problem with the standard model is that it has no physics for time. So you can make anything work that you like. I always use physics, and I don't know how to get the physics of time working as an arrow. But anyway, my fractal time works better than an arrow, because it allows free thought. If a body is connected to its own time energy it only uses its own time energy locally, and that allows an individual to separate themselves from the rest of the Universe. So that person then has thoughts individual to themselves.. free thought.

If time were an arrow (which I find impossible unless you just use words, and no physics) then free will becomes connected to an arrow of time, and you have no free will.

Anyway Gravity is local, so time should be local, that makes more sense.

I always use physics when I talk of ideas, I have no ideas without physics. I have physics for Gravity, magnetism, time, and nothing. I think that's why the Standard Model is so incomplete, and can get away with just saying the 4th dimension.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #139 on: 11/04/2013 11:06:02 »
Today's science link....
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130410141541.htm

So earlier I was saying that at 40 time starts to flow in reverse for you. The order in which you sort information is taken in reverse. You adapt to this reverse thinking pattern, because you sort things backwards.

4 + 3 = 7
3 + 4 = 7

You don't notice.

But I can give you an example. Sometime soon the World Snooker Championships begin. There are older commentators who used to play the game as World Champions. They often talk about loss of concentration in their older years, and a common complaint is forgetting to pot the ball. This is how snooker works...

In order of thinking...
1/ You calculate the white angle towards another ball to pot that ball.
2/ You look at the next ball that you would want to pot. Calculate how to get onto the next ball within about a 1ft radius of accuracy.


That's the correct order, but a problem begins in older players, that they forget stage 1, and take it for granted.

So the older player...

1/ Calculate how to get onto the next ball within about a 1ft radius of accuracy.
2 Forgets to calculate the white angle towards another ball to pot that ball.

Their thoughts are occurring in reverse order, but so good at potting that the final stage usually doesn't matter. If a professional snooker player could train themselves to think in reverse, then they could become fantastic again.

It is often the first thing that is skipped in older years. because the timing of that first thing seems to make the least sense to you...

"How did I forget to pot the ball, that is the main thing?"

The main thing is turning up last, and you skip it by rushing.

"I'm at the final stage now, the positioning of the ball. So I can't have missed anything out."

But the above link gives you some idea of how we sequence thoughts, and if that sequence is messed up, it is time reversal. But time as an energy source, not as Past, Present, and Future.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #140 on: 11/04/2013 14:32:30 »
The Universe as a local object...

The physics that I use depend upon curves, and the curves need to cancel each other out to get a zero state Universe. If you start with any set of physics they need a location inside something. You have to be careful how you work this out, because to keep the zero state you are putting particles on top of something. So if you have a single particle with a hole, you have a set of curves, and the convex curves are the particles, and the concave curves are the hole. They are inside a huge version of the same thing. In scale curves start to look like straight lines. So at the point where the Universe is large you can maintain the zero state by putting the particles inside a huge object with straight lines. This connects your inner particles to the outer membrane when they are cancelling each other out with...

1 + -1 = 0

1 + -1 = merged with the Universe.

Which sort of allows an action at a distance, because the distance has a dimension that is connected to a much bigger particle. Two photons with zero mass can be connected to the zero line of the whole Universe.

This is maybe convenient. I would prefer just to connect two photons to the Aether. It feels like there is some missing information still. A vacuum is used to move the particles, and there is no such thing as a vacuum, so it's a very cheated experiment anyway.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #141 on: 11/04/2013 15:18:34 »
Amazing Evolution...

Zero Particle Theory uses fractals as life shapes. Especially the Hexagon through Newton's Kissing Problem. That in a particle stacking system 12 particles can surround 1 particle, and you get a common Hexagon fractal. So most creatures are already covered before evolution, and DNA are required.

What does that mean?

It means that you can almost build all of our nature from fractals without evolution, but the shapes would be missing some features.

The one thing that I am always drawn to from evolution is that baby's feet are flat. That means that the baby is ready for Gravity, and Cause, and effect are backwards because the baby has never walked on the ground before. When Cause, and effect are backwards it shows that something in DNA is very amazing.

You can say that a person with flat feet survived better to pass on their DNA, and it works in a computer simulation. But how far can that go? How many people today are born with hooves? How long would it take to change feet into hooves?

1/ Nobody today has feet with hooves. The DNA could not be passed on.
2/ DNA Cause and Effect need memory to change the human into a human with hooves.

Something has to be stored during a human lifetime that adds to DNA. And that is Poise Energy of Time. Time as an energy flowing backwards into holes accounts for Cause and effect playing backwards. The baby can be born with flat feet, or even hooves if necessary.

The computer simulations work if humans can be born with hooves to survive better, but that doesn't happen. So instead you need DNA memory. For each person with harder feet you will eventually get hooves, but the harder feet have to be memorised at each stage.

DNA requires a memory system. Feedback into holes. The snowflake.. Bose Einstein Condensate.. time reversal.


 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #142 on: 12/04/2013 20:45:24 »
Today's science match is about evolution. It doesn't match what I said, but it gives an alternative idea that I like...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130412132407.htm
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #143 on: 13/04/2013 09:51:09 »
Ok so I have been programming for a couple of days now, and the physics are starting to self build. The program is creating physics that I never thought about. Like when two bubbles stick together the centre of mass moves, and the bubbles spin around a new mass point. Although I was not programming sticky bubbles, I accidentally got those physics, because my program isn't finished yet. But the interesting thing is that the sticky bubbles really work properly, and that is because of a bow shock. I use physics for relativity, and the physics for the bow shock automatically switch the mass centre, and create the centre of rotation, and rotate the mass all in one go. No formulas to work out, just natural events occurring from a bow shock. It may even turn out that I need sticky bubbles, because a Galaxy rotates as one object I think.

When I imagined my snowflake program it worked. Now it seems that my imagined physics for the Universe are going to work as well.
« Last Edit: 13/04/2013 09:58:33 by Pincho »
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11993
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #144 on: 18/04/2013 23:59:22 »
Pincho, it's time for you to check up on the terminology of science, just not loose sentences. You have a good and original mind, but you need to set it into a context. And using too many self defined definitions makes it very hard to read. Sit down and check out how main stream science define it. Then look at what you think, but use the words, and science, that already are there. I think you're young :) And impatient. Relax, time is enough.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11993
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #145 on: 19/04/2013 00:05:43 »
Yeah, I know. the more your idea differs, the harder it will be to find the right words. Don't give up though, they exist, you just have to search, but I promise you will recognize them when you see them. and they will also give you more ideas. Don't assume you're the only in physics with a good mind. We all stand on shoulders, just by growing up.
 

Offline Pmb

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1838
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #146 on: 02/05/2013 06:08:50 »
Pincho - Since you complained so much when I explained to you what the scientific method was and corrected your incorrect beliefs about what science is all about I thought I'd come on your turf and see if you'd justify any of your claims.

I saw only this and one other thread that you started. Before I added this post this thread consisted of 145 posts, 143 of which are yours. What are you attempting to accomplish?

When you make claims such as
Quote
You may think it is strange to call Dark Matter 'Ghost' but I don't think that anybody had heard of Dark Matter in 2009.
it's hard to take you seriously. You claimed to have never learned science and decided to reinvent it from scratch. If you never learned science then how can you expect anybody to take you seriously? In the other forum you didn't even seem willing to explain what you meant when you use the word "science" because its clear that what you mean yu that word and what others mean by it have little to do with each other. Then you make an erroneous statement like this one where you believe that nobody had ever heard of the term dark matter in 2009. You can't be serious. Only a crackpot would make such a terribly erroneous claim like that. It's unheard of to find an astronomy, cosmology or astrophysics text published within the, say, last 30 years, which doesn't talk about dark matter. Even my GR texts discuss it

So tell me. Are you willing to

(1) Define the term science as you have chosen to use the term.
(2) Explain why you're unwilling to justify any assertion that you've made to me in that other thread.
(3) Justify/clarify/explain your belief that you don't think that anybody had heard of Dark Matter in 2009.

I'd also like to hear why you'd reject science when you yourself have told us that you don't know anything about it. How you you be certain that you're talking about the same methodology that everyone else uses? I.e. how do you know that when you make a statement or attempt to make an argument hat you're doing so with sound logic?

And no. I'm not trying to be a jerk. I'm sincerely trying to understand you even if it doesn't come across that way to you.
 

Offline Ethos_

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1277
  • Thanked: 14 times
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #147 on: 02/05/2013 17:33:44 »

And no. I'm not trying to be a jerk. I'm sincerely trying to understand you even if it doesn't come across that way to you.
Good luck Pmb, I've also tried to communicate intelligently with this fellow. There is only one jerk involved here in this discussion and it isn't you. Nor is it I, we have both given it a fair effort but sadly, to no avail. Like yourself, I was interested in understanding Pincho's ideas, but he resists any and all corrective logic. I'm afraid our efforts have been terribly wasted!!!
 

Offline Pmb

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1838
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #148 on: 02/05/2013 17:56:01 »

And no. I'm not trying to be a jerk. I'm sincerely trying to understand you even if it doesn't come across that way to you.
Good luck Pmb, I've also tried to communicate intelligently with this fellow. There is only one jerk involved here in this discussion and it isn't you. Nor is it I, we have both given it a fair effort but sadly, to no avail. Like yourself, I was interested in understanding Pincho's ideas, but he resists any and all corrective logic. I'm afraid our efforts have been terribly wasted!!!
I agree. It was extremely frustrating trying to talk to somoene who is only willing to make unfound claims and refuse to back them up.
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #148 on: 02/05/2013 17:56:01 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums