The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Zero Particle Theory  (Read 28745 times)

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #25 on: 08/03/2013 17:41:11 »
What is the constant C?

When you use a Newtons Cradle the balls have a similar size, and a set radius, and all propagate through a force, and the energy escapes. The speed drops because the energy escapes. That would be the Convex waterfall effect escaping.

The physics of C are similar to a Newton's Cradle, but the energy doesn't escape. A set distance is propagated through. Time acts as a piston in the middle. The piston value...

5,4,3,2,1,-1,-2,-3,-4,-5 adds up to zero. So zero is lost.

So in a normal Newtons Cradle energy is lost in the X/Y/Z

Inverted physics forces the energy into a hole, and back into the system again. The hole is where X / Y /Z all meet up at a single point... Time.

Time which has a bounce with no loss of speed. The propagator of all things.

 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #26 on: 09/03/2013 02:34:38 »
Relativity stored in a fractal framework.

You stand on a train.

The train has a bow shock which is the scaling of space time.

Newton's Kissing problem is 12 balls around 1 ball.

The train scales down the centre ball of 12 to make points in space time, because the middle ball has nowhere to escape to.

The other scalar particles can escape if they are fast enough relative to the train speed. Otherwise bunching occurs.

Bunching traps more scalar particles, they cannot escape.

There are more points created by bunching, more scaling down, less resistance from forward motion due to a fragmented space time. Bunching is due to acceleration, once the speed becomes regular the bunching rolls through its own newly created holes in the bow shock areas.

Time as a geyser spring is under pressure. Time dilation occurs due to the restriction of forward flow from a hole. The loss of forward flow also takes pressure off the atoms. Contraction throughout the train is due to loss of internal time pressure. Time shrinks, time is a propagator of atoms.

The electrons as holes have a flow of incoming gravity from the train movement. This spins around the electrons, and expands the holes. Magnetism flows forwards as a push force. G force flows backwards as a push force. Magnetism is another aspect of the scaling of space time down.

Colour shifts are related to scale shifts. A wave is a scalar wave, so a red shift is a scale up, and a blue shift is a scale down. At the front of the train there is a scale down. At the back of the train there is a scale up.  A rainbow is therefore a scalar rainbow. The size to wave relationship is through individual particle pockets which are aligned to become waves. A rainbow looks like a curved packet of Rice Crispies at the quantum scale. The small crispies  shrunk to fall to the bottom of the big Crispies in the bag looks similar to photon pockets.

A person standing on this train experiences similar bow shock forces.
A person standing outside of the train has none of this Data.

So the frames are now frozen.

If the train is accelerating the zero particles change from convex to concave and forming the holes as an area of least resistance ahead of the train. Concave zero particles have an inward flow of time particles, and this flow acts as a bond (The waterfall is concave, you put your hand in it and your hand moves into the waterfall. It looks like a pull force, but is a quantum push force.) The zero particles can't escape under acceleration pressure. Time as a spring is under pressure. Magnetic bubbles are forming from electron spin speeds coming from increased G force. Zero particles are scaling down gravity into magnetism.

Train reaches a constant speed. The convex particles now bump away as less become concave. The convex geyser effect of time has regained momentum.

The thing is to think of the physics acting out Relativity as a Quantum flow. Two people do not share the entire flow of physics. The single frame is flowing towards the next frame.

Do not confuse time with Past, Present, and Future however. That's a big mistake. Time is always present time. The time dilation of a clock is a restriction of time energy. Time energy is a force limited to a small atomic sphere. It cannot escape it's own sphere, it's trapped. There is no arrow, there is a scalar sphere reducing to a snowflake, then into a point. If you test out the time physics on ageing then you get a result from limiting the energy loss of the test subject. That's not a time result in the sense of Past, Present or Future.

Time in most cases does not exist. It is just a force the happens inside a point where it propagates the X /Y /Z forces. A scaler vortex of Russian Dolls. A geyser where the water can fold inside out on itself... a super liquid, condom, geyser flow force.

It is quite complicated. And it is easy to make a mistake in this mixture of physics. So I may have missed something, or got something backwards. It's easy to get something backwards when a particle can take on the opposite physics by folding inside out...

Water scales up into ice, and ice scales down. The physics reverse. Water can be crushed into magnetism as well.

 




« Last Edit: 09/03/2013 02:50:57 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #27 on: 09/03/2013 10:20:18 »
The image above of a photon stream, spin, and scalar change is not totally at the Quantum Scale. I mean that there are smaller physics happening that aren't in the picture, quite important details actually...

Spin Spin...
Newtons Kissing Problem has a hidden 13th ball that can never be fitted. Zero particles perform scalar changes which are like mini waterfalls. The exchange of energy between scalar particles creates scale equalization. So Newton's Kissing Problem in this case uses same sized particles, and the waterfall flow is Time which is smaller, and builds the same sized particles. The 13th ball that can never be fitted allows all particles to spin around the central particle. That spin is......... Spin Spin.

You have a hollow propagator, so it's spin directs the flow invisibly. So what we see has another invisible spin which points energy towards the area of least resistance. In the prism above the spin spin would point towards the largest mass area of the prism, because mass is holes, and holes are electrons. So the spin spin points towards the electrons first, and this is the passageway to the area of least resistance for gravity.

Now the spin spin is a very useful physical device. It directs flow, and it creates bonding. The bonding is created by the fact that the spin spin has open ends, but a more closed middle area. It looks like a Gyroscope inverted to be hollow made from Newton's Kissing Problem. The 6 balls surrounding the middle area are the Gyroscope wheel. The other balls 3 at the top, and 3 at the bottom create the Gyroscope arms. You see the bonding in snowflakes, and the locking can rotate very rarely...

http://i.livescience.com/images/i/000/009/281/i02/ig35_snowflakes_10_02.jpg

Above you see a snowflake which normally bonds in lines has a 90 degree rotation through the bonding. Similar things happen in other areas of nature, like trees, and DNA double helix.

One of the other important states of this bonding process is in creating the wave.

 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #28 on: 09/03/2013 10:34:59 »
What is a wave?

A wave is particle bonding through a spin spin. It looks like a line of hollow Gyroscope end to end which propagate energy through touch bonding. Newton's Kissing Problem applies to all of the touch bonding locations. So the touch bonding is often limited to 60 degree angles, or various cases of Newton's Kissing Problem angles. Touch bonding is created by concave effects with concave flow walls which act 'similar' to a pull force. So all waves are created by particles.

The two slit experiment with an observer helps the bonding to take place. So you get spin spin towards the detector. Without an observer the contact of the zero particles is lesser without any bow shocks from the observer to create the concave holes required for bonding. The system can rock without better bonding, so it is like the gyroscopes slowing down on a table, and rocking in this lesser energy state.

The rocking motion creates the waves in the sea. The bonding is weak, it swings around like little bridges that open to let the boats through. Little fishing floats with magnets on the ends is a real model that you could build. If you centrally balance the floats, and use a weak magnet you can get the little waves to happen, and open up. If you can arrange a 60 degree rotation with a hoop, and make sure that you have opposite poles then you can get an even better model.

So that is how a particle converts into a wave, and a line.

Particle Wave Duality.
« Last Edit: 09/03/2013 11:33:39 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #29 on: 09/03/2013 10:55:56 »
I first started this theory in about 2003. I look in the science news each day to see what new, undiscovered physics matches my theory. About 100 times I have found a new match. Today this is my match...

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348865/description/News_in_Brief_Particle_caught_flip-flopping
« Last Edit: 09/03/2013 11:00:54 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #30 on: 09/03/2013 13:42:13 »
So Quantum Physics of the spin spin directs the energy flows, and it has limited turning ability because the energy has to propagate through Newton's Kissing Problem, and the propagation creates areas of least resistance at 60 degrees, and perhaps 30 degrees in places.

So why doesn't the Universe look more angular?

Well the rotations are tiny, but of course we do see a lot of angles like trees, and limbs, and snowflakes. However a circle is a large fractal of a hexagon anyway, so you can see that the angles become fainter, and fainter the larger you get. But here's a nice example...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn%27s_hexagon

The Universe isn't smooth however. The fractal survives large scales.

Think about this fractal...

Newton's Kissing Problem with a time geyser in the middle, and a hole down through the two triangles at each end (There is a Kissing Problem around a sphere with two triangles in it). Well let's just apply this fractal to a human for a bit of fun...

A hole in the top.. the mouth.
A hole in the bottom... the bottom.
A geyser in the middle... The Urinary Tract
6 energy locations around a hexagon form... two arms, two legs, a head, and a tail.

Now I figure that comparing a human to a particle is too much for most of you. However not only are the shapes in about the right places, but the physics play similar roles...

A hole in the top propagates matter... the mouth.

A hole in the bottom releases the used matter... the bottom.

A hole in the middle releases a geyser as an energy flow... urination.

The 6 points act as propagators of information.. hands touch, feet touch, the head incorporates a complete new fractal of 6 new points from scratch. Two ears, two eyes, a tongue, and a nose. More information centres.

And the whole lot is propagated internally through a skin, which is about right.

So the fractal is in nature quite strongly.

Some Scientists probably dropped out way before this post, you need to be open minded to go with a particle fractal into a human form.
« Last Edit: 09/03/2013 13:44:28 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #31 on: 09/03/2013 16:00:28 »
This is a fractal where zero is made from a combination of forces. 1 + -1 = 0.

0 doesn't exist.

1 + -1 = 0 does exist.

The human language once more creates an illusion...

"I pulled the weed out of the ground to create a hole!"

The real Quantum version is...

"I pushed a weed out of a whole!"

The hole exists even with the weed in it. 1 + -1 = 0

And the hole which we call 0 for hole

should be changed to the whole. zero is the whole.

1 + -1 = THE WHOLE

and my theory becomes...

The Whole Particle Theory

which itself becomes...

The Theory Of Everything
« Last Edit: 09/03/2013 16:09:50 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #32 on: 10/03/2013 13:55:26 »
Using the above example changes the start point of the Universe. The Whole universe is flat energy. You can pull everything out of the flat energy like pulling a rabbit out of a hat. So the Universe can start off infinite, and then you can move the energy around to make it change shape. In fact the Universe has to start off infinite, and you cannot add one more, because 0 doesn't exist on its own.

The Universe is sculptured from flat energy like building an igloo from the ice. You build the Igloo, and you have a same sized hole. The igloo becomes something observable in a flat plane. The hole become the lesser observable negative. So the Universe doesn't need the Big Bang now, as it already contains all of the material on location. The Universe now needs the little ripples that push up out of the flat energy. Newtons Kissing Problem creates all of the little ripples, because the flat energy states are granular, and stack up, but also scale down. So the flat energy state means that a granular structure is not passing along information, and is therefore scaling down not to touch a local particle.
« Last Edit: 10/03/2013 14:36:08 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #33 on: 10/03/2013 14:23:00 »
This scalar structure can create outside bumps, and inner bumps. Using spherical particles you can create an outside bump through an outward flow force. The inner bump, the inner flow force.

There is a neat little trick to the inner flow force that helps energy to escape from an area of high resistance. The sphere can escape if they are away from particle walls. So to scale down moves them away from the inner walls of a sphere. If a particle scales down it must not bump into a particle inside itself, and if a particle scales up it must not bump into a particle outside itself. The final trick is to turn inside out, and put your outer wall inside your inner hole. The hole is able to create force by creating spin like a whirlpool uses a hole to create spin forces. Atoms however contain too many particles to scale up or down very much. Atoms are scalar restricted by inner particles. We see a world where scalar events rarely happen. But Gravity is not scalar restricted, and neither is magnetism...

When you use a bar magnet, and view the iron filings you can see shapes in those iron filings. The shapes represent the scaling pressures of gravity to magnetism. Gravity scales to magnetism to escape high resistance. The scale of magnetism determines if it touches any other particles in the scalar chain. Magnetism touches iron in the scalar chain of inner sphere sizes. So Iron experiences an inner bump force  of a particle that has scaled down to a negative scale. Magnetism is therefore a push force. All forces are push forces. Inner or outer, and it is important to remember that for Quantum Physics. Quantum Physics become spooky because of pull forces not existing. The trick of the mind. Treat physics as Quantum Physics, and the two things are the same.
« Last Edit: 10/03/2013 14:31:40 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #34 on: 10/03/2013 16:47:48 »
Proving the Theory of a Fractal Universe...

This whole thing is a fractal that can be created in a computer. So somebody, some day will easily recreate life in a computer.

...and people often say to me prove it with Calculus...

... Mathematics is the scientific method, however mathematics has been wrong since day 1, and Newton was in no position to choose another form of proof, as he did not know of computer models.


Quote
I am changing the rules of science. I am changing the rules of the proof.

So from now on, I am changing the rules of the proof. Proof of the Universe as a fractal is to recreate the fractal in a computer. The person that uses the least rules, and the least logic gates has the new leading model. Any output by the model does not count as part of the logic so long as the computer never uses the output as further input. This means that you can put numbers on the screen as results as often as you want, and if this lengthens the program it does not count as more logic gates. All scientist are allowed to judge the new model to say that it is truly smaller than the previous model. All scientists are allowed to judge that the output matches the actual Universe that we live in. I think that a scoring system is probably best...

Best match for actual Universe score
Smallest number of logic gates score

This is the new proof. The proof is allowed to be rewritten by the majority. But the majority must not have an alternative motive to change the proof back to mathematics. Mathematics is not proof.

 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #35 on: 11/03/2013 12:37:08 »
Why don't I trust maths?

With mathematics you can make a formula based on a falling object, and it's speed, and acceleration, and then you need to say what is happening. The words that you use like 'pull' can be reversed to 'push' just by changing the formula around to give the same end result. But the physics in the formula can be completely different with the same end result. I think of mathematics as the Mario World formula. You can make a measurement, and recreate the measurement Mario style. I don't want a creativity to be allowed in the formulas that describe the Universe. I want to give the formulas their own creativity.

The fractal formulas.
Take a look again at Conway's 'Game Of Life'..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_Game_of_Life

It is creating fractals and movement, and the fractals have rules to obey. You can take this to the next level. You can change the rules to copy the Universe rules that I have been talking about in this thread. The scalar rules, and energy propagation rules. You can change the grid to a particle stacking system shaped grid. You can add the Quantum Physics as rules.

The result (if you get everything right) will be The Universe. A complete copy, self building, with the same physics. It is easier than you think. The Universe has no intelligence in its creativity, so simple bump forces are all that you need. If you want to make it look realistic you need to take into account the human sensory system. So to add colours you need to identify those colours as whatever physics make sense in the program to become colours. You might find a wave, you might find a spin, or you might find a scalar change. You might find a scalar change that changes a spin, and becomes a wave. You could create an artificial eye in the program to just read the incoming fractals.

I am saying that the fractal includes fractal physics, and is self building. The proof of the system is that the output should match the Universe without human creativity as part of the process. So the computer model is better than mathematics. It is repeating the same creativity as fractal rules, and there is no point where human intervention takes place. Nobody shouts 'pull' and shoots a skeet.

The other important thing  is that there is no Freefall, and no Vacuum, and no Pull forces. Everything is propagated by the grid. If you think of the grid as a scalar energy field then the energy is constantly flowing through the system. Moving an object from A to B has to be complete with physics. That's another thing that Mathematics fails at. Mathematics allows you to use X/Y/Z as Action At A Distance. A fractal shouldn't be allowed to do that. If you move something, you have to propagate it, and therefore you have to always be in physical mode.

I know how to do it, I have been programming since 1980. I think of myself as an original programmer of the modern age. I think in programming language, and can run the programs in my head. I did a poll, and asked if programmers could run programs in their head before they write the programs, the majority was 'Yes'.

So I am writing on these pages the close approximation of the physics of the computer program that I can see in the fractal. They are all Cause, and Effect physics. One type of physics leads to the next. Water crashes against a rock, chips it away, creates sand, the sand stacks according to its shape, the smaller bits drop through the bigger bits through vibrations.. a fractal is forming. The zero particle is like that. But the zero particle creates all of the physics from beginning to end. So the zero particle created the water that started it all off, and the zero particle created the Earth, and the zero particle created the electron, and the zero particle created space, and time.

The zero particle is the grid, and the energy, and the fractal, and the location, and the path of Cause, and effect. It just bumps.
« Last Edit: 11/03/2013 12:48:01 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #36 on: 11/03/2013 15:51:24 »
I've talked about about the Standard Model which to me has many Paradox "What's outside the Big Bang?" Which is a Paradox before you even bother talking about the Big Bang.

What about String Theory?

I think that string theory is most likely based on the fractal flows that Zero Particle Theory creates. So Zero Particle Theory is probably Quantum String Theory. In other words I don't use the strings, I build the paths that look like the strings. A string therefore is a necklace of Zero Particles. If the people using string theory were as strict as I am, they wouldn't allow the creation of mechanics to happen as a cause of the effects. The string theorists would have to sit down and create the strings before they have a theory at all.

And the chances are that the strings are Newtons kissing Problem. That's my analysis of String Theory. It requires the fractal that creates the strings. Then the Dimensions are simply paths through the fractal. Which takes away all of the strangeness of dimensions.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #37 on: 11/03/2013 19:36:32 »
What is hot, and what is cold?

Now, once you have the general physics sorted out, they just repeat a lot. So working out what everything is at the quantum scale is just a matter of picking from a selection of those physics.

Hot, is for particles to touch on the inside of your particles so that they scale up a bit. The up-scale now shows why hot air rises. Again the hot air rising is the Rice Crispy effect, and it is the small particles moving through the gaps between the hot particles that moves them up. Hot also smooths out crinkles by the inflation and stretching of an area.

Therefore the opposite is cold. Cold is to touch particles on the outside so that the particles scale down. Particles have a flow towards their nucleus through a hexagonal snowflake structure. This structure is therefore not smooth but jagged. The old person has a flow like this, and the jaggedness creates the wrinkles in their skin.

Now we have the rice crispy effect rising into the air, and a rainbow is a scalar rainbow.

Do you see how I re-used all of the physics? It's a fractal, the physics repeat.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #38 on: 11/03/2013 22:49:36 »
The Rising, and falling of scalar particles is part of the Granular Convection phenomenon...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granular_convection

So Red shift could also be the same phenomenon in space. And that would be my first choice. I think that the Universe is using scalar particles in space, and that they create pressures around planets, and suns. The pressures scale down into the electrons, and come back out as magnetism. The magnetism is a negative scale which can be larger than a positive scale when it is inverted. -5 is larger than 4 because magnetism fills a larger negative hole. The negative particles then leave the planets, and suns as part of a bow shock, and just to escape the incoming Gravity. The negative particles then head out to create a red shift from the spin of the photons that fill them up. And spin, and scale are colours that create waves that match those colours. That's 3 ways to collect colours using different methods. The prism, and the rainbow then display that scaling by splitting apart the colours through scaler spins.

 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #39 on: 13/03/2013 00:49:42 »
The larger picture of the Dark Energy in the Universe also has the fractal that I am discussing. Like I said earlier the most likely way to have hexagons all facing in one direction is that particle stacking rules are obeying Newton's Kissing Problem. And Newton's Kissing Problem averages out as a hexagon.

This image was stated not to have a fractal in it, but it has a hexagonal fractal in it if I bend the grid over the image...
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #40 on: 14/03/2013 02:47:16 »
Just in case you can't see the strange number of hits that the hexagonal grid gets, I have exaggerated the colours to make the distribution of matter clash against the grid. Now it sort of looks like the matter is growing on the grid like a climber plant. That's because the grid, and the matter match up so well.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #41 on: 17/03/2013 13:40:17 »
Ok so maybe you see the fractal, maybe you don't. I see a 100% fractal, which is a bit strange to me. I imagine some sort of computer glitch, or telescope glitch.

However, before I came across that fractal I was already working on a spacetime fractal using Newton's Kissing Problem. I was working on Snowflakes, and how they match a lot of animals, and fruits. For example if you cut a tomato in half you see a very similar fractal to a snowflake. It's in a lot of fruits.

So I programmed the 2D version of Newton's kissing Problem, which would be 2D because Gravity uses the Y, which only leaves the Hexagon. I had also read about the Bose / Einstein Condensate, and how the atoms merged together. I figured that a merging of Newton's Kissing Problem would create the Snowflake fractal.

So imagine that a snowflake is cause by first the formation of Hexagons from Newton's Kissing Problem with Gravity in the Y.

Second the atoms start to move together using points created by Newton's Kissing Problem.

Third the Inverse Square Law changes the strength at which the atoms approach one another.

So I wrote the computer simulation, and I got a perfect snowflake. (I stop the program before an even better snowflake is created, but I saw enough not to finish the program)

Download, and press the space bar...

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pinchopaxton/Snowflake.rar

And to see how matter propagates to be included with the Luminiferous Aether just hold down the space bar, and move the mouse around.

What you see is the bending of spacetime as a propagator of matter. To be combined with a propagator of light, and therefore to eliminate the failing in the Michelson and Morley experiment.

And the bending is the In/Out flow of time. In for backwards in time, and snowflakes. Out for spherical time, and Suns.
« Last Edit: 17/03/2013 13:46:46 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #42 on: 17/03/2013 16:37:22 »
One of the great things about my theory is how simple it makes the Universe. It turns complexity into a repeating fractal. Take for example my snowflake code above. It just takes a bunch of points, and moves them towards each other. If however you have ever looked into the maths of snowflake code, the mathematicians do not think like an artist...

This link makes everything sound very complicated...
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-do-snowflakes-form

Behind all of complexity is a simple idea just hidden from view. All the guys above had to do was move points together, but they couldn't see it. The periodic table is the same. It's a set of repeating rules, and throughout the atom is a set of repeating 6 particles.

The theory does away with mathematics, and changes the approach to recreating what you see in a loop of repeating rules. A Fractal.

I see all of these complicated rules as mistakes. Calculus is no match for a Universe with no mind. A fractal is a good match for a Universe with no mind. It is getting the match between the way that you work things out, and the actual Universe right.

I think like the Universe. I have taught myself how to think like the Universe. I change pull into push, I change time into geyser, I change waves into particles, I change maths into a fractal, I change Galaxy into Universe, I change inflation into scale, I change Past, present, and future into just present...

You walk from A to B.. you leave in the present, you arrive in the present. Time is reset.

Speed is the amount of separation between points.

Acceleration is the changing distance between the separation between points, and the dilation of a Geyser between those points.

Mass is created by holes full of Gravity...

Gravity is scalar particles that I call Zero Particles.

Gravity scales down negatively to Magnetism with spin forces.

A negative scale can be bigger than a positive scale, because the holes of the negative scale fill up with other particles.

Spacetime is not a Vacuum it is a grain structure of scalar particles.

Red shift does not necessarily represent time. It represents scale up. Scale up just means that points lead to scale down, and all of spacetime is a fractal of points. The further away you look out from a point the more the particles scale up...

The holes scale down space time, because spacetime spins around the holes like a whirlpool, and a whirlpool has a funnel. The spacetime funnel is a scale down funnel, a bit different to a water funnel. The galaxy has a bar across it, that is a scalar funnel. Level with mass, but scaled down to travel through mass.

Thinking like the Universe is to make yourself think in Quantum Physics even when you are looking at large objects like a Galaxy. Change a Galaxy into Quantum Physics and you will know everything.

 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #43 on: 18/03/2013 12:58:05 »
Why scalar funnels?

The idea of the scalar particles was to create movement from a push from a standing start like inflation. The idea was that scale has no real logic to it in an empty Universe, because scale is relative. The first particles having a scale would be a decision made before the particles existed. The way I imagine the Universe is that no decisions are made pre-existence. So no scale exists for particles. Particles end up with a scale because of infinite stacking rules. Atoms are scale locked because of the Russian Doll effect, they can't scale down, or up. And C is the scalar rebound of hitting negative scale which reverses to scale up when filled with other particles.

Scale allows energy to escape from being trapped in the middle of a whirlpool of scalar particles. We see whirlpool type structures in space.. Galaxies, and the other thing we see are rings.

Saturn has rings.

If you listen to the radio noise translated into sound for Saturn it sounds a lot like a toilet flushing. The rings look like a flattened rebound action. The two ends of Saturn exhibit whirlpool effects, and holes. So you can deduce two inward flowing funnels (like two toilets end to end) The collision in the middle turns out to be a scalar collision. The particles are scaled negatively into a flat disc. The disc escapes the pressure through negative scale coming out of Saturn's middle. So now you have these invisible negative particles. The negative particles act as the area of least resistance, and so act as holes. Bigger particles gather in the holes to form rings. Now you have the positive mass in the negative mass.

Every so often through the rings the funnel winds around to create streaks similar to the Galaxy Bars.

The Galaxy Bars are the funnel swinging around through a similar structure as Saturn's rings.

Outside Pressure on scalar particles scales them down.

Particles trapped in the middle escape when they reach a negative scale.

Negative scale fills with positive mass.

So Negative particles can appear bigger than positive particles.

Negative flow requires propagation from negative particles, and so act like a funnel, because the negative particles are pushing against the negative particles.

But because the funnel is also scaling down its particles it is escaping sideways. Unlike water which has very little scalar ability so escapes the pressure downwards, and across.

This becomes a series of scribbles like Newton's famous scribbles. The ideas are all related to each other. A set of repeating rules. But the bar across the Galaxy, and Saturn's rings can also be created by the positive particles captured in the negative rings. And so in this case it would be hard to establish if the bar is being created from the middle to the outside (negative to positive) or from the outside to the middle (positive to negative).

The moons around Saturn create bars as they move towards Saturn, and Gravity is positive, so that flow force is positive.

Here we have an example of how you can get two similar physics from two different causes. But at the end of the day, you have to create the rings, and to lock the rings in place you need an area of least resistance. The area of least resistance is in the middle of Saturn.

To me, using negative particles around Saturn has a high probability.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #44 on: 20/03/2013 13:44:23 »
I was thinking about this image...

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=47070.0;attach=17582;image

It includes a very clear fractal. When you try to map a flat image to a sphere it never fits. The best way to do that is to use a Geosphere poly primitive. Look at the one on the far right...

http://www.creativecrash.com/maya/downloads/scripts-plugins/modeling/poly-tools/c/geospheres--2

So the telescope is up there, and it most likely rotates on the spot. It maybe makes a panoramic image with a curve. Then somebody maps it, and the hexagons maybe appear.

So far that makes sense. But what if it is our human eyes which require the flattening out to be created for our own purposes? So that the hexagon is the reality, and we have eyes built to remove the hexagon fractal?

For example.. map some woods in the same way that the telescope was used to map the matter in the Universe...

http://ivorphotography.co.uk/2013/01/19/more-ice/iced-branches-olympus-e-5-iso-200-35mm-f63-160/

Do we get the fractal back again?

Look at Neanderthal man...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/neanderthals-large-eyes-led-to-their-downfall-says-study-8532539.html

Bigger eyes. So maybe we are removing a fractal from nature because our eyes aren't made to see it. Our lenses are the wrong curvature, and our mapping of reality is slightly out.

If we just play along with that idea like a toy, then we can suggest that bees, and birds, and butterflies see the fractal. Then we can suggest that these creatures can navigate using the fractal. The bee does a dance.. "6 hexagons, 8 hexagons, 20 hexagons" It does the dance to suggest how many hexagons to pass through to get to a destination.

So if the fractal is really there, then it is very large out there in space. It probably scales down in our Galaxy. Most people imagine particles to start off small, and get bigger. What if particles start off huge, and get smaller? Then the fractal gets smoother in our Galaxy. Trees become less fractal.

The image of the trees perhaps cannot be mapped with the same glitch as the image of the Universe.

But these are things to think about. If the glitch is reality, then the Universe is a fractal. If the glitch is a mapping anomaly then it should work on an arrangement of trees. But either way, as humans the anomaly could be the reality, because humans depend on false information. Colours, heat... etc. ... all false, so the fractal could be real even if we do find the glitch.

And whilst you are thinking about that.. take a quick look at my video...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3fTYS99ZeE&feature=plcp
« Last Edit: 20/03/2013 13:59:47 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #45 on: 21/03/2013 14:25:10 »
Fractals, and scales...

Let's go with the Universe being a fractal. Let's treat it as a fact. I will therefore skip words like presume, perhaps, what if? I do live my life using my own physics, and I don't use the Standard Model, so since 2003 I am used to treating my theory as a fact.

So the simple sum.. 1 + -1 = 0 suggests that you can create a Universe from nothing, because nothing is a literary misunderstanding in the English language. Nothing is 'The Whole Of Two Parts' and the two parts come from Newton's 3rd Law 'Every Action Has An Equal, and Opposite Reaction'

When used together the Universe is created from two equal parts that look like space.

But to complete Newton's 3rd Law you cannot have any unequal parts hidden in nothing. Nothing has to be exactly equal in every point. To hide information completely you have to rule out certain shapes. Let's just go to the shape that works best. Newton's kissing Problem.

Firstly the sphere is equal in every direction from a central point, that's what makes it a sphere in the first place. But it needs a position in space. Once you give a sphere a position it breaks equality unless that space is an exact opposite hole. That's what you want for a zero particle. A sphere on its own has no bonding force. It has a bunching set of rules, and the Bunching rules create fractals. To get a bonding force the sphere uses the hole.

The assemble of the fractal obeys Newton's 3rd law in that space hides itself in equality. The zero particles follow a stacking system that also obeys equality, and then the stacking system scales down so that no connections pass any messages along the chain which would break equality. The photon breaks equality as a message along the chain. Humans evolved to examine changes in equality.

Now we get to a Universe which is infinite, and infinity is actually a structure that obeys rules of equality, and hides itself away. But the rules didn't develop before the creation took place. The rules were part of the fractal that happened naturally. This means that the scale of all things is part of the natural fractal. Particles can be huge, and also negatively small. But entropy tries to hide all inequalities, so a large particle next to a small particle breaks equality. The large particle can be touched on every side by billions of tiny particles. This sharing of energy reduces the large particle down to a small particle. All particles in an area have little change, but a wave of change permeates through the Universe. However the Atom is a particle touched on the inside, and the outside. The change in scale is in both directions resulting in the atom being scaler limited... slowed down.

The scale of particles is due to entropy, but entropy is local. C is a propagation through a distance between particles, but the distance changes through entropy. Red shift is a scale shift, and pressure around particles scales them down. Everything is obeying Newton's 3rd law, but there is a delay which is a wave. It seems that everything must be scaling down around us as the wave tries to create a zero state. The wave will never create a complete zero state however because the fractal is never going to be perfect. Sphere can never surround sphere in a perfect zero state. There is an inequality that spins around a single sphere as other sphere try to occupy all spaces. This inequality creates chaos, and spin energy, and the spin energy is the butterfly effect with inequality as the cause. The 13th ball of Newton's Kissing Problem, the ball that never fits. That creates nature from the fractal.

So the scales of the sphere are a wave of entropy that large particles can be touched by many small particles, and so large particles can be said to be chipped away by many particles until all particles reach a state of equality... which will never happen (the 13th ball).

And C propagates over different distances...

Is C then a constant?

If you live in an area of larger particles, your fractal is larger. A human is larger, and so to that human scale everything is still equal to our scale. C is still C in that area, but from our area it is faster.
« Last Edit: 21/03/2013 14:58:05 by Pincho »
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #46 on: 21/03/2013 18:05:09 »
Should Time be renamed?

I think that time should be renamed, because the current use of the word 'TIME' is very inaccurate. There is no Past, Present, and Future. There is a series of physical events due to cause, and Effect, and because we are always local to events that affect our physical interactions we are always in the Present.

Walk from A to B.. start in the present, end in the present, start local, end local.. change of physics very likely.

I actually struggle to understand how humans are using time. It's like voodoo to me... humans use voodoo, and magic, and I feel like I am stuck 2000 years in the past. Humans believe in time travel, and a 4th dimension, and its voodoo, and child-like. Plus Bell's Inequality Theory, that everything that can happen does happen.

All mistakes because of the word 'time' being inaccurate.

It should be renamed to...

Point Scalar Energy... or Poise Time.. like a spring coiled and ready to act... per point.

It has a physical location. When you see X/Y/Z axes marker....

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/311500/why-do-we-draw-the-xyz-coordinate-system-like-this

It is the point where they all touch in the middle, and should be considered as the stationary location, scalar energy, and from that point X/Y/Z can go outwards using that scalar energy as a propagator.

POISE TIME



 
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #47 on: 22/03/2013 09:41:54 »
Scribblings Of Location...

Above I said that Time is in the middle of XYZ, where the points meet up. That was an example, but XYZ is much more complicated when you try to program it into a computer. It's like braille, you have to feel your way around the Universe. Each point has its own scalar energy, and each time that energy scales it renews the XYZ properties. Plus the Energy creates spin, and XYZ spins around per point. This is a nightmare. I said that I can think through my program, and run it in my head, but location requires you to think of several things at the same time, and so I can't totally get a clear image of location.

Here's an example... In this video I am tracking the rotation of energy propagation. Energy can only propagate through interaction, and interaction in a fractal is fractalized of course, so the transmission of location rotates, scales, and moves...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gd8RAQLTb7Q

I try to keep the numbers steady by having a corresponding link to each location. 12 points that can pass a message, each can scale, spin, and move.. a nightmare to track.

The Universe has the advantage of infinity, and trying to replicate infinity in a computer creates complications like the above. The braille type contact of energy is created by the scalar feedback of POISE TIME. The overlap of scalar information that converts distance, and speed to C. It's hard to replicate... well I'm not a mathematician, it's hard for me to replicate.

It's holding up my program.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #48 on: 22/03/2013 12:02:13 »
So to clear up what I said above.. I use 13 dimensions instead of XYZ, and they move around, and are not always the same size. Because the Universe is constantly changing, a position has locality, but the location moves, but action is always propagated locally. If you build the fractal, and try to search for a particular particle bumping into another particle, you have to go through a link. The Universe just multi tasks poise-time, location, and scale. XYZ is not smooth, it is lumpy.

Dimensions in my theory are always local, I don't use any overlapping dimensions. Physics at my Quantum Scale obey the rules of regular sized physics, but scaling is much easier (inflation and deflation).

Deflation...

Deflation has an advantage over inflation. It is easier for particles to bump on the outside, than it is for them to bump on the inside. So in my theory deflation is happening rather than inflation. The red shift however is the same because I deflate to infinite points, which is the opposite than inflate to infinite membranes. I have switched the direction, and part of that is to do with removing pull forces. It makes a lot of sense though, because if you use a singularity as an example, then the Galaxy is doing what I am saying...

The galaxy perhaps has a singularity with a flow force towards it, that scales down matter.

Which agrees with my theory as a fractal of my physics. I doesn't agree with Einstein...

"A singularity has flow away from it, and inflates to move matter apart."

I don't see why matter would move away from a singularity, and I don't see how matter would have a starting location in a void, and I don't see how a void would begin, and how does time relocate through the matter? I see many problems, and quite a few paradox.

I have a CMB because I have propagated light through a grainy fractal. I have red shift because I scale down to a point, and I have no Aether wind because I propagate matter with light, and Gravity all in synchronization to local poise-time.

There is inflation as well, but infinite particles squeezing together is the hardest direction to go. Room only for one small child.
 

Offline Pincho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
    • View Profile
Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #49 on: 22/03/2013 23:06:03 »
Gravity

Gravity is a positive scalar particle moving towards atomic holes as the area of least resistance. The atomic holes become quantum whirlpools, and generate energy. Therefore the atomic holes are electrons. To escape the whirlpool the gravity scales down to become electro magnetism, and becomes the next hole in the cycle. The holes then propagate out of the atomic structure to become a magnetic field.

This is a sort of reverse of Newton's Gravity. The mass is now a hole, and the pull force is now a flow force. The Inverse Square Law is a flow into holes through a grain structure from space. The mass is therefore reversed, and the mass is now in space, and is a scalar mass.

So the negative looks like this image...
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: Zero Particle Theory
« Reply #49 on: 22/03/2013 23:06:03 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums