The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Fundamental Theory Of Existence.  (Read 1441 times)

Offline variationz

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 32
    • View Profile
    • Fundamental Theory Of Existence.
Fundamental Theory Of Existence.
« on: 20/03/2013 09:10:51 »
I developed “FTOE “after reading

Prof. Stephen Hawking's

“A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME ".

FTOE is Fundamental Theory Of Existence.

Fundamental Theory Of Existence.

1. Zero cannot exist as denominator.

2. Anything cannot be created out of nothingness, only change of
    form is possible and change is everywhere.

3. Anything cannot be destroyed into nothingness, only change of
    form is possible and change is everywhere.

4. Existence of anything cannot be infinite.

5. There is no beginning and an end to the existence of the World.

6. There are finite absolute laws.

7. Velocity of light is relative.

8. There are three dimensions and three dimensions only.

9.Time Travel is impossible.

10.Tan 90 cannot exist.

11. God(s) cannot exist.

Fundamental Theory Of Existence.

What is infinite? Infinite = Not finite. If any number is finite then

Infinite cannot be a number and, use of INFINITE as a number in

LIMITS/Mathematics is one of the biggest mistake ever.

Mathematicians and students all over the World use INFINITE as a

number and draw conclusions such as “It is Not

Definted/Undefined "... Sadly this is wrong. Numbers being infinite

is a property of number and, no number can ever equal INFINITY...

INFINITY is not a number. Any number, however large or small is

always finite. So, no number is ever infinite. Numbers are infinite.

Numbers being infinite is one of the properties of the numbers.

Numbers don't have physical existence. Undefined or Not defined

means it has no definite solution. When you divide any number

with zero it can never be said as Undefined.

When you place an Apple on the table and eat it

then you can say there is no Apple on the table. That is... There is

nothing on the table! Zero = Nothing. If Zero is Mathematics and,

Nothing is English and, Nothingness is Physics then how can I say...

THEY ARE CONNECTED! Mathematics is some form of Truth or

Law. Also English and Physics are some forms of Truth and Laws.

The M, E and, P words are different names but they are all truths or

laws governing the World or Universe. So “nothing” is not just an

M or E or P word, it is all! When you say (Apple/Zero) then you

mean Apple destroyed into Zero. How? 1/2 means 1 cut into 2. So,

1/0 means 1 cut into 0. If 1 Apple can be cut into 0 or if 0 can give

birth to 1 Apple then 1/0 has an answer but, it is not possible. The

answer to 1/0 is not Undefined, it is Impossible. So, 1/0 is

impossible. It is said that 0/0 is Indeterminate... Is it so? How? Why

not? No, it is not indeterminate. And, why is it so? Because, when

you divide with anything then the denominator is given the first

preference... it is not just preference, it is the truth or common

sense or logic. Anything divided by 0 is said to be 0. And, it is true

because 0 in the numerator means you have nothing to divide. So,

you are not given the Apple in the first place. How can you eat an

Apple if you don't have any? So, what is 0/0 then? When you are

dividing some number with another number then the number that

acts as the denominator is the first thing that is important, not the

other way around. So, when you are asked to divide an Apple into

two parts you don't say... here... take this two Apples! It is, two

halves of the 1 Apple. So, division of an Apple into zero parts is

impossible. And, 0/0 doesn't mean you have nothing to divide, it

means you can't divide anything (even 0) into 0 parts. When you

say 0/0, there are no two things such as...

First thing: 0 in the numerator meaning “Nothing to divide "...

Second thing: 0 in the denominator meaning “Divide the numerator

into nothing ".

The “Second thing “is the correct answer. Why? Because, 1/2

doesn't mean 1/2 = 1! It means 1/2 = 0.5. So, the denominator is the

first thing that is to be used. Therefore...

1. Zero cannot exist as denominator.

The fact that the numerator cannot be divided into zero parts
means anything that exists cannot be destroyed into nothingness.

And the fact that sum of zeroes gives us zero alone means anything

that does not exist cannot be given existence out of nothingness.

Therefore...

2. Anything cannot be created out of nothingness, only change of

   form is possible and change is everywhere.

3. Anything cannot be destroyed into nothingness, only change of
    form is possible and change is everywhere.

Once again we need to know what infinite means. What does

infinite mean? Infinite means not finite and not finite means

Unlimited. By now we know that creation and destruction are

Impossible. If creation is impossible then there is no other way new

things can add up to the World that already exists. If new things can

not add up to the World then there is no way anything that exists in

this World can be infinite. Space cannot be infinite. Anything that

has physical existence can't be infinite. Space has physical

existence. Numbers don't have physical existence. The word Apple

doesn't have physical existence but the edible Apple in your hand

has physical existence and the edible Apples in your hands can't be

infinite. Also, Time is never Absolute, it is always Relative and, it

has no physical existence. Time is a measure of Change and

sometimes Change is a turn of events, events can be numbered to

an extent and, existence of more than one event of the same part of

World or Universe is impossible. So, Time can never be infinite.

Therefore...

4. Existence of anything cannot be infinite.

Numbers are infinite but number of apples (existence) cannot be

infinite. Now, we know that creation and destruction are impossible

and we also know that the existence of anything cannot be infinite.

We are part of the world we live in. In our world existence of

anything cannot be infinite. That is Space, Mass, Energy, Density,

Gravity, Force, etc.; cannot be infinite. Also, in our World

creation and destruction are impossible. Creation is impossible

means no new things can add up to the World that already exists

and it also means what already exists cannot come out of creation.

Creation is impossible, creation is completely ruled out. We also

know that destruction of the World is impossible. Space is timeless.

Therefore...

5. There is no beginning and an end to the existence of the World.

According to the fourth postulate space cannot be infinite and

according to the fifth postulate space is timeless. We know what an

equation means. An equation is a law of equity. If creation and

destruction are possible then all laws have to fail. In a World where

creation and destruction are possible laws cannot exist, only Chaos

exists. We know what infinity means. Infinity means not finite and

it means infinity is something that is unlimited, something that is

ever increasing. Positive infinity is ever increasing and negative

infinity is ever decreasing. Infinity means unlimited and it can not

be used in equations. If creation is possible, equations will fail.

Therefore...

6. There are finite absolute laws.

There is a small problem with the sixth postulate and it is... If you

take F=ma or E=mc2(c square) or such similar equations then these

type of Absolute laws are finite indeed. But if you consider that a

single couple, Mother and Father who can live forever and can give

birth to unlimited/infinite children and if you consider each child's

Individuality/brain-pattern as a different Absolute law then

Absolute laws are infinite. It is clear that every child from same

Parents is different/never-the-same and different parents from

Different races, species, families too can give birth to unique off

springs and life is unlimited when it comes to small variations. It is

true that unlimited life has something in common/same, something

similar and something different but it is true that Life comes in

unlimited variations.

Where Albert Einstein went wrong... Proof of Velocity of Light

being Relative to Gravity.

Albert Einstein: Special Relativity Theory

1. The laws of physics are the same in all inertial (=non-

accelerating) reference frames, and

2. The speed of light in free space is constant.

General Theory of Relativity

Clocks which are far from massive bodies (or at higher gravitational

potentials) run faster, and clocks close to massive bodies (or at

lower gravitational potentials) run slower. This is because

gravitational time dilation is manifested in accelerated frames of

reference or, by virtue of the equivalence principle, in the

gravitational field of massive objects.

Albert Einstein in his Special Theory of Relativity said that Velocity

of Light is Constant in Free Space. That is, Velocity of Light is

Constant on the Surface of the Earth or on the Surface of the

Moon. But, it's not so. I beg to differ on it and here is my

explanation. Ordinary body is measured in terms of MASS. Total

Energy is equal to the Sum of Kinetic Energy and Potential

Energy. For ordinary body-Gravity is Directly Proportional to

Change in Velocity per Time. Velocity of Light is constant when it

is measured on the surface of the Earth i.e.; it's Constant where ever

there is No Considerable Change in Gravity. What happens when

the Velocity of the Same Light (Same Source, Same Conditions -

Except Gravity) is measured on the Surface of the Earth and on the

Surface of the Moon? According to Albert Einstein it must be

Constant. But, I beg to differ. It's not constant and here is why?!

For ordinary body we have “MASS " but when it comes to LIGHT

we have “ENERGY/MASS” since Energy = Product of Mass and

Velocity Square. E=m c (square).

P.E=mgh

P.E is Directly Proportional to mgh

m mass

g gravity

h height or distance

P.E/m is proportional to gh

where h=vt

P.E/mvt proportional to g

For ordinary body

g is proportional to v/t

For Light

g is proportional to E/mvt, since Light is a form of energy with mass

Let's take t (Time) as constant?! On different places such as

Surface of the Earth and, Surface of the Moon... Gravity is

different... If Gravity is different Changes are different and Change

is a measure of Time. So, Time is not constant or same on different

places such as Earth and Moon. But, it doesn't differ by much.

So when it's ordinary body...

Gravity is directly proportional to Change in Velocity.

But, when we take Light into account...

1. Gravity is inversely proportional to Velocity [ Gravity is

proportional to E/mv i.e.; Change in Gravity leads to Change in

Velocity of Light]. As gravity increases velocity of light decreases

and when gravity is lesser then the velocity of light is more when

compared to a location where gravity is more...

So, Velocity of Light on Earth is lesser than Velocity of Light on

Moon.

For ordinary body

Acceleration is directly proportional to Velocity (When Gravity

increases Velocity of a free falling object increases... and, when it

comes to Light

Gravity is inversely proportional to Velocity... So, as Gravity

increases Velocity of Light decreases. Why? Because, Light is a

product of both Energy and Mass unlike an ordinary body which is

a product of Mass alone.

So, as Gravity increases Velocity of Light decreases.

So velocity of Light is more in space (where there is little gravity)

and on the Moon (where the Gravity is lesser than that on the

Earth) when compared to Velocity of Light on Earth.

Also in Space

P.E = Gm1m2/r

and

g = Gm/r square

And, this results in

So when it's ordinary body...

Gravity is directly proportional to Change in Velocity.

But, when we take Light into account...

1. Gravity is inversely proportional to Velocity [ Gravity is

proportional to E/mv i.e.; Change in Gravity leads to Change in

Velocity of Light].

When we take E/m into consideration...

g is inversely proportional to v.

Here is a better explanation...

E = m c square

So, for light

g t = E/mc

g t is inversely proportional to c

and, for ordinary body (ordinary body in a sense mass is taken into

consideration unlike mass and energy for light)

For a Body of mass m

g t = v

g t is directly proportional to v

For any body with Energy/Mass

g t = E/mv

g t is inversely proportional to v

According to Albert Einstein's

Special Theory Of Relativity... Velocity of light is constant in free

space

and, According to General Theory Of Relativity... it is relative

when there is difference in gravity.

That is... When Clocks run slower (When Time is relatively lower)

i.e.; when Gravity is more Velocity of light is lesser... similarly it is

more when gravity is lesser.

g t = E/mc

That is... gt inversely proportional to c. According to Albert

Einstein Velocity of light depends upon Gravity-Time but not

Relativistic Mass. Therefore, it is same/constant on a moving Train

and on Land. Where as it varies where there is change in Gravity-

Time.

Actually Light has RELATIVISTIC MASS... And, that is why I say

it varies with Gravity.

For a Body of mass m

g t = v

g t is directly proportional to v

Light...

E = m c square

So, for light

g t = E/mc

g t is inversely proportional to c

Therefore, velocity of light is relative not just because of General

Theory Of Relativity but also due to the fact that light has

relativistic mass and anything with greater E/m value than light can

travel faster than light. Velocity of light is relative because of

Gravity-Time (Clocks running faster or slower) and also because

Gravity attracts light (Relativistic mass).



 

Offline variationz

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 32
    • View Profile
    • Fundamental Theory Of Existence.
Re: Fundamental Theory Of Existence.
« Reply #1 on: 20/03/2013 09:11:16 »
Why is it that the velocity of light is same on both the Train and on

Land?

The reason is...

When you carry an Apple with you on a moving train then the

Apple has the train's velocity and it has no velocity on land.

And, when you carry light!

Carry light?

When you have a source of light on a train and on land velocity of

light is observed to be one and the same and, it is because we don't

carry light, we don't get hold of light, we carry light source but not

light. Light is generated at the source and it travels on its own.

Therefore velocity of light is observed to be constant in free space.

But, Light can't escape the Train called Gravity.

When Light travels through the Train called Gravity it has a (both

because of General Theory Of Relativity and due to Gravity

attraction of Relativistic Mass) relative velocity. In light's case

gravity is inversely proportional to its velocity. Velocity of light is

constant in free space and is relative with respect to change in

gravity both due to General Theory Of Relativity and also due to its

Relativistic Mass.

Gravity bending Space is something I don't know and don't

understand too. If Space is something, emptiness that can be

occupied what does Space occupy? How can it be bent if it doesn't

occupy anything? If Space=Emptiness then how can it be bent?

There are equations quoting Space is bent also there are some

cosmic observations that are said to prove this bending

phenomenon but, I don't understand it. I think Gravity bends light

and everything that has physical existence (but not space???), also

time has no physical existence but it is a result of something that

has physical existence so time too is dependent on gravity.

Everything is connected! Gravity connects everything! Gravity

controls velocities...

If gravity lensing is true, why do planets deviate from circular

orbits?

I have nothing against Gravity lensing... I don't even know the

theory and mathematics behind it... I only think Gravity bends light

and that is what makes me think that gravity bending light is a one

of the facts and gravity lensing is a different factor... According to

Gravity Lensing light travels in a straight line and looks like it is

bent due to bent space... According to me... Gravity lensing can be

true but gravity bending light is definitely true. Gravity bends light.

Space or Emptiness or anything that has existence can't be infinite

according to Fundamental Theory Of Existence and it is also true

that anything that has physical existence or anything that is

influenced by anything that has physical existence is in turn

influenced by gravity. Therefore emptiness or space too is

influenced by gravity and has physical properties and therefore

gravity lensing can be true? Is gravity lensing true?

There is no doubt Space and or Emptiness has properties and it is

so because it has existence and can't

be infinite. So, gravity lensing has a point to prove... Is it gravity

bending everything else except

emptiness or it is the finite emptiness that can be bent?

Space/Emptiness has physical properties and is finite.

Maxwell's equations state that "C" velocity of all EM waves is constant or is same in free

space... If it is not same then we will get to see different positions of stars in the sky with

varying spectra. So C in free space is constant but, it can't escape a train called gravity. So, C

is not constant when there is change in gravity. Gravity controls velocity of everything,

absolutely. Velocity of light on Earth's surface is lesser than velocity of light in free space.

All EM waves travel with same speed in free space and their velocity varies with medium...

also their velocity is controlled by gravity.

Velocity of light or any EM wave varies with varying gravity and it is so, because of two

reasons...

Reason 1: Time varies with Gravity so C is different.

Reason 2: C is inversely proportional to Gravity so with decrease in gravity c increases.

According to reason 1... Time is faster when gravity is low and C is more and, according to

reason 2... Gravity is low means gravity effect on mass E/m is lower so C is more.

For an ordinary body as gravity increases the velocity of the body increases...

If you drop an object from sky then the velocity of the object increases as it approaches the

earth and that is because velocity is directly proportional to gravity and, if you measure the

velocity of light focused from moon to earth its velocity is greater on moon, even greater

where there is lesser gravity is slower on earth than that on the moon and that is so because

EM waves are E/m waves and their velocity is inversely proportional to gravity.

Therefore...

7. Velocity of light is relative.

Everything is well defined in three dimensions. Space too is three

dimensional. String Theory claims more than three dimensions.

Time is an imaginary dimension. Time is a measure of Change.

There are three and only three Length/Spatial dimensions and one

Time dimension. Existence of anything short of three dimensions is

impossible since anything that exists cannot be destroyed into

nothingness. If more than three dimensions can exist, they have to

exist everywhere and always. Since anything cannot be created out

of nothingness more than three dimensions cannot be given

existence out of nothingness. Therefore String Theory cannot be

true. Therefore anything short of three dimensions and more than

three dimensions is impossible. Therefore...

8. There are three dimensions and three dimensions only.

Time travel! How do you define it? Can we go to past? If

Past=Memory then we can possibly go to past. If going to past is

like travelling from a city to a village then time travel is possible!

May be going to past is possible depending upon how you define

PAST. If Past is a physical World/Universe that is the precursor of

the Present World/Universe then Time Travel is impossible. It is not

only impossible but also meaningless. Why? Because, the so called

Past World/Universe has changed into Present World/Universe and

it is not two or more copies of The World... Thus, Time Travel is

only a story or just another day dream! What about Future? Also

Future is not another copy! So, it is also not possible. Wait! Is that

all? Didn't I tell you... Time is a measure of Change. So more

Gravity means slower changes and two places with different gravity

will have different time or clock... Is that you call Time Travel?

Really? Think twice! If so, Time Travel is indeed a reality and it is

something that all Life has always experienced. How? Gravity is

not the same everywhere... So, we have gone to places with varying

gravity and thus we have made that amazing trip... The TRIP, The

so called Time Travel Trip. There are no infinite parallel Worlds

with infinite parallel changes and we cannot Time Travel. Time

Travel is meaningless. Therefore...

9. Time Travel is impossible.

It is said that... --> [At π/2 radians, or 90° (and -π/2, 3π/2, etc.)

the function is officially undefined, because it could be positive

Infinity or negative Infinity. ]

Infinity is not a number and it can't replace an unknown number in

Mathematics and it is erroneous to say the result as undefined.

When we are in High School we are taught that two parallel lines

never meet and a line with slope next to a straight line eventually

meets the straight line at some point. This is not completely true.

There are two cases.

Case 1 is...

1) The line with slope never meets the straight line next to it. The

line with slope never meets X axis or Y axis.

and Case 2 is...

2) The line with slope intersects the straight line at some point.

Case 1 example is XY=1

If X=0 we get 1=0

and

If Y=0 we get 1=0

Therefore the line with slope never meets X-axis or Y-axis.

The reason is...

There are infinite numbers between 1 and 2 (or) 0.001 and 0.002

(or) any two different numbers.

So in XY=1, X and Y can have smaller values but never zero, also

they can have bigger values but never infinite... Let me remind you

again... Infinite is not a number and the answer is never undefined.

Case 2 example is X+Y=1.

If X=0 the line with slope meets Y-axis.

So there are three cases.

Case-I

Two parallel lines never meet.

Case-II

A line with slope never meets the X-axis or Y-axis.

Case-III

A line with slope meets the straight line next to it

Tan 90 graph gives a line with slope and this line with slope never

meets a straight line next to it. Why?

There are three cases and they are...

Case 1: Two parallel lines never meet.

Case 2: A line with slope never meets a straight line next to it.

Example is XY=1.

Case 3: A line with slope does intersect X-axis and or Y-axis.

Example is x+y=1.

The “CASE -II “is the reason for first and tenth postulates. There

are infinite numbers between 0.001 and 0.002.

Tan 90 is same as 1/0. The first and the tenth postulates are one and

the same! Therefore...

10. Tan 90 cannot exist.

God(s) cannot create and God(s) can not destroy and God(s) can

not change laws.

God(s) cannot create laws and also can not destroy laws...

Therefore God(s) cannot exist. Therefore...

11. God(s) cannot exist.
 

Offline variationz

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 32
    • View Profile
    • Fundamental Theory Of Existence.
Re: Fundamental Theory Of Existence.
« Reply #2 on: 20/03/2013 09:11:56 »
(1). Does Mathematics have bearing on reality?

(A). If you have a single Apple and you want to give two equal parts of it to your children then you cut it into two halves or to say, you divide it into two halves or we can say ½=0.5 and that is how Mathematics has a bearing on reality.

(2). What is division?

(A). Division is cutting into

(3). What is division with 1?

(A). Cutting into 100% or not cutting or keeping it the way it is, same thing as not dividing or not cutting at all.

(4). What is division with 0?

(A). Division with zero is cutting the numerator into zero parts or we can say making it disappear or destroying it into zero parts or into nothingness which doesn’t make sense and is impossible. 1/0 doesn’t lead to any satisfactory answer because if it equals to any answer we get 1=0 which is impossible. Division with zero is not meaningful and is impossible.

(5). What is division with 0.1?

(A). Division with 0.1 is possible in virtual reality or virtual existence and is impossible in physical reality or physical existence since you can’t cut a single Apple with 0.1 and make it into 10 Apples. You can say 1/0.1 as 10/1 as 10units is a single apple. So single apple divided by 1 so 1/0.1 is 10/1 where 10=single apple. In physical reality division is possible if the divider is 1 or greater than 1.

(6). What is the meaning of infinite?

(A). Infinite means ever increasing or unlimited.

(7). What is the opposite of infinite?

(A). The opposite of infinite is finite and is limited and is rounded and is static.

(8). Is there any number that is not finite?

(A). Numbers are unlimited, one of the properties of numbers is, there are unlimited numbers and, any number is always finite and there is no such number that is not finite.

(9). Is infinity a number?

(A). Infinity is never a number.

(10). What does positive infinity mean?

(A). Positive infinity means an ever increasing positive what ever it is, positive infinite space means positive ever increasing space but, space can’t be infinite. Infinity has its place in virtual reality but makes little or no sense in physical reality.

(11). What does negative infinity mean?

(A). Ever decreasing.

(12). What does creation mean?

(A). Creation means 1 can pop out of 0, it means 1=0=2=3=4=anything. Creation is impossible.

(13). What does destruction mean?

(A). Destruction means 1 can become 0, it means 1=0=2=3=4=anything. Destruction is impossible.

(14). Is creation possible?

(A). Creation is impossible and if possible why is it not happening now, why is it not happening everywhere and, why is it not happening in all sizes or proportions? Can a Sun be created on the surface of the Earth or can something new be created in our Brain from zero and hamper its functionality?

(15). Is destruction possible?

(A). Destruction is impossible.

(16). If destruction is impossible how can our World or Universe cease to exist?

(A). There is no end for existence. Change related end is possible but existence itself can never be zero. Change of form is possible giving birth or death to new things but it’s not possible for 1 to become 0 or 0 to become 1.

(17). If creation is impossible how did our World or Universe come to existence?

(A). Time has existence if World or Universe or Everything has existence and our World has never been created and no new Worlds will ever be created since creation is impossible.

(18). If our World or Universe was created what happened before creation?

(A). Creation is impossible.

(19).Is nothingness or non existence of Everything (World/Universe) possible?

(A). No, never. Finite World or 100% of this World is Everything. World=Universe=Everything which is 100% and is finite.

(20). If Everything or World or Universe was not created what is the first chain of events?

(A). There is no such thing as first or start for existence.

(21). If creation is not possible does it mean that there is no such thing as “First” or “Starting point” or “First chain of events”?

(A). Yes.

(22). Do laws depend upon equations?

(A). Yes. Since creation and destruction are impossible laws are possible. In a World where creation is possible balance will fail and equations and laws are impossible.

(23). Is everything connected or related?

(A). When you put some sand into a vessel, the particle that lies below is the foundation for what lies above that is, the position of one sand particle is responsible for the position of the other sand particles and that is how everything is connected. Everything is connected doesn’t mean anything is connected to anything else in every way. It means something is connected to something else in some possible way.

(24). How is everything connected or related?

(A). Everything is connected doesn’t mean anything is connected to anything else in every way. It means something is connected to something else in some possible way.

(25). Are equations necessary for relations to be established?

(A). Without equations how can anything be related?

(26). If creation is possible, will the balance or equations fail?

(A). If creation is possible, all laws fail. Let’s say you are buying 1kg tomatoes so the seller puts a 1kg stone on one side and 1kg tomatoes on the other side and tomatoes keep getting created on the tomato’s side… what happens? Balance is lost!!!

(27). Can more than a single copy of our World or Universe possible?

(A). No. No because creation is not possible and change is not decided. Free will exists and we have some percentage of ability to make decisions and change our Life/World.

(28). What is time travel?

(A). If moving from one place to another place where gravity is different is considered as time travel then it’s possible otherwise it’s impossible.

(29). Is time travel possible?

(A). If moving from one place to another place where gravity is different is considered as time travel then it’s possible otherwise it’s impossible.

(30). What is tan90?

(A). It is same as 1/0 which is not possible.

(31). What is rectangular or equilateral hyperbola?

(A). This is an equation such as XY=1 where X and Y can have any values other than zero. This equation suggests that division with zero is impossible and it also suggests that creation and destruction are impossible.

(32). If there is a curved line in a graph sheet with four quadrants does it touch x-axis and/or y-axis?

(A). It doesn’t follow a single rule. Sometimes it touches and in some cases it can’t touch.

(33). Do parallel lines meet?

(A). No.

(34). Does a curved line or a line with slope meet x-axis and/or y-axis?

(A). If you take XY=1 then this curve never touches x-axis and/or y-axis. Why? Because there are unlimited numbers between any two different numbers.

(35). What is the volume of our World or Universe if there is a fourth Spatial dimension or more?

(A). If there are more than 3 Spatial dimensions then volume changes and that means Earth doesn’t revolve around Sun the way we see it.

(36). Did God create himself/herself?

(A). No. Creation is impossible and that means creator can’t exist.

(37). Why do all Gods have Human form?

(A). Imaginations that are our creations…

(38). Do Humans have a beginning?

(A). Evolution.

(39). Does God have a beginning?

(A). God doesn’t even exist.

(40). Is it meaningful to say that “There is no beginning or an end to the existence of God”?

(A). It is, if god exists but, it is not because gods can’t exist and it is 100% meaningful and 100% true to say existence itself has no beginning and no end.

(41). Did God create our World such that 1/0 suggesting creation and destruction are impossible yet God has freewill and can create and destroy anything, anytime, anywhere and anyhow?

(A). Creation and creator, both are impossible.

(42). If God created our World or Universe where does God stand?

(A). Our World, World=Universe=Everything is 100% there is and is finite. Beyond this finite World… there is no such thing as beyond this finite World because when we say World we are taking everything into consideration and there is nothing beyond this 100% finite World.

(43). Can we call our finite World or Universe as Everything? Does it imply that Everything=World=Universe?

(A). Yes.

(44). If Space is emptiness what does it occupy?

(A). It doesn’t occupy anything and I have no proof. I believe World=Universe=Everything= Space + Everything else inside space.

(45). Is Gravity lensing true?

(A). I don’t understand Gravity lensing and it looks as if it makes a good story.

(46). Does Space have properties?

(A). Anything that has physical existence has properties and space does.

(47). Does Space have edge or boundary?

(A). Space is finite.

(48). If our finite World or Universe is 100% or is Everything, what does reside on its edge or boundary or outside of it?

(A). 100% means nothing else so there is no meaning in saying “outside”.

(49). What is virtual existence?

(A). The word A.P.P.L.E is virtual… numbers are virtual but the Apple, the edible Apple you hold in your hand is what we can call as real or physical existence.

(50). What is physical existence?

(A). Something that can be perceived as physical thing has physical existence. Magnetic lines of force have physical existence but Aladdin’s Genie has virtual existence.

(51). Is Existence always positive?

(A). Existence is never zero and is always positive. Change related existence can be zero.

(52). Does Nothing mean non existence?

(A). Yes.

(53). Does negative Apple exist?

(A). No.

(54). Is time absolute or relative?

(A). Always relative.

(55). What is Calendar Time?

(A). Calendar Time is different from Relative time. Calendar time is like numbering of different events. What is the first event? Human evolved, Earth evolved, Big Bang happened, what came first? Time has existence only when the World itself has existence also creation is not possible so the possibility of first event is zero. There is no such thing as first or last event. Existence is a Circle which has no beginning and no end, it’s a never ending line without any beginning. If you say everything has a beginning than the same question arises, what happened before that particular beginning event?

(56). How does Calendar Time differ from Time which is Distance travelled divided by Velocity?

(A). Time is relative and Calendar time is numbering of events.

(57). Can we carry light?

(A). No.

(58). Why is velocity of light same on a moving train and on the surface/ground?

(A). We don’t and can’t carry light. Only Gravity can carry light. Light can’t escape the train called Gravity.

(59). Does velocity of light depend upon gravity?

(A). Yes.

(60). Can light escape the train called gravity?

(A). Gravity has its influence on light’s velocity.

(61). Is velocity of light constant in free space where there is difference in gravity? That is, if gravity varies in free space and light travelling in this free space has a constant velocity?

(A). No. Velocity of light is relative.

(62). How many dimensions do we have?

(A). Three Spatial and one Temporal.

(63). If everything such as Energy, Force, Pressure,… have units and dimensions can they be incorporated into String theory and does it lead to Theory Of Everything?

(A). I don’t know String Theory. May be such integration will lead to TOE.

(64). Does light have mass?

(A). Relativistic mass.

(65). If creation is possible and if our World or Universe was created then where is this time? What about Calendar Time?

(A). Creation is impossible.

(66). How is light’s velocity connected to gravity?

(A). v=gt

E=mcgt

For ordinary body [ g proportional to v ]

Velocity is directly proportional to g

For light [ g proportional to E/mc ]

velocity is inversely proportional to g

(67). How is velocity of a rocket connected to gravity?

(A). For ordinary body [ g proportional to v ]

Velocity is directly proportional to g

For light [ g proportional to E/mc ]
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 11999
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Fundamental Theory Of Existence.
« Reply #3 on: 20/03/2013 11:06:05 »
'New theories' I would say :)
And philosophy.

Also, you're spamming a lot of forums with it, better to find a place where people talk about it with you, and stay there to talk it out. And as it is a question about philosophy first, science secondly, see if you can find a philosophy site.
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: Fundamental Theory Of Existence.
« Reply #3 on: 20/03/2013 11:06:05 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums