The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Browsing  (Read 1833 times)

Offline valonispetr

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 37
    • View Profile
Browsing
« on: 11/02/2014 20:54:38 »
Hay
During a recent surfing the net I came across a remarkable article, ( Socrates' Kvarton Model of World) the content of which shocked me. This article provides a very logical construct a model of the world. Completely beyond the current state of knowledge subnuclear physics. I present you a small sample of this work:

Principle dislocation kinetic mass in the volume of elementary particles

You can read hundreds of scientific books about physics, but nowhere, no will tell you, where elementary particles are storing their so-called kinetic energy with which is associated with the appropriate mass. Mass as one of the most fundamental and immutable physical properties. The total amount in the closed system of material objects are consistently maintained. Is passed between objects of a closed system like a hot potato, or Black Peter, but how and where is mass located in the volume of particles even under the threat of capital punishment ,educated' do not know. Why!

It is obvious that when if is accelerated a rocket from the fuel passed by some process (kinetic energy) mass, which is again released from the rocket body in the event of a sudden stop. One thing is certain: elementary particles, which consists of a rocket, "won" when accelerating from elementary particles of matter uprest drives (so-called kinetic) energy / mass. In this process the "transfer" released every particle of fuel by increasing their chemical bonds corresponding differential quantum mass and "gave" him the elementary particles of solid rockets. In sum: each particle of rockets acquired during the process of accelerating nonzero quantum of mass and must therefore be the question: where in its volume this mass that moves with the particle is harbored? For some it's a trivial question: no, just that mass somehow in itself has, and when necessary, so it somehow "cleared". Current academic physics, unfortunately, do not knows better and more concrete answer.. In sum: each particle of rocket acquired during the process of accelerating quantum of uprest mass and must therefore be the question of where in its volume of this mass that moves with the particle, harbor. For some it's a trivial question: no just the cinemas. Mass is somehow in itself has, and when necessary, so it somehow "cleared". Current academic physics, unfortunately, knows better, more concrete answer.
« Last Edit: 22/03/2014 20:45:27 by valonispetr »


 

Offline valonispetr

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 37
    • View Profile
Re: Browsing
« Reply #1 on: 12/02/2014 22:30:31 »
I'm surprised so little interest in this issue. Mass elementary particle that has portabillity thus separability from the own nature of particle. In particular, the so-called kinetic component of mass. The separability implies its volume structure. You can not separate a part of something that has no structure! Kinetic mass of particles is not monolithic. What has the structure has also a volume, because the structure has evary time a spread out . So the question is: what structure and what volume distribution has a mass of elementary particles?
Official physics to it does not reflect: particle mass acquires and surrenders. This himself physical process takes place in  "black box" without the supervision of physicians. What's stunting them? Is not the real issue underlying physics? How can physicists samething  talk seriously about physics when they do not know to describe the process of converting mass/energy? About its structure and storage?
« Last Edit: 02/03/2014 20:26:19 by valonispetr »
 

Offline David Cooper

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1505
    • View Profile
Re: Browsing
« Reply #2 on: 13/02/2014 20:25:19 »
Why not link to the source?
 

Offline valonispetr

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 37
    • View Profile
Re: Browsing
« Reply #3 on: 13/02/2014 22:08:14 »
Unfortunately I did not read it on my PC and I remembered only a name

According to the response I think I'm the only one here who do not knows where and how to store elementary particle their  kinetic energy and its equivalent of mass. I guess I read the wrong books. Be so kind to let me link here to a reliable source of such information, which is about the issues discussed.
 

Offline David Cooper

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1505
    • View Profile
Re: Browsing
« Reply #4 on: 14/02/2014 20:50:07 »
 

Offline valonispetr

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 37
    • View Profile
Re: Browsing
« Reply #5 on: 10/03/2014 21:03:09 »
I see that you are very respectable and deserving author. I expected from you expert opinion on the problem of storing kinetic mass in the volume of particles Unfortunately vain.
You really do not have a view on it ?
« Last Edit: 22/03/2014 20:48:34 by valonispetr »
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: Browsing
« Reply #5 on: 10/03/2014 21:03:09 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums