The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Poll

Is the cosmological redshift a gravitational redshift?

Author Topic: Is the cosmological redshift related to how these observations are possible?  (Read 3054 times)

Offline Author Frank DiMeglio

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
    • View Profile
How are telescopic/astronomical observations fundamentally possible? What of the blackness and constitution of outer space in relation to these observations?

It occurs to me that the cosmological redshift is a gravitational redshift in keeping with making space more invisible and more visible, on balance. Invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance involves an inherent and fundamental stability of inertial/gravitational/electromagnetic energy. The fundamental equivalency of inertia and gravity has to be at work here.

Gravity increases as space becomes increasingly invisible. On balance, objects are increasingly magnified or larger. Notice the large size of the Earth/ground in keeping with the fact that the space that it borders is the most invisible. Now consider that an object that we would drop gets smaller as it accelerates towards the Earth/ground. Now, the setting sun does involve a magnification/increase in its relative size and a flattening/contraction and stretching/expansion of the adjoining space which involves increasing transparency/invisibility. (Outer space is flat.) Is this not a telescoping effect?

The fundamental, ultimate, and true equivalency and balancing of inertia and gravity involves visible and invisible space in fundamental balance and equilibrium.


 

Offline Author Frank DiMeglio

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
    • View Profile
The fundamental, ultimate, and true equivalency and balancing of inertia, electromagnetism, and gravity involves visible and invisible space in fundamental balance and equilibrium. This has significant applicability here.
 

Offline Author Frank DiMeglio

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
    • View Profile
See my thread "Fundamental inertial and gravitational equivalency and balancing proven" under New Theories for more on all of this please. Thanks.

In the absence of gravitation, there is and can be no experience at all (including visual). Notice that vision begins invisibly inside the eye/body.

Visible and invisible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance is the requirement of inertial and gravitational equivalency and balancing. A fundamental balance and equivalency of inertia and gravity is required for our experience.
 

Offline Author Frank DiMeglio

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
    • View Profile
Ultimately and fundamentally, the cosmological redshift cannot be understood apart from the following:

Inertia and gravity in relation to our fundamental experience of space:

When waking and standing, full gravity is full distance in/of space as it is seen, felt, and touched. (Consider the range of feeling/touch.) Now consider the visible Earth/ground. Now, the space above it involves visible and invisible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance. This is the middle distance in/of space, and it is half gravity and half inertia. Outer space is full inertia. The direct/real/actual experience of outer space as it is eliminates and precludes our experience and thought.

It is important that vision begins invisibly inside the eye/body. While standing upright, the eye may be placed at the very top of the visible head/body, and this invisible space may be extended downward. Visible and invisible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance IS the middle distance in/of space, and it is half gravity and half inertia. That is most important and fundamental. The body is visible and invisible.

Full inertia and full electromagnetism (in the absence of our natural experience of gravity, that is) can be represented by both television and outer space. Here we have the detachment, elimination/flattening, and removal of these spaces in relation to touch/tactile experience.

The Earth/ground is semi-detached in relation to touch. It is a different/detached space, and yet it is also touched. The invisible experience of the eye is detached in relation to touching the visible Earth/ground, and the visible body is touching the visible ground/Earth. The space at the very top of the visible head/body is also invisible.

Fundamental inertial and gravitational equilibrium and balance is required for our experience and for the extension of stabilized distance in/of space. To understand experience, space, and physics properly, consistently, fully, and fundamentally, we need to examine touch, feeling, and visual experience fundamentally.

Our fundamental experience of space involves visible and invisible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance consistent with the experience of the middle distance in/of space, the semi-detachment of touch/tactile experience, and half gravity and half inertia. The [invisible] experience of the eye is semi-detached in relation to touch/tactile experience. Think about it. 

Full distance in/of space is in natural equilibrium and balance with middle distance in/of space.

Dreams balance being and experience. Dream experience is possible/potential and actual. It involves visible and invisible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance consistent with the experience of the middle distance in/of space and half gravity and half inertia. The body is visible and invisible in dreams. Seen and felt/touched, dream experience is that of the middle distance in/of space. Think about it.

 

Offline Author Frank DiMeglio

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
    • View Profile
Consider that the actual/real/direct experience of outer space as it is destroys and precludes our being, thought, and experience (including visual experience).

 

Offline Author Frank DiMeglio

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
    • View Profile
This thread/discussion is very important.
« Reply #5 on: 24/03/2014 21:31:34 »
Site Administrator, your reply please? Thanks.

The energy/brightness is reduced by the space becoming more invisible. Also, gravity involves pressure; and gravity also involves energy (of course).
Think about it please.

The Earth is also a larger object/observation within a smaller space (relatively, that is). Full gravity is full distance in/of space, right? Electromagnetism, inertia, and gravity are all fundamentally related, right?

Consider the reduction in peripheral vision/visual experience very carefully.

Notice the variable depth/distance of the astronomical observations. The space is contracted/flattened and stretched/expanded. The Sun involves enormous pressure. Think about it please. The cosmological redshift is a gravitational redshift.

 

Offline Author Frank DiMeglio

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
    • View Profile
The ideas of touch, feeling, vision, and thought/the theoretical need to all be brought to bear in a consistent and matching fashion. That is very important. One of the significant shortcomings of the modern approach of physics is to consider physical reality and experience as only visual. The physicists try to be at z when they are not fundamentally and really at A through F. We always begin with typical/ordinary, common, and fundamental/foundational experiences in laying the groundwork of fundamental physical understandings/truths. The ultimate unification of physics combines, balances, and includes opposites.

Consider how/that our motion is basically and fundamentally independent of electromagnetic space (e.g., the Sun and photons). Consider the white and black space (of outer space) as fully detached in relation to touch. Consider that the actual/real/direct experience of outer space as it is destroys and precludes our being, thought, and experience (including visual experience). Moreover and consistently, the visual experience of the Sun in outer space would destroy and preclude any such actual/real/direct visual experience of the sun. Furthermore, the ability of thought to describe or reconfigure sensory experience is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience. Accordingly, the understanding of outer space is inherently and fundamentally limited.

Direct bodily experience (seen, felt, and touched) is where we begin with our physical understanding. Thoughts are invisible, and they are certainly associated with the body and bodily experience. In the absence of inertial and gravitational equivalency and balancing there is no extension of space. Distance in/of space is fundamental. Dream experience is invisible. Dreams improve upon thought. Thoughts are invisible.

Instantaneity has been swept under the rug by the modern physicists. Ultimately, time requires and involves instantaneity, gravity, and extensiveness of space. The eye is visible and invisible.

Quantum gravity is present in dreams consistent with invisible and visible space in fundamental equilbrium and balance, the middle distance in/of space, and inertia and gravity in fundamental equilibrium and balance (this necessarily means half gravity and half inertia). Dreams involve fundamentally equivalent and balanced inertia, gravity, and electromagnetism.

The Earth/ground is full gravity. The invisible space above it is half gravity and half inertia (and therefore a middle distance in/of space). Outer space is full inertia. Newton correctly believed that inertia must be a property of space itself. The otherwise visible space goes to/is invisible space in/as dream experience. Dream experience involves the middle distance in/of space consistent with half gravity and half inertia. The space of dream experience involves visible and invisible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance. This is the middle distance in/of space. Vision begins invisibly inside the eye/body. Vision extends invisibly in an undivided fashion into invisible space. Obviously, invisible space is also visible. Invisible space is a space. Visible space is seen with, through, and in invisible space. That is clear.

Put the invisible space of the eye at the top of the head. Now, draw this invisible space at the top of the head to the center of the body. Now, draw the visible plane of the Earth/ground along with the visible experience of the body up to the center of the body. Dreams balance being and experience. Seen and felt/touched, dream experience involves fundamentally balanced invisible and visible space consistent with middle strength force/energy/feeling/touch and the experience of the middle distance in/of space. Dream experience is semi-detached in relation to touch/feeling consistent with a maximum of half of the touch/feeling that is experienced at the feet while waking and standing. Vision begins invisibly inside the eye/body.

The self represents, forms, and experiences a comprehensive approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. This is a very great truth/fact with tremendous physical/real applicability (or substance/significance). Dream experience is consistent with the fact that the self represents, forms, and experiences a comprehensive approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. Indeed, if the self did not represent, form, and experience a comprehensive approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience, we would then be incapable of growth and of becoming other than we are. Dream experience grows/increases. Dreams are separate from, and yet they are fundamentally and undeniably linked with, waking experience.

The fundamental and true unification of electromagnetism and gravity requires fundamental and true inertial and gravitational equilibrium and balance. This requires and involves half gravity and half inertia of necessity.

 

Offline Author Frank DiMeglio

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
    • View Profile
Importantly, please see my other thread too On the Lighter Side New Theories Fundamental inertial and gravitational equivalency and balancing proven.

Site Administrator, please give these two threads the priority attention and consideration that this entire matter deserves.

This is a huge and fundamental breakthrough and advancement in physics.
 

Offline Author Frank DiMeglio

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
    • View Profile
The experience of the eye is the experience of the body, and it is (or it matches) the space that we are in. The eye/body is visible and invisible. Think hard on that one. It's worth it. Then think more. Vision begins invisibly inside the eye/body.

Full inertia and full electromagnetism may be associated with flat space. Regarding the visual extension of space, full gravity is full distance in/of space as it is seen, felt, and touched. Stand upright and look down at the Earth/ground. Consider the range of feeling/touch.

------------------------
Dreams are not creations of thought, and they cannot be held to be hallucinations either. Dreams are separate from, and yet they are undeniably and fundamentally linked with, our being and our experience. The mistake among the dream theorists is to hold that dreams are entirely/only separate experiences. Dreams balance being and experience. Dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general, thereby improving upon memory and understanding. Television is a creation of thought, as it is fully like thought. Dream experience is semi-detached in relation to touch. Television is fully detached in relation to touch. Dream experience is possible/potential and actual.

I have proven in my work that dreams involve equivalent and balanced inertia and gravity. Accordingly, dream experience is that of the middle distance in/of space, with invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance.

Waking experience is at the actual end of the spectrum. Half gravity and half inertia in dreams (middle distance). Dreams are in the middle. Television is at the potential end of the spectrum. Dream experience is possible/potential and actual. Dreams balance being and experience. Think about it hard.

Notice how the body may appear as either invisible or visible in dreams. Dream experience is that of the middle distance in/of space, and dreams balance being and experience. These are great ideas, and they are facts.

The blue (exteriorised) sky forms a half of a sphere, as it is half falling, circular, translucent. The flat, orange/red sun (at a right angle thereto); is this not an "interiorised" representation of the Earth? What of the orange magma/lava in (and) on the Earth/ground? Here is a good one. The slight curvature of the moon matches the slight curvature of the Earth/ground. The nature of electromagnetism is possible/potential. The real/direct/actual experience of outer space as it is (including the sun in outer space) precludes and destroys us, our thought, our experience, and our visual experience. The understanding of outer space is inherently and fundamentally limited.

The fundamentals are just not there in the modern approach. Newton was right that inertia must be a property of space itself. Outer space is full inertia. Television is full electromagnetism and full inertia.

This is fundamental to physics: Invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance is the middle distance in/of space (clearly, logically, and fundamentally) consistent with half gravity and half inertia. Invisible space is semi-detached in relation to touch. Outer space is detached in relation to touch. Visible space is not detached in relation to touch.

There is no extension of space, body/bodily experience, and visual experience in the absence of real, fundamental, and true inertial and gravitational equivalency, equilibrium, and balance. Stablized and fundamental distance in/of space as it is seen, felt, and touched is fundamental. Is the eye (the experience of the eye) not in possible/potential/actual form? Is the eye/body not quantum mechanical/quantum gravitational in nature? The eye is visible and invisible. The body is visible and invisible. Think.

Dreams are definitely quantum gravity.

Dreams balance being and experience. A huge truth/fact. Think about it.

My ideas merit very serious consideration. That is clear.
 

Offline Author Frank DiMeglio

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
    • View Profile
What is the fundamental physics of telescopic/astronomical observations? Consider how these observations are/must be possible. The underlying and fundamental physics of the telescopic/astronomical observations must allow/account for the reality/possibility of the observations. Please consider:

The space is stretched/expanded and contracted/flattened.
These telescopic/astronomical observations are significantly or fundamentally related to the physics of dreams. Dream physics/experience is that of the middle distance in/of space.
A balance of visible and invisible space along with a relation of gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism are apparent. Balance and completeness go hand-in-hand. Balance involves the center. Center and middle.

The ultimate unification of physics combines, includes, and balances opposites. Magnification, increasing gravity, increasing invisibility of space, and increasing visibility of space are necessarily at play. Dreams involve how a larger space is made smaller and how a smaller space is made larger. Outer space is full inertia. Think!!!!   
 
The cosmological redshift is a gravitational redshift. That is a fact. I have proven this. Gravity is fundamental to distance in/of space as we experience it. THINK!!!! 

Astronomical/telescopic observations are significantly and fundamentally related to the physics of dream experience (i.e., dream experience).

The real/actual/true/full/direct experience of outer space as it is precludes and destroys us, our experience, our thought , and the/our entire visual experience. Outer space is full inertia. The space is black, we are not touching anything/outer space, and there is weightlessness. It all makes sense.

The space is stretched/expanded and contracted/flattened. More is seen at once over [comparatively] a larger/greater distance, and this also involves/consitutes a [comparatively] smaller distance in/of space in order to be able to see/survey such enormous distance at once.   

The space is stretched/expanded and contracted/flattened. This clearly relates to and involves gravity/gravitational effect. The cosmological redshift is a gravitational redshift. I have proven this. 

Full gravity is full distance in/of space seen, felt, and touched. Being and experience. VISIBLE SPACE.
(Invisible space is between the Earth/ground and outer space.)

Dream experience is half gravity and half inertia consistent with the experience of the middle distance in/of space (seen, felt, and touched). Dream experience is possible/potential and actual. INVISIBLE SPACE. Being and experience.

Full inertia/outer space is nothing (seen, felt, and touched). Being and experience.

Invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance is the middle distance (necessarily, fundamentally, and logically) in/of space consistent with half gravity and half inertia. Vision begins invisibly inside the eye/body. Notice the seamless or undivided whole in/with the visual experience of the eye/body. 

by Author Frank DiMeglio
 

Offline JP

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3366
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Breaking forum rules (cross-posting this verbatim to other sites) and promoting your personal theories is going to get you site moderator attention, but not in the way you wanted.  I'm locking this thread as it's been cross-posted and is in violation of site policy. 
 

The Naked Scientists Forum


 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums