The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Relative Simultaneity  (Read 24165 times)

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 12001
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Relative Simultaneity
« Reply #100 on: 02/03/2015 14:51:26 »
Abstractions is what will define the experiment, then there will be mathematics supporting it. If the experiment fails the mathematics was wrong, here. It doesn't discuss whether those mathematics will fit 'somewhere else' though. you can look at it at least two ways. One in where whenever a mathematical proof becomes true, it also has a possibility of existing 'somewhere', even if not here. The other is experimental physics, sometimes the mathematics won't exist, so you will have to invent them, to fit the experiment, or logic.
==

Actually this is even more true when it comes to theoretical mathematics. As I gather Perelman had to invent a lot of new ways to describe it, and as I remember, so it was with Einstein.
« Last Edit: 02/03/2015 14:53:55 by yor_on »
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: Relative Simultaneity
« Reply #100 on: 02/03/2015 14:51:26 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums