The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Theorem of finite matter  (Read 810 times)

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3929
  • Thanked: 55 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Theorem of finite matter
« on: 29/08/2015 19:45:16 »
If we take any quantity and divide it by itself it is obviously unity. As in 358433299e2b16e8992ab22950484500.gif. If we consider infinity as a quantity then we can formulate the abstract algebraic formula 786b8820745aa9467207a854fa60d4d0.gif. We can then decompose this unity to arrive at 72c89be215b2e841cf6e20730b034165.gif. Here the left hand side is zero and the right hand side has an infinite radial value. These values are imposed upon the equation forcing a particular result but show the relationship of the gravitational field to infinity.

However, we can also formulate the equation thus, 9c47c5a0507c8d1c42c19575e8921b22.gif. This then relates to an infinite mass energy. Such as that required to escape a black hole. Here radial distance from the source has no effect on the strength of force. This is because by implication there is no point outside the source across an infinite distance. This result indicates that if there were an infinite amount of matter it would have to occupy an infinite amount of space. Thus there cannot be an infinite amount of matter in the universe.


 

Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1879
  • Thanked: 145 times
    • View Profile
Re: Theorem of finite matter
« Reply #1 on: 29/08/2015 19:54:53 »
∞/∞ is not necessarily 1

for instance:

lim        2n = 2
n→∞     n
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3929
  • Thanked: 55 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Theorem of finite matter
« Reply #2 on: 29/08/2015 19:56:59 »
Which surely equates to multiplying 2 by unity.
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3929
  • Thanked: 55 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Theorem of finite matter
« Reply #3 on: 29/08/2015 20:16:33 »
∞/∞ is not necessarily 1

for instance:

lim        2n = 2
n→∞     n

If you had stated instead:

6cff7602eaef78d7ea17b33a919a6caa.gif

then you would have a difference and be reformulating the equation in terms that could ultimately become complex and therefore amenable to quantum mechanics.
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3929
  • Thanked: 55 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Theorem of finite matter
« Reply #4 on: 30/08/2015 17:29:01 »
As an extension to the above the abstraction could be changed to the following.

667459cd36ba25fe4caa6105fcf1765f.gif

So that we are using a complex infinity with its complex conjugate. The complex conjugate indicating a negative direction along the radius.
« Last Edit: 30/08/2015 17:31:26 by jeffreyH »
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4728
  • Thanked: 155 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Theorem of finite matter
« Reply #5 on: 31/08/2015 00:29:22 »
72c89be215b2e841cf6e20730b034165.gif. Here the left hand side is zero and the right hand side has an infinite radial value.

No,the RHS = 0.
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3929
  • Thanked: 55 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Theorem of finite matter
« Reply #6 on: 31/08/2015 00:48:01 »
72c89be215b2e841cf6e20730b034165.gif. Here the left hand side is zero and the right hand side has an infinite radial value.

No,the RHS = 0.


Yes. Sorry I didn't make that clear.
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: Theorem of finite matter
« Reply #6 on: 31/08/2015 00:48:01 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums