The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: All my ideas in one basket.  (Read 3283 times)

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3153
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #25 on: 19/10/2015 19:33:12 »
We see  frequencies that are individually distinct from the constant.
 

Offline sam7

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #26 on: 19/10/2015 21:25:13 »
I bet you'd love timecube theory.
 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3153
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #27 on: 19/10/2015 22:08:44 »
I bet you'd love timecube theory.

I emailed the Author, told him to withdraw his $10,000 offer and the reasons why he was wrong.  I insist science is correct but perceives it wrong,

this guy -

When the Sun shines upon Earth, the sun does not give 2 hoots what time it is, time is arbitrary, a day is what ever we wish to call it.

He doesn't even know what science is like most people, he does not understand time, space-time, real time or the concept of abstract meanings.
« Last Edit: 19/10/2015 22:17:35 by Thebox »
 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3153
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3153
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #29 on: 23/10/2015 15:35:11 »
 

Offline Wajideu

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #30 on: 23/10/2015 17:05:23 »
The flaw with your theory is that you assume light has a color, when it doesn't.

Inside your eyes are these things called "cone cells" and "rod cells" which act as photoreceptors. Rod cells are in the peripheral vision of the eye and are 100 times more sensitive than cone cells, so sensitive that they can respond to a single photon; but they cannot distinguish color. Cone cells come in 3 kinds, S-cones, M-cones, and L-cones. S-cones respond to wavelengths between ~400-500nm. M-cones respond to wavelengths between ~400nm-675nm, and L-cones respond to wavelengths between ~400-700nm.



S-cones are what we perceive as blue light, M-cones are what we perceive as green light, and L-cones are what we perceive as red light. The peak responsiveness of these cones is at ~420nm, ~534nm, and ~564nm respectively.

Combining waves is done by adding the waves together. When 2 positive or 2 negative peaks hit each other, the absolute value of the peak increases. When a positive and a negative peak hit each other, they cancel out.


+

=


So as you can see, white is not the combination (read: addition) of red, green, and blue (all subjective) waves of light; it's the presence of all these waves of light. If you actually combined them, you'd just get a single wave that stimulates one type of your cone cells more than the others, which would probably just appear orange.
« Last Edit: 23/10/2015 17:08:28 by Wajideu »
 
The following users thanked this post: Ophiolite

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3153
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #31 on: 23/10/2015 18:34:29 »
The flaw with your theory is that you assume light has a color, when it doesn't.



The process of colour is done in the brain by seeing different energy amplitudes through the dark that is transparent to light that is then transparent to sight. I do no think light has a colour, I think we observe and convert a process into colour by our brains.   White is a colour that we see through the clear of light, like I see the white background behind this writing. We do not observe ''colour'' of space because light in space travels at c and a linearity. The propagation of light through space is opposed by matter that creates a layer compression and temporal exchange rate.
The clear of space is an equilibrium to sight, A=B when A is a light constant of c in space and B is sight through space.   


[A=B]≠C when C is c slowing in a medium or by obstruction causing radiation pressure. Because if B=C  everything would be invisible.

   
« Last Edit: 23/10/2015 18:36:39 by Thebox »
 

Offline Wajideu

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #32 on: 24/10/2015 03:03:34 »
[A=B]≠C when C is c slowing in a medium or by obstruction causing radiation pressure. Because if B=C  everything would be invisible.

A+B=C. Always. The medium being passed through or the obstruction is irrelevant in this context. If B=C, then A has 0 amplitude and a wavelength of 0. In that sense, yes, A is invisible, because we can't see wavelengths shorter than 400nm. It's like if you reverse the amplitudes of an audio wave and play it at the same time as the original audio wave. The two cancel each other out, and you end up with no sound.
 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3153
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #33 on: 24/10/2015 11:29:26 »
[A=B]≠C when C is c slowing in a medium or by obstruction causing radiation pressure. Because if B=C  everything would be invisible.

A+B=C. Always. The medium being passed through or the obstruction is irrelevant in this context. If B=C, then A has 0 amplitude and a wavelength of 0. In that sense, yes, A is invisible, because we can't see wavelengths shorter than 400nm. It's like if you reverse the amplitudes of an audio wave and play it at the same time as the original audio wave. The two cancel each other out, and you end up with no sound.

exactly light in space as no net charge, no amplitude, no frequency and no wavelength, it is all neutralised when travelling through space without a reactant force.  Like a pond stays calm until a pebble is dropped in or there is a breeze. It is not white light, it is invisible light, the same as we cant see radio waves etc.
« Last Edit: 24/10/2015 11:32:19 by Thebox »
 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3153
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #34 on: 26/10/2015 13:40:21 »
The easy interpretation of this, is to imagine that all light propagating through space or the air is Ultraviolet, a range we can not see .

Light is a constant isotropic ripple at a constant rate in space that is equal to sight.



« Last Edit: 26/10/2015 15:01:25 by Thebox »
 

Offline Wajideu

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #35 on: 28/10/2015 00:40:02 »
Okay, lets put this another way, conceptually. Let's say that there is no such thing as light and the photoreceptive cells in your eyes are shaped like little bowls.

---.___
__.-----

And for the cell to produce a signal, a photon must bounce off only one side of the bowl and strike the back of it. If the wavelength of the photon is too low, it'll just strike the back of the bowl without touching the sides and no signal will be fired. If the wavelength of the photon is too high, it will strike the sides of the bowl twice before it hits the hits the back, and so there also won't be a signal. Thus, the photon must have a have a wavelength within a very specific range for the cell to fire a signal.

In addition to this, photons do not interact with each other. When they strike matter, they are converted into energy. That energy may excite electrons, which in turn create more (identical) photons when they return to a ground state. A single photon doesn't cross millions of lightyears without colliding with any matter; fluid or solid.
« Last Edit: 28/10/2015 00:43:51 by Wajideu »
 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3153
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #36 on: 29/10/2015 15:37:41 »
I am not sure If I ever posted this here.

Reactance of matter or a medium is the opposition of the element to a change of form or molecular breakdown by the opposing force of the transmission medium constant energy that is temporally oppossed to a body in rotation realtive to a Sun due to the element's inductance or capacitance. . A suggested built-up electrical field or a suggested magnetic field or magnetic resonance that resists the force of the constant transmission rate decreasing the speed of the constant transmisson energy flow through or onto the matter or medium.
Inductance is a property of the Atoms of the matter or medium by which a change in current magnitude induces a voltage electromotive force in both the conductor itself and in any nearby conductors by Thermodyanmic process transfer of energy. Electric charge is a physical property of Atoms that causes the Atom to experience an increase in Kinetic activity when placed in an electromagnetic energy transmision medium such as ''light'' creating an electromotive force around the Atoms and the Molecules to become unstable.
All matter or mediums that are essentially under a constant force of such as gravity are at a suggested constant loss of energy to gravity, a Non-equilibrium of thermodynamics or of a Non-equilibrium of energies within. Most systems found in nature are not in thermodynamic equilibrium; for they are changing or can be triggered to change over time, and are continuously and discontinuously subject to flux of matter and energy to and from other systems and to chemical reactions. Many natural systems still today remain beyond the scope of currently known macroscopic thermodynamic methods.
There are two types of electric charges: positive and negative. Positively charged substances are repelled from other positively charged substances, but attracted to negatively charged substances; negatively charged substances are repelled from negative and attracted to positive. An object is negatively charged if it has an excess of electrons, and is otherwise positively charged or uncharged


is a branch of thermodynamics that deals with thermodynamic systems that are not in thermodynamic equilibrium.Non-equilibrium thermodynamics is concerned with transport processes and with the rates of chemical reactions.[1] Many natural systems still today remain beyond the scope of currently known macroscopic thermodynamic methods.

A suggested communications protocol to the brain by a low voltage differential signalling of EM radiation interaction with matter or a medium that sends a transparent echoe of EM radiation interference back through the visual transparent constant of itself which is formed by matters resistance force to the opposing force of light thus giving propagation and pressure magnitude to spectral content each of which content is capable of transmitting messages modulated onto light waves in their perceived spectral content that travel through the constant equilibrium of light to sight, a carrier signal to the brain unseen by the constant transparent wash of Incident rays.
The information exchanged through the constant transparent transmission medium the main means of mass communication. The nature of a communication the actual data exchanged and any state-dependent behaviours is defined by its specification and the brains ability to interpret this information.
A communication transmssion medium that refers to a physical transmission medium such as the constant of EM radiation in passive space, a Synchronization of the coordination of timing events to operate a system in unison to sight. The familiar conductor of an orchestra that serves to keep the orchestra in ''time''.

The communications protocol by low voltage differential signalling of matter, which is formed by matters resistance force to the opposing force of light thus giving propagation magnitude to spectral content, each of which content is capable of transmitting messages modulated onto light waves in their perceived spectral content that travel through the constant equilibrium carrier signal to the brain, a communications protocol is a system of digital rules for data exchange between light interactions and the brain. Communicating systems use well-defined formats (protocol) for exchanging messages.
The information exchanged —through a constant media—is governed by rules and conventions that can be set out in technical specifications called communication protocol standards. The nature of a communication, the actual data exchanged and any state-dependent behaviors, is defined by its specification.
The basic difference between a parallel and a serial communication channel is the number of electrical conductors used at the physical layer to convey bits, this effect can be attributed to the transfer of energy from the light to an electron in the matter. From this perspective, an alteration in either the amplitude or wavelength of light would induce changes in the rate of emission of electrons from the matter.
A parallel communication is a method of conveying multiple binary digits (bits) simultaneously. It contrasts with serial communication, which conveys only a single bit at a time; this distinction is one way of characterizing a communications link to the brain.
A communication channel or channel, that refers to a physical transmission medium such as the constant of light, or to a logical connection over a multiplexed medium such as light. A Synchronization of the coordination of events to operate a system in unison to sight. The familiar conductor of an orchestra that serves to keep the orchestra in ''time''.

I postulate that light is a state and we see by EM radiation being a communications protocol by low voltage differential signalling of matter , which is formed by matters resistance force to the opposing force of light thus giving propagation and pressure magnitude to spectral content, each of which content is capable of transmitting messages modulated onto light waves in their perceived spectral content that travel through the constant equilibrium of light to sight, a carrier signal to the brain, a communications protocol that is a system of digital rules for data exchange between light interactions with matter and within itself to the brain. Communicating systems use well-defined formats (protocol) for exchanging messages.
The information exchanged through a constant, the main means of mass communication—that is governed by rules and conventions that can be set out in technical specifications called communication protocol standards. The nature of a communication, the actual data exchanged and any state-dependent behaviours, is defined by its specification and the brains ability to interpret this information.
The basic difference between a parallel and a serial communication channel is the number of electrical conductors used at the physical layer to convey bits, this effect can be attributed to the transfer of energy from the light to an electron in the matter. From this perspective, an alteration in either the amplitude or wavelength of light would induce changes in the rate of emission of electrons from the matter.
A parallel communication is a method of conveying multiple binary digits (bits) simultaneously. It contrasts with serial communication, which conveys only a single bit at a time; this distinction is one way of characterizing a communications link to the brain that also becomes a duplicate transfer by mirrored properties, a period of changing from one state or condition to another by receivership.
A communication channel or channel, that refers to a physical transmission medium such as the constant of light in passive dark space, or to a logical connection over a multiplexed medium such as light. A Synchronization of the coordination of events to operate a system in unison to sight. The familiar conductor of an orchestra that serves to keep the orchestra in ''time''.
 

Offline Wajideu

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #37 on: 29/10/2015 18:04:41 »
No malfeasance, but it's indubitable you're expounding your conjecture by espousing sesquipedalian nomenclature that is nebulous to your quintessence.
 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3153
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #38 on: 30/10/2015 08:25:32 »
quintessence
I think you have just said it is a bit long winded in my explanation of trying to add details, and my details are a bit unclear?

I started my edit , that was just notes i saved I wrote, that needed an edit or two.

gravity?

''Consider an electrically neutral plasma in equilibrium, consisting of a gas of positively charged ions and negatively charged electrons. If one displaces by a tiny amount all of the electrons with respect to the ions, the Coulomb force pulls the electrons back, acting as a restoring force.''



Reactants of matter or a medium is the opposition of the element to a change of form or molecular breakdown by an opposing force such as the transmission medium constant (EMR), that temporally opposes change due to the element's inductance, capacitance, and emittance that denotes total equilibrium entropy of the mass. A suggested built-up electrical field or a suggested magnetic field or magnetic resonance that resists the force of the constant transmission rate , decreasing the propagation speed of the constant flow through or onto the matter or medium, inverting through itself the propagation of light by reflection and permeable properties of the matter, creating a constant interference pattern of matter relative to permeable and reflective properties of the matter between 400nm-700nm, that can be visually observed by sight through the constant clarity of light propagating through space.
The clarity of light propagating through space, the quality of being clear in particular, a suggested second constant to all observers when there is sufficient intensity of EMR present. A suggested frequency of zero whilst EMR is propagating through space, an equilibrium to sight, that all observers can clearly observe  the reactant of matter through, that creates a frequency between 400nm-700nm known as spectral content, by the process of  EMR interaction with a concrete existence such as objects or a medium.
I postulate that light is a state and we see by EM radiation being a communications protocol medium of inverted neutralised carrier signals of that which  is formed by matters resistance force to the opposing force of light thus giving propagation of EMR  pressure magnitude to spectral content, each of which content is capable of transmitting messages modulated, inverted into itself in it's perceived spectral content, that travels through the constant equilibrium of light to sight, a carrier signal to the brain, a communications protocol that is a system of digital rules for data exchange between light interactions with matter and within itself to the brain.
The information exchanged through the neutral communication medium  constant, the main means of mass communication—that is governed by rules and conventions that can be set out in technical specifications called communication protocol standards.
 The nature of a communication, the actual data exchanged and any state-dependent behaviours, is defined by its specification and the brains ability to interpret this information.
The basic difference between a parallel and a serial communication channel is the number of electrical conductors used at the physical layer to convey bits, this effect can be attributed to the transfer of energy from the light to an electron in the matter. From this perspective, an alteration in either the amplitude or wavelength of light would induce changes in the rate of emission of electrons from the matter.
A parallel communication is a method of conveying multiple binary digits (bits) simultaneously. It contrasts with serial communication, which conveys only a single bit at a time; this distinction is one way of characterizing a communications link to the brain that also becomes a duplicate transfer by mirrored properties, a period of changing from one state or condition to another by receivership.
A communication channel or channel, that refers to a physical transmission medium such as the constant of light in passive dark space, or to a logical connection over a multiplexed medium such as light. A Synchronization of the coordination of events to operate a system in unison to sight. The familiar conductor of an orchestra that serves to keep the orchestra in ''time''.
Modify message

« Last Edit: 30/10/2015 08:59:52 by Thebox »
 

Offline Wajideu

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #39 on: 30/10/2015 11:31:04 »
english: "No offense, but it's obvious you're explaining your ideas using big words for concepts that are unclear to yourself."

Reactants have nothing to do with capacitance, inductance, emittance, entropy, or mass. They are substances consumed in a chemical reaction.

Light is, in the strictest sense, a stream of photons (a type of boson) moving within the visible wavelength of 400nm to 700nm.

Light has nothing to do with communications protocols.

The difference between parallel and serial communications channel has nothing to do with the number of electrical conductors. Serial communication channels simply operate on multiplexed data.

Lastly, light does not keep anything in time. In fact, light itself is out of time if it's not measured in a vacuum. We measure things in terms of light because light is the fastest thing we know, and thus with we can assert the shortest distance and shortest time with it as a Planck length and Planck time.
 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3153
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #40 on: 31/10/2015 07:49:03 »
english: "No offense, but it's obvious you're explaining your ideas using big words for concepts that are unclear to yourself."

Reactants have nothing to do with capacitance, inductance, emittance, entropy, or mass. They are substances consumed in a chemical reaction.

Light is, in the strictest sense, a stream of photons (a type of boson) moving within the visible wavelength of 400nm to 700nm.

Light has nothing to do with communications protocols.

The difference between parallel and serial communications channel has nothing to do with the number of electrical conductors. Serial communication channels simply operate on multiplexed data.

Lastly, light does not keep anything in time. In fact, light itself is out of time if it's not measured in a vacuum. We measure things in terms of light because light is the fastest thing we know, and thus with we can assert the shortest distance and shortest time with it as a Planck length and Planck time.


Then you do not understand light, light is a well known communications method in such as fibre optics.   

'In telecommunications, a communications protocol is a system of rules that allow two or more entities of a communications system to transmit information via any kind of variation of a physical quantity.''


''devices require that the devices agree on the format of the data.''


 These are the rules or standard that defines the syntax, semantics and synchronization of communication and possible error recovery methods. Protocols may be implemented by hardware, software, or a combination of both.[1]

''Communicating systems use well-defined formats (protocol) for exchanging messages. Each message has an exact meaning intended to elicit a response from a range of possible responses pre-determined for that particular situation''

One day the science that tries to insult my intelligence will realise that EMR is what keeps everything synchronised in the entire universe
« Last Edit: 31/10/2015 08:09:38 by Thebox »
 

Offline Wajideu

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #41 on: 01/11/2015 05:39:30 »
Light is not a communications method. It can be used as a method of communication; but that's not just a property of light, you can do that with anything.

For example, just the other day I was pondering mechanical computers and designed this simple mechanism for data storage using a spring, a ratchet, and a gear with a needle attached to it that pointed to 1 or 0. When the gear rotated counterclockwise, the ratchet would lock it in place and a write operation would occur that points the needle to 1. When the ratchet was released, the spring would reset the gear back to it's default position, and an erase operation would occur that points the needle to 0.

Let's decide on a 2-bit encoding for communication. Here's a specification:

00 - subtract 1
01 - add 1
10 - multiply by 2
11 - execute and reset to 0

Now, let's make the device say "HELLO" (in ASCII encoding):

01101010101010010101010101010111
01101010101010010101010111011010
10101001010101010110110110101010
10010101010101101101101010101001
01010101011001010111
« Last Edit: 01/11/2015 05:44:40 by Wajideu »
 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3153
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #42 on: 01/11/2015 13:04:05 »
Light is not a communications method. It can be used as a method of communication; but that's not just a property of light, you can do that with anything.

For example, just the other day I was pondering mechanical computers and designed this simple mechanism for data storage using a spring, a ratchet, and a gear with a needle attached to it that pointed to 1 or 0. When the gear rotated counterclockwise, the ratchet would lock it in place and a write operation would occur that points the needle to 1. When the ratchet was released, the spring would reset the gear back to it's default position, and an erase operation would occur that points the needle to 0.

Let's decide on a 2-bit encoding for communication. Here's a specification:

00 - subtract 1
01 - add 1
10 - multiply by 2
11 - execute and reset to 0

Now, let's make the device say "HELLO" (in ASCII encoding):

01101010101010010101010101010111
01101010101010010101010111011010
10101001010101010110110110101010
10010101010101101101101010101001
01010101011001010111


Light is a communications medium, and I have no idea how  or why you are trying to relate binary and observer effect with  the nature and natural of light.   Your device is not really a mass communication device and you are inputting the command structure, you are actually doing the communicating.


Light communicates with our brains, if it was not for light then your brain would have no network to matter and you would be not be able to see. Like if there was not air you would not hear and the communication method is lost.

The communication medium constant is a frequency of zero, equal to sight, equal to all inverted signals, we only observe changes in the network, we observe four dimensions occupying the fifth dimension of the synchronised constant that is synchronised with the brain. The four dimension we observe of ourselves travelling through timeless time of the fifth dimension.


https://theoristexplains.wordpress.com/2015/11/01/my-mind-ticking-in-thought-synchronised-in-time-with-time/
 

Offline Wajideu

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #43 on: 01/11/2015 17:26:22 »
I repeat, light is not a communications medium, it can be used as a communications medium. Also, what I said had absolutely nothing to do with binary data, the observer effect, or the nature of natural light. I designed a mechanism that had 2 states and a encoding for messages; then I wrote a message using that encoding. and for the record, some of the earliest forms of using light for transmitting messages looked like:





Modern optical communication involves electrically modulating the intensity of light being sent through an optical fiber. A specific encoding is used that involves a bit error correction; but the simplest form, you could say that high intensity = 1, low intensity = 0. Light does not intrinsically communicate anything; we take advantage of it's natural properties to make it do so.
 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3153
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #44 on: 01/11/2015 21:28:06 »
I repeat, light is not a communications medium, it can be used as a communications medium.

That is a rather contradictory statement.
 

Offline Wajideu

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #45 on: 02/11/2015 09:43:14 »
No, it's not. It's analogous to the statement, "guns don't kill people, people kill people with guns.". Take away the guns and they'll use knives. Take away the knives and they'll use sticks. Take away the sticks and they'll use fists. In any case, not the guns, nor the knives, nor the sticks, nor the fists have the intrinsic property of killing people.
« Last Edit: 02/11/2015 09:48:47 by Wajideu »
 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3153
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #46 on: 03/11/2015 14:24:41 »
No, it's not. It's analogous to the statement, "guns don't kill people, people kill people with guns.". Take away the guns and they'll use knives. Take away the knives and they'll use sticks. Take away the sticks and they'll use fists. In any case, not the guns, nor the knives, nor the sticks, nor the fists have the intrinsic property of killing people.


Completely far away from any points that alter the intention and merit of my idea.   EMR such as CBMR is a communications medium,  Gravity communicates through it, objects communicate through it by interacting with it and modulating the communication signal.  You know very little about light.


Just understand this, if it were raining and several droplets were red, you would receive this information to your brain.
« Last Edit: 03/11/2015 14:28:08 by Thebox »
 

Offline Wajideu

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #47 on: 03/11/2015 23:26:53 »
Now see, if you had explained it like that to begin with instead of writing a novel filled with irrelevant and questionably incorrect statements, we wouldn't have been going around in circles.

From what I can tell, what you're trying to explain has absolutely nothing to do with light or communication. I'm guessing that you're saying:

 - Light is a form of electromagnetic radiation.
 - Gravity interacts with electromagnetic radiation
 - Objects interact with electromagnetic radiation

Therefore:

 - Electromagnetic radiation (a subset of which, being light) acts as a medium through which gravity and objects interact with each other.

I'd say this is actually pretty logical.
 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3153
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #48 on: 04/11/2015 01:00:44 »
Now see, if you had explained it like that to begin with instead of writing a novel filled with irrelevant and questionably incorrect statements, we wouldn't have been going around in circles.

From what I can tell, what you're trying to explain has absolutely nothing to do with light or communication. I'm guessing that you're saying:

 - Light is a form of electromagnetic radiation.
 - Gravity interacts with electromagnetic radiation
 - Objects interact with electromagnetic radiation

Therefore:

 - Electromagnetic radiation (a subset of which, being light) acts as a medium through which gravity and objects interact with each other.

I'd say this is actually pretty logical.


I did say that, the confusion of messages hey, EMR couples our brains to things also, we see through the emr because frequency x is an equilibrium to sight.   


Constant 1- absolute darkness

constant 2 - the speed of EMR

Constant 3 - clarity to sight , no observed frequency of between 400nm -700nm while EMR propagates through space.

Constant 4 - A set of subset constants , spectral frequencies between 400nm-700nm


Ok?


From my wordpress blog

''A separation of time and space, illuminated by the fabric of light, a fabric constant that allows the perception of distance , a fabric that alters the very essence of space, an opaqueness to vision clarified by it’s very existence.  An existence that synchronises my mind to all of space, a constant that couples my mind to matter, distance a sense of separation of mind over matter,

In my mind time stands still, synchronised to timeless space,  all that I observe, a change in time, synchronisations different to my own.''

I observe four dimensions through a fifth dimension of synchronised state, a dimension that allows four dimensions to exist but to not out welcome their stay.

 
« Last Edit: 04/11/2015 01:32:09 by Thebox »
 

Offline Wajideu

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #49 on: 04/11/2015 21:40:13 »
And, now you're back to speaking complete grandiose nonsense... Anyhow, I understand your basic point now and accept that there is some logic to it.
 
The following users thanked this post: Thebox

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: All my ideas in one basket.
« Reply #49 on: 04/11/2015 21:40:13 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums