The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Mach Maxwell Marosz ( New Physics Fundamets )  (Read 563 times)

Offline machmarosz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Mach Maxwell Marosz ( New Physics Fundamets )
« on: 11/11/2015 09:07:50 »
Hi from Poland  my Name is Maciej Marosz I'm 35 yo Engineer
in 2012 (Poland  city Walbrzych ) I made very simple test

3 Years Later ... I saw Nasa's raport about EM drive  I started learn my self new facts

I HOPE FIND PEOPLE WHO WILL REPEAT MY TEST
I NOT HAVE CONDITION TO WORK IN LAB
I HOPE BEFORE MY DIE OUR CHILDRENS WILL LEARN "MORE FRESH" PHYSICS




     MICHELSON - MORLEY
(DYNAMICA EDITION  2012 Poland
)
THEORY :
James Clerk Maxwell, in 1861–64, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.

SI units :
ENERGY / SPACE  =  [ Joul / cubic meters  = Newton *meter / cubic meters  =  N/m^2 ]



ENERGY ( em waves ) is  pushing objects



WE CAN COMPARE  EM PREASURE and FLUID ( Ideal Gas model)
0,001 mm  sheet has got near 100 m^2  area !!!



It Is impossible Big / Small mass m can not fall at one time !!!


Each Material need Separate Master and we have to evaluate and measure NORMAL Air's preasure and Normal EM preasure




EM presure is very very important for physics
( special important is dynamic preasure )






I FOUND THAT EXIST OPTION 3 ( it is not Joke  Newton told only about 2 options )





WE CAN USE ABOVE FACTS TO BUILD NEW ENGINE
this Engine =EMdrive  ( we no need use P=mV )






WHY EARTH IS MAKING OWN ROTATION ?
PLEASE COMPARE ELECTRO MAGNETIC
 DYNAMIC PREASURE ( both Earth's side )


VERY IMPORTANT IS ENERGY's DENSITY










MICHELSON - MORLEY
(DYNAMICA EDITION  2012 Poland)


How big force is registering left /right wall ( intensity ? ) 
1 NOT EXIST C+V !
2 where 3D signal started?
3  where are  walls ?








camera ------Bulb >>> motion

Bulb-------camera >>> motion

Camera is not registering the same INTENSITY !!!





POINT WHERE THE 3D  SIGNAL STARTED IS NOT MOVING WITH AIRPLANES !!!!





EXIST ALSO TORQUE edition !!!





ABSOLUTE SPEED IS PROPORTIONAL TO FORCE !!!
BELOW ENGINE IS LOSTING POWER  !!!




P1....P2.....me >>> Motion


I WAS IN POINT  P1,P2

I'M in point P3

I will be in point P4




« Last Edit: 11/11/2015 09:16:55 by machmarosz »


 

Offline machmarosz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: Mach Maxwell Marosz ( New Physics Fundamets )
« Reply #1 on: 11/11/2015 09:25:18 »



EACH FORCE HAS GOT SPECIAL COLOUR !!!





PLEASE READ ABOUT TOLMAN !!!!

MOTION IS CHANGING  GRAVITATION's INTENSITY !!!


How big intensity is registering mass m left and m right ?




BIG PROBLEM OPTICA !!!




ABSOLUTE MOTION IS INSIDE EACH ATOM








 

Offline machmarosz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: Mach Maxwell Marosz ( New Physics Fundamets )
« Reply #2 on: 11/11/2015 09:32:26 »


WHAT I WANT  TO CHANGE IN OLD BOOKS  PHYSICS !!!


Galilean relativity - fundament for modern physics
source : http://physics.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node47.html

******************************************************************
Imagine a person inside a ship which is sailing on a perfectly smooth lake at constant speed. This passeneger is in the ship's windowless hull and, despite it being a fine day, is engaged in doing mechanical experiments (such as studying the behavior of pendula and the trajectories of falling bodies). A simple question one can ask of this researcher is whether she can determine that the ship is moving (with respect to the lake shore) without going on deck or looking out a porthole.
Since the ship is moving at constant speed and direction she will not feel the motion of the ship. This is the same situation as when flying on a plane: one cannot tell, without looking out one of the windows, that the plane is moving once it reaches cruising altitutde (at which point the plane is flying at constant speed and direction). Still one might wonder whether the experiments being done in the ship's hull will give some indication of the its motion. Based on his experiments Galileo concluded that this is in fact impossible: all mechanical experiments done inside a ship moving at constant speed in a constant direction would give precisely the same results as similar experiments done on shore.
The conclusion is that one observer in a house by the shore and another in the ship will not be able to determine that the ship is moving by comparing the results of experiments done inside the house and ship. In order to determine motion these observers must look at each other. It is important important to note that this is true only if the ship is sailing at constant speed and direction, should it speed up, slow down or turn the researcher inside can tell that the ship is moving. For example, if the ship turns you can see all things hanging from the roof (such as a lamp) tilting with respect to the floor
Generalizing these observations Galileo postulated his relativity hypothesis:

any two observers moving at constant speed and direction with respect to one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments
(it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them).
In pursuing these ideas Galileo used the scientific method (Sec. 1.2.1): he derived consequences of this hypothesis and determined whether they agree with the predictions.
This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute. This means that velocity can only be measured in reference to some object(s), and that the result of this measurment changes if we decide to measure the velocity with respect to a diferent refernce point(s). Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving . The question ``are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame (``are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity.
************************************************************************************



ABOVE I MARKED FALSE !!   

GALILEO 1600

MAXWELL 1861


« Last Edit: 11/11/2015 09:34:40 by machmarosz »
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: Mach Maxwell Marosz ( New Physics Fundamets )
« Reply #2 on: 11/11/2015 09:32:26 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums