The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: The Fundamental Contradiction  (Read 1938 times)

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3154
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Fundamental Contradiction
« Reply #25 on: 07/02/2016 20:10:00 »
your mind at any given moment is one zero-point, just as 0 itself can be 0 or it can be one-0 or it can be two-0(00) or three-0(000) and you can assume one-0 will eventually bump into another 0 during the process of defining the first zero(singularity), now we have two-0's they'll probably ripple off a few new 0's like any healthy 'cell' would and stumble into a few more random 0's. as a result of fundamental incompleteness/uncertainty, given enough time we get a variable pattern of 010101 (010001000011101110100) out of the random chaos which we can call the "big bang" just the right amount of 0's and 1's would provide just the right amount of complexity for randomness to temporarily appear logical, for a random pattern to temporarily appear coherent enough to actually become self aware before it again degenerates into entropy, unless the self aware patterns could reverse engineer the exact pattern that created the exact elements/particles/spatial folds in our universe to create a new fertile universe



Math: Gödel's incompleteness theorems

en(DOT)wikipedia(DOT)org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems

Physics: Uncertainty Principle

en(DOT)wikipedia(DOT)org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

You have unusual dialect.


Do not forget though that X ≠ Y in a matrix

added - your mind at any given point is a zero point just as zero can be 0 or it can become 00, but the length of the mind and 0's is dependent to the inverse square law and light radius. Your mind expands with light magnitude but it contracts when the light fades.



« Last Edit: 07/02/2016 20:42:35 by Thebox »
 

Offline the5thforce

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 74
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Fundamental Contradiction
« Reply #26 on: 08/02/2016 00:42:51 »
your mind at any given moment is one zero-point, just as 0 itself can be 0 or it can be one-0 or it can be two-0(00) or three-0(000) and you can assume one-0 will eventually bump into another 0 during the process of defining the first zero(singularity), now we have two-0's they'll probably ripple off a few new 0's like any healthy 'cell' would and stumble into a few more random 0's. as a result of fundamental incompleteness/uncertainty, given enough time we get a variable pattern of 010101 (010001000011101110100) out of the random chaos which we can call the "big bang" just the right amount of 0's and 1's would provide just the right amount of complexity for randomness to temporarily appear logical, for a random pattern to temporarily appear coherent enough to actually become self aware before it again degenerates into entropy, unless the self aware patterns could reverse engineer the exact pattern that created the exact elements/particles/spatial folds in our universe to create a new fertile universe



Math: Gödel's incompleteness theorems

en(DOT)wikipedia(DOT)org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems

Physics: Uncertainty Principle

en(DOT)wikipedia(DOT)org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

You have unusual dialect.


Do not forget though that X ≠ Y in a matrix

added - your mind at any given point is a zero point just as zero can be 0 or it can become 00, but the length of the mind and 0's is dependent to the inverse square law and light radius. Your mind expands with light magnitude but it contracts when the light fades.

words are essentially operators, rather than combining 'mathematical operators' with numbers/quantities i prefer combining words with numbers to communicate the same concept, they're all geometric symbols at the end of the day(math only simplifies), in other words- im terrible at math. ultimately english is more complex, more interesting, and more useful when socializing ->(1)0 looking for 1(0)


added- when the light fades, your mass rebuilds, light and mass are opposite ends of the energy spectrum, the mind transcends both in a way that is only transparent to you.

---inverse 'square' law: how rarely your 1=0.
« Last Edit: 08/02/2016 01:12:27 by the5thforce »
 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3154
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Fundamental Contradiction
« Reply #27 on: 08/02/2016 10:17:28 »
your mind at any given moment is one zero-point, just as 0 itself can be 0 or it can be one-0 or it can be two-0(00) or three-0(000) and you can assume one-0 will eventually bump into another 0 during the process of defining the first zero(singularity), now we have two-0's they'll probably ripple off a few new 0's like any healthy 'cell' would and stumble into a few more random 0's. as a result of fundamental incompleteness/uncertainty, given enough time we get a variable pattern of 010101 (010001000011101110100) out of the random chaos which we can call the "big bang" just the right amount of 0's and 1's would provide just the right amount of complexity for randomness to temporarily appear logical, for a random pattern to temporarily appear coherent enough to actually become self aware before it again degenerates into entropy, unless the self aware patterns could reverse engineer the exact pattern that created the exact elements/particles/spatial folds in our universe to create a new fertile universe



Math: Gödel's incompleteness theorems

en(DOT)wikipedia(DOT)org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems

Physics: Uncertainty Principle

en(DOT)wikipedia(DOT)org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

You have unusual dialect.


Do not forget though that X ≠ Y in a matrix

added - your mind at any given point is a zero point just as zero can be 0 or it can become 00, but the length of the mind and 0's is dependent to the inverse square law and light radius. Your mind expands with light magnitude but it contracts when the light fades.

words are essentially operators, rather than combining 'mathematical operators' with numbers/quantities i prefer combining words with numbers to communicate the same concept, they're all geometric symbols at the end of the day(math only simplifies), in other words- im terrible at math. ultimately english is more complex, more interesting, and more useful when socializing ->(1)0 looking for 1(0)


added- when the light fades, your mass rebuilds, light and mass are opposite ends of the energy spectrum, the mind transcends both in a way that is only transparent to you.

---inverse 'square' law: how rarely your 1=0.

I am terrible at Math, and yes light and mass are opposite in my opinion, where do you get your ideas from they sound rather familiar?

 

Offline the5thforce

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 74
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Fundamental Contradiction
« Reply #28 on: 08/02/2016 10:46:29 »
pi=perfectly incomplete

even a perfect circle has no symmetry:  3.14159265359... ∞

the uncertainty principle in physics and godel’s incompleteness theorem in math is a reflection of pi itself, an imperfect circle is asymmetrical and a perfect circle is undefined thus all ‘real’ circles are asymmetrical and all lines are sections of an imperfect circle. pi is infinitely uncertain/incomplete, the purely abstract concept of a perfect circle is itself the singularity which creates the real imperfect multiverse- infinitely expanding pi.

pi is infinitely complex and infinitely paradoxical, the only thing both stable and unstable enough to generate consciousness, pi is the only perfectly unstable-symmetry(perfectly stable by being perfectly incomplete), pi is the only incomplete fractal, the only fertile contradiction.

each new digit of pi is simultaneously a new symmetry and a new symmetry break defining a completely new imperfect circle out of the image of the perfect singularity

pi=O, pi=(singularity), pi=perfectly-incomplete(duality), pi=singularity-duality(trinity), pi=3.14159265359..., pi=∞
 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3154
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Fundamental Contradiction
« Reply #29 on: 08/02/2016 11:22:51 »
pi=perfectly incomplete

even a perfect circle has no symmetry:  3.14159265359... ∞

the uncertainty principle in physics and godel’s incompleteness theorem in math is a reflection of pi itself, an imperfect circle is asymmetrical and a perfect circle is undefined thus all ‘real’ circles are asymmetrical and all lines are sections of an imperfect circle. pi is infinitely uncertain/incomplete, the purely abstract concept of a perfect circle is itself the singularity which creates the real imperfect multiverse- infinitely expanding pi.

pi is infinitely complex and infinitely paradoxical, the only thing both stable and unstable enough to generate consciousness, pi is the only perfectly unstable-symmetry(perfectly stable by being perfectly incomplete), pi is the only incomplete fractal, the only fertile contradiction.

each new digit of pi is simultaneously a new symmetry and a new symmetry break defining a completely new imperfect circle out of the image of the perfect singularity

pi=O, pi=(singularity), pi=perfectly-incomplete(duality), pi=singularity-duality(trinity), pi=3.14159265359..., pi=∞
see attached

 

Offline Thebox

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3154
  • Thanked: 44 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Fundamental Contradiction
« Reply #30 on: 08/02/2016 11:24:44 »
4/3 pi rc³=visual universe


added - Mods it is your maths that is broken on your symbols you provide. I can write pi but cant use your symbol.

 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: The Fundamental Contradiction
« Reply #30 on: 08/02/2016 11:24:44 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums