The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Theory of light  (Read 3622 times)

jccc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 742
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #100 on: 19/05/2015 00:46:26 »
the speed and strength of light, gravity and em force, are magically match. what's the odds?

isn't the nature told us all the secret ALREADY?

PmbPhy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1683
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #101 on: 19/05/2015 05:59:47 »
Quote from: jccc
the speed and strength of light, gravity and em force, are magically match.
Like so much of what you post, that sentence doesn't make sense. E.g. there is no sense in speaking about the speed of light and the strength of light to match. The same with the rest of your claim.

jccc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 742
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #102 on: 19/05/2015 08:11:05 »
speed of light, gravity and em force are the same c.

strength of light, gravity and em force are all inversely proportional to r^2.

Colin2B

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 410
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #103 on: 19/05/2015 09:11:40 »
strength of light, gravity and em force are all inversely proportional to r^2.
So is sound, thickness of a balloon skin as it inflates, it's called geometry.
When the geometry is different, they can all cease to be prop to r2
« Last Edit: 20/05/2015 07:23:12 by Colin2B »

jccc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 742
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #104 on: 19/05/2015 14:02:04 »
strength of light, gravity and em force are all inversely proportional to r^2.
So is sound, pressure due to ripples in a pond, thickness of a balloon skin as it inflates, it's called geometry.
When the geometry is different, they can all cease to be prop to r2

so you think geometry made light, gravity and em force all have same speed?

why is dipole field strength falls off inversely with the cube of the distance?

you don't even know how a hydrogen atom is formed, is it 2d or 3d yet, get those right first.

Colin2B

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 410
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #105 on: 19/05/2015 14:29:48 »
so you think geometry made light, gravity and em force
No, that's your misreading what I said

why is dipole field strength falls off inversely with the cube of the distance?
Do you mean dipole antenna? Inverse square
Do you mean dipole moment? Different geometry, not the same as the others, check your facts and look carefully at what the terms mean.

you don't even know how a hydrogen atom is formed, is it 2d or 3d yet, get those right first.
I know, I've got it right, you just don't want to believe.

Off to talk to folks with real questions.

jccc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 742
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #106 on: 19/05/2015 17:08:38 »
what's the odds told you?

moon disk and sun disk are the same size in the sky

light, gravity and em force speed are the same c in space

i say the solar system is designed

gravity is em force and light is em wave




Thebox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 468
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #107 on: 19/05/2015 18:36:47 »
what's the odds told you?

moon disk and sun disk are the same size in the sky

light, gravity and em force speed are the same c in space

i say the solar system is designed

gravity is em force and light is em wave


Gravity is not Em force, Em wave is coupling between all matter.

jccc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 742
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #108 on: 21/05/2015 03:22:37 »
all truth goes through three stages. first it is ridiculed. then it is violently opposed. finally it is accepted as self-evident.

Ethos_

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 853
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #109 on: 21/05/2015 13:20:01 »
all truth goes through three stages. first it is ridiculed. then it is violently opposed. finally it is accepted as self-evident.
And all the bull s_1t also goes through three stages. First it is eaten, then it is scrutinized, and finally it's excreted.
« Last Edit: 21/05/2015 22:27:02 by Ethos_ »

jccc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 742
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #110 on: 21/05/2015 13:42:24 »
yes, such as flat earth, gravitron, photon. time will tell.

Thebox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 468
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #111 on: 22/05/2015 19:11:16 »
yes, such as flat earth, gravitron, photon. time will tell.

I like your wavelength JCCC, consider that emr to be like  a constant energy channel with no net charge, all values are zero unless by interaction.  Interaction being matter or observer effect that makes a net charge.

i.e I send a carrier wave through the constant such as satellite signal. A stream through the zero.

Now consider matter and Protons and einsteins photon electrical effect, matter emits light that travels through the light, a sort of fibre optic signalling.


Consider light opposes light, two streams travelling opposing directions.


quarks attract quarks, so protons attract protons, electrons emitted from the charged protons oppose incoming light.

This is gravity dude.  The photon electrical effect is the mechanism.


''LIGHT HAS BEEN put to work generating the same force that makes airplanes fly, a study appearing online December 5 in Nature Photonics shows. With the right design, a uniform stream of light has pushed tiny objects in much the same way that an airplane wing hoists a 747 off the ground.''

http://www.wired.com/2010/12/laser-light-can-lift-tiny-objects/


Because matter emits an equal and opposing electrical field.




« Last Edit: 22/05/2015 19:35:53 by Thebox »

jccc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 742
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #112 on: 22/05/2015 19:34:26 »
i don't have wave length, due to i don't vibrate, my force field is not moving.

if i shake my head 4 x 10^14 times per second, the sky around me will turn red.

if you shake your head 8 x 10^14 times per second, your sky will be blue.

bet?

Thebox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 468
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #113 on: 22/05/2015 19:38:07 »
i don't have wave length, due to i don't vibrate, my force field is not moving.

if i shake my head 4 x 10^14 times per second, the sky around me will turn red.

if you shake your head 8 x 10^14 times per second, your sky will be blue.

bet?


you would black out and see nothing

jccc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 742
    • View Profile
Re: Theory of light
« Reply #114 on: 22/05/2015 20:40:21 »
got me that 1

 

SMF 2.0.8 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines