The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Onesimpleprinciple  (Read 55974 times)

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« on: 21/02/2007 11:58:28 »
If we dont know how gravity working, we have to ask, is there any gravity at all

I can explain everything with pressure change, so i dont need gravity at all.

Lets take a look this videoclips.

Dont worry about language, we have english text in video.














This video is old one. We need to make new one.

http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/?lang=1&noflt=1&haku=%5Bvideo%3A


One simple principle


According to this simple principle (the Savonian theory) the universe consists of only energy and space. Energy is the one and the same energy that has the ability to wrap up into denser space and the ability to open up into less dense energy in space, which does not expand or bend. You can perform an experiment by trying, how a single concentration of energy (you, in this case) can wrap up into smaller space (foetal position), in which less energy is released from you. Then you can try to think how the energy in the core of an atom is always denser and denser, depending on how close the energy is to the center of a separate energy concentration.

Does history repeat itself? People, who believed that the earth was the centre of universe, thought erroneously that the earth stays in its own place and all the celestial objects circle us. Modern theories suggest that all visible objects of the universe mostly stay in a static area in space, which expands in such way that the universe does not expand outwards into existing space. This model requires an additional space dimension, which is rather impossible for people to understand.


The Big Bang
According to the Big Bang theory, in the beginning there was only a very dense concentration of energy and space was created inside this concentration in a big explosion. But what if all this energy begun to open up outwards to a space that already existed?

We do not have to assume that all energy in that concentration opened up evenly. According to my theory, all energy in that concentration begun to push itself away from the center of the concentration while expanding at the same time. When all the energy tried to expand into every direction, it caused an enourmous pressure towards the center, and that pressure kept this energy hot and dense. The farther the energy traveled, the faster it could expand, and thus the faster the movement became.

Let us assume that there was another similar concentration in space, and the energies from these two concentrations collided. As a result, these energies from the two sources no longer had unlimited space to expand into, so instead they were squeezed into separate, smaller concentrations, which then started releasing their own energy waves.

This can explain how smaller particles and separate concentrations were created from two larger concentrations of energy as they were expanding three-dimensionally.

Savor

:);):)
« Last Edit: 29/11/2007 07:47:35 by JukriS »


 

Offline daveshorts

  • Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
  • Physics, Experiments
    • View Profile
    • http://www.chaosscience.org.uk
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #1 on: 21/02/2007 12:43:08 »
Perculiarly my Finnish is limited to tooth, lamb, and rhubarb pie, which does not qualify me to read your site. However you appear to be trying to redefine the whole of physics in different terms. In which case you have a lot of immensely accurate observations to explain, and the lack of maths worries me.

ps I will move this thread to new theories, as it is one.
 

Offline Mr Andrew

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 206
  • God was primitive man's attempt at Physics.
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #2 on: 22/02/2007 23:47:41 »
It seems to me that, in your videos, you're saying that all energy concentrations emit energy waves.  These energy waves repel each other, explaining the expansion of the universe.  You then go on to say that these energy waves cancel each other out and create a pressure differential (gravity).  How can the energy waves repel each other AND cancel each other out?  If energy repeled itself, wouldn't these hypothetical energy concentrations be unstable?  You seem to contradict yourself quite a lot...at least in the videos.
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #3 on: 23/02/2007 07:11:13 »
Most important video is protons and neutrons = protonit ja neutronit.

How meteor/asteroids burning in ear?

Savor

:);):)
 

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3345
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • View Profile
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #4 on: 23/02/2007 18:02:14 »
This is total rubbish and has no sensible relationship with the most simple physical observations

It is about as sensible as assering that the moon is made out of green cheese!
 

paul.fr

  • Guest
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #5 on: 23/02/2007 18:38:31 »

It is about as sensible as assering that the moon is made out of green cheese!

Oh, come on. Are you seriously saying that the moon is not made of green cheese?
 

jolly

  • Guest
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #6 on: 24/02/2007 16:59:59 »
 deleted as inapproprate
« Last Edit: 06/03/2007 00:58:34 by jolly »
 

paul.fr

  • Guest
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #7 on: 24/02/2007 17:25:39 »

paul because you want to, thats procrastination really coz tomorrow you'll put it off aswell, really thats sounds to me like somthing you say everyday; to not do somthing. might be wrong through. because you want to is my answer to that. besides you might not be here tomorrow, correct? why assume there is a tomorrow, your saying is silly   

Hello Mr/s Jolly. I found it amusing, and somewhat reflective of the society we live in. Just for you i have changed it.
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #8 on: 24/02/2007 19:24:10 »
there is gravity and ther isnt it depends where in the universe you are, there certainly is on the earth, or are you saying that you want to rename it somthing else? what ever you call that force it still exsists. as we and you all feel it. or are you saying that its percevied so it could be an illusion? which would explain levatation. but i think it dose exist. as if it was just percieved some of us would float.



If you are in spaceships who moving faster and faster, you have same gravity what we have here in earth. Thats you feeling, you dont feel about some power, who keeping you here.

Savor

:);):)

paul because you want to, thats procrastination really coz tomorrow you'll put it off aswell, really thats sounds to me like somthing you say everyday; to not do somthing. might be wrong through. because you want to is my answer to that. besides you might not be here tomorrow, correct? why assume there is a tomorrow, your saying is silly   
 

paul.fr

  • Guest
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #9 on: 27/02/2007 22:13:47 »
  your saying is silly   
not as sill as 'boys dreul' which they do not. They may drool, or even druel. Which is the verb of drool.
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #10 on: 09/03/2007 16:56:37 »
Protons and Neutrons

According to my theory protons and neutrons are similar 3-dimentionally expanding concentrations of energy and they unroll energywaves which have the nature of even smaller 3-dimentionally expanding concentrations of energy. This way protons and neutrons (which we could call with a mutual name) get more energy from the samekind of concentrations nearby and that causet that the protons and neutrons explode / uproll energy towards each other. With this energy they push themselves away from each other with the same respect as they expand.

From the middle of the “surface” towards the centre, the energy is four times denser wrapped and from this point towards the middle of the centre even more four times denser wrapped energy. Therefore in an area which has the same size has 16 times more energy than on the “surface” of the consentration. This distance can be divided in halves in endless times and that makes us ask if there is enormeous amount of dense wrapped energy in the centre of energyconsentration.

In the atom cords of heavy substances these consentrations exist more side by side. Consentrations can push themselves away from each other faster than they expand rarely and then there is a question about  atoms going halves. The atoms of heavy substances go halves faster because their centres have more consentrations, which burn each others energy faster and because of that from the cords of heavy atoms it opens up denser energywaves than from the light atomcords. That is not enough because by reason of 3-dimentional expansion it must all the time open up more and more energy from the cords of heavy substances in relation to the atomcords of light substances so that these heavy substances would expand observably as fast as the light substances. So in principle the energy of heavy substances expands faster ja because of that all the substances as we see expand with a increasing speed at the same as they preserve their form and capasity from the point of humans view for a reasonably long periods.

With the help of the videoclip attached, I will show you how the protons and neutrons have always expanded with an increasing speed. It may be difficult for you to accept this theory even though itīs understandable. If I am right about my theory, please remember that people about 500 years ago were in a same situation when Copernicus and Galilei overturned our opinions about the universe. The sun seemed to circle us, but it doesnīt! The objects that drop seem to be moving towards the centre of  earth, but according to this new theory they also push themselves away from the centre of earth slower than the surface of the earth and then they only seem to move towards the centre of earth while dropping towards the surface of the earth.

Savor

:);):)
 

Offline thebrain13

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 442
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #11 on: 19/10/2007 05:45:06 »
Do you think soul surfer realizes how funny he is?
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #12 on: 19/10/2007 19:36:29 »
Age of globe*
If I am right about my theory, how many times has the globe circulated the sun? It might very well be so, that once the planets have pushed themselves away from the sun much more directly.  Not until then when there has become
energywaves from other galaxies has the orbit of each planet bended more curved and settled to the stable speed it has now. So the atoms of the globe have vibrated for 4,5 billion years, but if the globe once didīt circulate the sun nearly as fast as it nowadays does, we can ask how old the globe really is? If the age is counted so that one year is one circuit, so how old is the globe then?
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #13 on: 19/10/2007 19:37:31 »
Cold fusion*
Apparently nowadays most of the people in science societies donīt presume that the so called cold fusion could be possible. According to my theory it however is possible. As a matter of fact it is a relevant part of the
principles of the universe.

As I understand, observations of cold fusion can be observed in a certain substance, that has hydrogen atoms. A sound (=a certain pressure wave) is conducted to that substance and according to my theory this sound cleans the
energywaves opening up at that that moment from two different hydrogen atomcores with the sound. After that these two cores of hydrogen atom donīt push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand.

The other atoms around them continue to expand and push this way these two hydrogen atomcores close to each other with the energywaves that open up from themselves. This is the way that helium atom is born. At the same time it releases so called pure energy, which could maybe be used by a convenient technology.

It is possible, that the solid substance of the sufrace of earth has born like in cold fusion. Maybe the energybundles that came towards the globe and were energic enought caused that the liquid altered to a solid substance.
Maybe the globe once was a gasplanet and a gas altered to a liquid and a liquid to a solid substance.
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #14 on: 19/10/2007 19:38:23 »
Quasars*
Quasi-stellar objects (QSO)


Is it possible that the visible universe moves in a moment entirely away from the space where it locates now, so that everything expand / explode at the same time and become for example to times bigger than they are now?

Are the galaxies photons of a substance that is in one size larger scale?

Are the quasi-stellar objects formed at the same time when the giant energyconcentrations of the galaxycentres pass by the similar concentrations that come against nearby?

Maybe the whole visible univese moved for the first seven billion years inside a substance that was one scale larger.

Also the photons give way to the photons coming against by waves that open up by themselves. The nearer the passing happens the more the opening energy from the energy concentration comimng against makes the concentration to explode energy in frontsides and with this energy they pass to another direction.

Is the corona of the sun formed when the energybudles coming against the sun pass nearby the energybudles opening up from the sun? Or does there happen straight smashes?


Savorinen

:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #15 on: 19/10/2007 19:38:59 »
Stars *
According to my idea, stars are formed out of gigantic, three-dimensionally expanding energy concentrations in the centres of galaxies, which release energy waves with an atomic nature. Energy waves that open up contain expanding quarks.

A sufficient energy pulse from outside sweeps with it the energy waves released by the quarks, which would otherwise push other quarks away in a relation analogous to their expansion. Now, the quarks start to expand and come close to each other in a way similar to cold fusion, forming what is called protons and neutrons, which are similar expanding energy concentrations releasing energy waves.

This explains one of the mysteries in modern physics, that is, how it is possible that new stars still come into existence near the gigantic black holes in galaxy centres. If the black holes indeed had a force that the calculations show, that attractive force ought to prevent the formation of new stars. My idea, in turn, could predict the new stars in the vicinity of the huge black holes in galaxy centres.



Savorinen

:);):)
 

Offline Ophiolite

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
  • Thanked: 6 times
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #16 on: 22/10/2007 14:45:50 »
If we dont know how gravity working, we have to ask, is there any gravity at all
I am confident you are correct. There is no gravity: the Earth sucks.
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #17 on: 23/10/2007 11:26:03 »
The Lightnings

Lightnings exist in a certain weather, when there is a certain kind of pressure variation in atmosphere. At first the energy rapidly explodes from down to up towards a less dense area and this dense energypulse cleans the energy opening from the atomcores with the energypulse up towards a less dense area.

The energybundles of this energic pulse open energy itself forwards. Now one energybundle in this energyfront hits to some atonscore higher up, before the actual energypulse reaches there. It makes really a lot of energy to explode from there. This energy is now directed also to an area that has the least dense energy and locates now down, from where the front of the energypulse (the pilotwave) has cleaned energy upwards with it.This is why the actual lightning strikes straight towards the energypulse that has opened up from downwards.

Look also ”the Tsunami 2004” subject in Geology section.

Many blue jets exist in upper atmosphere and they release really a lot of energy upwards like fans. Is this a mystery to a modern technology?

Let us think, that towards the globe there comes energywaves from space and the energic energybundles of these energywaves meet energybundles that open up from the globe. The energybundles coming from the globe clean with them away from the globe the energywaves that come from energybundles coming towards the globe. Now the energybundles coming towards the globe donīt push themselves separate from each other at the same relation
as they expand. This is how they reach out each other without actually moving towards each other.

The energybundles coming towards the globe unite themselves to more energic energybundles. At the same time they themselves clean with them the energywaves opening up from the upper atmospheres atomcores. At some point one energybundle in that energypulse hits to some three-dimentionally expanding centre of energyconcentration that locates in atomcore of atmosphere.

This makes a lot of energy to explode from that towards a less dence area up above from where the energypulse itself has just cleaned energy with it towards the globe.  During the movement of energypulse coming towards the globe, those atomcores from which the energypulse cleaned energy with the pulse, have had time to push themselves away from the centre of the globe so that now the strongly exploding energy can spread powerfully upwards as a fan.


Savorinen

:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #18 on: 23/10/2007 11:26:44 »
Tornados*
There are lots of researches about tornados, but this phenomen is still not quite understood.

Often lightnings belong to the birth of tornado. Let us think how the energy of a lightning cleans up the energy opening up from the atomcores of atmosphere with it and the atomcores of that area donīt push themselves away. The atoms outside this area continue pushing themselves away from each other and this is how the atomcores in target area of a lightning push themselves close to each other. This is how a gas statue developes. After that the atom cores start to push themselves forcefully away from each other. The atoms of the statue donīt have the power to push each other towards a less dence area, that is to say upwards so that the statue could stay straight. It twistes itself to a tornado, and its atoms / molecules capture with them the molecules of the atmosphere alongside. This is how masses of air begin to flow towards the tornado on account of variation of pressure.
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #19 on: 23/10/2007 11:27:24 »
High tide *
The energybundles coming from the moon burn out approximately in a four degree sea storey increasing this way the energy/thickness of energywaves opening up from atomcores. This way the waves are able to push away more
efficient these expanding atomcores of this storey. That causes perceptible thermal expansion and tide phenomen. When the globe has swinged around its axle a quarter this same storey has got colder to a four degree and yet after another swing of quarter that storey gets golder to under four degrees
and expands again faster than other substaces. This causes a new tide.

Water is such an extraordinary substance, that it expands while getting colder to under four degrees. This idea of mine is able to explain that the energywaves opening up from the molecules of water bend more efficient
towards the centre of watermolecules nearby in a water that is under four degrees cold. This way these molecules push each other away more efficient and expand three-dimentionally at the same time.

Savorinen

:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #20 on: 24/10/2007 08:53:41 »
The tracklevel of planets*
Planets always try to push themselves away from their stars to a area, where they get the least thick energy from the star. And every planet in a way float in an energysea opening from the star (the same way as the fishing float does) plumping around its axle depending which side of the planet is thicker. The thicker side of the planet is plumping down towards the sun (= the "the bottom of the sea).

Also the galaxy is like a plate, this way for example towards the sun there comes more energywaves from other stars in equator level of sun than from the direction of the sunpoles. The sun makes the energywaves of other stars to bend. When the stars pass the sun above, they bend and go gross with the energywaves that have passed the sun beneath. These waves also bend. That is why there is in a way an energyfurrow in a energysea coming from the sun and all the planets take their places according how thick the planets themselves are. This is compared to a thing how the water take its place in a river at the bottom of a valley or a pass.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #21 on: 24/10/2007 22:04:49 »
Acceleration +
Why dont we on the globe orbit observe the acceleration away from the Globe?

Same time we also dont observe the acceleration away from the Sun.

The neutrinos coming from the Sun expand three dimensionally and move their kinetic energy to the atomic cores.

Also same kind of energy coming from the Globe expand three dimensionally and move their kinetic energy to the atomic cores of the spaceport on the Globes orbit seperately.

When we move away from the surface of the Globe, we can see more of it.
There will also be more opening energy bunches which expand and move their kinetic energy to other materials on the Globe orbit.

The farer away off Globe s surface we go the more energy can come towards us the outskirts of the Globe. And the outer pressure that push us towards the Globe s surface will decrease relatively.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #22 on: 24/10/2007 22:05:25 »
Ice age*
Let us think, that more energy than normally comes towards the sun and this makes the sun open up more energy than usually. Then towards the globe there comes more energy than usually and this causes that the globe begins to push itself away from the sun in a curved orbit faster than normally. The seas and the lakes vaporize more humidity to atmosphere than normally. In some point there wounīt come any more energy towards the sun than normally and
then also there wounīt open up energy from the sun more than usually.

Then the globe is pushing itself further away from the sun and thatīs why the temperature of the globe drops rapidly a lot. Then the humidity in the atmosphere freezes and this is how continents become covered with ice. This surface does not totally melt when the globe sinks "deeper" than normally to the energysea that opens up from the sun. When the energywaves coming from the sun have made the globe rise over the "seasurface" in the energysea opening up from the sun, the seas vaporize again strongly and freeze again over the ice cover at the continents.

For some time the movement orbit of the three-dimentionally expanding globe swings more than usually at the same time as the expanding globe pushes itself away from the three-dimentionally expanding sun.

During some time this swinging reduces and the ice begins to melt.

Savorinen Jukka

:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #23 on: 25/10/2007 16:30:47 »
The Planets

The heavier substace the planet consists of, the deeper in an energysea opening up from the sun it pushes itself in a curved orbit away from the sun.

A new species of the Planets

http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/press/2006/pr200624.html

The astronomers have located several bizarre light gasplanets.

They move close to their star and circulate around it in 4-5 days.

According to my theory the gasplanets of the solar system push themselves away from the sun further than the rock planets, because the gas planets are lighter.

Why do these even more lighter planets circulate around their stars so close?

Why do the Pioneer sounders have an unexplainable acceleration towards the sun?

According to my theory the atoms of the planets expand and open up energywaves. These waves make the neutrinos to explode their energy towards the atomcores of the planets. This is how a neutrino transfers its kinetic energy.

At some point the atoms of gasplanets have expanded for so long time, that the energywaves opening up from them are able to push the atomcore nextby easily further. Now between the atomcores there doesnīt move relatively such dense energywaves as earlier.

Neutrino that moves between the atomcores of such a light gasplanet donīt affect with dence energy. That is why neutrino doesīt explode its energy as much towards that light planets atomcores.

Now the surface of expanding star begins to reach for expanding gasplanet relatively. The gasplanet approaches the star without moving towards it. Then it settles down and pushes it away from its star nearby.


Savorinen

:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #24 on: 26/10/2007 13:23:17 »
Saturn*
Do the planets open up more energy from their poles?

That would explain the location of the rings that have been observed around the gasplanets. The material of the rings has found its way to a energyfurrow around the planet and pushes itself away from its expanding planet in that area. This happens also in Uranus case.

This information lets us understand that the gasplanets really do open up more energy from their poles.

http://apod.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap061113.html

At least the energy coming from the sun reflects partly out of the planets and because the planets are round, this energy does not go back towards the sun. Also in case of the Uranus this reflecting energy would form its own share of the energyfurrow, because it it really doesnīt reflect from Uranus towards its rings.

Approximately in 30 years distance there is a big strorm observed in Saturn. The maximum amount of sun points appear in 11 years distance. Saturn itself circulates around the sun once in 29,5 years.

I predict that energywaves come from the galaxy centre in approximately 11 years distance. These energywaves have the nature of the quarks. Because the regular storms of Saturn in 30 years distance last just for a little time, I claim that only one out of three strorms is observed from the globe.

These energywaves in the centre of the galaxy maintain also the red spot of the Jupiter and maybe also can explain the spots of Uranus and Jupiter.

The energybundles heading towards the sun burn out so deep inside the sun that the energywaves coming out of them appear in 11 years delay. When the outcoming energysreams are staunched there are only sunspots left.

Savorinen

:);):)
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #24 on: 26/10/2007 13:23:17 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums