The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Onesimpleprinciple  (Read 56000 times)

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #50 on: 28/11/2007 12:16:17 »
Magnetism*
When an iron item is brought close to a magneto, the energybundles opening up from them have interaction with each other.The energybundles opening up from a magneto slow down the energybundles that come from an iron item and the energybundles coming from the iron item slow down the energybundles coming from the magneto.

This way their speed does not accelerate. When the energybundles coming from the magneto get inside the iron item and energybundles coming from the ironitem get inside the magneto, they make the atomcores of the magneto and iron item themselves to go to the orbit so that they turn around scant half a round and then are thrown to the same direction where they came from. The speed has accelerated in a same than the speed of a sounder does while passing the planet.

Now the energybundles are directed straight towards some expanding atoms core and they explode there.

This is why we can feel how the magneto and a iron item aspire towards each other when they locate close enough each other.

The repulsion of two magnetos can be explained so, that the magnetos make eac others atomcores to explode their energy towards each other. Perhaps a part of the energybundles are directed straight towards the atomcore of a magneto nextby.



Let us think that the atoms of a magneto and iron item are galaxies.

If there comes from outside an energyconsentration towards the centre of the galaxy, does this energyconsentration get so much energy as waves from the stars of the external circle of the galaxy. Now these energywaves make this energyconsentration to explode its energy away from the galaxy centre. The orbit of the energyconsentration bends according to the galaxy centre.

Energybundles come also towards the energyconsentration from the centre of the galaxy. These energubundles are more massive and they have less external surface. The longer time the energycentre locates nearby the hot centre of the galaxy, the more the massive energybundles coming from the galaxy centre begin to have interaction with the atomcores of the energyconsentration.

The denser energywaves the atomcores of the energyconsentration do open, the more the energybundles coming from the galaxy centre get hits towards thenselves and the more they do explode their energy towards the atomcores of the energyconsentration and also the more they move their kinetic energy
towards the atomcores of the energyconsentration.

Now the speed of the energyconsentration begins to accelerate and it pushes itself away from the galaxy centre faster than the "surface" of the galaxy centre. The further the energyconsentration pushes itself from the galaxycentre, the more it has stars behind it and the more its speed accelerates away from the galaxy centre.

This way we can explain without using the drawing force, how the energybundles coming from the magneto and from an iron item turn around the atomcore inside the magneto and an iron item scant half a round and are then thrown powerfully towards some atomcore, where they explode and move their
kinetic energy towards it.


:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #51 on: 29/11/2007 06:33:01 »
The overquantity and underquantity of the electrons



The so called electron quantity of atoms is based on how dense energywaves open up from the atomcore.

These waves make the energybundles that move in an area between atomcores to explode their energy towards the atomcores ect.

If some energybundle that moves in an area between atomcores cleans up with itself more energy opening up from the atomcore than it opens itself towards the atomcore, the atom can have a dificit of electron that stays.

That happens because from the atomcore there does not come so much energy that it would make the energybundles passing by the atomcore to explode their energy as much towards the atomcore ect.

If an energybundle that explodes in an atomcore is directed to the atomcore, it will open now more energy from the atomcore and this way the overquantity of the electron stays.

The overquantity of the electron stays because a denser energywave from the atomcore makes the energybundles passing by to explode more of their energy to the core of the atom ect.



:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #52 on: 30/11/2007 08:02:58 »
External pressure*
A stronger external pressure is directed to the black hole than to the other orbs.

This is because the massive and a little external surface possessive energybundles opening up from the black hole don´t have interaction with the expanding energybundles that pass by the black hole.

Now the expanding energybundles passing by the black hole push each other towards the black hole with the energywaves opening up from themselves. This is why more three-dimentionally expanding energybundles go towards the black hole.

They also move their kinetic energy more towards the pieces that locate nearby the black hole than the energybundles opening up from the black hole can move their kinetic energy towards the pieces close to the black hole.



:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #53 on: 14/12/2007 12:47:21 »
The charge of a corpuscule*

Why does the positively charged corpuscule bend at its track in a magnetic field?

The track of a corpuscule can bend only when the corpuscule explodes its energy more towards one side than the opposite.

The corpuscule holds its charge because the energy opening up from it makes the small energybundles coming towards it to unite as in cold fusion.

The energybundles opening up from the corpuscule clean the energywaves of the smaller energybundles that come towards the corpuscule with them away from the corpuscule. Now the small expanding energybundles coming towards the corpuscule don´t push themselves away from each other. They expand and reach out each other without actually moving towards each other.

The corpuscule itself continues to expand and this way it gets more exploding energybundle hits. This is why the corpuscule is able to keep its charge, still opening up energywaves, which make the energywaves coming towards the corpuscule thicker and the energybundles passing by to bend towards the corpuscule ect.

Let us think about that different kind of energywaves come from the magneto and these energywaves have for example lots of extremely small expanding energybundles. Now the energywaves that open up from positively charged corpuscule won´t be able to make the much smaller enrgybundles to bend towards the corpuscule.

This way the positively charged corpuscule explodes more of its energy away from the magneto and the orbit of a corpuscule bends a little towards the magneto.

:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #54 on: 19/12/2007 10:39:55 »
Corpuscule?!?


The charge of a particle*
Why does the positively charged  particle bend at its track in a magnetic field?

The track of a particle can bend only when the particle explodes its energy more towards one side than the opposite.

The particle holds its charge because the energy opening up from it makes the small energybundles coming towards it to unite as in cold fusion.

The energybundles opening up from the particle clean the energywaves of the smaller energybundles that come towards the particle with them away from the particle. Now the small expanding energybundles coming towards the particle don´t push themselves away from each other. They expand and reach out each other without actually moving towards each other.

The particle itself continues to expand and this way it gets more exploding energybundle hits. This is why the particle is able to keep its charge, still opening up energywaves, which make the energywaves coming towards the particle thicker and the energybundles passing by to bend towards the particle ect.

Let us think about that different kind of energywaves come from the magneto and these energywaves have for example lots of extremely small expanding energybundles. Now the energywaves that open up from positively charged particle won´t be able to make the much smaller enrgybundles to bend towards the particle.

This way the positively charged particle explodes more of its energy away from the magneto and the orbit of a cparticle bends a little towards the magneto.

:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #55 on: 21/12/2007 14:33:08 »
Photon in a optical fiber cable*
The light is possible to make move along the optical fibre cable even though the cable is wavekind bend.

The photons move in accordance with the cable, because in a curve they get more energy from the outer circle of the curve and this is how the photon explodes its energy towards the outer circle of the curve and makes the orbit to bend in accordance with the cable. Surely the cable is in an inner edge denser. The photon aspires to continue its movement straight ahead, but in a curve more energy comes towards it from the outer circle. Now the frontside of a photon that locates in a curve side begins to explode more of
its energy away from the photon and this way the orbit of a photon bends in accordance with the optical fibre cable.

In an double-slit experiment a sensitive sensor opens up denser energy from some zones and when a photon falls into a zone where denser energy comes towards, the photon starts to explode more of its energy forwards from its other side and this way it twists itself towards a zone where denser energy comes towards it. So in a space there exists in a away immaterial "optical fiber cables", through which the photons are guided towards certain zones in a sensitive sensor.

When one remembers that the photons themselves are three-dimentionally expanding, so to say exploding concentrations of energy its easy to understand that they make these zones to explode their energy more away from the sensitive sensor ect.

:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #56 on: 24/12/2007 10:51:45 »
Maybe, maybe not?!?



E = m * c^2 * RT/(pV) * |c|


Units are E = kg * (m/s)^2 * 1 * 1

Now for the arithmetical operations' unit can have E = Joule (in other words J = kg * m^2 / s^2 )

?

Savor

:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #57 on: 04/01/2008 10:37:11 »
Post from my friend



" Dear Sir,
>
> Here is a new theory suggesting that everything is energy.
>
> E = (mgh * ½mv^2) * RT/(pV) * |c|
>
>
> mgh = potential energy
> ½mv^2 = kinetic energy
> R = (gas) constant
> T = temperature
> p = pressure
> V = volume
> |c| = mass specific heat capacity, absolute value only
>
>
>
>
> Feel free to use, copy, review, do what ever You would like to do with this theory."
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #58 on: 10/01/2008 08:05:08 »
What about now?

E = (mgh + ½mv^2) * nRT/(pV) * |c|

:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #59 on: 16/01/2008 05:42:35 »
GRAVITATION*
1. The surface of the expanding globe pushes us away from the centre of the globe in the same relation as we and everything else expand.

2. Energy flows as waves between the atomcores of the globe and the expanding eneregybundles in these waves get hits towards themselves from the from the energybundles that open up from the atomcores. That is why they open up their energy towards the atomcores and move this way their kinetic energy to the expanding atomcores.

3. There comes energywaves also from the space and these waves have energybundles that have had interaction with eachother by the energywaves that open up from themselves. From these energywaves that open up they have received themselves energyfields at the same principle than the centers of the galaxies have received energyfiels around them from the stars. So the stars have arised from the energywaves that come from the giant energy concentraions of the galaxy centres and can be assumed to be particles of a substance of larger size.  This way the energybundles comimg from the space move their kinetic energy more towards the atomcores of the globe than the energybundles that move between the atomcores of the globe do.

4. When one remembers that for example the energywaves opening up from the globe have interaction with the energywaves coming towards the globe, one can easily understand this theory. In other words to say, the energybundles that push themselves away from the globe clean / absorb with themselves the opening energywaves coming from the energybundles that move towards the globe. Now the energybundles moving towards the globe expand without pushing themselves away from each other. That is why a larger amount of them move towards the globe than would have moved if the globe did not open up energy as waves away from itself.

The external pressure towards the orb is so based on what kind of energywaves the orb itself opens up away from itself, because the energywaves opening away make the energy in a way to bend towards the orb.

The interior pressure pushing away from the orb is based on how massive small energybundles the piece itself opens up away from itself.

The smaller energybundles are, the less they get hits from the expanding energywaves of  the atomcores. The massiver and the smaller energybundles the orb itself opens up, the less they have interaction with the atomcores of the pieces nearby the orb and the less they move their kinetic energy towards them.

Simply it does not exist any so called drawing force. That is why it is unnecessary to even try to make an explanation how the so called drawing force would transfer.


:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #60 on: 31/01/2008 05:42:25 »
Freezing water*
Let us imagine that the expanding footballs are water molecules which open up expanding table tennis balls, so to say energy as waves in every direction.

When the temperature of the water is over four degrees, the table tennis balls are partly directed beyond the footballs nextby. Then a different amount of energy (=table tennis balls) is directed towards the footballs from different directions.

When the temperature of the water gets down under  four degrees, those table tennis balls are directed all the time less and less beyond the footballs nextby.

This happens because the table tennis balls coming towards twitch with them even smaller balls that open up from the table tennis balls and then these table tennis balls that move to a same direction don´t push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand themselves. Then the footballs expand faster than the table tennis balls coming towards them do spread.

Now a bigger and bigger part of the expanding table tennis balls hit to the expanding football nextby and this way the footballs finally lock out to expand side by side so to say the water freezes.

The more table tennis balls hit directly to the footballs nextby, the more energic the expanding footballs have strenght to push themselves away from each other and this is why the water expands when its temperature gets down under four degrees.

This is when towards the water there doesn´t come so much energy as waves outwards and this way the water molecules can find a well-balanced way to expand side by side.

PS. I describe the water molecules bigger than the energybundles locating in energywaves opening up from them are. Surely for example there exists a lot more energy in the atom cores than there is in electrons, but still the electrons cover the space more than the atom cores do. In so called electrons there exists considerably less dense energy than the energy in atom cores is.

When an electron coming from the atomcore nextby reaches the expanding atomcore, it moves to a denser form. The energywaves opening up from the separate expanding energybundles of the electron burn out when they meet energybundles opening up from the atomcore and then snatch themselves along them away from the atomcore towards which the electron is heading.This way the capacity of the
electron is reduced in a relation to the atomcore and finally the electron itself burns out to the energy
opening up from the atomcore and snatches with it away from the atomcore that it had just headed.

Later from that and from all the other energy coming outwards from the atomcore rises new electrons (according to my theory).
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #61 on: 17/02/2008 00:36:21 »
Entropy = Expanding stuff

Its meaning stuff who expanding all a time


It is that simple

Peace and love

:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #62 on: 14/03/2008 22:27:03 »
A logical story
How do the particle coming from the space move their kinetic energy more
towards the atomcores of heavier substaces?

According to my theory this is how it should be, because a hammer drops to
the surface of the moon at the same time as the feather does!

The massiver the atomcore is, the denser energywaves it opens up and the
more it possesses so called electons.

The denser energywaves the expanding atomcore opens up, the more it makes
the expanding particle passing by to explode energy towards itself.

And this is how all the atoms get an equal amount of kinetic energy
(towards that piece in whose neighbourhood the atom locates) from the
expanding particles coming from the space.

When for example the surface of the globe simultaneously pushes itself away
from the centre of the globe, we don´t have to try to explain how the globe
draws the items towards itself. Everything can be explained with the
variation of the pressure. The pressure pushes all the expanding atoms of
the expanding globe away from the centre of the globe and the external
pressure keeps us on the surface of the expanding globe.

So you can forget all about the gravitation and start to wonder how the
universe really works.

The accelerating movement of all the substance away from one certain point
that is really far away from the visible universe, may take the visible
universe in a moment away from the space where it locates now and at the
same time all energy concentrations have had room to expand
three-dimentionally.

The speed of the galaxygroups that move ahead us accelerate faster than our
speed and their speed accelerates more the further they are from us. The
speed of the galaxygroups behind us accelerates in relation to us slower the
further behind us they move. Because of the expanding of the sector the
galaxygroups moving by the side of us draw away faster the further they
locate from us and this is how the common redshift can be explained without
a magical expanding of the space.

When the stars formely arised relatively all at the same time, the new light
did not meet with the light coming towards and this is how the expanding
photons could make their speed to accelerate easily at the same relation as
they expanded three-dimentionally. So the expanding photons also open up
energywaves with which they push eacother away from eachother. The old light
assembles for example when it comes towards the sun, because it meets energy
that comes towards it and makes the photons to explode their energy more
forwards in relation to the motiontrack. Still the common redshift of the
light does not vanish entirely from the old light.

Peace and love!
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #63 on: 03/04/2008 08:03:22 »
For example in the sun the energy is denser than outside the sun. In the
atom cores of the sun the energy is denser tham in an area between the atom
cores. In the protons and in the neutrons the energy is denser than in an
area between them. In the quarks the energy is denser than in an area
between the quarks ect.

When one can understand that all the energyconsentrations do expand  and
emit their energy, one can also understand that there is less dense energy
in the area between the energyconsentrations than in the
energyconsentrations themselves.

There is no reason to doubt that the neutrinos and the photons also do
expand and emit their energy according to the entropy.


Peace and love

:);):)
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #64 on: 14/04/2008 09:43:14 »
No gravity



How does kinetic energuy transfer



No dark matter



Peace and Love
 

Offline Alan McDougall

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1285
  • Thanked: 14 times
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #65 on: 06/07/2008 10:49:39 »
What???????????????????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #66 on: 10/07/2008 19:51:39 »
What ?

It that I am he which invented how macrocosm seriously functioned.

Truly this small truth from all to prove its that we are one and same energy. We him which experiences all matters our by way of and like this you too you are small part we him which experiences all our by way of.

Tätä Onesimpleprinciple thought was initially nice to work and develop! Just now when understand that all energy is quite probably one and same energy, understands that each from the thought hearing gets for itself burden!   If we are one and same energy, so then all which we do to our another, comes with the same done rather like to our self. Also all prayers of all persons are directed to us all. Then is futile accuses some outsider God from all dreadfulness. Then is futile to believe somewhere to the outside God.   Then should believe to his self and then held (?) Tell to all people this small truth from all, whereby knowledge of mankind grows and perhaps by way of that try better time to the all mankind!?!    Are we bad God / Luoja/Älykäs or silly ) designer?   We which Want to forget self ourselves and finally find ourselves?   If, so we are probably notso good mortal? What dreadfulness olemmakaan made self to our self? It is difficult to understand to make war, violence etc.    On the other hand eternity is rather long time. In eternity have time to experience one and another.   If we are one and same energy, so then we he we have at least experienced by way of the mankind, really in the rich colours pleasure and grief!   Everything is difficult to accept and understand!   Just are we he got punishment from each our act at the same time? If each act is directed to us to our self in other words if we he experiences all matters our by way of, so then so is!    If Onesimpleprinciple.com on the sides presented thought is right, so then everyone which slow to common knowledge coming of this thought, slows its time whereby persons around world start to help another each others unselfishly. Time whereby we do matters together to our self in other words to all people! Time whereby person is not predator to another to people!    If you are sure that with these on the sides presented thought pictures wrong mode of action of macrocosm. You can forget its happily. The self find _________________ Olemmeko ourselves? Do they be connected different religions and science already our during?   
      
 Savor




Man/Woman can fall ill so that together in the human body is many different person. If one from the persons to perceive that perhaps they also are all the same person, can this one person continues in the same body their condition other with different persons , without trying tell them truth so that they are all the same person? If different persons besides try to damage another each others even though they have same body, so do hold possible truth seer to become silent and try to live own canting their truth, piittamatta from right truth? Or should he after all try to tell this possible truth to the even one different person?   


 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #67 on: 30/08/2008 17:33:51 »
More than in this proof to it from the expansive Sun radiates expansive neutrino, which move to their kineticenergy Globe to expansive to the atoms' cores. Neutrino so expand and radiate enegy away towards themselves. Produce radiation can't observe. Let think about galaxies to be big neutrino! In the galaxies' centres are colossal particle which is developed themselves round from the energy field's star which radiate extremely small particle in the relationship galaxy centre to colossal energiaconcentration (to big vestige). Galaxies so are big particles which are originated really a long distance visible outside visible universe , as being energy from concentrating on which still to explode and radiates energy waves which have galaxies personality. On his journey galaxies centres explode energyconcentration have interacted themselves avutuvien with the energy waves , which have atom personality. Stars so are originated from the galaxy's centre and they radiate to their energy and so on. At same time in the way to the neutrino born around themselves energy field and to the herring!

Now pioneerproblem gets their explanation so that from Sun come neutrino interact it with the more atoms cores, what further off from Sun they get, because they have time to interact with each other and develop for itself energy field which radiates neutrino business energy to the atoms' cores!

In other words should pioneerprobes of expansive speed then accelerate according to this thought ? Yes, but expansive gas planets the pace picks up more and like this pioneerprobes is observed towards the inexplicable acceleration, Sun!

In other words expansive neutrino don't move to their kineticenergy of fixed to the atoms' cores so much as gaseous ingredients.

Crucial is of course understand it that in the planets' centre is hard pressure and neutrino move to their business energy to the planets' centres powerfully and from there its come across atom from the atom to all to the planets' atoms and also to the planets' moons. Truly moons atoms get business energy from the neutrino also direct!

http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?no_d2=1&sid=08/08/29/1227239
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #68 on: 23/09/2008 07:38:32 »
The evidence is increasing all the time!

The entire visible universe of energy is coming from one direction and moving in any direction.

Now, the background radiation has been detected differences in support for this idea!


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7440217.stm


Detailed measurements made by the satellite have shown that the fluctuations in the microwave background are about 10% stronger on one side of the sky than those on the other.

Sean Carroll conceded that this might just be a coincidence, but pointed out that a natural explanation for this discrepancy would be if it represented a structure inherited from our universe's parent.

Meanwhile, Professor Carroll urged cosmologists to broaden their horizons: "We're trained to say there was no time before the Big Bang, when we should say that we don't know whether there was anything - or if there was, what it was."

If the Caltech team's work is correct, we may already have the first information about what came before our own Universe.





.
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
It is time to wake up, you cardboard!
« Reply #69 on: 25/09/2008 18:57:57 »
Evidence of the claims / predictions!





Opposition 1

Neutrino transfer the kinetic energy of atoms in kernels.

Proof

http://arxivblog.com/?p=596

Opposition 2

The entire visible universe of energy is moving away from one point on which is really far away from the visible universe outside!

Proof 1

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7440217.stm

Proof 2

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows.html
« Last Edit: 05/05/2009 21:25:40 by BenV »
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #70 on: 26/09/2008 07:27:41 »
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l2

"Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in a visible universe."







As if the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy weren't vexing enough, another baffling cosmic puzzle has been discovered.

Patches of matter in the universe seem to be moving at very high speeds and in a uniform direction that can't be explained by any of the known gravitational forces in the observable universe. Astronomers are calling the phenomenon "dark flow."

The stuff that's pulling this matter must be outside the observable universe, researchers conclude.

When scientists talk about the observable universe, they don't just mean as far out as the eye, or even the most powerful telescope, can see. In fact there's a fundamental limit to how much of the universe we could ever observe, no matter how advanced our visual instruments. The universe is thought to have formed about 13.7 billion years ago. So even if light started travelling toward us immediately after the Big Bang, the farthest it could ever get is 13.7 billion light-years in distance. There may be parts of the universe that are farther away (we can't know how big the whole universe is), but we can't see farther than light could travel over the entire age of the universe.

Mysterious motions

Scientists discovered the flow by studying some of the largest structures in the cosmos: giant clusters of galaxies. These clusters are conglomerations of about a thousand galaxies, as well as very hot gas which emits X-rays. By observing the interaction of the X-rays with the cosmic microwave background (CMB), which is leftover radiation from the Big Bang, scientists can study the movement of clusters.

The X-rays scatter photons in the CMB, shifting its temperature in an effect known as the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect. This effect had not been observed as a result of galaxy clusters before, but a team of researchers led by Alexander Kashlinsky, an astrophysicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., found it when they studied a huge catalogue of 700 clusters, reaching out up to 6 billion light-years, or half the universe away. They compared this catalogue to the map of the CMB taken by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite.

They discovered that the clusters were moving nearly 2 million mph (3.2 million kph) toward a region in the sky between the constellations of Centaurus and Vela. This motion is different from the outward expansion of the universe (which is accelerated by the force called dark energy).

"We found a very significant velocity, and furthermore, this velocity does not decrease with distance, as far as we can measure," Kashlinsky told SPACE.com. "The matter in the observable universe just cannot produce the flow we measure."

Inflationary bubble

The scientists deduced that whatever is driving the movements of the clusters must lie beyond the known universe.

A theory called inflation posits that the universe we see is just a small bubble of space-time that got rapidly expanded after the Big Bang. There could be other parts of the cosmos beyond this bubble that we cannot see.

In these regions, space-time might be very different, and likely doesn't contain stars and galaxies (which only formed because of the particular density pattern of mass in our bubble). It could include giant, massive structures much larger than anything in our own observable universe. These structures are what researchers suspect are tugging on the galaxy clusters, causing the dark flow.

"The structures responsible for this motion have been pushed so far away by inflation, I would guesstimate they may be hundreds of billions of light years away, that we cannot see even with the deepest telescopes because the light emitted there could not have reached us in the age of the universe," Kashlinsky said in a telephone interview. "Most likely to create such a coherent flow they would have to be some very strange structures, maybe some warped space time. But this is just pure speculation."

Surprising find

Though inflation theory forecasts many odd facets of the distant universe, not many scientists predicted the dark flow.

"It was greatly surprising to us and I suspect to everyone else," Kashlinsky said. "For some particular models of inflation you would expect these kinds of structures, and there were some suggestions in the literature that were not taken seriously I think until now."

The discovery could help scientists probe what happened to the universe before inflation, and what's going on in those inaccessible realms we cannot see.


http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows.html
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Re: It is time to wake up, you cardboard!
« Reply #71 on: 26/09/2008 07:30:31 »
"Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in a visible universe."

As if the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy weren't vexing enough, another baffling cosmic puzzle has been discovered.

Patches of matter in the universe seem to be moving at very high speeds and in a uniform direction that can't be explained by any of the known gravitational forces in the observable universe. Astronomers are calling the phenomenon "dark flow."

The stuff that's pulling this matter must be outside the observable universe, researchers conclude.

When scientists talk about the observable universe, they don't just mean as far out as the eye, or even the most powerful telescope, can see. In fact there's a fundamental limit to how much of the universe we could ever observe, no matter how advanced our visual instruments. The universe is thought to have formed about 13.7 billion years ago. So even if light started travelling toward us immediately after the Big Bang, the farthest it could ever get is 13.7 billion light-years in distance. There may be parts of the universe that are farther away (we can't know how big the whole universe is), but we can't see farther than light could travel over the entire age of the universe.

Mysterious motions

Scientists discovered the flow by studying some of the largest structures in the cosmos: giant clusters of galaxies. These clusters are conglomerations of about a thousand galaxies, as well as very hot gas which emits X-rays. By observing the interaction of the X-rays with the cosmic microwave background (CMB), which is leftover radiation from the Big Bang, scientists can study the movement of clusters.

The X-rays scatter photons in the CMB, shifting its temperature in an effect known as the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect. This effect had not been observed as a result of galaxy clusters before, but a team of researchers led by Alexander Kashlinsky, an astrophysicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., found it when they studied a huge catalogue of 700 clusters, reaching out up to 6 billion light-years, or half the universe away. They compared this catalogue to the map of the CMB taken by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite.

They discovered that the clusters were moving nearly 2 million mph (3.2 million kph) toward a region in the sky between the constellations of Centaurus and Vela. This motion is different from the outward expansion of the universe (which is accelerated by the force called dark energy).

"We found a very significant velocity, and furthermore, this velocity does not decrease with distance, as far as we can measure," Kashlinsky told SPACE.com. "The matter in the observable universe just cannot produce the flow we measure."

Inflationary bubble

The scientists deduced that whatever is driving the movements of the clusters must lie beyond the known universe.

A theory called inflation posits that the universe we see is just a small bubble of space-time that got rapidly expanded after the Big Bang. There could be other parts of the cosmos beyond this bubble that we cannot see.

In these regions, space-time might be very different, and likely doesn't contain stars and galaxies (which only formed because of the particular density pattern of mass in our bubble). It could include giant, massive structures much larger than anything in our own observable universe. These structures are what researchers suspect are tugging on the galaxy clusters, causing the dark flow.

"The structures responsible for this motion have been pushed so far away by inflation, I would guesstimate they may be hundreds of billions of light years away, that we cannot see even with the deepest telescopes because the light emitted there could not have reached us in the age of the universe," Kashlinsky said in a telephone interview. "Most likely to create such a coherent flow they would have to be some very strange structures, maybe some warped space time. But this is just pure speculation."

Surprising find

Though inflation theory forecasts many odd facets of the distant universe, not many scientists predicted the dark flow.

"It was greatly surprising to us and I suspect to everyone else," Kashlinsky said. "For some particular models of inflation you would expect these kinds of structures, and there were some suggestions in the literature that were not taken seriously I think until now."

The discovery could help scientists probe what happened to the universe before inflation, and what's going on in those inaccessible realms we cannot see.


http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows.html
« Last Edit: 05/05/2009 21:26:13 by BenV »
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark
« Reply #72 on: 27/09/2008 06:20:03 »
Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of undeclared?

Would you have been able to predict in this video



through

Dark flow phenomenon?

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows. html




 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • Posts: 12656
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark
« Reply #73 on: 27/09/2008 08:11:13 »
That YouTube video is just plain ridiculous. Whoever made it understands neither physics nor cosmology. Quasars could be galaxies beyond the visible universe? If they're beyond the visible then, by definition, they must be invisible. And what does "invisible" mean? Yes, WE CAN'T SEE THEM!

The 2nd link doesn't work.
 

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Re: It is time to wake up, you cardboard!
« Reply #74 on: 28/09/2008 14:17:02 »
You should look about that video and some other!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF41G3gGYHA

http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=Etimespace

Here i told 28.5.2008, there can be phenomena like dark flow. Lets using google translation!

"The baby Galaxies

http://www.ursa.fi/blogit/ta/index.php?title=hubble_paljasti_massiiviset_vauvagalaksi&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1


Maybe these baby galaxies are from different energyconcentration than older galaxies. If so, then the baby galaxies could be moves to detect this.

Both concentrations of energy, therefore, are located in the visible universe outside and they are expanded, and emit energy waves with a galaxy nature.

Heitämpä So ilmoille suspicion here!

RemonttiJukteri"
« Last Edit: 05/05/2009 21:26:37 by BenV »
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: It is time to wake up, you cardboard!
« Reply #74 on: 28/09/2008 14:17:02 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums