The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: The Fifth proof of the GAT (Gestalt Aether Theory):-  (Read 528 times)

Offline McQueen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 545
  • Thanked: 6 times
    • View Profile
    • http://www.geocities.com/natureoflight/pgindex
One of the big draw backs of Quantum Mechanics and other Standard Theories is the principle of wave particle duality.  More than anything else it is this aspect that adds to the confusion. For instance reflection is thought to be the effect of an electromagnetic wave 'bouncing' off the atom. What is there on the surface of an atom to bounce off ? Also when you think that even ordinary mobile phones are processing ( and remember all that the meaning of this word implies) data at the rate of several Gigabits per second, would it be such a big thing for electrons in the atom to oscillate at a few hundred terahertz per second ?  Be honest with yourself.

What does this achieve ? Well for one thing it brings about a conformation between fact and theory.  Fact as observed in Black Body radiation by Max Planck for instance and theory as in any theory.  If the two agree then everything is OK.  By acknowledging that there is only one working mechanism of all aspects of light, namely absorption and emission of photons by electrons, theory is brought into line with observation. So far electricity also is thought to be the result of 'moving' or 'vibrating' electrons (or atoms or the vibrations of the metal lattice or of ions)) being passed on as an electromagnetic wave from one electron to the next:

The mechanism of energy transport through a medium involves the absorption and re-emission of the wave energy by the atoms of the material. When an electromagnetic wave impinges upon the atoms of a material, the energy of that wave is absorbed. The absorption of energy causes the electrons within the atoms to undergo vibrations. After a short period of vibrational motion, the vibrating electrons create a new electromagnetic wave with the same frequency as the first electromagnetic wave. While these vibrations occur for only a very short time, they delay the motion of the wave through the medium. Once the energy of the electromagnetic wave is reemitted by an atom, it travels through a small region of space between atoms. Once it reaches the next atom, the electromagnetic wave is absorbed, transformed into electron vibrations and then reemitted as an electromagnetic wave. While the electromagnetic wave will travel at a speed of c (3 x 108 m/s) through the vacuum of interatomic space, the absorption and reemission process causes the net speed of the electromagnetic wave to be less than c.

IF serious thought is given to the above explanation, it is full of holes, where is Max Planck where are quanta or packets of energy ? Totally absurd.

Another unquestionable drawback of this theory that reflection, for instance, is the result of electromagnetic radiation bouncing off atoms while in other instances of  energy exchange it involves absorption and emission of photons, is that the whole concept of wave-length and frequency as applicable to photons becomes disassociated. Wave-length and frequency are present when it is electromagnetic radiation BUT absent, non-existent and abstract when applied to photons ! Surely this is absolutely nonsensical and ridiculous ? 

The GAT theory holds that all instances of energy exchange involving  electrons are due to emission and absorption of photons.  The concept of frequency and wave-length as applied to photons is as follows:

1e1d893e5619822b47ecaf13545a68ef.gif., 93e28d4ee19b4658ab0adf7166943ae5.gif OR 3703e179829cb1e97d28d6c804dd3a26.gif.

What does this mean and how is it significant?

Take for instance light of  ded9f1564fa407dfd0b33739d4a7fe6d.gif

Suppose, it is not really possible, but suppose that it was possible to isolate a single electron that is oscillating  at ce60b5f5b7a65d26f603ba60368548c7.gif a sec. and that it oscillates for exactly 1 second. Then given the speed of light 68a008223144e03b2f302b45655bd33c.gif m/s the light would have traveled exactly e6d9f839677ee3daa62517042cd6a018.gif metres during the time the electron is oscillating. Because of the relationship : 119436ab2e539c488da3fdd3e37fa946.gif it is possible to determine the wave length which in this case turns out to be c6480c29b09023f3e894e85d355dd1c5.gif m.

Multiplying the duration for which the oscillation has taken place by the wave-length and frequency will give the distance travelled:

0d0632d13891b3589cdaccfb0f4f6eb7.gif = 68d0b5f2331b82ef8b645bf182ae93fc.gif m. So it does make sense.

At the same time taking into account the inverse square law at the end of that time the light would have spread out over 22360.680 sq metres or 22 sq kms. Thus as the stream of photons moves forwards it passes its energy to the virtual photons surrounding it, these virtual photons in turn pass on their energy to the photons in front of them, in this way a cone of light, which ( in this particular case) does not follow the summation of squares from a point of origin, is formed which culminates in the 22km/sq  formation shown above. Thus without ever moving away from the (wave and particle synthesis) model that has been built up for the photon in Gestalt Aether Theory (GAT), every aspect is accounted for including distance traveled and dispersion according to ISL, energy or identity of individual photons and so on.

Standard or Quantum Mechanics states that as far as photons are concerned the concept of frequency and wave-length does not apply, they are only useful as abstracts to calculate the momentum45e614fb68b466c6cad1a4862989a0bd.gif (where k is the wave constant e68f6dd2cc3965f05bbb32ab3ee3ab27.gif)of the photon.

These theories are missing out or rather have missed out on (till the 60's many physicists did not know what photons were, they were not named till 1926) many interesting possibilities

« Last Edit: 07/04/2016 06:47:28 by McQueen »


 

Offline McQueen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 545
  • Thanked: 6 times
    • View Profile
    • http://www.geocities.com/natureoflight/pgindex
Take the transmissions from the Voyager 1 space craft. If the distance from earth is taken to be 15 billion kilometres. The transmitter power  of the radio transmitter on the Voyager 1 space craft has a power output of  about 13 watts at 8415MHz.

The 3.7m dish antenna on Voyager 1 has a gain of 48 dB which makes this an effective power in the direction of earth of 800kW. In reality the huge distance (5a54afe012345a8262e1c695c2331ba3.gif Km ) from the earth mean that the transmission is almost isotropic in nature.  So even if the transmission is considered to be a cone in cross section of the full isotropic transmission which would be spherical, the transmission still follows the inverse square law. Thus the transmission signal spreads out over an area of :

f76aa855a80b67dc7489b72d6a70e1ba.gif Kms.

Proof of the GAT lies in the fact that within that transmission cone every radio wave (photon) will have preserved its original energy or identity intact.

Thus in this case :

25ad211b1c485035943282ea0bf2b47b.gif 7c2e71b2e46ed786c69fa6579a108123.gif J.

This being so, where is the need for a wave solution or a collapse of the propagating wave function every time a signal is detected ?

Using this information it is possible to calculate the power density at earth:

f8dabbb477a13ad322f97de0c6e63888.gif watts per square metre.

Signals from Voyager are received by the large 70m dish at Goldstone. A 70m dish has an area of 3800m, so the total power it receives over that area is 872e8adb39cab5665b4cd5c5d2ff9854.gif W

I frankly don't see why any more proofs need to be presented. There are zero arguments against the GAT theory.
« Last Edit: 08/04/2016 06:53:16 by McQueen »
 

The Naked Scientists Forum


 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums