The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: The Gestalt Aether Theory and Gravity  (Read 1876 times)

Offline McQueen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 545
  • Thanked: 6 times
    • View Profile
    • http://www.geocities.com/natureoflight/pgindex
Re: The Gestalt Aether Theory and Gravity
« Reply #25 on: 25/04/2016 02:50:07 »
Einsteins elevator would not explain why a heavy ball on the floor of the elevator would attract another ball nearby.Thus the elevator would have to accelerate in all directions simultaneously.

Absolutely , excellent, exactly my point as to why Einstein's Greater Relativity theory is so flawed. It is not possible to substitute one force, namely acceleration, for another force, namely gravity.  What the heavy ball is experiencing is Newton's second and Third laws. Newton has clearly stated that a body once set in motion would continue to move in the direction of its motion until acted upon by an external force.  This was his genius.  When Einstein claims exactly the same thing as being a part of his new theory, it isn't acceptable.

 
Firstly matter does not attract matter. Matter is pushed together with matter as they radiate dot-waves. At the big bang the entire universe existed at the size of a single neutron. This exploded at a faster that light rate since nothing existed outside the neutron. billions of black holes formed from the single black hole and this formed a spherical surface at a distance Ru from an absolute center. they in turn exploded to form all the galaxies.

The second line of this statement seems to be  Universally accepted, namely that the Universe originated from a singularity and then experienced an inflationary stage during which it reached something near its present size. When speaking about the size of the Universe, we have no clear idea of what that might be.  One of the premises used to figure out the size of the Universe is to calculate from the distance the earliest detectable light from the Universe might have traveled, this is close to 13.5 billion years, during this time the Universe would have travelled a distance of 46.5 billion light years due to the expansion of the Universe. Unfortunately even this calculation is subject to conjecture, because no-one can really tell the rate at which the Universe is expanding.  In fact all of the evidence seems to point to exactly the opposite, that the effects of the early acceleration are slowing down. I say this because the further we look back in time ( i.e., the further the galaxies are from earth, the faster they seem to be accelerating away from earth) the decrease in speeds of galaxies moving away from earth slows with distance from the earth. The closer galaxies moving away more slowly. This makes sense if one considers that the further away we look the further into time we are looking.

This exploded at a faster that light rate since nothing existed outside the neutron. billions of black holes formed from the single black hole and this formed a spherical surface at a distance Ru from an absolute center. they in turn exploded to form all the galaxies. As dot-waves are radiated from the galaxies, they push the universe apart. At the same time there is a kickback effect and matter is pushed by the resulting gravitational waves. thus it looks like matter attracts matter but the gravitational waves push matter together as the universe expands. Today matter is only about 4% of the universe while the gravitational waves in dark matter/dark energy consist of about 96%.

By Ru I presume you refer to the radius of the Universe, I do not know what dot waves are. In the Gestalt Aether Theory the whole of the Universe is filled with light, although that light now has such low energies that it is practically impossible to detect. This light takes the form of almost stationary di-poles that are capable of orienting themselves at 3600 degrees. Thus when a real photon is emitted these low energy photons line up in the direction of propagation of the real photon forming a line whose ends rest on infinity and the energy of the real photon travels along this line of aligned virtual photons.  Gravity is also , according to Gestalt Aether Theory , due to similar interactions taking place  at infinitesimally shorter time intervals.
Thus it is possible , since the aether depicted in Gestalt Aether Theory, has both a static and a dynamic role that it is both dark matter And dark energy.
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3917
  • Thanked: 53 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: The Gestalt Aether Theory and Gravity
« Reply #26 on: 25/04/2016 20:02:29 »
No. You have exactly the same situation on the surface of the earth with the two balls next to each other. You are just misinterpreting the vector nature of forces.
 

Offline McQueen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 545
  • Thanked: 6 times
    • View Profile
    • http://www.geocities.com/natureoflight/pgindex
Re: The Gestalt Aether Theory and Gravity
« Reply #27 on: 26/04/2016 10:32:14 »
Again the same obfuscation, you may sit in an accelerating car and experience 'gravity' but it is just acceleration due to an external force, not acceleration due to gravity. There is a lot of difference between the two.
 

Offline jerrygg38

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 781
  • Thanked: 27 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Gestalt Aether Theory and Gravity
« Reply #28 on: 04/07/2016 14:21:11 »
Einsteins work is electrical theory calculations of the effects of gravity. It is a mathematicians solution. It does not answer how objects are attracted to each other. As many scientists have noted, it it not credible that things should be attracted to each other at a distance. Thus the force of gravity cannot be attraction. The only reasonable explanation is that things are pushed together. thus as the universe expands by gravitational radiation, the Earth radiates and pushes against the gravitational waves coming from the Earth and thus the bacdkpressure pushes back upon the Earth. thus gravity is both positive and negative. It is positive because this appear to attract each other and it is negative because everything is expanding.
   Einstein's particular math calculations are good but his reality is false. Acceleration is linear such as the elevator but gravity is spherical and unfortunately spherical Doppler space time has been left out of our learning.
 

Offline jerrygg38

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 781
  • Thanked: 27 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Gestalt Aether Theory and Gravity
« Reply #29 on: 04/07/2016 14:38:42 »
By Ru I presume you refer to the radius of the Universe, I do not know what dot waves are. In the Gestalt Aether Theory the whole of the Universe is filled with light, although that light now has such low energies that it is practically impossible to detect.

My dot-waves are the lowest form of mass/energy in the universe. They add to each other to form particles and photons. Basically they have a mass of 1.566E-72kilograms and charge of 2.755E-61coulombs. Everything is made from them and they fill the universe. Protons slowly radiate them and the visible universe slowly converts into an invisible universe. The spherical dot wave can oscillate from a dot to a particlular radius. Therefore it is spherical energy. Within a photon the dot-waves tend to be bipolar. It is massless because mass needs spherical energy forms and the photons only have linear and orbital energy. Within a hydrogen atom the photon converts to an orbital patterns which spins out a spherical Bohr type patterns and thus produces mass. In addition some of the energy enter the electron and converts back to spherical energy. Thus the dot-wave is a very flexible quantum of energy and the total energy is
Energy = spherical+linear +orbital.
Physics have been written using linear and orbital energy. Spherical forms of energy have be omitted. That is where physics has gone wrong but it is not easy to measure spherical energy.
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: The Gestalt Aether Theory and Gravity
« Reply #29 on: 04/07/2016 14:38:42 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums
 
Login
Login with username, password and session length