The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Can we see remnants of the moon landing with telescopes and prove it happened?  (Read 670 times)

Offline thedoc

  • Forum Admin
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
  • Thanked: 11 times
    • View Profile
Prasad  asked the Naked Scientists:
   Hello Chris:
Congratulations on fifteenth anniversary of Naked Scientists!

I have an unanswered question lingering for a long time!

We all have heard of controversies and conspiracies around the moon landing back in 1969. There are so many theories which suggest it never happened because of the scientific factors around the angle of the pictures shared, position of sun, unexplained shadow and so on.

I have been asking this question myself for a long time. We know that when the crew landed on the Moon they left behind few things like landing gear. Unless they are totally covered by the sand and dust storms, we should be able see them again. With the availability of all those high powered cameras and satellites flying around the earth, and even Hubble telescope in our orbit, why can't we take a picture of those debris and close the controversy for good?!

Hope you can answer this in your next episode.

Prasad S

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 06/07/2016 16:50:03 by _system »


Offline chris

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5295
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Welcome Prasad!

The moon landings did happen!

There are several strands of "evidence" (apart from the samples of moon rock given to countries all around the world by the successful returning teams).

Most compelling are the independent images of the landing sites captured by the European Space Agency's "SMART-1" probe, an ion-drive powered craft launched in 2003; part of its mission was to scrutinise the Lunar surface, which results in the capturing of images of the infrastructure left behind more than 40 years previously:

The other strand of evidence is the mirror positioned on the moon from which a laser beam is reflected to measure the Earth-Moon distance on a daily basis. This is how we know that the moon is moving about 2cm further from the Earth each year.

So, in sum, there are personal accounts, images and independently gathered data that all support the claim that men went to the moon in the 1960s and 70s.

Offline evan_au

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3957
  • Thanked: 229 times
    • View Profile
Quote from: Prasad
Unless they are totally covered by the sand and dust storms
Unlike Mars, the Moon does not have enough atmosphere to move grains of sand.

There is another phenomena, where it seems that sunlight at dawn can electrostatically charge minute specks of dust, and elevate them above the Lunar surface. I guess this would eventually fill in footprints.

It is possible that a meteor impact could obliterate one of the landing sites, but is unlikely to damage all of them. 

Offline syhprum

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3771
  • Thanked: 16 times
    • View Profile
Although earth based telescopes cannot provide enough resolution to detect moon landing artefacts those mounted on lunar orbiting satellites certainly can and numerous pictures of landing vehicles, rover tracks etc have been published.

The Naked Scientists Forum


SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums