The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Are paranormal subjects a science?  (Read 1797 times)

Offline Pseudoscience-is-malarkey

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 96
    • View Profile
Are paranormal subjects a science?
« on: 03/10/2016 04:17:48 »
When watching documentaries, debates, discussions, ect on all things paranormal, the "believers" 99% of the time outnumber the skeptics. This, I think, is the primary reasons that give these topics legitimacy. That and the fact that they give a palatable, over-simplified "answer" to the complexities of the real world. In these debates/discussions, the skeptics are forced to run a gauntlet (like a prowrestling match where, for example, Hulk Hogan must face several wrestlers alone). 

I will add that if any of these paranormal topics prove to be real, they would no longer be paranormal or pseudoscience, but legitimate science.  With that said, I am creating a blog and vlog offering a skeptical view of these topics, based on what I know about science, logic, and, most importantly, the massive testimonial contradictions. (a person will tell their story on an "Unsolved Mysteries" segment, and then on another show such as "A Haunting", "Paranormal Witness", "Ghostly Encounters", "Smoothe Young Boys Investigate All Things Paranormal", that same person will say something different.


 

Offline RD

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8122
  • Thanked: 53 times
    • View Profile
Re: Are paranormal subjects a science?
« Reply #1 on: 03/10/2016 04:55:39 »
Q. Are paranormal subjects a science?

A. I think they're covered by "anomalistic psychology".
« Last Edit: 03/10/2016 05:02:42 by RD »
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4696
  • Thanked: 153 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Are paranormal subjects a science?
« Reply #2 on: 03/10/2016 08:27:09 »
Cosmology, lightning, evolution, radioactivity....everything is paranormal until it is rationalised by science.
 

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2760
  • Thanked: 38 times
    • View Profile
Re: Are paranormal subjects a science?
« Reply #3 on: 11/10/2016 00:31:41 »
When watching documentaries, debates, discussions, ect on all things paranormal, the "believers" 99% of the time outnumber the skeptics. This, I think, is the primary reasons that give these topics legitimacy. That and the fact that they give a palatable, over-simplified "answer" to the complexities of the real world. In these debates/discussions, the skeptics are forced to run a gauntlet (like a prowrestling match where, for example, Hulk Hogan must face several wrestlers alone). 

I will add that if any of these paranormal topics prove to be real, they would no longer be paranormal or pseudoscience, but legitimate science.  With that said, I am creating a blog and vlog offering a skeptical view of these topics, based on what I know about science, logic, and, most importantly, the massive testimonial contradictions. (a person will tell their story on an "Unsolved Mysteries" segment, and then on another show such as "A Haunting", "Paranormal Witness", "Ghostly Encounters", "Smoothe Young Boys Investigate All Things Paranormal", that same person will say something different.
The reason for this has to do with the large percentage of the population being ignorant of science and the scientific method and as such are mislead by the way these charlatans present paranormal material. The next time you watch a show whose subject is the paranormal pay particular attention to these charlatans when they make statements such as "Is it possible that...?"  That's a highly misleading question for obvious reasons but people who are ignorant in science and logical reasoning are easily swayed by it.
 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: Are paranormal subjects a science?
« Reply #3 on: 11/10/2016 00:31:41 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums
 
Login
Login with username, password and session length