Why don't black holes explode once they lose enough mass?

16 October 2011


If it takes a very massive star collapsing to form a black hole, and Hawking's radiation eats it away, then why doesn't it blow up after enough matter is eaten away?

I was listening to one of your previous Naked Astronomy shows and they stated that eventually the black hole will disappear.  If after awhile it no longer has enough mass to sustain being a black hole why doesn't it just blow up?


We put this question to Andrew Pontzen...

Andrew - I'm Andrew Pontzen. I'm a research fellow at the Kavli Institute for Cosmology at the University of Cambridge. The picture the question paints is that we have this black hole and Hawking radiation is making that black hole shrink slowly until the black hole gets to below some critical mass and then suddenly it is not a black hole anymore and an explosion follows. That's not quite an accurate picture because actually, there isn't critical minimum mass for black hole. It is more to do with the density of the matter. It's about packing matter in really tightly and so, it's even possible to have sort of microscopic black holes. So what actually happens is that a black hole never stops being a black hole. Once you've formed a black hole, that object is going to stay a black hole. But Hawking radiation does slowly eat away at the mass in a black hole and in fact, the prediction is that a black hole should radiate faster and faster as it becomes smaller and smaller. So, right at the end, as a black hole becomes tinier and tinier, we do expect that to be sort of energetic pop at the very end of its life as the black hole shrinks away to nothing and emits a final burst of very intense radiation. So, there is sort of a bit of an explosion right at the end, but that's not because it's reached a minimum mass. It's just because it's radiating away energy faster and faster.

Add a comment

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.