The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. In the past when the Earth was spinning faster, was gravity different?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

In the past when the Earth was spinning faster, was gravity different?

  • 7 Replies
  • 4999 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Farmer John (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
In the past when the Earth was spinning faster, was gravity different?
« on: 16/02/2010 11:29:20 »
Hello

In the past when the Earth was spinning faster, was gravity different?  Or is gravity different at the poles as compared to the equator?

Thanks,
Steve

Logged
 



Offline flr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 302
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
In the past when the Earth was spinning faster, was gravity different?
« Reply #1 on: 16/02/2010 15:53:24 »
Gravity should be the same:
G=mg
regardless of how fast am object is rotating.(but we are assuming non-relativistic speeds).

The resultant force between gravity and centrifuge force would had been indeed different. (and the difference in this resultant force between poles and equator should have been larger)
Logged
 

Offline PhysBang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 706
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 21 times
    • View Profile
In the past when the Earth was spinning faster, was gravity different?
« Reply #2 on: 16/02/2010 16:10:25 »
When the Earth was spinning faster, it would have had more energy, hence the weight of all things toward to the Earth would have been slightly higher. It would probably not be significant, though.
Logged
Naked Scientists values: support moderators who try to demean posters by suggesting that they are Catholic, support moderators who ignore homophobic and transphobic threads, support moderators who promote climate change denial.
 

Offline flr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 302
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
In the past when the Earth was spinning faster, was gravity different?
« Reply #3 on: 16/02/2010 16:43:07 »
Quote from: PhysBang on 16/02/2010 16:10:25
When the Earth was spinning faster, it would have had more energy, hence the weight of all things toward to the Earth would have been slightly higher.

Should not the 'weight' been actually slightly smaller since the centrifugal force was stronger due to faster rotation?

Just like today astronauts feel less weight in space (actually they feel weightless) not because the gravity force is very small (G=mg=0) but rather because the centrifuge force equal the gravity. The gravity force acting on an astronaut in orbit at 200-300km from Earth is about 2/3 from the gravity on Earth, and the centrifuge force compensate that.

EDIT: I was referring to the 'apparent weight' as given by the resultant force between the gravity and centrifuge force.
« Last Edit: 16/02/2010 17:40:14 by flr »
Logged
 

Offline PhysBang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 706
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 21 times
    • View Profile
In the past when the Earth was spinning faster, was gravity different?
« Reply #4 on: 16/02/2010 17:15:13 »
I was only considering the increase in weight due to the increase in the energy. I don't know how significant one factor would be over the other.
Logged
Naked Scientists values: support moderators who try to demean posters by suggesting that they are Catholic, support moderators who ignore homophobic and transphobic threads, support moderators who promote climate change denial.
 



Offline Farmer John (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
In the past when the Earth was spinning faster, was gravity different?
« Reply #5 on: 16/02/2010 18:34:48 »
Excellent, sorry about the poor wording of the question, I was refering to centrifugal(?) force.

So has anyone calculated how fast the earth was spinning 4 billion years ago. I have visions of an earth shaped like a pumpkin,  I guess there must be a limit at which point the planet would fly apart, I would think this would happen before the place looked too distorted.

Logged
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 44469
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 99 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
In the past when the Earth was spinning faster, was gravity different?
« Reply #6 on: 16/02/2010 21:21:21 »
Don't know if it's correct, but it's still good reading.
Earths rotation
==

And this one for the math
math gravity
==

Sorry, I missed your first question here.
Yes you're right, gravity varies on Earth."You weigh about 0.5% more at the poles than on the equator," which mean that we Northern guys, the Eskimos and the penguins are naturally 0.5% stronger and shorter that we otherwise would be due to gravity... weight

Hah. *he said as he looked up at the giant looming over him*
« Last Edit: 19/02/2010 21:31:08 by yor_on »
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline Farsight

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 396
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
In the past when the Earth was spinning faster, was gravity different?
« Reply #7 on: 16/02/2010 21:48:29 »
Farmer John: the spin won't affect things much. There's more energy so you'd fall faster, and the difference between the surface gravity at the equator and the poles would be more pronounced, but it's going to be pretty slight. Maybe The Dirac Large Numbers Hypothesis is of more interest to you. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_large_numbers_hypothesis and note the bit where it says The strength of gravity, as represented by the gravitational constant, is inversely proportional to the age of the universe: G ∞ 1/t.
   
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Is there a "force of gravity"?

Started by GeezerBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 51
Views: 31870
Last post 19/03/2020 20:01:02
by Bored chemist
What causes the Earth to have "seasons"?

Started by RobotGymnastBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 11
Views: 14265
Last post 28/07/2021 14:58:50
by TommyJ
How does the water in a water balloon behave in zero gravity?

Started by paul.frBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 7
Views: 10846
Last post 10/02/2020 22:18:15
by chiralSPO
Does anti-matter produce anti-gravity?

Started by kenhikageBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 12
Views: 10710
Last post 31/07/2017 20:40:35
by Kryptid
Why is it called dark matter instead of dark gravity?

Started by IAMREALITYBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 25
Views: 11328
Last post 19/05/2020 19:13:04
by Professor Mega-Mind
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.2 seconds with 54 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.