0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Particle accelerator data has shown that electrons are fundamental particles, where mass and negative charge are integrated into a unified state; single particle state.
This unique difference between electrons and protons explains the uncertainty principle when applied to atoms. If the electron was a single particle with negative charge and mass unified, and the proton was not, their EM interaction will impact each differently, due to the EM force of the electron unified and sharing potential with the electron mass. The energy balance will be correct, but the EM balance should have uncertainty; momentum and position There will be energy bleed off to mass side, so EM force predictions seem somewhat off. Heisenberg would have seen things differently if that data was available to him.
Two characteristics of mass is mass takes up space and has inertia.
I don't think anyone expected that,
This unique difference between electrons and protons explains the uncertainty principle when applied to atoms.
One thing that has always puzzled me is why is the electron always on the move, compared to the proton?
mass takes up space
In terms of hydrogen bonding, the binary nature of hydrogen bonding; covalent and polar
You keep on calling mistakes "new connections"Why do you do that?
Particle accelerator data has shown that electrons are fundamental particles, where mass and negative charge are integrated into a unified state; single particle state. The same is not true of the proton.
Puppypower:One thing that has always puzzled me is why is the electron always on the move, compared to the proton?Kriptoid:Because it has less mass
QuotePuppypower:One thing that has always puzzled me is why is the electron always on the move, compared to the proton?Kriptoid:Because it has less massThe sad part is an answer was given by two people but you will continue to be puzzled since you never learn anything new, you just make up new stuff.
and not two separate particles as was assumed for a century,
An analogy is the moon orbiting the earth.
My guess is the over reliance of biology and the life sciences on statistics, instead of logic, may be based on the classic assumption of the electron being two particles.
you just make up new stuff.
Quote from: puppypower on 09/06/2021 12:11:57and not two separate particles as was assumed for a century,When did anyone assume that?
Equal and opposite no longer applies, since the electron is one particle and the proton is not.
Quote from: puppypower on 09/06/2021 12:11:57My guess is the over reliance of biology and the life sciences on statistics, instead of logic, may be based on the classic assumption of the electron being two particles.Nobody ever made that assumption.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 09/06/2021 12:53:37Quote from: puppypower on 09/06/2021 12:11:57and not two separate particles as was assumed for a century,When did anyone assume that?Yes, I too want to know that.Quote from: puppypower on 09/06/2021 12:11:57Equal and opposite no longer applies, since the electron is one particle and the proton is not.The proton isn't the opposite of the electron. The positron is.
In our universe, the lions share of negative charge is connected to the electron, while the lions share of positive charge is connected to the proton.
Quote from: Bored chemist on Yesterday at 12:58:41Quote from: puppypower on Yesterday at 12:11:57My guess is the over reliance of biology and the life sciences on statistics, instead of logic, may be based on the classic assumption of the electron being two particles.Nobody ever made that assumption
As new data appears, like the electron being a single particle, and not two separate particles as was assumed for a century,
Positive charge, in practical terms, is more pure than negative charge since the unification of mass and negative charge allows negative charge to be impacted and modified by its integrated mass. When pure positive charge interacts, with mass tainted negative charge, it will lead to some odd results in the EM force such as uncertainty.
Why do you make up goofy crap and then present it as if it was true?
This paradox
Why do you believe that nonsense about anyone thinking an electron was two particles?
This is a very integrated affect that only happens with water and the element Antimony.
The reason why I assume the standard theory still assumes the electron was/is two particles is because nobody made the connection that mass/gravity and negative charge were fully integrated within the electron, because the electron is only one particle.
As the rule, only the electron is fully integrating charge;